South Korea: Korean Supreme Court Finds Criminal Breach Of Fiduciary Duty In LBO Pledge Of Target Assets

Last Updated: 11 December 2006
Article by Keun Byung Lee and Hee Gang Shin

Ruling confirms long-suspected risk of liability for directors and officers in approving use of target company assets as security for acquisition financing.

On November 9, 2006, Korea’s highest court affirmed the conviction of the CEO of a target company for criminal breach of fiduciary duty, for pledging the target’s assets post-acquisition as security for loans used in the acquisition by a special purpose company (SPC). The landmark decision by the Supreme Court, confirming what had long been a theoretical problem for leveraged buyouts (LBOs), may have ramifications for many potential deal structures seeking to utilize target assets.


The decision stems from the acquisition in 2001 of Shinhan Corporation ("Target") by an SPC set up by the defendant (a Mr. Kim) who would become Target’s CEO (or "representative director"). Target, a publicly listed construction company, had been in corporate reorganization. The SPC, headed by Kim, acquired the majority of the shares of Target, as well as reorganization claims of its creditors, with financing from institutional lenders. As collateral for these loans, the SPC pledged the Target shares and creditor claims so acquired.

Immediately after the acquisition, once installed as representative director of Target, Kim mortgaged and otherwise pledged most of Target’s assets to the SPC’s lenders. At the same time, the initial pledge over Target shares and reorganization claims was released. It seems Target fared better financially in the wake of the acquisition.

Indictment And Grounds

Kim as Target CEO was charged with breach of fiduciary duty (bae-im, also termed occupational breach of trust), for pledging Target assets as collateral for the SPC debt. Under relevant law , a company director, or officer, commits bae-im if he breaches his fiduciary duty in order to obtain a pecuniary benefit himself or to procure such a benefit for a third party, and thereby causes economic harm (or creates a risk of such harm) to his company.

Lower Court Findings Mixed

Following trial, the district court found Kim guilty of bae-im as charged, reasoning that the pledge of Target’s assets subjected it to the risk of forfeiting them, in case of default, without receiving any value in return for the pledge.

On appeal, the Seoul High Court reversed, finding no basis for criminal liability. The court concluded that Kim gained no personal benefit from the pledge. Rather, the loan proceeds so secured were used to acquire, and extinguish, reorganization claims, leading to an improvement in Target’s financial condition. In itself, the furnishing of Target assets as security, the court reasoned, does not necessarily mean an intention to cause harm. Prosecutors appealed to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Findings

Siding with the guilty verdict of the first court, the Supreme Court ruled1 that, in pledging target assets without procuring adequate compensation for Target in return, Kim breached his fiduciary duty to Target for personal gain, or gain of a third party, causing Target economic harm.

In its decision of November 9, the court observed that, in this LBO context, a target company as pledgor must bear economic burdens associated with the pledge, and the risk of forfeiting assets in case of default by the acquiror. Hence, the court said, the pledge would only have been permissible if the acquiror had furnished adequate consideration for Target in exchange. Not having done so, the SPC derived a pecuniary gain based on the value of the collateral, and caused Target harm.

In passing, the court observed that Kim should at least have buffered Target against risks of foreclosure by, for example, maintaining the initial pledge over Target shares and/or some claims against Target. However, the precise significance of this was left unclear.

Unlike the intermediate court, the Supreme Court dismissed the evident post-LBO improvement in Target’s condition and Kim’s alleged efforts to that end. Instead, the court focused on Kim’s intent at the time of the pledge: The purpose was to aid the SPC and himself, not the Target, by furnishing leverage for the acquisition, without intending to compensate Target for the pledge. Add to this the harm to the Target (economic burden and risk of forfeiture), and the elements of the crime are complete. Subsequent actions by Kim cannot cancel out his criminal intent at the time of the pledge, the court held.

Kim could not be exonerated through ratification by SPC as the controlling Target shareholder, the court noted, because the duty in question is owed to the company itself, Target, not its shareholders.

Implications And Questions

It has been widely understood that a pledge of target company assets to secure acquisition financing may involve risks of criminal, as well as civil, liability for breach of fiduciary duty on the part of directors or officers who approve the pledge. In a sense, the Supreme Court decision is not a surprise, reaffirming the caution that must be exercised in any proposal to use target company assets to finance an LBO.

The decision gives some shape to the necessary analysis. Pledging of target company assets in the LBO context is not necessarily, in itself, a criminal breach of fiduciary duties. Rather, according to the decision, such a pledge may be lawful if "adequate" consideration is procured for the target company, or, perhaps, if there is enough of an intent to benefit the target company.

Further, the decision seems to imply that criminal intent, or resulting harm, may be deemed mitigated if a sufficient separate security package is furnished in addition to target company assets, or other steps taken, so as to narrow the risks for the target.

At the same time, the decision invites much speculation. What might constitute "adequate" consideration for a pledge of target assets? What form might it take, and how would the value of it be assessed, as compared to the putative harm of the pledge? How might an adequate degree of beneficent intent be shown? What might be the precise advantage of a mixed security package, including collateral other than target assets?

Also worth considering is to what extent the ruling can be viewed as fact-specific. A Supreme Court decision is authoritative guidance for lower courts in later cases. But there may have been aggravating facts here, extrinsic to the core LBO structure. Among other things, the defendant Kim was, until installed at the Target, head of the SPC and evidently a large investor in it, as well as the individual driving force behind the acquisition.

Hence in several ways it is uncertain how broadly, or narrowly, the court’s reasoning should be read. Could the court’s reasoning cover alternative structures arriving at similar results? Could it extend to transactions other than direct pledges of assets?

In any case, the decision—and the questions it raises—will merit careful attention in the structuring of leveraged acquisitions in Korea.


1. Supreme Court Decision in Case No. 2004-Do-7027.

This update is intended as a summary news report only, and not as advice. For legal advice, please inquire with your contact at Bae, Kim & Lee, or the following attorneys of our firm:

Keun Byung Lee
tel. 82-2-3404-0124

Hee Gang Shin
tel. 82-2-3404-0156

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions