South Africa: A Clearvu On Adwords?

Last Updated: 31 October 2014
Article by Gaelyn Scott

Most Read Contributor in South Africa, February 2019

South Africa finally has its first Adwords decision. Judge Nicholls of the Gauteng Local Division handed down judgment in the case of Cochrane Steel Products Pty Ltd v M-Systems Group (Pty) Ltd on 29 October 2014.

An Adwords case is a case where the issue is this: is it lawful for company A to purchase the trade mark of company B as an Adword in order to ensure that when anyone searches company B's trade mark they get to see company A's adverts?

Cochrane is the owner of the trade mark ClearVu in respect of fencing. M-Systems is a competitor that sells a product under the trade mark M-Secure. M-Systems admitted that it bids on the Adwords 'clearvu', 'clear vu' and 'clear-vu', but denied that this is unlawful. Cochrane felt aggrieved by this, claiming that anyone who searches ClearVu is obviously looking for its product rather than the product of M-Systems. It felt particularly upset by the fact that, because the market for Adwords is an open one with the price being determined on a click-through basis, these actions were costing it money. The judge summarised Cochrane's frustration as follows: 'To add insult to injury, to ensure that the applicant's (Cochrane) advertisement has a higher ranking and appears in a preferable position to that of the respondent (M-Systems), the applicant has to raise the price-per-click for the use of its own brand name... the applicant is, it asserts, doubly prejudiced.'

What made this case slightly different from cases that have been decided elsewhere is that the trade mark ClearVu - although well-established and seemingly quite well known – is not registered. In fact Cochrane claimed that M-Systems had deliberately and maliciously opposed its trade mark application for ClearVu in order to make sure that Cochrane could not do anything about the Adwords usage. Cochrane had, however, decided to proceed with a passing off action.

But not just passing off! Cochrane threw in another cause of action, one that few will have heard of. Cochrane argued that the court should recognise and develop the common law action of 'leaning on'. Leaning on has been described by two legal academics, Van Heerden and Neethling, as a cause of action that relies on reputation but does not require confusion or deception. It occurs, it was argued, when one company misappropriates the advertising value of a competitor's trade mark. It therefore protects a company against the dilution of the advertising value of its trade marks.

All very interesting, but does it exist? No said the judge, pointing out that the courts have, in the past, made it very clear that if there's no passing off there's no action. In a famous case involving the Moroka Swallows football club the judge said this: 'Provided that he does not commit the delicts of defamation or passing off or offend against any specific statutory prohibition, there is no reason why an entrepreneur should not take the benefit of such advantage as he may be able to gain in the marketing of his goods and services by associating them with names that may have become famous'. In the leading case of Payen v Bovic, the court warned that companies who cannot establish passing off should not add unlawful competition as a 'ragbag and often forlorn alternative'. And in the case of Blue Lion v National Brands, the court - after warning against 'the creation of impermissible monopolies' - said that companies cannot use 'some general notion of unlawful competition to create ersatz passing off with requirements less exacting than those required by the common law.'

So it was all down to passing off. An action that requires proof of reputation, confusion and harm. The judge focussed on the issue of confusion and this gave him the opportunity to look at foreign Adwords cases. For example, the European decisions of Google v Louis Vuitton, Interflora v Marks & Spencer and, most recently, Amazon v Lush. Cases that have made it clear that 'keyword advertising is not inherently or inevitably objectionable from a trade mark perspective.'

The courts in Europe have been consistent in saying that using a competitor's trade mark as an Adword is fine provided that there's no confusion. This approach is based on the recognition that most people are internet-savvy enough to know that when they search a trade mark they will see adverts for other products too. This is fine as long as those adverts don't mislead them. The only case where the court felt that confusion was a possibility was the Interflora case, and this was down to the particular facts: it's well known that Interflora operates a flower delivery service through independent florists, which meant that consumers seeing the name Marks & Spencer in conjunction with Interflora might well believe that Marks & Spencer was part of the Interflora network.

The judge summed it up as follows: 'In this matter a consumer who searches for "ClearVu" is confronted with a multiplicity of suppliers. No reasonable consumer could possibly be under the impression that all of them relate directly to the applicant. The reaction to these might well be irritation or indifference but it is highly unlikely that the reasonably observant consumer would be confused and deceived into thinking they were all the advertisements of the applicant. To reiterate the sentiments in foreign jurisdictions, Adwords are a familiar feature of the internet and consumers are used to distinguishing them from natural search results.'

So Cochrane had failed to establish a likelihood of confusion, which meant that the other requirements of reputation and harm did not even need to be considered. The passing off claim had to fail.

A few final points. There was a suggestion that M-Systems also made use of the trade mark ClearVu in the ads itself, in other words visible use of the trade mark. This issue was, however, raised very late in the day and the judge didn't allow it because there was no reasonable explanation as to why it hadn't been included from the outset. There was also a suggestion that M-Systems had made some metatag use of Clearvu, but this issue wasn't pursued by Cochrane.

Although this case dealt with passing off rather than trade mark infringement it is, I think, a good indicator that a South African Adwords case featuring a registered trade mark will follow the approach of the courts in Europe. Is this the right approach? Probably. But it's perhaps a pity that the judge didn't at least consider whether the foundation on which this approach rests – the experienced internet user who isn't easily fooled - is as appropriate in a developing country as it is in a developed country. After all, there have been cases in South Africa - especially ones dealing with cheap consumer goods – where the courts have taken into account that many consumers are illiterate or semi-literate. If that's the case, can we really assume that most of us knowjust how the internet works?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq AdviceCentre
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions