UK: Party-Appointed Arbitrators: What Is Their Proper Role?

Last Updated: 7 October 2013
Article by Professor John Uff CBE QC

Two distinguished US international arbitrators recently published an outspoken attack on two distinguished European arbitrators, following their own publication of articles questioning the impartiality of party-appointed arbitrators. So, what was all the fuss about?

The first volume of Arbitration International of 2013 contains an astonishing attack by two of the most distinguished US international arbitrators, Charles N Brower and Charles B Rosenberg, respectively former judge and legal advisor to the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, on two of the most distinguished and experienced European Arbitrators, namely, Jan Paulsson and Albert Jan van den Berg, under the title 'The Death of the Two-headed Nightingale'.

Accusing the European duo of having advocated a presumption that party-appointed arbitrators were "untrustworthy", the US pair attack their several contributions on the subject as "wrong-headed".

So, what was all the fuss about and how could the debate have descended to such a level?

The starting point is an article by Jan Paulsson entitled 'Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution', itself based on an earlier lecture in which the proposal was advanced that, in lieu of any arbitrators being appointed by parties, they should all be appointed by the Administering Institution.

This thesis gained support from an article by van den Berg on Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators , itself drawing on earlier articles suggesting that party-appointed arbitrators were more likely to issue dissenting opinions in favour of their appointor.

The issue was further developed in a debate at the London School of Economics in November 2010 between Paulsson and Alexis Mourre, in which the latter robustly defended party-appointees.

Not content with Mourre's response, however, Brower and Rosenberg proceed to dissect the opinions of both Paulsson and van den Berg, which they find to be unsupported, and conclude that "the well-established right of the parties to choose the arbitrators and the ability of a member of the Tribunal to express differing views in a dissenting opinion are significant elements of perceived legitimacy".

There is little chance of the long-established contractual right for each party to appoint an arbitrator falling out of use; and any Arbitral Institution that sought to override that right would soon find its business being taken over by others prepared to uphold it.

Parties to International Arbitrations typically find themselves facing a tribunal and an opposing party each likely to be rooted in traditions different from their own. No wonder, then, that they should place great value on the ability to select an arbitrator from, or at least sympathetic to, their own traditions and approach.

But does it go further than mere consolation? It would be naive to think that parties and their lawyers will not at the same time seek to appoint an arbitrator who is going to be sympathetic and perhaps responsive to the arguments and contentions being advanced by that party.

Anyone with experience as a party-appointed arbitrator over a number of years is bound to have encountered fellow party-appointed arbitrators who are, sometimes openly, sometimes overtly, intent on supporting their appointing party: in Paulsson's terminology the "bad apples" of international arbitration. Paulsson considers this situation rare and ultimately self-defeating; but there is no doubt it continues.

There is a problem created by this situation in terms of the proper response of the other party-appointed arbitrator and the Chairman. They will certainly during the course of the proceedings have become aware of the approach being adopted by the partial arbitrator.

In most cases, the problem is readily resolved by the other two arbitrators agreeing or acknowledging that the Award will in effect be given by them and that the inevitable dissenting opinion of the partial arbitrator will be effectively neutralised.

It will be interesting to know how frequently this situation occurs in practice. It is, however, a statistic most unlikely ever to be placed formally on the record.

Of more interest is the role of the party-appointed arbitrator who approaches his task impartially while being aware that he has been selected by one of the parties who may expect some degree of understanding if not support.

What is the basis of such expectation?

Are not all arbitrators intended to act "fairly and impartially" as expressly required by s.33(1)(a) of the English Arbitration Act 1996? The answer is, of course, yes, but nevertheless the view is advanced in Redfern & Hunter, at para. 9.184 of the 5th Edition, that "it is not improper for a party-appointed arbitrator to ensure that the tribunal properly understands the case being advanced by that party".

In a footnote, which has remained unaltered since the authorship of Martin Hunter and Alan Redfern themselves, who are two of the most distinguished arbitrators of their generation, it is explained that "a party nominated arbitrator should do his best to ensure that he himself understands the case being put forward by the party which nominated him and should seek to make sure that the arbitral tribunal as a whole is in the same position".

Redfern & Hunter do not quote any authority other than an earlier article by Murray Smith, which helpfully quotes the views of a number of authoritative commentators including Paulsson and Steven Bond, then Secretary General of the ICC, and Martin Hunter himself.

Hunter is quoted from an earlier paper in which he said, as the representative of one party, that he "looks for a party-appointed arbitrator who has a maximum predisposition towards his client with the minimum appearance of bias".

This characteristically frank observation doubtless expresses what most other party representatives would not say openly but would not dissent from.

A recurrent theme in the literature is communication between a party and its appointed arbitrator or proposed appointed arbitrator.

In the first case, the universal view is that this must not take place and any such communication (which can be assumed in the case of the bad apple) is outside the rules and would be conducted clandestinely.

In the case of a proposed arbitrator who is not yet appointed, however, it is now accepted practice that parties, or more usually their legal representative, may conduct an exploratory conversation, ostensibly to confirm matters such as qualification, experience and availability.

All too easily, such a conversation can stray into the views of the potential candidate on matters that only the interviewer will know the significance of, given that the interviewee is not privy to any of the issues at that stage.

Of course, this raises many ethical issues and dictates the need for considerable restraint. The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators has helpfully produced guidelines on this process that include the interviewee making a record of the conversation.

Each arbitrator will have his own war stories on the subject of interviews. My own include a few uneasy occasions on which the questions seemed too pointed.

However, an overriding reason for not allowing the process to go too far is the possibility, in my own case realised on more than one occasion, that the first interviewer decides to appoint another candidate and there is then an approach either from the other side or from the appointed arbitrators to act as Chairman.

The first interview must, of course, be disclosed. It is likely to be regarded as a ground of disqualification in any subsequent appointment and thus militates against anything going beyond general questions concerning qualifications and availability.

While much of the literature on the role of party-appointed arbitrators emanates from Europe and from the US, it must be recalled that the UK has a strong tradition of arbitrators acting in the interests of the party that appointed them.

Thus, the traditional format for commodity and related arbitrations involving the use of an umpire, initially involves the appointment of two arbitrators who seek to agree the award before any further appointment.

Only if they disagree is the umpire brought in. The procedure still exists under the Arbitration Act 1996, where the umpire may "replace" the party arbitrators, who then argue the case on behalf of the parties before the umpire, who is to make the final decision.

Thus, the notion that arbitrators are under a duty to have regard to the interests of the party appointing them is no novelty and should not be regarded as in any sense unusual or improper.

It might be added as a footnote that the regular influx, at least in the UK, of retired judges into the field of commercial arbitration, potentially creates a problem, in that their tradition while on the Bench is to act entirely impartially and to express any disagreement with the majority without restraint.

Indeed, the great FA Mann castigated what was then known as the House of Lords for their practice of delivering a single speech with which all the judges agreed, pointing out that it was their duty to express their different view-points and dissents.

I suggest that the position in arbitration is entirely different, both in terms of recognising a duty to have regard to the case advanced by the appointing party and in terms of the need for the tribunal, if possible, to agree a single award in the interests of finality as well as clarity.

Whilst our judges are rightly held in the highest regard internationally, they should temper this reputation with a reconsideration of their different role in international commercial arbitration.

By contrast, arbitrators appointed from the Bar or from practising solicitors will have no difficulty in taking on board their duty in relation to the party that appoints them.

www.keatingchambers.com

The articles and papers published by Keating Chambers are for the purpose of raising general awareness of issues and stimulating discussion. The contents must not be relied upon or applied in any given situation. There is no substitute for taking appropriate professional advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions