DMH Stallard has advised Espial Group Inc. ("Espial")
in relation to its acquisition of AIM-listed ANT plc
("ANT"), which was made through a takeover offer effected
by way of a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act
2006. At a price of 20.5 pence per ANT share, ANT was
valued, for the purposes of the transaction, at Ł4.979
Espial, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange,
is a leading provider of TV Browser and TV Everywhere software
solutions to consumer electronics manufacturers and
telecommunications service providers. Based in Cambridge, ANT
is similarly a leading provider of software solutions and services
to TV device vendors, broadcasters and operators.
The acquisition was announced on 30 November 2012 and, following
approval by ANT shareholders and sanction by the High Court of
Justice, the scheme of arrangement became effective on 4 February
DMH Stallard's deal team, led by
Jonathan Deverill, included Chris Simmons and Ben Gale. Espial
was also advised on the acquisition by its Canadian counsel, Randy
Taylor of LaBarge Weinstein, Ottawa.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
A recent Court of Appeal decision approved the decision in Mopani Copper Mines plc v Millennium Underwriting Ltd that the court may take into account deleted words which have been removed by modification.
The English law of damages for breach of contract is founded upon the compensatory principle: that damages should place the claimant in the same situation with respect to damages as if the contract had been performed.
Whilst there were factors pointing against such an intention, the judge held that the terms of the document in question and the conduct of the parties viewed objectively lead to the conclusion that the term sheet was valid and enforceable.
A High Court decision involved interpreting the pre-emption provisions in a company's articles. The court had to consider the basis on which the appointed accountants should value the shares which the defendants wished to transfer.
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation.