DMH Stallard has advised Espial Group Inc. ("Espial")
in relation to its acquisition of AIM-listed ANT plc
("ANT"), which was made through a takeover offer effected
by way of a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act
2006. At a price of 20.5 pence per ANT share, ANT was
valued, for the purposes of the transaction, at Ł4.979
Espial, whose shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange,
is a leading provider of TV Browser and TV Everywhere software
solutions to consumer electronics manufacturers and
telecommunications service providers. Based in Cambridge, ANT
is similarly a leading provider of software solutions and services
to TV device vendors, broadcasters and operators.
The acquisition was announced on 30 November 2012 and, following
approval by ANT shareholders and sanction by the High Court of
Justice, the scheme of arrangement became effective on 4 February
DMH Stallard's deal team, led by
Jonathan Deverill, included Chris Simmons and Ben Gale. Espial
was also advised on the acquisition by its Canadian counsel, Randy
Taylor of LaBarge Weinstein, Ottawa.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
After global media organisations published the leaked Panama Papers from law firm Mossack Fonseca revealing how corporates and some of the world's wealthy and powerful used offshore companies to hide their assets . . .
Following the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) in July, this alert discusses its impact on AIM listed companies, changes to the AIM Rules and what actions AIM listed companies need to consider.
In two cases this year, the Court of Appeal has held that a term in a contract that no variation shall be binding unless it complies with certain formalities does not necessarily prevent an informal variation.
The amount of information contained in arbitration clauses varies greatly from contract to contract. Some parties, in their arbitration clauses, specifically state the rules to be applied, the number of arbitrators (and sometimes the requisite qualification and experience of these arbitrators), the language of the arbitration proceedings, the location of hearings and the seat of arbitration.
An assignment of rights under a contract is normally restricted to the benefit of the contract. Where a party wishes to transfer both the benefit and burden of the contract this generally needs to be done by way of a novation.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).