On 27 December 2012, the Belgian federal government introduced
two draft bills aimed at reforming Belgian competition law. These
bills are expected to be adopted in February 2013 but will not
enter into force before 1 April 2013 at the earliest.
While the draft legislation does not affect the substance of the
Belgian competition rules on anti-competitive agreements, abuse of
a dominant position and merger control, it introduces a number of
important procedural reforms.
Most notably, the bills introduce the possibility for the
Competition Authority to fine individuals who were involved in
"hardcore" infringements of competition law, such as
price-fixing cartels. In return, these individuals also become
eligible for immunity from fines as part of the leniency
The draft legislation also brings about a significant reform of
the Belgian Competition Authority ("BCA"), which will be
set up as a single, independent authority but will be divided in
four distinct divisions with separate tasks. The BCA will consist
of (i) a President; (ii) a Competition College; (iii) a Management
Committee; and (iv) a College of Prosecutors headed by a Chief
In order to ensure that the new Competition Authority remains
fully independent, the draft legislation puts an end to the current
powers of the Council of Ministers to overrule a merger control
prohibition decision adopted by the Competition Authority (a power
which the Council of Ministers never made use of).
The draft legislation also improves the Competition
Authority's decision-making process, codifies the existing
leniency procedure, introduces a settlement procedure and provides
for more efficient interim measure procedures. In line with a
recent ruling of the Belgian Constitutional Court (see VBB on
Competition Law, Volume 2012, No. 12, available at
www.vbb.com), the draft legislation also provides that
antitrust fines are not tax deductible.
Finally, the draft legislation broadens the powers of the
existing Price Observatory, which will be in charge of the
detection of any "problems regarding prices or margins,
abnormal pricing developments or structural market problems".
Any finding of such supposed pricing anomalies will be transmitted
to the Competition Authority for further review. In addition, the
government will be given the power to take structural measures
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Importance of so-called natural monopolies in Kazakhstan can be seen in the fact that some of Kazakhstan's largest and most powerful corporate empires are officially subject to natural monopoly regulation.
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that a dawn raid conducted by the Czech Competition Authority violated the right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence, because it was not subject to prior judicial authorisation and there was no effective post-inspection court review in place.
Following a request for leniency from seven wallpaper producers for engaging in anticompetitive conduct, the French Competition Authority (FCA) recently sanctioned them in the amount of 5.27 million euros (US$6.6 million).
On Dec. 11, 2014, Advocate General Niilo Jääkinsen advised that a German court could retain jurisdiction over a cartel damages claim even after the only German defendant company has reached a settlement.
On November 10 2014 the Competition Agency announced that it had concluded another proceeding dealing with resale price maintenance, as prohibited under Article 8 of the Competition Act, which mirrors Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”