We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
Do you know what RTI is? It stands for Real Time Information.
If you are none the wiser, you are probably not alone. Many
companies are only just beginning to realise what a huge change it
will be.
In a nutshell, RTI requires all employers to send a return to
HMRC every time a payment is made to employees, on or before the
actual date of payment. So companies will need to send a return on
the payroll date every month (or every week for some companies).
But that is not all – companies will need to send another
return whenever any other payment is made, such as a bonus,
overtime, commission – and whenever an option is
exercised or shares vest. There will be multiple returns.
Your colleagues in the payroll department will need to plan for
this. New software will be needed, to cope with all these returns.
And new internal systems will be needed, to ensure that the
payroll department is provided with information promptly. This will
affect you, and your share plan administrators.
When is this happening?
It is in force now, but not for all employers. A pilot has been
running, with 10 employers, since 6 April 2012, and 310 more
employers are joining the pilot over the next few weeks. By 6
October 2013 it will be compulsory for all employers, but HMRC has
power to add any employer to the pilot at any time, so you need to
be ready now. They say there will be 250,000 RTI employers by next
March.
Will there be penalties?
Yes, there will be penalties if returns are not filed on time.
But more importantly, RTI will give HMRC the information it needs
to charge penalties for late payment of tax. You may think this
won't apply to you, because you always pay tax on time
– but actually, there are probably times when it applies
to most employers who run share plans.
Technically the due date for payment of PAYE is 14 days after
the end of the tax month (in other words, the 19th of
each month). Usually employers have no problem complying with this,
but sometimes payments miss the payroll cut-off date. This quite
often happens with share plans. It is normal practice for these
payments to be picked up in the following month. In the past, that
was not a problem – employers just had to make sure
everything was in order by the end of the tax year. But in 2009
legislation for in-year PAYE penalties was introduced.
Initially HMRC was not able to enforce the penalty legislation
in practice, because there was no mechanism to determine the amount
of PAYE that companies should pay each month. But now HMRC will be
able to use the information delivered under the RTI returns to
check whether the right amount of PAYE has been paid each month,
and to impose penalties for late payment, even where it is only one
month late.
The problem with share plans
Share plans do not fit neatly into the PAYE system, because it
was designed for payments of cash, from which tax can be deducted.
They have been shoe-horned into the system, using the concept of a
"notional payment" to describe a taxable event which
could be anything from an option exercise to the expiry of
restrictions on forfeitable shares. Employers often can't
control when these events will happen, and they can't know the
value of the shares – and therefore the amount of the
notional payment – until after the events have
happened.
We are concerned that employers may be penalised for making late
RTI returns, and late payments, despite making every effort to
comply with the system, simply because of the nature of share plans
and the way they are taxed in practice. This seems unfair.
What can we do to help?
We have had several meetings with the RTI team at HMRC, and we
have explained the problems faced by employers in connection with
share plans. We have already achieved one success – the
RTI regulations allow employers to make a single monthly return for
notional payments under share plans, instead of having to make a
separate return for each one. This return does not have to be made
until the 19th of the following tax month –
the same time as payment of tax is due.
That is very welcome, and will certainly solve a lot of
problems. But some problems remain, especially where the payroll
cut-off date is missed. We hope it will be possible to reach a
practical solution which will avoid penalties in cases where there
are good reasons for payments being carried forward to the next
month – for example where leaver information needs to be
transmitted to a SIP administrator before the taxable value of SIP
shares can be calculated.
This article is intended merely to highlight issues and not
to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Should you have
any questions on issues reported here or on other areas of law,
please contact one of your regular contacts at Linklaters.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On 18 April 2013 the UK government issued a legal challenge to the decision of the EU Council of 22 January 2013 which authorised a subset of the EU (not including the UK) to introduce a financial transaction tax.
A discussion on the changes brought by the Finance Bill in relation to the commitments to raise the Inheritance Tax and exempt limit on the value of transfers of assets to a non-UK domiciled spouse or civil partners.
In his March 2011 Budget statement the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced consultation on the introduction of a statutory definition of tax residence.
The European Court of Justice recently ruled that VAT on investment management fees paid by the trustees of a UK defined benefit pension scheme is irrecoverable under a VAT exemption for special investment contained in two EU Directives.
In the latest budget, Chancellor George Osborne announced that the corporation tax rate in Britain will be cut by an additional one per cent to 20 per cent by April 2015.
A summary of the main Budget items affecting farmers and landowners.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”