On 20 June 2012 the Deputy Prime Minister announced plans for
mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for
businesses listed on the London Stock Exchange. This is to take
effect from April 2013 and is expected to impact around 1101
companies. The plan is to require GHG reporting in the
directors' report of quoted company annual reports.
The announcement follows consultation in 2011 on proposed GHG
measurement and reporting requirements which in turn arose out of a
positive obligation on the Government under Section 85 of the
Climate Change Act 2008 (namely that the Government had to either
make regulations requiring directors' reports to include
information about GHG emissions or explain why no such regulations
would be made).
Voluntary reporting has been adopted for some time by many
companies. The Environment Agency's most recent report on
environmental disclosures by quoted companies identifies that in
2009/10 annual reports, 22% were reporting in accordance with
Government guidance. Clearly the Government does not feel that
voluntary measures are adequate. The (updated) Impact Assessment
accompanying this policy proposal states a number of reasons
underpinning Government intervention. It is stated that
"information about companies' exposure to climate
change-related risks is material information for all investors and
other stakeholders; that provision of such information helps
markets to function optimally; and government intervention can
provide for a level of transparency and consistency, as is already
the case for company financial information, which is not being
achieved by individual private initiatives." In particular it
is considered that a company's exposure to climate change
related risks "is essential information for investors who wish
to assess medium to long-term risks."
It is envisaged that regulations will set a minimum level of
reporting, requiring disclosure of a figure for global direct
emissions and a base year and a relevant intensity ratio (e.g.
emissions per £ turnover, per tonne production or other
factor that is relevant to the particular business).
The Government will consult on draft regulations before
implementation (in April 2013).
Following implementation of the regulations for quoted
companies, the Government will consider (in 2016) whether to extend
the requirement to all large companies.
For access to our earlier Lawnow on the report laid before
For the Impact Assessment on the proposal (option 2)
This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron
McKenna's free online information service. To register for
Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq
Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance
only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now
articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to
give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates
to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication
and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent
The original publication date for this article was
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In June 2011, a site in West Cumbria was confirmed as a suitable location for the development of a new nuclear power station. The project is named ‘Moorside’ and is proposed by NuGeneration Limited (‘NuGen’)- a UK nuclear company- who hope to develop a new generation nuclear power station of up to 3.4 GW.
The Court of Appeal have ruled that a landowner can be held criminally liable for a breach of the environmental permitting regulations carried out on their land by a third party where they have knowledge of the regulated act taking place.
With the ever increasing focus on environmental concerns the
property industry is being pushed to become more energy efficient.
As reduction targets cannot simply be met by improving the
efficiency of new buildings, attention is now being given to
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”