We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The purpose of this briefing note is to provide information on
the review by the Central Bank of the business plans for UCITS
self-managed investment companies ("SMICs"). The Central
Bank reviewed the business plans of all UCITS management companies
for UCITS IV compliance on or before 1 July 2011. However, for all
UCITS SMICs authorised prior to 1 July 2011, the Central Bank
proceeded on the basis that each of these self-certified that they
met the UCITS IV requirements before 1 July 2011 and it was known
that the Central Bank would begin to carry out reviews of these
business plans in 2012.
In February 2012 the Central Bank proposed a timetable for the
review of the UCITS SMIC business plans based on the date of their
authorisation. Before this review process got underway the Legal
and Regulatory Committee of the IFIA requested that the Central
Bank reconsider its approach to the application of all of the
organisational rules that apply to UCITS management companies to
SMICs. The Level 2 measures1 highlighted the need to
have the same rules of conduct and provisions regarding conflicts
of interest and risk management for both types of entities.
However, some organisational rules were applied by the Level 1
measures2 to both SMICs and UCITS management companies
and yet the other organisational rules in the Level 2 measures
applied only to UCITS management companies. The Central Bank took
the position that all UCITS SMICs must be fully UCITS IV compliant
- in other words that they adopt all the same rules as those that
apply to UCITS management companies. However, as a consequence of
the IFIA submission the Central Bank has confirmed that because
proposed amendments to the UCITS regime contemplated by the UCITS
IV Directive do not include common organisational rules for the two
entities, the Central Bank is willing to reconsider the
applicability of all of the organisational rules to SMICs.
Although the Central Bank's starting point is that both
UCITS management companies and SMICs should be subject to the same
regime, it acknowledges that a UCITS management company may engage
in more complex activities (for example, in individual portfolio
management and passporting into other EU jurisdictions) and so not
all of the organisational rules that it adheres to should apply to
SMICs.
In short, the Central Bank has requested that the IFIA make a
submission which addresses why each particular organisational rule
should not apply to SMICs. This submission is to be made to the
Central Bank by 21 May 2012.
We would expect the Central Bank to respond promptly to that
submission given that is has already indicated that it would like
the majority of the reviews of the business plans to be completed
by early 2013. In the meantime, the original proposed dates for the
submission of the business plans for review no longer apply. Once a
final position of the applicability of the organisational rules is
determined, the Central Bank will issue revised deadlines for the
submission of the draft SMIC business plans for review.
We will be in touch with clients shortly to provide an update on
this review and the revised timing for the submission of business
plans.
Footnotes
1 Directive 2010/43/EC
2 Directive 2009/65/EC
This article contains a general summary of developments and
is not a complete or definitive statement of the law. Specific
legal advice should be obtained where appropriate.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Risk and Regulation Monthly provides a summary of the key International, European and UK regulatory developments and pertinent regulatory activity affecting the Financial Services industry.
Existing funds which no longer invest after July 22, 2013 are not required to comply with the provisions of the KAGB, even if the manager of such funds also manages funds which still make investments.
The purpose of this investment memorandum is to provide an overview of the investment vehicles (i.e. regulated, lightly regulated and unregulated) that Luxembourg offers to (foreign) entrepreneurs and managers.
The FSA has been in discussions with the banks with regard to them providing appropriate redress for affected customers in relation to the mis-selling of payment protection insurance.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that VAT on investment management fees paid by the trustees of a UK defined benefit pension scheme is irrecoverable under a VAT exemption for special investment contained in two EU Directives.
The draft legislation transposing the European Union’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive into Luxembourg law was submitted to the grand duchy’s Chamber of Deputies by finance minister Luc Frieden on August 24.
Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers comes into force on 22 July 2013, and aims to provide common requirements across all EU States for the management or sale of Alternative Investment Funds by Alternative Investment Fund Managers within the EU.
A summary of the most recent financial regulatory developments.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”