We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The VEUO, VNO-NCW and Eumedion, special interest organisations
representing listed companies and institutional investors, have
made an urgent appeal to the Second Chamber of parliament to remove
a provision in a bill requiring shareholders with a stake of 3% or
more to notify the AFM whether or not they support the
company's strategy. This mandatory notification is part of a
bill implementing recommendations of the Frijns Monitoring
Commission.
The organisations emphasise that such mandatory strategy-related
notification by shareholders is contrary to Supreme Court and
Enterprise Chamber case law, which suggests that the responsibility
for determining strategy lies with the managing board and the
supervisory board. Mandatory notification by shareholders could
cause confusion and create the impression that shareholders have
formal rights with regard to determining or changing the
company's strategy. The organisations also argue that
"strategy" is not a clear-cut concept and therefore not
suitable for a "yes/no" question. The provision may also
cause shareholders not to increase their stakes above the 3%
threshold, thus posing an obstacle to long-term shareholding.
Finally, the organisations argue that if the Netherlands were to
introduce such mandatory reporting, it would deviate from what
other countries do.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Business Owners often ask whether a contract that their company is entering into can in fact take effect from an earlier date compared to the date on which it is to be signed by the parties.
Following the bailout package agreed between the so-called troika of the EU, European Central Bank and IMF on one hand and the Cyprus government on the other, the two largest banks in Cyprus will be merged and considerably downsized.
The new Companies House registration regime seeks to modernise and streamline the charge registration process and a new, optional, online registration system has been introduced.
There exists a liaison office structure in Turkey, which is considered neither as a capital company nor a branch, but preferred by foreign investors as a vehicle to enter into Turkish market.
The recent case of Petroleo Brasiliero v E.N.E. Kos 1 Limited is a timely example of how the historical principles of bailment remain highly relevant today and how the law on bailment is still developing.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”