The Constitutional Court judgment in the matter of The
Aviation Union of South Africa and the South African Transport and
Allied Workers' Union v South African Airways (Pty) Limited and
LGM South Africa Facility Managers and Engineers (Pty) Limited and
Allan and 204 others became available on 24 November 2011. The
judgment overturns the ruling of the Supreme Court of Appeal on
second generation outsourcing. The Constitutional Court found that
section 197 of the LRA indeed applies to second generation
outsourcing. In fact, the Court commented that section 197 of the
LRA could even apply up to "fifth generation
The Court found that when it has to be determined whether or not
section 197 of the LRA is applicable, the focus should be on
"what" is being transferred, as opposed to who the
parties to the transfer are and what "generation"
transfer it is. The Court found that as long as:
"a business" is being transferred,
"as a going concern",
from an "old employer" to a "new employer",
section 197 of the LRA will be applicable.
The Court found further that the emphasis previously placed on
the identities of the old and new employers were misplaced as the
concept of an old and new employer cannot be static, i.e. in a
first transfer by A to B, A is the old employer and B is the new
employer; in a second transfer by B to C, B is the old employer and
C is the new employer; if the second transfer is by B back to A, B
will be the old employer and A will be the new employer, etc.
The Court, however, distinguished a transfer of a business as a
going concern from a pure outsourcing agreement, i.e. if the
outsourcing institution from the outset did not provide the
service, the service cannot be said to ever have been part of the
institution's business and can therefore not be transferred
from it as a going concern for the purposes of section 197 of the
LRA. In other words, section 197 of the LRA is applicable to the
transfer of a business as a going concern, irrespective of the
"generation", but not to a pure outsourcing
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Employment relationships in the United Arab Emirates are governed by Federal Law No.8 of 1980 Regulating Labour Relations as amended by Federal Laws No.24 of 1981, No.15 of 1985 and No.12 of 1986 (the Labour Law).
As the name implies, end of service gratuity is an amount of money that every employee is entitled to receive, and every employer is liable to pay, upon termination of an employment relationship in the UAE, provided that the employee meets the conditions set out in the Labour Law (UAE Federal Law No.8 of 1980).
Cabinet Resolution No. (25) of 2010 concerning Internal Work Permits Applicable in the Ministry of Labour ("Cabinet Resolution") has recently introduced five new types of work permit to the private sector in the UAE, including the long-awaited part-time work permit.
With businesses operating globally, it is increasingly common for employees to be working in business units spread across jurisdictions or to spend time on secondment to an associated company or a branch of their employer company.