South Africa: Quality Of Care In The National Health Insurance Debate

Last Updated: 29 September 2011
Article by Neil Kirby

There is currently much debate about the implementation of a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in South Africa. Media reports indicate that a tension exists between supporters and detractors of the NHIS. One of the primary tenets being used to support the introduction of a NHIS is the constitutional obligation of Government to provide access to healthcare services.

This debate arises, as of necessity some would say, as a result of the direction contained in section 27(1)(a) of the Constitution, which obliges Government to provide access to healthcare services. In a similar vein, and maybe as a forbear to a NHIS, the State has already, some would argue, met its obligation in section 27(3) of the Constitution: to provide all persons with emergency medical services.

The legislative support for this obligation, imposed upon the State by the Constitution, is set out in section 5 of the National Health Act No. 61 of 2003, which provides that no one may be refused emergency medical treatment.

Within the context of the current NHIS debate, the emphasis has clearly fallen on the manner in which a NHIS is to be constructed in order to provide as many people as possible with access to healthcare services. The access debate revolves primarily around the issue of what measures Government should implement in order to ensure that healthcare is accessible to all.

The concept of access to healthcare arguably requires that legislative measures be taken by Government to provide for procedures, administrative and bureaucratic infrastructure, and policies that are to be relied upon to provide people with access to healthcare services. Such policies, by way of example, may require:

  • an increase in the number of clinics that are available to people living in rural areas;
  • access to a primary healthcare provider;
  • the provision of cheaper medicines; and
  • the identification of diseases that affect more people and thus require more attention and appropriate responses from Government - especially diseases such as cholera, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV and AIDS.

The debate about access to healthcare services is certainly a debate that must be held by virtue of the constitutional directives campaigned by the Bill of Rights. This debate also finds a voice in our common law by virtue of judicial pronouncements by the Constitutional Court. These pronouncements are encapsulated in matters ranging from the provision of renal dialysis services in the Soobramoney v Minister of Health, KwaZulu- Natal 1997 (12) BCLR 1696 (CC) decision and the decisions concerning the provision of HIV treatment following legal action taken against the Department of Health by the Treatment Action Campaign in 2002.

But what of quality healthcare?

Quality of care as a separate component of a NHIS, however, stands as a secondary consideration when one is talking about a NHIS or even debating such a scheme.

Quality of care is more ethereal in nature. It is difficult to pin down or encapsulate eloquently in a sentence or two and so is largely ignored by legislators. There is great difficulty in defining what it is that defines quality healthcare - most commentators on the topic defer to the idea that quality of care is dependant on the emotional connection between an individual and his or her health service provider.

Quality is thus defined by the individual based on the outcome of the healthcare service that he or she receives: a good outcome normally indicates good quality care and a bad outcome indicates bad quality care.

This debate, on such terms, makes defining a generally accepted normative quality of care difficult if not impossible and certainly renders it controversial within the current debate of the access to healthcare – at least in the NHIS paradigm in which we currently find ourselves.

But is quality healthcare a priority?

In their book Redefining Healthcare: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results M E Porter and E O Teisberg (2006 at page 85) state that, "[t]he issues of safety and quality are valid and essential. It simply is not acceptable to have preventable medical errors as a leading cause of death. Information on quality and outcome is essential to any effort toward value improvement [in healthcare]... Moreover, and this is less understood, poor quality almost always raises costs through inefficiency, prolonging the need for care, and requiring remedial treatments or surgery".

They conclude on the topic (at page 88) that, "[t]he only truly effective way to address value in healthcare is to reward ends, or results, rather than means, such as processed steps. The relevant results can be measured only at the level of medical conditions and over the cycle of care, where healthcare value is determined for patients, not for a hospital or other provider entity overall. Guidelines are important to go to doctors and spread knowledge about best practices, but rewards for excellence must be tied to results, not compliance. Providers should have to compete for patients based on value and not be rewarded for delivering just acceptable care".

The debate concerning quality is certainly one that appears to be centred on whether or not care that is provided produces the results that are desirable but the question is desirable to patients or administrators or healthcare providers. Therefore quality appears to have a place in the debate.

Quality is especially important when one considers what social ends healthcare is designed to achieve within a democracy or, more particularly, what co-ordinated healthcare such as a NHIS is designed to achieve in the context of a South African democracy – one that is premised upon the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

In their book Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy (2006 at pages 81 to 84), M Powers and R Faden state usefully that "... insofar as a standard view of the moral justification or moral point of public health as emerged, it goes something like the following. Public health is the social institution charged with promoting human welfare by bringing about a certain kind of human good, the good of health. The moral foundation for public health thus rests on general obligations in beneficence to promote good or welfare. Depending on the interpretation, public health is further understood as having utilitarian commitments to bring about as much health as possible. Concerns about justice, like concerns about respect for individual liberties, are understood as ethical considerations external to the moral purpose of public health that served to balance the public health's single-minded function to produce the good of health with other, right making concerns".

Therefore, it appears that the arguments for access to healthcare, in so far as the public health goal is to be achieved optimally by the introduction of a NHIS, rest on notions of justice within a society. Arguably, within our society, justice is realised with regard to the successful implementation of the Bill of Rights – bearing in mind that the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, is a social contract amongst each citizen with each other and the citizenry of the Republic as a whole with its Government. Accordingly, the Bill of Rights may be the best place to start in relation to what quality of healthcare should be in our NHIS.

It is submitted that measuring quality of care in relation to outcomes is only one way of assessing whether or not healthcare or a NHIS meets the State's obligations, with reference to the terms of the Constitution. A more effective means may be to judge whether or not the NHIS, when it is finally implemented, gives rise to a situation in which those persons subject to the NHIS are treated in such a manner that their other rights in the Bill of Rights are respected within a democracy built on equality, freedom and dignity.

The Bill of Rights contains rights that may influence and inform the quality of care process. Such rights may include: the right to dignity; the right to life; the right to equality; the right to proper and procedurally fair administrative justice; and the right to information. These rights may collectively inform what it is that quality care consists of within the NHIS once it is established.

Certainly, pronouncements by our courts already indicate that a great deal of respect is to be accorded to the individual when making decisions concerning his or her healthcare, which is fundamentally a matter of self determination. For example, the choice whether or not to smoke, whether or not to abuse substances, whether or not to exercise, whether or not to modify or not modify dietary habits, whether or not to drive recklessly, or engage in potentially dangerous sports, whether or not to have an abortion, whether or not to change one's gender, whether or not to end one's life and the means that one elects to do so.

All of these matters indicate the individual's self determination with reference to the individual's rights to dignity, life, equality and self determination. The collective impact of these rights has never been assessed, to the writer's knowledge, within the context of how they would inform the process of determining whether or not quality care is available to an individual receiving or accessing such care in terms of a NHIS, but they are a powerful platform on which to champion quality care.

This debate will unfold properly, within the context of such a rights analysis, in due course. However, a decision concerning the right to life and the right to end one's life is instructive in such an instance. In the matter of Clarke v Hurst NO and Others 1992 (4) SA 630 (D), the High Court was faced with the question of whether or not criminal liability would be visited upon an individual for turning off life support machines.

In such an instance, the High Court decided that, with reference to the legal convictions of our community, it was appropriate to consider an individual's circumstances with reference to his or her quality of life and decide if such a quality would be maintained by artificial means. Following such an evaluation, the quality of the patient's life would determine whether or not it was appropriate to turn off artificial life support. Whilst the debate in this matter was about what was wrongful or reasonable, the debate was informed by an element of quality, which rested on an appreciation of the individual's rights.

The debate concerning quality of care and its role ultimately in a NHIS is one that should be concluded prior to the implementation of a NHIS. The role of quality in the ultimate deployment of a NHIS in the Republic cannot be underestimated and does, in fact, carry constitutional weight within the context of such a NHIS environment.

Certainly, South Africa may learn from the experience of other countries who have dealt with or who are dealing with the implementation of a NHIS. Quality of care issues have arisen in such jurisdictions, but post the implementation of such systems.

Government finds itself in a position where, taking from those lessons and with a keen eye on the Bill of Rights, it must take such measures to implement a NHIS that accords with its responsibility in section 27(1)(a) of the Constitution, but that does not lose sight of the rights that are enjoyed by every individual in every circumstance of his or her life including, but not limited to, the receipt of quality healthcare services within whatever NHIS context.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Neil Kirby
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.