Ukraine: Dispute Resolution in the WTO: Not a Piece of Cake

Last Updated: 10 January 2011
Article by Nataliya Y. Mykolska

"From the point of view of international law, the World Trade Organization is perhaps the most advanced of our international institutions because it has binding judicial power."
George Soros

In 2010, Ukraine, as a new member of the World Trade Organization, has for the first time in its history referred to the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement mechanism by claiming the WTO inconsistency of certain Armenian tax laws. The benefits and complexities of this process are still to be experienced by the Ukrainian government and Ukrainian business entities, but there is already some practice of dealing with a very specific international dispute settlement procedure. This legal vehicle is comparatively fast, equitable and effective, but not easy from the procedural standpoint. Generally, WTO dispute resolution goes through a number of stages with a detailed procedure and deadlines.

Hence, this article focuses on the role, main features and procedural aspects of consultations and the establishment of the Panel within the framework of the WTO dispute settlement in the view of a dispute recently initiated by Ukraine.

Priority is to Settle Disputes, Not to Pass Judgments

A strong dispute settlement is a key feature of the WTO and it would not have become such a powerful institution without efficient resolution of disputes. The WTO dispute settlement system was based on the dispute resolution in the framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) and was reshaped into a stronger and more efficient system during the Uruguay Round of negotiations. One of the major characteristics of the system is that it mandates the WTO Members to comply with the respective final decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Effective enforcement of WTO commitments via the dispute settlement is one of the reasons why WTO Members are very cautious to undertake new obligations in the Doha Round of negotiations.

Another important feature of WTO dispute settlement is that all WTO Members can benefit from it. Generally, the Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes (DSU) which is the main "procedural code" of the WTO provides a forum for the dispute resolution between governments. Private entities may not initiate disputes in the WTO, but, surely, they are the main stakeholders and the ones lobbying the initiation of disputes domestically. Additionally, the DSU provides a possibility for the third parties (WTO Members) to join the dispute between WTO Members. Not only parties involved in the case benefit from the finding, but all other WTO Members receive certain advantages as well. For example, if the DSB finds that the US ban on importation of shrimp is WTO inconsistent following the EU complaint, it means that this trade barrier shall be eliminated not only for the EU, but for Ukraine as well.

Generally, WTO dispute resolution goes through the following stages: 1) consultations; 2) establishment and composition of a panel; 3) panel review; 4) appellate review (optional); 4) implementation; 5) dispute over implementation (optional); 6) arbitration on the level of retaliation (optional)1. The DSU prescribes precise procedure and deadlines for each stage, but as noted above, this article focuses in more detail only on the initial stages i.e. the consultations and establishment of a panel.

Consultations: The Ball is in Your Court

In 2009, the total number of disputes brought to the DSB since the WTO's creation in 1995 reached 402. The European Union, US, Canada, Brazil and Argentina were among top users of the WTO dispute resolution within the period 1995 – 20092. According to the statistics of the WTO Secretariat, "the annual number of requests for consultations peaked in 1997 with 50 requests, then fell to 40 in 1998 and, since then, has fluctuated between 23 and 37 annually"3. In 2009, the DSB received 14 notifications from WTO members formally requesting consultations under the DSU.

First and foremost, official consultations are the compulsory stage of WTO dispute settlement. Article 4(5) of the DSU explicitly provides that "before resorting to further action under this Understanding, Members should attempt to obtain satisfactory adjustment of the matter [through consultations]". Basically, this means that WTO Members may not go to the next stage i.e. submitting a request for the establishment of a Panel unless official consultations failed.

Interestingly, unlike ordinary diplomatic procedures, official consultations conducted under the Article 4(5) of the DSU have firm deadlines. For example, WTO Member has to reply to the request for consultations within 10 days from the date of its receipt. These firm deadlines prevent the delay of the dispute settlement proceedings, but they do allow WTO Members to agree on longer periods, when necessary.

Furthermore, request for official consultations is filed with the WTO Secretariat and it in turn notifies all WTO Members. The notification signals other WTO Members about the potential dispute and gives them an opportunity to join the dispute as third parties in the future. Moreover, notification informs all WTO Members which will need to adopt the final decision about the issues raised in the dispute.4

Quite remarkably, the DSU allows the holding of not only bilateral consultations (between the complaining and responding parties), but trilateral and plurilateral consultations. However, the complaining party may in its request for consultations effectively prevent third parties from the participation in the consultations by referring to specific provisions of the GATT 1994 pursuant to which consultations are held. In its request for consultations Ukraine provided that they will be held pursuant to Article XXII of GATT 1994 which means that Ukraine permitted the participation of third parties in the consultations. Alternatively, if Ukraine requests consultations pursuant to Article XXIII:1 of GATT 1994 third parties may not join consultations. However, it must be noted, that exclusion of third parties from consultations does not prevent them from joining the case at the stage of the establishment of a panel.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that numerous unofficial consultations are held before and after the initiation of official consultations within WTO dispute settlement procedure and in its essence, official consultations are a formal step confirming that there is a disagreement between WTO Members.

Notably, out of the 402 cases filed up to the end of 2009, roughly half were eventually settled directly between the parties following the consultations mandated by the DSU, without going to further stages.5 This demonstrates that disputes can be effectively resolved at the stage of consultations

Establishment of a Panel: Know the Ropes

Following failure to resolve the dispute through the official consultations the complaining WTO Member submits the first request for the establishment of a Panel. Pursuant to Article 6(1) of the DSU "if the complaining party so requests, a panel shall be established at the latest at the DSB meeting following that at which the request first appears as an item on the DSB's agenda, unless at that meeting the DSB decides by consensus not to establish a panel".

Basically, this provision sets the following procedure for the establishment of a panel. After the request of the complaining WTO Member has been put on the DSB's agenda it is considered at the DSB's meeting, The DSB is composed of representatives from all WTO Members (mainly diplomatic personnel or sometimes Ministers) and meets on a monthly basis, but it may also conduct extraordinary meetings when required by the DSU.6 At the DSB's first substantive meeting general rule of 'positive consensus' applies which means that unless everyone agrees the decision is not taken. For that reason, naturally, at the first meeting as the responding party uses its right to object the Panel is not established.

The tricky part about establishing a WTO panel comes up when the DSB considers the request for the establishment of a panel for the second time. On this occasion a special rule of 'negative consensus' applies. It means that unless everyone disagrees the panel is established. And again, certainly, the complaining party wishes to establish the panel and even if everyone else from the WTO Membership is against such decision, the panel will be established.

It is worth mentioning that the complaining WTO Member can use certain tricks in order to decrease the 'waiting period' for the establishment of a Panel. For example, in case of the second request of the establishment of a Panel, footnote 5 to the DSU specifies "if the complaining party so requests, a meeting of the DSB shall be convened for this purpose within 15 days of the request, provided that at least 10 days' prior notice of the meeting is given". Hence, upon the request of complaining party the DSB may held extraordinary meeting and consider the second request before the next scheduled meeting. Therefore, this procedure allows WTO Members either to speed it up if there is not possibility to solve the dispute amicably or to drag out time in case unofficial consultations are in progress.

Panel Established: Going all the way to the Final Binding Decision

Once the panel is established, there is still a long way to go in order to get the final decision. After the establishment of a panel parties to the dispute decide on the composition of the panel i.e. choose panel members who will consider the case. After the panel is composed, the procedure briefly looks as follows. The panel considers the case by organizing several meetings with the parties. Then it prepares the report with its recommendations concerning alleged inconsistency of measures which are to be adopted at the DSB meeting.

The parties have a certain period to appeal against the report in case they disagree with the panel's findings. If this happens, the panel report will not be adopted by the DSB and the case is referred to an Appellate Body. The dispute is considered by an Appellate Body consisting of seven permanent members. The report of the Appellate Body is adopted at the DSB meeting and cannot be challenged. After the DSB adopts the Appellate Body report it becomes legally binding for parties.

However, one should not regard this as the end of the procedure, because the most important thing – implementation, comes up now. Sometimes WTO Members do not drag out time, but usually this is not the case. Moreover, it may be politically impossible to implement the WTO decision domestically or the violating WTO Member does not implement the decision correctly. In this case, the DSU provides a possibility to challenge the way the decision is implemented and such disputes are not rare in the DSB's practice.7

Ukraine vs Armenia Case8

Before discussing in depth the case against Armenia it is worth noting that Ukraine used the procedure of unofficial consultations last year. The Ukrainian Government, following requests from domestic producers had initiated informal consultations with Georgia with regard to the discriminatory excise duty on imported tobacco products and successfully solved this problem and the discriminatory regime was withdrawn, which meant better market access for Ukrainian companies. After following several successful unofficial consultations the problem was resolved. This demonstrates that the mere possibility of WTO dispute settlement facilitates amicable bilateral dispute resolution. However, in the case of Armenia the situation became a bit more complex...

On 20 July 2010, Ukraine after Armenia had failed to react to a number of requests for unofficial consultations, Ukraine requested consultations with Armenia pursuant to Article 4 DSU and Article XXII of the GATT 1994 and notified the WTO Secretariat on the issue. Under the DSU Armenia had to reply to the request within 10 days after its receipt and enter into consultations within no more than 30 days.

Notwithstanding the general trend of using consultations stage for resolving the dispute, Armenia did reply and did not entere into official consultations with Ukraine. Thus, on 8 September 2010 Ukraine submitted its first request for the establishment of a panel9.

On 25 October 2010 at the first DSB meeting devoted to Ukraine`s request for the establishment of a panel, Armenia used its right to object and that is why the panel was not established. This is quite commonplace among WTO Members and usually the panel is not established at the first meeting of the DSB. On 23 November 2010, the request made by Ukraine was on DSB's agenda, but once again the panel was not established. Due to the ongoing bilateral consultations with Armenia the WTO dispute settlement procedures were halted for the time being.

Legally speaking, Ukraine did not lose its right to refer to the WTO dispute settlement in future with the same matter and to submit the request for the establishment of a panel. Furthermore, there is nothing in the DSU preventing parties from holding bilateral consultations whilst conducting dispute settlement procedures. Therefore, currently the outcome of this procedure depends on success of the bilateral negotiations being held.


WTO dispute settlement is an effective and comparatively fast way of solving international trade disputes, because it has clear binding procedure and, most importantly, it mandates violating WTO Members to comply. Even though the procedure is complex and the implementation of decisions could be time consuming and politically complicated, it prevents trade wars and provides security and predictability of market access.

Finally, WTO dispute settlement is an important tool not only for governments but mainly for business entities, because the DSB's decision opens up markets and eliminates trade barriers for companies.

Hence, currently Ukrainian government has in its hands a valuable instrument that can help companies in Ukraine to be better off in the international market. Whether or not this instrument is used depends on the Ukrainian companies. Let's hope that case against Armenia is the first step and Ukrainian business makes the most of the WTO dispute settlement in the nearest future.

Flow Chart of the Dispute Settlement Process10


1. Please consult the flow chart below for more details concerning stages of the dispute settlement.

2. WTO Annual Report 2010, p.82;


4. The role of all the WTO Membership in the adoption of the final decision is discussed in more detail below.

5. WTO Annual Report 2010,

6. This issue is explained in more detail below.

7. Please consult the flow chart for details.

8. Armenia — Measures Affecting the Importation and Internal Sale of Cigarettes and Alcoholic Beverages (DS411)

9. This request was further revised and submitted on 6 October 2010

10. Source: WTO web-cite:

Vasil Kisil & Partners

Through relentless focus on client success, the Vasil Kisil & Partners team delivers integrated legal solutions to complex business issues. In Ukraine, the Vasil Kisil & Partners brand is synonymous with great depth and breadth of legal expertise and experience, which has created superior value for our clients since 1992.

Vasil Kisil & Partners is a Ukrainian law firm that delivers integrated business law, dispute resolution services, tax law, energy and natural resources law, intellectual property law, international trade law, labour and employment law, real estate and construction law, as well as public private partnership, concessions & infrastructure law.

The firm serves international and domestic companies, as well as private individuals, dealing in agriculture, banking, chemical, construction, financial, energy, high-tech, general commodities, insurance, IT, media, metallurgy, pharmaceutical, real estate, shipbuilding, telecommunication, trading, transport, and other industries and economy sectors.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.