United States: California Supreme Court Will Have The Final Word On Exceptions To Activity-Based Pay Systems

Last Updated: October 9 2019
Article by John K. Skousen

Over a decade has passed since an appellate court in California ruled that employers could not average pay for productive activity to include unpaid non-productive activity in meeting their minimum wage obligations. That decision engendered additional state and federal decisions over the years holding that, under California law, piece-rate compensation similarly could not be averaged into time spent on non-piece work such as waiting time between jobs or time spent on rest periods. 

These decisions ultimately resulted in, or significantly contributed toward, legislation taking effect on January 1, 2016 (AB1513), which provides specific guidelines for paying piece-rate employees for (1) productive activity, (2) non-productive activity, and (3) 10-minute rest periods which must be authorized and permitted for every four hours of work or major fraction thereof. AB1513 was encoded as Section 226.2 of the Labor Code.

Section 226 does not define “piece-rate” compensation, but the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) has attempted in its enforcement guidelines to fill in the gaps by resorting to the American Heritage Dictionary. That source defines the term as: “work paid for according to the number of units turned out.”

Consequently, a piece rate must be based upon an ascertainable figure paid for completing “a particular task or making a particular piece of goods.” The DLSE then provided examples of piece-rate plans to include the following:

  • Automobile mechanics paid on a “book rate” (i.e., brake job, one hour and fifty minutes, tune-up, one hour, etc.), usually based on the Chilton Manual or similar;
  • Nurses paid on the basis of the number of procedures performed;
  • Carpet layers paid by the yard of carpet laid;
  • Technicians paid by the number of telephones installed;
  • Factory workers paid by the widget completed;
  • Carpenters paid by the linear foot on framing jobs.

The DLSE further noted that a piece-rate plan of compensation “may include a group of employees who share in the wage earned for completing the task or making the product” and that “piece-rate and commission plans may be in addition to an hourly rate or a salary rate of pay. Such plans may also be in the alternative to a salary or hourly rate. As an example, compensation plans may include salary plus commission or piece-rate; or a base or guaranteed salary or commission or piece-rate whichever is greater.” (DLSE Website Frequently Asked Questions regarding AB1513).

However, Section 226.2 simply lays out two principal options for paying employees for piece work (commission and other incentive pay systems are not addressed). The first method pays separately for (1) productive activity, (2) non- productive activity, and (3) 10-minute rest periods at the greater of the applicable minimum wage or the average rate of pay for the work week which does not take into consideration the time and compensation for rest periods or any overtime premiums.

The second method eliminates the need to separately keep track of time spent on productive versus non-productive hours and simply pays (1) a base hourly wage at no less than the applicable minimum wage for all hours worked, plus (2) rest period compensation at the greater of the applicable minimum wage or the average rate of pay for the work week which does not take into consideration the time and compensation for rest periods or any overtime premiums. If the employee’s base wage includes rest-period time, then a pay supplement would be added if the average hourly rate is higher than the base hourly rate.

Certified Tire & Service Centers Compensation Plan

Some employers altogether abandoned the piece-rate methods of compensation and developed creative hourly rate programs that took production into consideration. One ingenious method departing from the “activity based” piece-rate model was addressed in Certified Tire & Service Centers Wage & Hour Cases, 28 Cal.App.5th 1 (2018). 

In that case, the employer paid technicians an hourly wage for all work performed, but the actual hourly rate earned by a technician would vary from pay period to pay period. However, the hourly rate for any pay period also was guaranteed to be at least an agreed-upon minimum hourly rate that the technician was assigned at the time of hire, which always exceeded the legal minimum wage. The hourly rate paid to a technician during any given pay period could wind up being higher than the guaranteed minimum hourly rate based on a formula that rewarded the technician for work that was billed to the customer by Certified Tire as a separate labor charge. 

Specifically, Certified Tire would multiply the dollars billed by the technician to the customer by 95%, then multiply that amount by a fixed “tech rate” assigned to the technician depending on experience and qualifications, and then divide that amount by the total hours worked by the technician during the pay period, which produced the “base hourly rate.” As described in the opinion, “if the base hourly rate exceeded the technician’s guaranteed minimum hourly rate, the technician was paid the base hourly rate for all time worked during the pay period. If the guaranteed minimum hourly rate was higher than the base hourly rate, the technician was paid the guaranteed minimum hourly rate for all time worked during the pay period. Overtime hours are paid at one and a half time the hourly rate that applies during the pay period.”

In the lawsuits that resulted, the plaintiffs argued the compensation plan was flawed because they did not have the opportunity to increase their base hourly rate by participating in activities that did not generate production dollars. In effect, they contended that they were not paid at all for the non-productive work and that minimum wage laws had been violated. A central component of their argument was that, much like the cases in the appellate decisions, they were being paid on an “activity based” method of compensation, which requires separate payment for productive and non-productive activity. 

However, the court rejected that argument, reasoning that, although the pay system “has similarities to a piece-rate system or a commission-based system because technicians are able to increase their earnings by increasing their production,” this was “not an “activity-based compensation system.” The court reasoned that “the technicians are always paid on an hourly basis for all hours worked at a rate above minimum wage regardless of their productivity, and regardless of the type of activity in which they were engaged during those hours.” By so ruling, the court rejected plaintiffs’ argument that defendants must somehow “make a separate additional payment to the technician to comply with the minimum wage and rest period requirements.”

The California Supreme Court granted review of the decision but did not order the appeals court decision depublished while review is pending.

Dark Horse ExpressDecision

In Jimenez-Sanchez v. Dark Horse Express, Inc., 32 Cal.App.5th 224 (2019), truck drivers paid under different piece-rate compensation methods filed a class action and a motion or class certification. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion, and the plaintiffs appealed, asserting the claims of the proposed class were based on statutory and regulatory requirements and uniform policies of defendant, presenting predominantly common issues of law and fact suitable for determination on a class basis.

In this case, one question which arose was whether compensation for non-productive time and rest breaks could be included in the piece-rate compensation agreement, a practice condemned by other appellate decisions. The appellate court reversed and remanded the case back to the trial court, noting that the issue of whether the tasks plaintiffs characterized as “nonproductive time” and rest breaks were included in, or incidental to, the activities for which the piece work payment was made was a question still to be determined. Further, the resolution to this issue would depend on the terms of each driver’s employment agreement with defendant. In its analysis, the court further determined that the trial court had used improper criteria in its analysis. The Supreme Court granted review; unlike the Certified Tire case, the court ordered this decision depublished for the time being.

What These Latest Developments Mean

It’s quite possible that, in granting review of the above decisions, the California Supreme Court is seeking to clarify the legal standards for adjudicating alleged activity-based compensation systems in class actions. Whether that means that the court will modify the appellate court’s ruling with regard to the creative hourly method of pay addressed in Certified Tire is uncertain.

Previous decisions have upheld an employer’s development of pay methods that do not violate public policy despite plaintiffs’ arguments to the contrary. An essential component in those cases has been that the employers in question actually paid the employee in question a base wage from which there was no deduction then added an incentive component that was expressly drafted so that there was no illegal deduction from an employee’s expected wage.  See, e.g., Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co., Inc., 42 Cal.4th 217 (2007) (unlawful deduction claim failed where employees received base wages without reduction and incentive element was specifically defined and paid accordingly without violation of public policy); Steinhebel v. Los Angeles Times Communications, LLC, 126 Cal.App.4th 696, 704–12 (2005), 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 351 (newspaper could charge back commission advances to subscription telemarketers paid a base hourly wage for all hours worked where commission was deemed earned in addition to base wages only if subscription was retained for 28 days); see also DeLeon v. Verizon Wireless, LLC, 207 Cal.App.4th 800 (2012) (no underpayment of contractual or statutory wages occurred where the terms for earning the incentive pay were clearly defined, including chargebacks).

Thus, it remains to be seen whether the California Supreme Court will go down the road and invalidate variable hourly compensation agreements, replacing them with its own preferred version of how wage payments can be structured. It’s also quite possible that the court makes only minor changes to the analysis, leaving intact an employer’s freedom of contract regarding payment of wages within specified limits the law permits. 

In any event, employers with incentive-based compensation systems should contact their legal counsel in developing strategies to address the uncertainty created by recent actions of the Supreme Court in granting review of cases addressing alleged activity-based compensation systems.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions