United States: Blended Benefits: LIBOR Replacement Provisions In CLOs

Last Updated: September 30 2019
Article by Ryan Suda, J. Paul Forrester, Sagi Tamir, Joanna Nicholas and Arthur S. Rublin

Transactions in the collateralized loan obligation ("CLO") market have generally included some form of LIBOR replacement provisions for over a year, stemming from the announcement in July 2017 by Andrew Bailey, the head of the UK Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), that the FCA intended to phase out LIBOR in its present form by the end of 2021. Recently, a new iteration of LIBOR replacement mechanics has debuted. This latest iteration adapts language from the Alternative Reference Rates Committee's ("ARRC") May 31, 2019 recommended fallback language for new issuances of LIBOR securitizations,1 resulting in these CLO provisions being viewed by some as "hardwiring" a replacement reference rate (based on a limited array of prioritized options) into CLO documents. However, while this approach does have an element of hardwiring, in that it specifies a fallback waterfall of particular replacement rates that can be implemented in the CLO without investor consent, the rate produced by the fallback waterfall—at least in the relevant CLO transactions in which Mayer Brown has been involved—is not automatically implemented as "pure" hardwiring would dictate. Rather, the approach in these CLOs preserves discretion for the collateral manager, with the consent of specified classes of investors (typically a majority of the controlling class and frequently also a majority of the equity), to implement a replacement rate other than the rate produced by the fallback waterfall. Because the rate produced by the fallback waterfall (i.e. the "hardwired" rate) does not automatically replace LIBOR as the reference rate following a trigger event, this latest iteration blends a "hardwiring" approach with an "amendment" approach. We therefore refer to it as the "Blended Approach."

The Amendment Approach to LIBOR Replacement in CLOs

The LIBOR replacement mechanics in CLOs that do not utilize the Blended Approach typically institute a reduced investor consent threshold for a supplemental indenture to change the reference rate applicable to the CLO's liabilities following a trigger event— including a complete elimination of investor consent if certain conditions are satisfied, as described below—with the collateral manager being the party responsible for selecting a replacement reference rate.2 While there has been variation across the CLO market in some particulars of this approach, for simplicity we will refer to this approach as the "Amendment Approach."

Under many versions of the Amendment Approach, if the collateral manager selects a replacement reference rate that satisfies certain specified criteria (a "Specified Rate"), no investor consent is required to implement that replacement reference rate. The collateral manager may also select a replacement reference rate other than a Specified Rate, but the use of that other rate requires consent from a majority of the controlling class plus, frequently, consent from a majority of the equity.3

The primary evolution embodied in the Blended Approach is the replacement of the Specified Rate concept with a fallback waterfall of replacement reference rates based on the ARRC's fallback waterfall for new issuances of LIBOR securitizations (the "ARRC-Based Waterfall") that specifies a SOFR-based reference rate in the first and second instances as the replacement rate that can be implemented without investor consent,4 while preserving the flexibility of the collateral manager (subject to a streamlined set of investor consents) to select a rate other than the one resulting from the ARRC-Based Waterfall.

Value Transfer and Basis Risk Considerations

Two of the central concerns that LIBOR succession mechanics aim to address are value transfer and basis risk. Based on current information about the loan market and the future of LIBOR, at this time we believe that the Blended Approach addresses these concerns in a way that, for CLO transactions, is superior to a "pure" hardwired approach that would automatically implement a predetermined successor reference rate following a trigger event.

Value transfer. First, automating the implementation of the replacement benchmark at the CLO level before the identity of the replacement benchmark is known at the underlying asset level may produce value transfer, because the replacement benchmark at the CLO level may favor either debt investors or equity investors relative to the rate being earned on the CLO's portfolio, and no class of investors will be able to prevent this value transfer because no class of investors will be entitled to consent rights in relation to the replacement benchmark (nor will the collateral manager have any ability to prevent implementation). The Blended Approach mitigates this problem because the collateral manager is not required to implement the rate produced by the ARRC-Based Waterfall but can implement another rate with investor consent. Nevertheless, the risk is not completely eliminated because value transfer could still result if the collateral manager elects to use the rate resulting from the ARRC-Based Waterfall, which the collateral manager is entitled to do without investor consent.5

The Blended Approach also mitigates value transfer as compared to the Amendment Approach in that the Blended Approach more precisely weds the selection of the spread modifier (often referred to as the "benchmark 3 Mayer Brown | Blended Benefits: LIBOR Replacement Provisions in CLOs replacement adjustment") to the selection of the replacement base rate, thereby ensuring that the modifier and base rate are appropriately paired to create a rate that most closely approximates LIBOR.

Basis risk. Second, automating the implementation of the replacement benchmark at the CLO level before the identity of the replacement rate is known at the underlying asset level may produce basis risk because, if the fallback waterfall at the CLO level results in a replacement benchmark that is different from the one that is prevailing in the loan market at the time, there will be a mismatch between the interest rate that the CLO earns on its assets and the interest rate it must pay on its liabilities, which could reduce returns to the CLO's equity investors and potentially also adversely affect payments to one or more classes of the CLO's debt investors. Although current indications are that the consensus replacement benchmark in the loan market will be some form of SOFR (which would be consistent with the initial outputs of the ARRC-Based Waterfall), at this stage it remains unknown whether and, if so, when, SOFR will ultimately be the prevailing rate in the loan market.6

The Blended Approach mitigates basis risk by permitting the collateral manager (with specified investor consents) to implement a rate other than the rate produced by the ARRC-Based Waterfall, which the collateral manager could be expected to do if the loan market had adopted a different rate than the one produced by the ARRC-Based Waterfall. Since CLOs repackage loan exposures, there is a risk for CLOs in getting out in front of the loan market on benchmark replacement and committing to a specific replacement rate before the loan market does. And even if the replacement rates in the CLO market and the loan market ultimately end up being the same, a difference in the timing of the transitions in the respective markets could produce basis risk during the transition period. We believe that, in and of itself, favors the flexibility afforded by the Blended Approach.

To fully benefit from the mitigation of basis risk provided by the Blended Approach, we further recommend that market participants adopting the Blended Approach include a trigger event that occurs if a specified percentage (e.g., more than 50% by principal amount) of the loans in the CLO's portfolio use a benchmark other than LIBOR (an "Asset Replacement Percentage" concept), which is not uniformly included as a trigger by CLOs using the Amendment Approach. The Asset Replacement Percentage trigger can help to mitigate basis risk in the event that the loan market adopts a replacement benchmark before there has been a disruption to or cessation of LIBOR. In general, it would, of course, be a desirable outcome for the financial markets if the loan market adopts a successor benchmark before a LIBOR disruption occurs, but at the CLO level that would introduce basis risk if, due to the absence of a relevant pre-disruption trigger event, the CLO cannot respond through a streamlined amendment process to implement a benchmark replacement.

Conclusion: Benefits of the Blended Approach

While automatic implementation of a hardwired replacement rate following a disruption to LIBOR will undoubtedly be a desirable outcome in the CLO market in the future when there is certainty and complete information about the benchmark that will replace LIBOR in the loan market, the current environment is one of imperfect information. We believe that, in these circumstances and at this time, the Blended Approach for CLOs strikes a workable balance between signaling support for a SOFR-based replacement reference rate and preserving flexibility to mitigate basis risk and value transfer related to the replacement of LIBOR.

First, the Blended Approach signals to the CLO and loan markets an acceptance of SOFR as the preferred benchmark rate to replace LIBOR. It is desirable for the stability of the financial markets that they coalesce around a single replacement for LIBOR, and the Blended Approach indicates that the relevant CLO investors are comfortable enough with SOFR to accept it as a replacement rate at the CLO level without a requirement that investors give consent at the time of the transition. In fact, to be more specific, the Blended Approach signals that a SOFR-based benchmark will be acceptable to the relevant CLO investors as a replacement reference rate even if term SOFR is not available at the time of the transition. The fact that the Blended Approach is being adopted in some CLOs at a time when term SOFR is not currently available (other than as an indicative rate) demonstrates investor acceptance of the possibility that compounded SOFR, the second option in the ARRC-Based Waterfall after term SOFR, may be implemented in the CLO without investor consent.7 This is a meaningful indication that SOFR is the preferred LIBOR replacement, even if term SOFR never materializes.

Second, it is a positive outcome for the CLO market, in our view, if the rate resulting from the "hardwired" ARRC-Based Waterfall is not automatically or necessarily implemented by the collateral manager. While the stability of the financial markets is a goal shared by CLO market participants, until there is greater certainty around the actual replacement benchmark that will be adopted by the loan market, we are concerned that committing CLOs to automatic benchmark replacement with a specified rate could produce an opposite, destabilizing result by causing a basis mismatch with the CLO's assets if the loan market has not yet transitioned to a successor rate or, worse, has implemented a different replacement rate. We believe that, to minimize basis risk, it is beneficial for CLO indentures to continue to include flexibility for the CLO to amend its reference rate to match the successor benchmark that ultimately prevails in the loan market.


1. The ARRC's recommended language is at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/f iles/2019/Securitization_Fallback_Language.pdf.

2. In the absence of such mechanics, a change to the reference rate would generally be expected to require the consent of 100% of the holders of every class of securities.

3. In many CLOs using the Amendment Approach, the Specified Rate is defined as the rate recognized or acknowledged by the Loan Syndications & Trading Association or ARRC, the rate used by 50% or more of the floating rate assets in the CLO portfolio or the rate used by 50% or more of new issue CLO liabilities issued over a specified lookback period.

4. The first replacement benchmark specified by the ARRC-Based Waterfall of replacement reference rates used in the Blended Approach is term SOFR (plus a spread modifier). If term SOFR is not available, the next replacement benchmark specified is compounded SOFR (plus a spread modifier). Since spot SOFR already exists, compounded SOFR already exists as well, making it unlikely that any of the other benchmarks included in the ARRC-Based Waterfall will come into play.

5. Market participants could consider modifications to the Blended Approach in order to further mitigate the risks of value transfer and basis mismatch. For example, the CLO indenture could grant an objection right to one or more classes of investors that applies if a specified percentage (e.g., more than 50% by principal amount) of loans in the CLO's portfolio are accruing interest based on a benchmark rate that is different from the rate resulting from the application of the ARRC-Based Waterfall. Alternatively, in lieu of investor objection rights, the ARRC-Based Waterfall could be modified to provide that if a specified percentage of loans in the CLO's portfolio are accruing interest based on a benchmark rate that is different from the rate that would otherwise result from the application of the ARRC-Based Waterfall, the rate prevailing among the loans in the CLO's portfolio would instead be the benchmark that could be implemented by the collateral manager without investor consent. Another possibility is that the collateral manager could be given discretion not only to implement a replacement rate other than the rate produced by the ARRC-Based Waterfall but also to defer implementation of a replacement rate until a specified percentage of loans in the CLO's portfolio were accruing interest based on a benchmark rate other than LIBOR.

6. Unlike some forms of traditional securitization that may be more suited to automated benchmark replacement provisions, CLOs have little control over the benchmark that will apply to the CLO assets, which, in the case of most CLOs of broadly syndicated loans, are purchased in the open market from third parties. Credit agreements in the broadly syndicated loan market have not yet implemented hardwired benchmark replacement mechanics that will prescribe SOFR as the successor rate to LIBOR but instead are generally adopting an amendment approach that requires lender consent to implement a replacement. To the extent that CLOs hold minority positions in loan facilities, CLOs will not necessarily be able to control the identity of the replacement rate selected by lenders if replacement does not require the unanimous vote of the lenders. Additionally, new information may arise or new developments may occur that could cause the loan market to implement a consensus replacement benchmark other than SOFR.

7. Presumably, a reputable collateral manager would not implement compounded SOFR if a SOFR-based benchmark were not prevailing in the loan market at the time, but the fact remains that under the Blended Approach, investors do cede control in relation to the implementation of the rate produced by the ARRC-Based Waterfall. If the collateral manager is unable to garner approval for a given alternative rate from investors at both the top and bottom of the CLO capital stack, investors could be stuck with SOFR even if a better alternative were available at the time.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2019. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arnold & Porter
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Arnold & Porter
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions