United States: Proposed Section 382 Regulations Would Eliminate Section 338 Approach Of Notice 2003-65

On September 9, 2019, the Treasury Department (“Treasury”) and the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) issued proposed section 382 regulations (REG-125710-18) (the “Proposed Regulations”) reversing certain previously taxpayer-favorable positions regarding the treatment of built-in gains and built-in losses for purposes of section 382(h). Despite being taxpayer adverse in certain respects, the Proposed Regulations address many previously unanswered questions regarding the treatment of built-in gains and built-in losses under section 382(h) and also address a number of issues related to section 382 that were raised by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the TCJA).1

As described in more detail below, the Proposed Regulations, if finalized, would result in the withdrawal of Notice 2003-65 (the “Notice”) and eliminate the section 338 approach set forth in the Notice (the “Section 338 Approach”). This change would significantly reduce the ability of many taxpayers to utilize net operating losses (NOLs) following a section 382 ownership change, particularly in acquisitions of loss corporations with significant intellectual property or other assets with a fair market value in excess of tax basis as of the date of the ownership change date. In addition, the Proposed Regulations address certain issues raised by cancellation of debt (COD) income in adjusting a loss corporation’s section 382 limitation and the interaction of section 382 with various TCJA Code provisions, including section 163(j).

The Proposed Regulations are proposed to be effective for ownership changes occurring after the date that the Proposed Regulations are published as final Treasury regulations. Therefore, loss corporations may continue to apply the Notice and the Section 338 Approach to ownership changes occurring prior to the date that the Proposed Regulations are finalized.

The discussion below provides a high-level overview of section 382, summarizes the key provisions set forth in the Proposed Regulations and concludes by providing insights into the potential impact of the Proposed Regulations on mergers and acquisition transactions and restructurings of financially troubled companies.

Overview of Section 382

Section 382 limits the ability of a loss corporation to utilize NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes following an “ownership change.” A “loss corporation” is a corporation that is entitled to use a NOL carryforward, capital loss carryforward, carryforward of disallowed interest expense under section 163(j), has a net unrealized built-in loss or certain other attributes that can reduce taxable income. Section 382(a) generally limits the amount of pre-change losses of the loss corporation that can be used to offset its post-change income by an amount equal to the product of (i) the aggregate fair market value of the loss corporation’s outstanding stock immediately before the ownership change and (ii) the published long-term tax-exempt rate (the “base limitation”), which is increased or decreased, as the case may be, in the manner set forth in the immediately succeeding paragraph.

Section 382(h) provides that, if a loss corporation has a net unrealized built-in gain (NUBIG) at the time of the ownership change, such loss corporation’s base limitation is increased by any recognized built-in gain (RBIG) of the loss corporation during the five-year recognition period beginning on the date of the ownership change (the “Recognition Period”). The amount by which the loss corporation’s base limitation may be increased by RBIGs taken into account by the loss corporation during the Recognition Period cannot exceed the loss corporation’s NUBIG on the date of the ownership change. In addition, if the loss corporation has a net unrealized built-in loss (NUBIL) at the time of the ownership change, any recognized built-in loss (RBIL) of the loss corporation during the Recognition Period is treated in the same manner as pre-change losses (i.e., such losses are available to offset post-change income subject to the loss corporation’s section 382 limitation). The aggregate amount RBILs that are treated as pre-change losses may not exceed the loss corporation’s NUBIL on the date of the ownership change.

The Notice allowed taxpayers to elect either of two approaches for determining a loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL and adjusting the loss corporation’s base limitation for RBIGs and RBILs. Under the Section 338 Approach, a loss corporation identified and measured its NUBIG/NUBIL and RBIG/RBIL by comparing its actual items of income, gain, loss and deduction against those items that would have arisen had the loss corporation sold its assets to a third party that assumed all of the loss corporation’s liabilities on the ownership change date. Under this approach, the loss corporation was generally able to increase its section 382 limitation by the hypothetical depreciation and amortization deductions resulting from the step-up in tax basis that arose in connection with the hypothetical sale that exceeded the actual depreciation and amortization deductions allowable to the loss corporation with respect to its assets (regardless of whether the loss corporation sold its assets during the Recognition Period). Under the section 1374 approach, a loss corporation identified and measured its NUBIG/NUBIL and RBIG/RBIL based on the principles for calculating net recognized built-in gain for the conversion of a C corporation to an S corporation under section 1374 (the “Section 1374 Approach”). In general, the Section 1374 Approach relied on the accrual method of accounting and only permitted a taxpayer to increase its section 382 limitation on account of an RBIG arising from an asset with a built-in gain on the date of the ownership change where the loss corporation actually disposed of such asset during the Recognition Period.

Generally, the Section 338 Approach was viewed as more favorable for taxpayers that were in a NUBIG position on the date of the ownership change because it allowed for the depreciable or amortizable assets with a built-in gain on the date of the ownership change to generate RBIG in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the hypothetical depreciation or amortization deductions that would have been available to the loss corporation over the Recognition Period had an election under section 338 been made with respect to a hypothetical purchase of the stock of the loss corporation over (ii) the actual depreciation and amortization deductions allowable to the loss corporation during the recognition period. In addition, the Section 338 Approach was more favorable in its treatment of built-in COD income. The Section 1374 Approach was viewed as more favorable to loss corporations that had a NUBIL on the date of the ownership change because such approach did not treat deductions arising from the payment of contingent liabilities as RBIL items.

Overview of Proposed Regulations

As discussed below in more detail, the Proposed Regulations eliminate the Section 338 Approach and adopt the Section 1374 Approach with a number of modifications.

Changes to Measurement of NUBIG/NUBIL

In adopting a modified version of the Section 1374 Approach, the Proposed Regulations significantly change how a loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL is calculated. This could result in more loss corporations having a NUBIL on the date of an ownership change due to the changes to the treatment of recourse liabilities and COD income in the calculation of the loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL.

Under the Proposed Regulations, a loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL is computed pursuant to a two-step process. In the first step, the loss corporation is treated as surrendering assets to creditors holding undersecured non-recourse liabilities for no consideration other than the relief of liabilities. In the second step, the loss corporation is treated as selling all remaining assets (other than cash and cash-equivalents described in 382(h)(3)(B)(ii)) to an unrelated party, with such unrelated party not assuming any of the recourse liabilities of the seller. For an insolvent loss corporation, the Proposed Regulations result in the loss corporation having a lower amount realized from the hypothetical sale and decreasing the loss corporation’s NUBIG (or potentially moving the loss corporation from a NUBIG to NUBIL position) because the unrelated purchaser is not be treated as assuming the recourse liabilities of the loss corporation.

The amount realized from the two hypothetical transactions is then (i) decreased by the fixed and contingent2 deductible liabilities of the loss corporation, (ii) decreased by the loss corporation’s tax basis in its assets, (iii) increased or decreased, as the case may be, by the amount of RBIG or RBIL that can be recognized by the loss corporation during the Recognition Period (excluding certain items of COD income and gains from the disposition of property) and (iv) increased or decreased, as the case may be, by any positive or negative section 481 adjustments that would be required to be included in connection with the hypothetical asset sale.

The Proposed Regulations provide that COD income is generally not included in the loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL calculation and, as a result, is not treated as RBIG/RBIL. However, a loss corporation has the option to treat COD income as a RBIG item that increases its NUBIG/NUBIL where: (i) the COD income is recognized by the loss corporation within the first 12 months of the Recognition Period and (ii) either (A) the COD income is not excluded from the loss corporation’s gross income under section 108(a)(1) or (B) the COD income is excluded from the loss corporation’s gross income under section 108(a)(1), but the COD income results in a reduction to tax attributes of the loss corporation that are not pre-change losses (including the loss corporation’s tax basis in assets that it did not hold at the time of the ownership change). Furthermore, if the loss corporation recognizes excluded COD income during the first 12 months of the Recognition Period and such excluded COD income results in a decrease to the loss corporation’s tax basis in assets that it held at the time of the ownership change, the Proposed Regulations provide that such COD income is not an RBIG item. Instead, the amount of the tax basis reduction under section 1017 for such excluded COD income is taken into account in the loss corporation’s tax basis in its assets for purposes of the NUBIG/NUBIL calculation.3 The Proposed Regulations also place limitations on the amount of post-ownership change COD income that can be treated as a RBIG item. The limitation differs depending on whether the indebtedness is non-recourse or recourse. In addition, in the case of recourse indebtedness, the limitation is different where the loss corporation is under the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court under title 11 of the United States Code on the date of the ownership change.

Changes to Identification and Measurement of RBIG/RBIL

As noted above, the Proposed Regulations eliminate the Section 338 Approach. This prevents loss corporations from increasing the section 382 limitation on account of built-in gain assets that the loss corporation owns on the date of the ownership change where the asset is not disposed of by the loss corporation during the Recognition Period. This significantly reduces the value of NOLs of a loss corporation with significant intellectual property, goodwill or other intangible value.

The Proposed Regulations also adversely impact taxpayers that are in a NUBIL position. First, the Proposed Regulations treat deductions arising from the post-change payment of liabilities that were contingent at the time of the ownership change as RBIL items. This is a less taxpayer favorable treatment than that provided by the Section 1374 Approach, which did not treat payments of contingent liabilities as RBIL items. Second, the Proposed Regulations provide that deductions may be treated as RBILs where they may not be deducted by the loss corporation pre-ownership change because of limitations relating to taxable income or timing (not solely because the economic performance requirement was not satisfied, which was the case under the Section 1374 Approach). Finally, under the Section 1374 Approach, a bad debt deduction was only treated as a RBIL where the bad debt deduction arose in the first 12 months of the Recognition Period. Under the Proposed Regulations, all bad debt deductions that are recognized during the Recognition Period are treated as RBILs. On the other hand, COD income continues to be treated as a RBIG item only if it is recognized within the first 12 months of the Recognition Period.

Finally, the Proposed Regulations provide that certain items of income that are recognized by a loss corporation during the Recognition Period do not constitute RBIG items, including:

  • Dividends, including amounts treated as dividends under section 1248, received by the loss corporation with respect to stock held by the loss corporation as of the date of the ownership change (even if the stock had a built-in gain as of the date of the ownership that may be reduced or eliminated as a result of the payment of the dividend);
  • Inclusions of Subpart F income and global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) arising with respect to stock held by a loss corporation under sections 951 and 951A, respectively; and
  • Any prepaid income that is received by the loss corporation prior to the ownership change and that is deferred until a post-change period under section 451(c) or section 455.

Interaction With Section 163(j) Provisions

Section 163(j), as modified by the TCJA, generally limits the amount of interest expense that a taxpayer may claim in a particular taxable year to an amount equal to the sum of (i) the taxpayer’s business interest income for such taxable year and (ii) 30% of the taxpayer’s adjusted taxable income for such taxable year. Section 163(j)(2) provides that disallowed interest expense may be carried forward to future taxable years (such carryovers, “Section 163(j) Carryovers”). Section 382(d)(3) treats Section 163(j) Carryovers as pre-change losses under rules similar to those contained in section 382(d)(1).

Because Section 163(j) Carryovers are generally treated as pre-change losses, the Proposed Regulations provide that interest expense arising from the utilization of Section 163(j) Carryovers during the Recognition Period will not give rise to a RBIL (in order to ensure that the same expense will not be limited twice under section 382—once as a pre-change loss and a second time as a RBIL item).

Furthermore, for purposes of determining a loss corporation’s NUBIG/NUBIL and RBIG/RBIL, the Proposed Regulations provide that a loss corporation’s tax basis in a partnership interest that is held by the loss corporation is increased by the Section 163(j) Carryovers that are attributable to such partnership interest.4 This ensures that (i) interest expense arising during the Recognition Period from the utilization of such Section 163(j) Carryovers or (ii) a future loss from the sale of the partnership interest occurring within the Recognition Period, in each case, will be treated as RBIL.

Treasury and the IRS have solicited comments from practitioners as to whether interest expense that is suspended under section 704(d) should also be treated as RBIL.

Effective Date of Proposed Regulations

The Proposed Regulations are proposed to be effective for ownership changes occurring after the date that the Proposed Regulations are finalized. However, loss corporations may elect to apply the Proposed Regulations to ownership changes occurring prior to the date that the Proposed Regulations are published as final Treasury regulations. Loss corporations may continue to apply the Notice and the Section 338 Approach with respect to ownership changes occurring prior to the date that the Proposed Regulations are finalized.

Impact of Proposed Regulations

The Proposed Regulations, viewed together with the TCJA’s limitation on the utilization of post-2018 NOLs to 80% of a corporation’s taxable income, have significantly reduced the value of a loss corporation’s tax attribute carryforwards, which will impact how such carryforwards are viewed in the context of both mergers and acquisitions and restructurings.

In particular, the Section 338 Approach historically permitted many acquirers of loss corporations with built-in gain assets to use pre-change NOLs of a loss corporation far more quickly than they could have used such NOLs under section 382 or the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder. However, in light of the Proposed Regulations’ elimination of the Section 338 Approach, buyers of loss corporations will need to carefully consider and model out the impact of section 382 and the Proposed Regulations on the loss corporation’s ability to utilize its tax attribute carryforwards post-acquisition. Furthermore, if a seller asks a buyer to pay up-front for a target’s tax attributes, the buyer will need to consider the impact of sections 382 and the Proposed Regulations when determining the value that it will ascribe to the target’s tax attributes. The Proposed Regulations, together with the limitation on the utilization of post-2018 NOL carryforwards, will also further incentivize buyers of loss corporations to attempt to acquire the assets of the loss corporation (or to make an election under section 338(h)(10) in connection with the acquisition of the stock of a loss corporation from a member of a consolidated tax group) in order to obtain additional depreciation and amortization deductions as a result of a tax basis step-up in the assets of the loss corporation in lieu of inheriting its section 382-limited NOL carryforwards.

Additionally, with respect to loss corporations that are under the jurisdiction of the court in a title 11 or similar case, the Proposed Regulations may, in certain situations, make it more attractive for a loss corporation to structure into, and elect into the application of, section 382(l)(5) (which generally provides that the section 382 limitation shall not apply to an ownership change if (i) immediately before the ownership change, the loss corporation is under the jurisdiction of the court in a title 11 or similar case and (ii) former shareholders and “qualified creditors” of the loss corporation own 50% or more of the loss corporation’s stock immediately after the ownership change as a result of being shareholders or creditors immediately before the ownership change).5 In addition, the Proposed Regulations may, in certain situations, make the acquisition of a financially distressed loss corporation through a taxable asset transaction (i.e., a so-called Bruno’s transaction) more attractive. In these transactions, a buyer will forego the use of the loss corporation’s NOL carryforwards (which would otherwise be subject to limitation under section 382 and subject to reduction under section 108(b)) in order to generate depreciation and amortization deductions post-acquisition as a result of the tax basis step-up in the acquired assets.

Finally, the Proposed Regulations may impact whether a loss corporation will make an election to reduce its tax basis in its assets in order to create (or preserve) tax attributes, including (i) the election under section 108(b)(5) to reduce the tax basis of depreciable property by excluded COD income prior to reducing NOL carryforwards and (ii) the section 168(k) bonus depreciation election.

Footnote

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all “section” references are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The TCJA is officially known as “An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018,” Public Law No. 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (2017).

2 The Proposed Regulations provide that if a contingent liability is reflected on the face of the most recently issued “applicable financial statement,” within the meaning of section 451(b)(3) and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, then the estimated value of a liability is the amount of such liability reflected on the most recent applicable financial statement as of the date of the ownership change.

3 This COD income should correspondingly be treated as a RBIG. Although the preamble to the Proposed Regulations provides that any reduction to the tax basis of assets should be treated as occurring prior to the ownership change for both NUBIG/NUBIL and RBIG/RBIL purposes, the text of the Proposed Regulations does not appear to reduce the tax basis of the assets of the loss corporation to which the tax basis reduction was applicable for RBIG/RBIL purposes. The IRS should clarify that this COD income will be treated as a RBIG when the Proposed Regulations are finalized.

4 This is adjustment is achieved by treating the loss corporation as if it had disposed of a partnership interest held by it immediately before the ownership change, resulting in an adjustment its tax basis in such interest under section 163(j)(4)(b)(iii).

5 However, the loss corporation will need to take into account the interest expense haircut rules set forth in section 382(l)(5)(B) and the limitation on a second ownership change contained in section 382(l)(5)(D).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions