United States: Public Relations Considerations When Managing A Crisis

Global Crisis Management Series: This post is part 10 in a series concerning topics further elaborated on in Cleary Gottlieb's Global Crisis Management Handbook—a desk reference for spotting issues and avoiding common mistakes when faced with a crisis. The current version is available here.

In an increasingly global, regulated, and litigious environment, companies face unanticipated and potentially destabilizing events that often play out in the public eye. Frequently, the issues organizations face during large-scale, often public, crises require more than exclusively legal skills, but also communications skills. Below we discuss three key steps in the process for handling the public relations aspects of any crisis: (1) assembling a crisis-response team, (2) deciding whether or not to make a public statement, and (3) crafting the public message.

Assembling a Crisis-Response Team

Even before a crisis arises, it is important to assemble a crisis-response team. While there is no "one size fits all" approach that works for every situation, we discuss two main considerations when deciding who to include on the crisis-response team: (1) internal stakeholders and (2) external assistance.

1. Internal Stakeholders.

The first members of the crisis-response team should represent a cross-section of the organization—including senior management, the general counsel's office, compliance, and senior members of the marketing, public relations and investor relations groups. This group will ensure that the company's messaging is consistent across the organization, and that every potential audience (including governmental authorities, the public, and other employees at the company) is taken into account. Team members should also reflect considerations specific to each crisis. For example, if one subsidiary is prominently involved in a crisis, the response team should include senior members from that subsidiary, which will promote consistent messaging company-wide.

In some situations, especially those implicating senior management or involving certain types of conduct, it may make sense to have an audit committee or potentially a special board committee that can act as an independent entity to oversee the investigation and manage the crisis.

2. External Assistance.

Once a crisis hits, the next decision is whether to retain outside legal counsel and public relations consultants to help handle the public response. For example, simple matters, such as possible violations caused by rogue, low-level employees caught early by internal compliance, may not ever require a public response. Ultimately, like the decision to retain outside counsel generally in an investigation, the decision turns on factors such as the complexity of the issues and nature of the exposure, including additional potential consequences. Of course, if a situation calls for outside assistance, the quicker they are involved, the sooner they can help with messaging.

When hiring public relations consultants, it is important to consider issues related to privilege. Under the Kovel doctrine, in many circumstances, communications with the agents of attorneys are as protected as communications with attorneys themselves.1 This applies when attorneys retain a public relations firm to assist specifically with managing issues related to litigation.2 Therefore, in order to protect privilege to the fullest extent possible, a company should consider having outside counsel directly retain any public relations firm.

Deciding Whether to Make a Public Statement

When a company is facing a large-scale crisis, another early step is to determine what to say and when to say it. These considerations should encompass both legal and practical concerns. For example, in certain circumstances, business considerations to rebuild trust in a community or within a consumer base in the present might outweigh concerns about the possibility of follow-on lawsuits or investigations in the future. We address three important considerations when deciding whether and when to make a public statement: (1) the way in which the crisis arose, (2) the status of the investigation and information available, and (3) the legal disclosure duties that apply.

1. How did the crisis arise?

The manner in which a crisis arises can influence the optimal response—a Wells Notice, for example, may lead to a careful, more deliberate disclosure of an investigation than an investigation arising from a high-profile public incident or indictment.

When an investigation stems from a highly-publicized event, one strategy is to quickly make strong assurances that the issue is being addressed, instead of letting bad news trickle out over time. Such a strategy helps the company shape the narrative and express appropriate concern about the matter.

But, keep in mind: this strategy is harder to execute if an organization lacks information and the investigation is still in its early stages. Under those circumstances, a generic statement acknowledging the situation but avoiding comment on the facts may be more appropriate. For example, days after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP made the first of multiple statements regarding the flow rate of the leak.3 When BP eventually settled with the SEC, the settlement noted that BP failed to update the initial flow rate disclosure despite data indicating that the flow rate was many times higher than BP initially specified.4 A delay until the investigation concluded or an update after obtaining additional information could have prevented this scenario.

2. What is the status of the investigation, and how much remains unknown?

Even when a crisis does not arise in a public way, getting out in front of the story with a forceful statement or even a more limited disclosure can help. Early messaging can allow a company to control the story, mitigate the impact of later bad news, and "creat[e] a climate in which prosecutors and regulators might feel freer to act in ways less antagonistic."5

In deciding whether to play offense with a preemptive statement, an organization should consider the status of the investigation and the availability of information. If a company makes a premature disclosure early in an investigation, the disclosure could add political and public fuel to an investigation that otherwise would have run its course. Making a statement when the underlying facts and the outcome are uncertain could also exacerbate the situation. Early statements based on incomplete information could expose the company to potential liability for misleading statements, or create a potential future duty to disclose or update.

3. What, if any, legal disclosure duties apply?

The decision whether to make a disclosure may also depend on which regulatory regimes apply. After identifying the applicable rules, an organization should plan a response in light of the potential duties by which it is bound.

Issues about disclosure often arise with respect to government investigations. The fact of an investigation may not require disclosure, and in many instances, the investigating authority may demand or request that a company not do so.6 Of course, it is critical to consult with experienced counsel about potential disclosure obligations.

In certain circumstances, public companies have a duty to disclose material information about investigations. For companies subject to the SEC's jurisdiction, the SEC has promulgated various reporting requirements for public companies to follow in their filings. Below is a brief summary of the most pertinent Regulation S-K items that relate specifically to disclosing material information about regulatory investigations.

  • Regulation S-K Item 103 requires a company to "[d]escribe briefly any material pending legal proceedings . . . known to be contemplated by governmental authorities."7 However, this standard only requires the disclosure of imminent There is no duty to disclose litigation that is not "substantially certain to occur."8 For example, receiving a subpoena or a Wells Notice about an SEC investigation does not necessarily trigger a disclosure requirement—that is, the fact of an investigation does not need to be disclosed.9
  • Regulation S-K Item 401(f) requires that in identifying and describing the background of its directors, registrants must describe certain events that are "material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of any director, person nominated to become a director or executive officer of the registrant."10 Included in the definition of such events is whether the person is "a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding."11
  • Regulation S-K Item 503(c)12 applies to prospectuses in securities offerings and is incorporated into periodic filings by Item 1A of the instructions to Forms 10-K and 10-Q. It requires a discussion of the most significant risk factors a company faces. Regulation S-K Item 30313 is a similarly broad regulation which also imposes a duty to "[d]escribe any known trends or uncertainties that have had or that the registrant reasonably expects will have a material favorable or unfavorable impact on net sales or revenues or income from continuing operations."14 As such, in one instance, a court permitted claims to go forward for a failure to disclose ongoing criminal and civil investigations impacting a company's operations and financials.15

Beyond formal regulations, case law in the United States has created additional requirements for public companies to correct or update prior communications in certain situations. A duty to correct previous communications may arise when the issuer of the statement discovers that the statement was inaccurate or misleading when made.16 Similarly, even if a company's statements are accurate when made, a duty to update explicit or implicit forward-looking statements may arise if the circumstances change and the statements become inaccurate or misleading. Companies should be cautious when making early statements to avoid the need to provide updates later once additional facts come to light.

Crafting the Public Message

If an organization facing a crisis decides to issue a public statement, the next step is to consider how to craft the message, keeping in mind certain legal and practical considerations. Below are do's and don'ts when crafting a public message.


  • Deliver a Consistent Message. While nuance and tone may shape the delivery and content of each message for the corresponding audience, the messages must remain consistent.
  • Focus on Past and Present Policies. Explain how new policies will prevent similar occurrences in the future, and how the company has always been committed to avoiding such instances.
  • Tailor to Applicable Legal Requirements. Statements should be carefully evaluated by counsel before they are made public. As noted above, if a public company subject to U.S. securities laws makes "misleading" statements, even if those statements are technically true or express only opinions regarding the company's compliance with laws, those statements can form the basis of separate legal action.
  • Be Explicit. To avoid potentially misleading prospective buyers, be explicit in disclosures about existing subpoenas and ongoing investigations.


  • Contradict Settlement Agreements. While it may be tempting to issue a statement denying wrongdoing by implying that the company always maintained certain standards and practices, be careful: regulators may force a company to withdraw such strongly-worded post-settlement statements, which undermines the company's credibility. Even a statement after a resolution on a no-admit-or-deny basis as mild as "we have maintained our standards, in market share as well as our reputation, in my view" has come under scrutiny.17
  • Unnecessarily Place Blame. In some cases, it may be necessary to explain what happened. But, often, trying to shift blame too blatantly backfires. For example, when Mylan came under scrutiny for its pricing of the EpiPen, its initial strategy of attempting to deflect blame broadly onto the healthcare system stoked the fire before antitrust charges.18
  • Make Predictions. A disclosure about an ongoing investigation should not predict its outcome. As noted, even statements regarding potential risks and next steps should only be included with care. If forward-looking statements are included, they should be paired with adequate and meaningful cautionary statements, to obtain protection under the "safe harbor" in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.


1. United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918 (2d Cir. 1961).

2. In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 265 F. Supp. 2d at 332; Haugh v. Schroder Inv. Mgmt. N. Am. Inc., No. 02 Civ. 7955 (DLC), 2003 WL 21998674, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2003).

3. Press Release, Sec. Exch. Comm'n., BP to Pay $525 Million Penalty to Settle SEC Charges of Securities Fraud During Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (Nov. 15, 2012), https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2012-2012-231htm.

4. Id.

5. In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 24, 2003 Directed to (A) Grand Jury Witness Firm and (B) Grand Jury Witness, 265 F. Supp. 2d 321, 326 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

6. Criminal grand-jury investigations, for example, proceed in secrecy. Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B).

7. 17 C.F.R. § 229.103.

8. In re Lions Gate Entm't Corp. Sec. Litig., 165 F. Supp. 3d 1, 12 (S.D.N.Y. 2016).

9. Id.; Richman v. Goldman Sachs Grp., Inc., 868 F. Supp. 2d 261, 273-74 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); see also City of Westland Police and Fire Ret. Sys. v. MetLife, Inc., 928 F. Supp. 2d 705, 718 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

10. 17 C.F.R. § 229.401(f).

11. Id.

12. 17 C.F.R. § 229.503.

13. Id.

14. Ind. Pub. Ret. Sys. v. SAIC, Inc., 818 F.3d 85, 94 (2d Cir. 2016) (citing 17 C.F.R. § 229.303(a)(3)(ii)), cert. granted sub nom. Leidos, Inc. v. Indiana Pub. Ret. Sys., 137 S. Ct. 1395 (2017), cert. dismissed, No. 16-581 (R46-032), 2018 WL 3026583 at *1 (U.S. June 18, 2018).

15. Id.

16. Vacold LLC v. Cerami, 545 F.3d 114, 121 (2d Cir. 2008); Backman v. Polaroid Corp., 910 F.2d 10, 16-17 (1st Cir. 1990) (en banc).

17. Robert Khuzami, Testimony on "Examining the Settlement Practices of U.S. Financial Regulators," Sec. Exch. Comm'n (May 17, 2012), https://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2012-ts051712rkhtm#P77_13677. See also Floyd Norris, Morgan Stanley Draws S.E.C.'s Ire, N.Y. Times (May 2, 2003), https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/02/business/morgan-stanley-draws-sec-s-ire.html.

18. Charles Duhigg, Outcry Over EpiPen Prices Hasn't Made Them Lower, N.Y. Times (June 4, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/business/angry-about-epipen-prices-executive-dont-care-much.html.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions