United States: Wealth Management Update - August 2019

August 2019 Interest Rates for GRATs, Sales to Defective Grantor Trusts, Intra-Family Loans and Split Interest Charitable Trusts AFRs

Important federal interest rates continued to drop for August 2019. The August applicable federal rate ("AFR") for use with a sale to a defective grantor trust, self-canceling installment note ("SCIN") or intra-family loan with a note having a duration of 3-9 years (the mid-term rate, compounded annually) is 1.87%, down from 2.08% in July.

The August Section 7520 rate for use with estate planning techniques such as CRTs, CLTs, QPRTs and GRATs is 2.2%, down from 2.6% in July.

The AFRs (based on annual compounding) used in connection with intra-family loans are 1.91% for loans with a term of 3 years or less, 1.87% for loans with a term between 3 and 9 years, and 2.33% for loans with a term of longer than 9 years. With the mid-term rate now less than the short-term rate, clients will likely prefer the mid-term rate in their estate planning transactions.

Thus, for example, if a 9-year loan is made to a child, and the child can invest the funds and obtain a return in excess of 1.87%, the child will be able to keep any returns over 1.87%. These same rates are used in connection with sales to defective grantor trusts.

Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 18-70565 (June 21, 2019)

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit has affirmed an estate tax deficiency with respect to the undervaluation of art by a qualified appraiser.

Eva Franzen Kollsman, a resident of New York, died testate and named Jeffrey Hyland, a family member, as Executor. In addition to acting as Executor, Mr. Hyland was also the beneficiary under Ms. Kollman's Will of two 17th century Old Master oil paintings. Mr. Hyland did not wish to retain the paintings, so he hired Sotheby's to sell them at auction.

An employee of Sotheby's had seen the paintings prior to Ms. Kollsman's death, and, based thereon, provided a written estimate of the predicted sales price: $600K-$800K for one painting ("Painting One") and $100K-$150K for the other painting ("Painting Two"). Thereafter, the same Sotheby's employee then inspected the paintings and provided a second letter that was to supersede the first letter (the "Second Letter"). The new sales predictions were $500K for Painting One and $100K for Painting Two. The second letter was eventually attached to Ms. Kollsman's estate tax return as evidence of the value of the paintings.

Mr. Hyland wanted frames for the paintings, so he hired a restoration company that frequently worked with Sotheby's. A representative of the restoration company said that the paintings were dirty with nicotine and heavy surface dirt but could safely and easily be cleaned. In fact, one of the paintings looked like it had already been cleaned.

Painting One eventually sold at auction for $2.4M, which triggered the IRS deficiency.

The Estate defended the Second Letter and the disparity between the appraised value and the purchase price by making several arguments against the imposition of the deficiency. First, the Estate emphasized the dirty quality of Painting One at the time that it was appraised. The Court responded that a hypothetical buyer of the level of sophistication that would buy a piece of art like Painting One would know that Painting One could be cleaned, which would result in a significant increase in value.

Second, the Estate argued that, after Ms. Wollman's date of death, there was an increase in demand for Old Master paintings. The Court pointed out that there was, in general, no increase in the sales prices of Old Master paintings at Sotheby's between Ms. Wollman's date of death and the sale of Painting One, which suggested that demand was not, in fact, greater. Also, Sotheby's documents filed with the SEC actually contradicted the Estate's contention.

The Court took issue with (i) the absence of comparables presented by the Estate's experts and (ii) the opinion of the Estate's experts that comparables were not important in valuing art.

Famiglio v. Famiglio, [TBD] So.3d [TBD] (May 10, 2019)

The Florida Court of Appeals held that a provision in a prenuptial agreement providing for a lump sum payment based on the date of the filing of a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage (a "Petition") could refer to a previously filed Petition that did not culminate in a divorce, provided that a Petition were eventually filed that did result in a divorce.

An engaged couple signed a prenuptial agreement before their 2006 wedding (the "Agreement"), which provided for a lump sum alimony payment depending on number of years of marriage. Specifically, Section 5.3 of the Agreement stated, "Mark shall pay to Jennie, within 90 days of the date either party files a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage the amount listed below next to the number of full years they have been married at the time a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage is filed." If Mark and Jennie were married for seven full years but less than ten full years, the amount was $2.7 million, and if they were married for ten full years, Jennie would receive $4.2 million.

In 2013, Jennie filed a Petition but never served it on Mark and eventually dismissed the Petition. However, in 2016, Jennie filed another Petition, at which point the parties had been married for ten full years. She did not dismiss the second Petition.

Mark filed a construction proceeding, claiming that the first Petition in 2013 was the operative year with respect to the measurement for the alimony payment. Jennie argued that the 2016 Petition controlled the provision because that was the Petition that resulted in the dissolution of the marriage.

The trial court held for Jennie, saying that there was no ambiguity in the Agreement and that it was clear that Mark's obligations thereunder would only arise after an actual dissolution of marriage. The trial court further opined that no rights arose from the mere filing of a Petition and that the use of "a" vs. "the" in modifying the word "petition" was unpersuasive. According to the trial court, the word "a" is obviously different from the word "the"; however, the Agreement must be looked at as a whole, and, when read as a whole, must be interpreted to only take effect if the marriage is actually dissolved because anything else would lead to absurd results. For example, Mark could have just filed and immediately withdrawn a Petition right after the parties got married, just to reserve the smallest alimony payment possible in the event the parties ever divorced. Conversely, Jennie could file and withdraw a Petition every year and receive a separate lump sum payment after each Petition.

Mark appealed, and the trial court's decision was reviewed de novo. The District Court of Appeals of Florida emphasized that the choice of the word "a" was of paramount importance because "a" is an indefinite article and is intended to indicate that the noun it modifies (here, "Petition") is unidentified or unspecified. The Court recognized that the provision was drafted to refer to just one Petition and that the alimony would only be payable if the parties were to eventually divorce, but said that the language used in the Agreement did not identify which Petition should be used to determine the length of the marriage, which would subsequently determine the lump sum payment.

The Court opined that the use of the word "a" may have been intentional on Mark's part. Furthermore, the Court criticized the trial court's use of the concept of absurdity and the use of examples because it is always possible to devise absurd interpretations of plain language while using hypotheticals. The Court used a golf metaphor in its analysis, stating that predicating an event on an occurrence is normally understood to mean the first time that that thing occurs. Golf courses usually have a rule that when a thunderstorm approaches, you must end your golf game, and that rule is universally understood to refer to the first clap of thunder and not any clap of thunder of the golfer's choosing.

In Re Rensin, 600 B.R. 870 (May 3, 2019)

The Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida held that Florida law applied to and that creditors could reach all assets of a foreign, self-settled trust, and that a bankruptcy estate would include exempt assets that were purchased with non-exempt assets with the intent to hinder creditors.

Joseph Rensin formed the Joren Trust, an irrevocable, self-settled, spendthrift trust that was governed by the laws of the Cook Islands (the "Trust").

Rensin founded a company many years after the Trust was created. The Federal Trade Commission filed suit against the company for defrauding retail customers.

While the suit was pending, Rensin purchased and sold several residences in Maryland, his home state, in quick succession. Eventually, he used the proceeds from the sale of one of the Maryland homes to purchase a residence in Florida.

A judgment was eventually entered into against Rensin for almost $14 million. A few months later, Rensin, individually, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Code. His only listed asset in the bankruptcy schedules was a bank account holding the proceeds from a fixed annuity owned by the Trust. He did, however, disclose his beneficial interest in the Trust. At the time, the Trust's only assets were two annuities payable to Rensin, but one of the annuities had not yet started, which meant that the Trustee could cancel the annuity.

Rensin also wanted to exempt from the bankruptcy estate his home in Florida as his homestead. Rensin claimed that he used assets from other exempt assets (residences) to purchase the home, but the bankruptcy trustee successfully argued that the pattern of buying and selling homes constituted the use of non-exempt assets to purchase the home with intent to hinder creditors. Therefore, the Florida home formed part of the bankruptcy estate.

Under Florida law, choice of law in a contract (or trust) is upheld unless it offends Florida public policy. Florida public policy strongly disfavors asset protection trusts, and Florida law will not enforce a spendthrift trust designed to permit a person to place his assets beyond the reach of creditors. Therefore, Florida law applied to all provisions of trust, and, under Florida law, notwithstanding spendthrift a provision in a trust, creditors can reach maximum amount of trust assets that could be distributed to or for the Settlor's benefit. If distributions to the Settlor are fully discretionary, creditors have the same rights as if the trust were never created. Because this was a fully discretionary trust, the Trust formed part of the bankruptcy estate.

Nonetheless, only the remainder interest of the annuity, the start date of which had commenced, was includible in the bankruptcy estate because (i) annuity proceeds are exempt assets and (ii) the annuity that had not yet started could be cancelled by the Trustee of the Trust at any point prior to the start date. The bankruptcy trustee's claim that the annuities were purchased to hinder creditors was rejected because the Trustee of the Trust, and not Rensin, purchased the annuities.

Wealth Management Update - August 2019

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions