Worldwide: A U.S.-Style Regime For Class Action Litigation Looms Large In The EU

Multinational corporations operating in the United States and abroad encounter complex and dispositive legal frameworks that govern not only substantive rights, but also procedural rules that dictate who may assert such rights and, importantly, on whose behalf they may be asserted. Most businesses operating in the United States are, unfortunately, all too familiar with its class action device available in state and federal courts. Indeed, the 1966 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—the rules governing procedure in civil cases litigated in federal courts in the United States—brought with them the modern articulation of the procedural rule governing class actions: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. And while state courts have adopted their own individualized class action procedures, they commonly look to federal law for guidance.

In the intervening five decades, class action filings increased exponentially in the United States, bulwarked by the potential for crushing aggregate monetary damages, classwide injunctive relief and significant attorneys' fees (while the Unites States generally does not have looser pay rules for attorneys' fees, successful class actions are one exception). These cases are often filed by individuals, such as consumers or employees challenging purported conduct on behalf of all others "similarly situated." The rise in litigation was met with judicial and legislative reformations in class action procedure. On the judicial side, federal courts have become increasingly vigilant in their efforts to ensure that plaintiffs strictly comply with the class Rule 23's certification requirements. As for legislation, Congress passed the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005) (CAFA), which relaxed some of the requirements defendants face to access federal courts, which are perceived to be better venues, in class action lawsuits. Nevertheless, enterprising plaintiffs' lawyers and their counsel leverage the class action device to put substantial pressure on businesses to consider settlement of claims, even where there are valid and potentially dispositive defenses. The defense costs alone can be significant, the potential exposure great and the sensitivities and disruption to the business that accompany litigation of this magnitude considerable.

Across the Atlantic, collective redress litigation has not yet taken hold in the same fashion, at least in part because there is serious disparity in the processes and procedures available in the different European Union Member States. But that may very soon be changing. At a time when lawmakers in the United States are increasingly focused on reeling in frivolous litigation, the EU is considering an overhaul and expansion of the current (very limited) Unionwide collective action regime. See Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Representative Actions for the Protection of the Collective Interests of Consumers, and Repealing Directive 2009/22/EC, available here (the "Proposal"). The Proposal has gained increased momentum, with consumer groups, such as the Bureau Europeen des Unions de Consommateurs, endorsing it.

Further, on March 26, 2019, the Plenary (the whole EU Parliament) adopted its position of the Proposal. See Representative Actions for the Protection of the Collective Interests of Consumers ("Parliament's Position"). Now that the elections have concluded, the Council of the European Union next will consider the Proposal and Parliament's Position.

The Injunctions Directive, the Proposal and the Parliament's Position

Since 1998, the European Union has required its Member States to make collective redress available through representative actions for injunctive relief brought by qualified entities designated by the Member States, such as consumer organizations or independent public bodies (pursuant to Directive 2009/22/EC (as amended), known as the "Injunctions Directive"). There has been no Unionwide regime for other forms of collective remedy such as damages by way of compensation, however, and so the Injunctions Directive has been regarded by the European Commission as inadequate for some time. Although a number of Member States (including, perhaps most notably, the U.K. and Netherlands) have their own established regimes for collective compensatory actions, there is a great divergence in the availability and nature of the regimes in each member state. In fact, some Member States have no compensatory regimes at all (and therefore no class actions comparable to those in the United States).

The Proposal, which was first issued in April 2018, passed by the European Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee just last December, and by the EU Plenary (in the Parliament's Position) in March 2019, seeks to "modernise and replace" the Injunctions Directive with a regime that will enhance the protection afforded to consumers under EU law. To that end, the collective action regimes already available in individual Member States will not be replaced. Instead, the legislation provides an expanded framework for specific representative actions that would be implemented at Member State level so that consumers in all Member States will benefit from at least one similar mechanism Unionwide. Under the Proposal, this Unionwide framework would:

  1. Enable compensatory redress by empowering "qualified entities to bring representative actions seeking different types of measures as appropriate, depending on the circumstances of the case." Id at 3. "These include interim or definitive measures to stop and prohibit a trader's practice, if it is considered an infringement of the law, and measures eliminating the continuing effects of the infringement." Id. "The latter could include redress orders and declaratory decisions establishing the trader's liability towards the consumers harmed by the infringements." Id.
  2. Expand the sectoral scope of the regime "to cover other horizontal and sector-specific EU instruments relevant for the protection of collective interests of consumers in different economic sectors such as financial services, energy, telecommunications, health and the environment." Id. at 2–3.
  3. "[B]uild on the approach of the current Injunctions Directive" in respect of the "'qualified entities' designated by the Member States to bring representative actions." Id. at 3. "[T]hese qualified entities will have to satisfy minimum reputational criteria (they must be properly established, not for profit and have a legitimate interest in ensuring compliance with EU law)." Id. In addition, "[f]or compensatory collective redress actions, qualified entities would also be required to disclose to the courts or administrative authorities their financial capacity and the origin of their funds supporting the action." Id. And "courts and administrative authorities will be empowered to assess the arrangements for third party funding." Id.
  4. Require "Member States to ensure 'due expediency' of procedures and to avoid procedural costs becoming a financial obstacle to bringing representative actions." Id. Under the Proposal, this would be achieved by ensuring consumers are "adequately informed of the outcome of representative actions and how they will benefit from them." Id. The Proposal also "promotes collective out-of-court settlements, subject to court or administrative authority scrutiny." Finally, "[f]inal decisions of a court or authority establishing that a trader has infringed the law will be irrefutable evidence in redress actions (within the same Member State) or a rebuttable presumption that the infringement has occurred (for cases brought in another Member State)." Id.

The Proposal and the Parliament's Position are largely overlapping, although not identical. The Proposal explains that, "[a]s a rule, qualified entities should be entitled to bring representative actions seeking a redress order, which obligates the trader to provide for, inter alia, compensation, repair, replacement, price reduction, contract termination or reimbursement of the price paid, as appropriate." Id.; see also Parliament's Position, No. 60 (similar). However, the Proposal also acknowledges that it will be "necessary to provide flexibility to the Member States in cases where the quantification of the harm of the consumers concerned by the representative action is complex due to the characteristics of their individual harm." Id. In such cases, under the Proposal, but not the Parliament's Position, Member States may be entitled to "empower courts or administrative authorities to decide whether to issue, instead of a redress order, a declaratory decision regarding the liability of the trader towards the consumers harmed by an infringement of Union law, which may be directly relied upon in subsequent redress actions." Id. Notably, however, the Proposal states that such "flexibility" would be inappropriate in so-called "'low-value cases' where a number of consumers have suffered such a small amount of loss that it would be disproportionate or impracticable to distribute the redress back to the consumers." Id. In these cases, redress would be "directed to a public purpose to serve the collective interests of consumers." Id. The Parliament's Position omits these directives.

Looking Ahead

While the Proposal/Parliament's Position import from the United States the availability of class actions seeking monetary damages, it is not yet clear whether any of the associated procedural safeguards found in Rule 23 will be imported too—either by the EU in any final directive, or in national legislation when implemented by each Member State. Certainly, the Proposal and the Parliament's Position do not appear to consider many of the lessons that could be learned from class actions in the United States.

Specifically, Rule 23 requires plaintiffs to establish that their action is properly adjudicated as a class action before any questions regarding classwide liability are resolved. In every putative class action seeking monetary relief, plaintiffs must establish, among other things, (1) a numerous class that makes joinder impracticable; (2) "questions of law or fact common to the class"; (3) that the plaintiff's claims are "typical" of the class claims; and (4) that the plaintiff will "fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class." Rule 23(a)(1)-(4). In addition, the majority of putative class actions seeking monetary relief must also show "[1] that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and [2] that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy." Rule 23(b)(3).

As for counsel in class actions in the United States, they too are required to seek appointment from the court, which must also approve any payment of attorneys' fees. See Rule 23(g)-(h). Finally, class action settlements in federal courts in the United States include robust notice requirements that provide members of any putative class with rights to opt out of the proceedings and, where a class is settled, class members are permitted an opportunity to lodge objections to the agreement. See Rule 23(c)(2) and Rule 23(e). At every step, courts are required to vigorously enforce these requirements.

The EU, by contrast, is considering no such requirements (at least not expressly). Instead, the Proposal claims that the "qualified entity" requirement "is a strong safeguard against frivolous actions." Proposal at 4. The Parliament's Position includes no additional protections. And as many commentators have cautioned, the "qualified entity" requirement, like its predecessor, may do little more than serve a pro forma purpose, and that the requirement will not meaningfully deter, much less prevent attempts to abuse the collective action procedure.

Similarly, the Proposal says little about when consumers will need to be alerted to or involved in actions that might concern them. It does specify, however, that qualified entities would be able to seek injunctions without having "to obtain the mandate of the individual consumers concerned or provide proof of actual loss or damage on the part of the consumers concerned or of intention or negligence on the part of the trader" Id. at 28, Art. 5 ¶ 2; accord Parliament's Position, No. 55 (similar). And where "consumers have suffered a small amount of loss and it would be disproportionate to distribute the redress to them" [i.e., "low-value cases"], Member States would be required to "ensure that the mandate of the individual consumers concerned is not required." Id. at 29, Art. 6 ¶ 3(b) (emphasis added); but see Parliament's Position, No. 64 (deleting Art. 6 ¶ 3). Accordingly, unlike the strict requirements for notice and right to opt out of class actions in the United States, consumers in the European Union may in some instances (and depending on how any directive is ultimately implemented in each Member State) be represented by "qualified entities" regardless of the consumers' knowledge or consent to the action—and possibly without any proof of damage.

Finally, attorneys' fees in these collective actions is not meaningfully addressed. There are some restrictions proposed regarding third party funding, and qualified entities are required to be "not for profit," but it is not clear whether this operating status would have an impact on the ability of these entities to seek and recover significant fees in the prosecution of these actions. As for costs, the Proposal would not impact national rules regarding cost allocation, while the Parliament's Position would shift costs onto the unsuccessful party. See Parliament's Position, No. 4.

If implemented in its current form, there is a risk that the EU would only import what many believe to be the most frustrating aspect of the United States class action system: that often the true beneficiaries of the cases are the lawyers who file them. This is particularly notable in light of the fact that references to an excessive class action litigation environment in the United States were made while in committee. While the legislation awaits review and approval by the European Council, some form of the new directive is likely to be codified as law within the EU. Businesses would be wise to stay abreast of developments, in addition to amendments expected elsewhere in the European Union, as Member States continue to grapple with these important issues.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions