United States: An Eye On Workplace Harassment Liability In NYC

Previously published in Law360, New York (May 21, 2009)

In recent months, a federal district court judge and a New York state court appellate judge have held that the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL") should be more liberally construed than its federal and state counterparts, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State Human Rights Law.

In Zakrzewska v. The New School, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5183 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), the court held that there is strict liability for supervisory harassment and that the long-standing Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense does not apply to claims brought under the NYCHRL.

In another recent decision, Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, 872 N.Y.S.2d 27 (1st Dept. 2009), the court effectively lowered the burden for plaintiffs to establish a hostile work environment claim from demonstrating that the conduct was "severe and pervasive" to simply showing that they were treated "less well" than other employees.

Both decisions dramatically increase potential liability under the NYCHRL for employers who have operations in New York City and raise questions for all employers nationwide as to the applicability of well-settled federal standards to state and local laws.

In Zakrzewska v. The New School, the U.S. Court for the Southern District of New York held that New York City employers accused of sexual harassment under the NYCHRL are not entitled to an affirmative defense initially set forth by the Supreme Court in Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) and Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998).

The now familiar Faragher/Ellerth defense negates employer liability for harassment claims when the employee has not suffered a tangible employment action and the employer demonstrates that (1) it took reasonable steps to prevent or promptly correct the alleged harassment; and (2) the plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer to avoid harm.

This defense has proven to be a powerful tool for employers faced with harassment claims, particularly in situations when an employee files a claim of harassment at the point of employment termination, having never notified the employer of the alleged harassment while employed despite well-published procedures to address discriminatory harassment.

Although the Zakrzewska court opined that the employer had established a factual basis for a Faragher/Ellerth defense because it had in place and disseminated an effective harassment policy, took reasonable steps to investigate the complaint and the plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered by the employer, the court held that the defense did not apply to claims raised under the NYCHRL.

In so holding, the court reviewed the language of the NYCHRL, which it construed to impose vicarious liability on an employer for discriminatory acts of (1) a manager or supervisor, without regard to whether the employer knew or should have known of the acts, and (2) a co-worker, provided the employer, or a manager or supervisor knew of and acquiesced to, or should have known of the co-worker's acts.

The court held that the plain language of the NYCHRL is inconsistent with the Faragher/Ellerth defense because the statute creates vicarious liability for the acts of managerial and supervisory employees even where the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct any discriminatory actions and even where the aggrieved employee unreasonably has failed to take advantage of employer-offered corrective opportunities.

Likewise, it provides for employer liability for the discriminatory acts of co-workers in like circumstances provided only that a manager or supervisory employee should have known of the unlawful conduct and failed to take reasonable preventative measures.

Finding the Faragher/Ellerth defense inapplicable to claims brought under the NYCHRL, the court denied the employer's motion for summary judgment. Notably, the court recognized the significance of its findings and that its determination was "not free from doubt" and certified the decision for interlocutory appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

In Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, the Appellate Division lowered the threshold for plaintiffs to establish hostile work environment claims under the NYCHRL from the well settled "severe and pervasive" standard to whether the plaintiff has been treated "less well" than other employees.

In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), the Supreme Court determined that, to prevail on a workplace harassment claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the harassment is sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment.

The Supreme Court has characterized this requirement as a "middle path" between making actionable any conduct that is merely offensive and requiring the conduct to cause a tangible psychological injury, as some earlier judicial decisions had held.

The Williams court concluded that this middle path approach was too restrictive under the NYCHRL, as amended by the 2005 Civil Rights Restoration Act, because it effectively "sanctioned a significant spectrum of conduct demeaning to women" and was therefore inconsistent with the NYCHRL's "uniquely broad and remedial purposes."

The Williams departure from federal and state precedent is based on the Restoration Act, which amended the NYCHRL to state that the "provisions of this title shall be construed liberally for the accomplishment of the uniquely broad and remedial purposes thereof regardless of whether federal or New York state civil and human rights laws including those with provisions comparatively worded to provisions of this title have been so construed."

With the statute's broad remedial purpose in mind, the court concluded that the question of severity and pervasiveness was applicable to consideration of the scope of permissible damages, but not to the question of underlying liability.

Instead, the court determined that for establishing liability under the NYCHRL, the primary issue for the trier of fact in harassment cases is whether the plaintiff has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that she has been treated "less well" than other employees because of her gender.

The court further held that, at the summary judgment stage, judgment should normally be denied to a defendant as to whether such conduct occurred unless the employer can establish an affirmative defense that the conduct complained of constitutes nothing more than what a "reasonable victim of discrimination would consider petty slights and trivial inconveniences."

In the opinion of the Williams court, the aim of New York City's workplace harassment laws is zero employer tolerance for conduct involving an employee being treated "less well" based on his or her membership in a protected class.

New York's Decisions Raise Questions For Employers Nation-Wide

The Zakrzewska and Williams decisions will likely lead to a substantial rise in harassment claims brought under the NYCHRL.

While employers with operations in New York City are particularly vulnerable and should take steps now to implement zero tolerance discrimination and harassment policies, the cases raise questions for all employers as to how courts will interpret and apply different legal standards arising under federal, state and local laws governing discrimination and harassment.

Historically, despite some difference in language and structure, New York federal and state courts had treated Title VII and the local antidiscrimination laws as substantially co-extensive with respect to the standards for determining discriminatory harassment. See Patane v. Clark, 508 F.3d 106 2d Cir. (2007).

Until now, the Second Circuit, federal district courts and New York state courts have either applied, or assumed the applicability of the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense and the Meritor Savings "severe or pervasive standard" in NYCHRL cases.

These recent decisions represent a significant departure from existing law. As recognized by the Zakrzewska court, the existence of different standards to employer liability requires employers to conduct their businesses in the manner dictated by the most restrictive criteria.

Furthermore, once litigation begins, the existence of different standards for federal, state and local laws applied to the same facts could render trials — in which plaintiffs commonly proceed in the alternative on federal, state and local legal theories based on the same facts — more complex, time consuming and confusing for juries.

For states like New York that provide for an election of remedies, permitting a complainant to choose between an administrative or judicial forum, these decisions leave open the question of whether a plaintiff whose state claim is dismissed can refile her case before the New York City Commission on Human Rights or a court on grounds that her claim is meritorious under the more liberal city statute, thereby obtaining a second bite at the apple.

Employers are well advised to stay tuned for the Second Circuit's consideration of Zakrzewska and to see whether other judicial departments and ultimately the New York Court of Appeals will follow the court's ruling in Williams.

This article is for general information and does not include full legal analysis of the matters presented. It should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The description of the results of any specific case or transaction contained herein does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter. Each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. The invitation to contact the authors or attorneys in our firm is not a solicitation to provide professional services and should not be construed as a statement as to any availability to perform legal services in any jurisdiction in which such attorney is not permitted to practice.

Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm of more than 650 attorneys, offers innovative solutions across diverse industries in the United States and internationally to address the legal and business challenges of today's evolving global markets.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions