United States: The Christian Doctrine: The Double-Secret Contract Clause

The typical government contract contains a laundry list of standard Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or Defense Federal Regulation Acquisition Supplement (DFARS) clauses that outline the requirements for the construction or services to be provided. These clauses are either expressly stated, i.e. written out in full length in the contract, or incorporated by reference to a particular provision which the contractor must research for the specific language. But contractors beware: not all contracts are what they seem. Since 1963, courts have held that certain clauses are so integral to public procurements that they are deemed incorporated by operation of law, even if they are omitted from the contract.

The Christian Doctrine

The "Christian Doctrine" arises from the Court of Claims' 1963 decision in G.L. Christian & Associates v. United States.1 The contractor there sought to recover anticipated profits on a contract that terminated by the U.S. Department of the Army. The government sought to avoid liability for anticipated profits, relying on the standard termination for convenience clause, which disclaims government liability for anticipated profits on unperformed work. Interestingly, the termination for convenience clause was not referenced or incorporated in G.L. Christian's contract. The government argued that, despite its absence, the clause should be read into the contract as a matter of law. In support of its argument, the government relied on Section 8.703 of the Armed Services Procurement Regulations ("ASPR"), which requires the termination clause be inserted in all fixed-price construction contracts such as the one at issue.2 The Court agreed, stating that since World War I, the limitation on anticipated profits in a termination case was "a deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy."3

Following this ruling, various boards of contract appeals and courts took a relatively broad view of the court's holding, incorporating clauses and procurement regulations with little or no consideration for whether such provisions reflected a deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy. Thus, a series of ancillary clauses were deemed incorporated by operation of law, even though they were not in the contract. For example, one case from the Court of Claims held that the ASPR "Mistake in Bids" clause was incorporated by law into the contract based on a theory that: "If a regulation appears intended to define and state the rights of a class of persons, it is presumptively intended to benefit those persons."4 The Court ruled that the missing clause was intended to benefit bidders, without any analysis as to whether that end was a deeply ingrained in the federal procurement scheme.

The Federal Circuit Reels in the Christian Doctrine

In 1993, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the expanding scope of the Christian Doctrine in General Engineering & Machine Works v. O'Keefe.5 Emphasizing Christian's reliance on the significant and long-standing policy implemented by the termination for convenience clause, the Court re-iterated that "the Christian Doctrine does not permit the automatic incorporation of every required contract clause."6 Rather, "the Christian Doctrine applies to mandatory contract clauses which express a significant or deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy."7 In the wake of General Engineering, one set of commentators noted: "They [the courts and boards] have been saved for the last 20 years by being able to mechanically follow the Christian Doctrine to incorporate all mandatory clauses in the contract without analysis or thought. But that day is over. Under the guidance provided by the Federal Circuit, the boards of contract appeals now have to think through each case to determine if the clause meets the General Engineering tests."8

Under the guidance of General Engineering, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) has invoked the Christian Doctrine only twice to incorporate clauses into contracts. And even so, the ASBCA only incorporated clauses that had been previously incorporated under earlier case law.9 In that same time, the ASBCA has refused to invoke the incorporate various other clauses.10

K-Con, Inc.—Mandatory Bonding Requirements

In its most recent decision involving the Christian Doctrine, the Federal Circuit held for the first time that bonding requirements in FAR Part 52.228-15, "Performance and Payment Bonds—Construction," were incorporated in every construction contract at the time of award.11 Not only did the Court find that the purposes of the performance and payment bonds rendered them "a significant or deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy," it was also persuaded by the fact that government property cannot be subject to subcontractors' and suppliers' mechanic's liens.12 Thus, protecting subcontractors and suppliers represents a deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy.

The lesson of K-Con: Federal contractors of all sizes must understand: (1) what type of contract is being contemplated by the government's solicitation; (2) which provisions are found in those types of contracts; and (3) which provisions have been, or may be, deemed incorporated by operation of law even if not present in the contract. This will greatly impact how contractors price their proposals in competitive solicitations to better account for potential risks.

Post-1963 Christian Decisions

Case Holding
Rough Diamond Co. v. United States, 351 F.2d 636, 642-43 (Ct. Cl. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 957 (1966) Incorporates statute containing pricing rules
Schoenbrod v. United States, 410 F.2d 400, 404 (Ct. Cl. 1969) Incorporates clause outlining proper pre-award negotiation procedures
Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States, 426 F.2d 314, 317 (Ct. Cl. 1970) Incorporates "Mistake in Bids" clause required under ASPR [Armed Services Procurement Regulation]
American Elec. Contracting Corp. v. United States, 579 F.2d 602, 612-13 (Ct. Cl. 1978) Incorporates clause addressing when qualified products are to be procured as components of end items
Applied Devices Corp. v. United States, 591 F.2d 635, 640 (Ct. Cl. 1979) Incorporates clause calling for the contracting officer to make a reasonable and realistic estimate of labor learning, and other nonrecurring costs for computation of the 'cancellation ceiling'
SCM Corp. v. United States, 645 F.2d 893, 903-04 (Ct. Cl. 1981) Incorporates clause promoting uniform treatment of "major issues" such as cost and pricing data when more than one military department is purchasing an item
Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 188 (5th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g in banc denied, 734 F.2d 1479, cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037 (1984) Incorporates clause requiring plaintiff to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing suit for breach of lease
M.E. McGeary Co., ASBCA 36788, 90-1 BCA ¶ 22512 (1990) Incorporates DAR 7–602.23, Disputes Concerning Labor Standards
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., ASBCA 38284, 91-1 BCA ¶ 23439 (1990) Incorporates FPR § 1–7.102–12 (1980), Disputes
H&R Machinists Co., ASBCA 38440, 91-1 BCA ¶ 23373 (1993) Incorporates FAR 52.249-8, Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service)
Rodgers Construction, Inc., IBCA 2777, 92-1 BCA ¶ 24503 (1991) Incorporates FAR 52.232–23, Assignment of Claims
Telesec Library Services, ASBCA 42968, 92-1 BCA ¶ 24650 (1991) Incorporates FAR 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act–Price Adjustment
OFEGRO, HUDBCA 88-3410-C7, 91-3 BCA ¶ 24206 (1992) Incorporates FAR 52.249–8, Default
Balimoy Manufacturing Co., ASBCA 43768, 93-1 BCA ¶ 25437 (1992) Incorporates FAR 52.209-3, First Article Approval
Technical & Management Services Corp., ASBCA 39999, 93-2 BCA ¶ 25681 (1992) Incorporates FAR 52.217-1, Limitation of Price and Contractor Obligation
Miller's Moving Co., ASBCA 43114, 92-1 BCA ¶ 24707, 34 (1992) Incorporates Services Contract Act provisions
Ace Services, Inc. v. General Services Administration, GSBCA 11331, 92-2 BCA ¶ 24943 (1992) Incorporates FAR 52.222–43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act–Price Adjustments


Post-1993 General Engineering Decisions

Case Holding Comments
S.J. Amoroso Co. Inc. v. United States, 12 F. 3rd 1072 (Fed. Cir. 1993) Incorporates 52.225–1-14 Buy American Act
Unit Data Service Corp. v. Department of Veterans Affairs, GSBCA 10775-P-R, 93-3 BCA ¶ 25964 (1993) Incorporates FAR (FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting
Montana Refining (ASBCA – 1994) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.249-2, Termination for Convenience 1. "[T]he Termination for Convenience clause in appellant's contract was an authorized deviation from the required clause.... Accordingly, the Christian doctrine is not applicable."

2. It does not appear that there was, in fact any authorized deviation specific to the T for C clause. And, if there was, it appears that it was not permissible.
BellSouth Communications, Sys. (ASBCA – 1994) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.222-43 1. "Before award, the contracting officer determined that the BellSouth contract was not covered by the Act. That determination was made in good faith.... In these circumstances the Christian Doctrine is not applicable."
Old Dominion Security (ASBCA – 1994) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act 1. "[S]o long as the GSAR 552.222-43 clause remained in effect as an authorized deviation the Christian Doctrine does not require us to read FAR 52.222-43 clause into the contract as a substitute therefore."
Professional Services Unified, Inc., ASBCA 48883, 96-1 BCA ¶28073 (1995) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.229-4, Federal, State, and Local Taxes for competitive procurement
Shawn K. Christensen, AGBCA 95-188-R, 95-2 BCA ¶ 27724 (1995) Refuses to incorporate FAR ____, Differing Site Conditions for service contracts
C&J Associates v. VA Medical Center, VABCA 3892, 95-2 BCA ¶ 27834 (1995) Incorporates FAR ____, Termination for Convenience

Refuses to incorporate FAR ____, Termination for Default
GAI Consultants, Inc., ENGBCA 6030, 95-2 BCA ¶ 27620 Incorporates FAR FAR 52.243-0001, Changes
Computing Application Software Technology (ASBCA – 1996) Refuses to incorporate NASA FAR 18-52.245-17, Liability for Government Property Furnished for Repair and Services 1. "[A] policy on repair or service contracts is therefore not sufficiently significant ...."

2. The Board did note that "[NASA] does not argue, and we have not found, a legislative basis for procurement policy on Government property."

3. Board looks at Engineering's listing of examples that fit being significant and characterizes them as procedural. That might bode well for our case since our issue is not procedure.
Rehabilitation Services of Northern California (ASBCA 1996) Incorporates FAR 52.245-2, Government Furnished Property 1. Incorporated on strength of two pre-1993 ASBCA cases incorporating the same clause

2. Stong dissent by Kielein
Lambrecth & Sons (ASBCA – 1997) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.212-11 on the grounds that it does not reflect a significant or deeply ingrained policy 1. No legislative basis for the clause

2. FAR revises several times the contracts into which the clause is to be inserted
MDP Const., Inc. (ASBCA – 1997) Refuses to incorporate FAR 52.212-11 on the grounds that it does not reflect a significant or deeply ingrained policy 1. The decision simply cited to Lambrecth.
F2M (ASBCA – 1997) Refuses to incorporate Incorporates FAR 52.233-3, Protest After Award 1. "[W]e held that the Christian Doctrine is inapplicable to NAF procurements...." (That is, it is inapplicable to contracts awarded with non-appropriated funds."
Lockheed Martin, Librascope (ASBCA – 1999) Refuses to incorporate DAR 7-108.2, Incentive Price Revision finding that it does not reflect a significant or deeply ingrained policy 1. No reference to legislative basis or not

2. "the ... clause contains a methodology for price revision.... It simply had not been demonstrated that the clause is of such importance as to reflect a deeply ingrained strand of, or a legislative intent for, public procurement policy."

3. "[A]ppellant is not receiving a double recovery of profit."
Empresa de Viacao Terceirnese (ASBCA – 2000) Refuses to incorporate DFARS 252.237-7020, Restriction On Severence Payments To Foreign Nationals 1. DFAR required inclusion on two conditions. "While the first criterion was satisfied in that the contract was for bus transportion services on the island of Terceirence ... no facts have be been furnished concerning the other criterion. On this record, the clause was not mandatory and, therefore, not eligible for incorporation therein by operation of law...."
Dawkins General Contractors & Supply (ASBCA – 2003) Incorporates FAR 52.232-7, Payments under Time-and-Material and Labor Hour Contracts 1. Little discussion. Relies entirely on General Engineering which "incorporate[ed] the [DAR] clause required for time and material contracts, the predecessor to the FAR 52.232-7.)
Labat-Anderson v. United States (Ct. Cl. 1999) Incorporates FAR 52.233-3, Protest After Award 1. "[T[he clause expresses a significant strand of public procurement policy because it implements section 2741 of the Competition in Contracting Act [which] requires federal agencies to suspend contract performance if they receive notice of a protest.... This statutory purposes serves the valuable purposes of ...."

2. Notes that the ASBCA had previously incorporated the same clause in Comsi, Inc. (1987).
Gold Line Refining v. United States (Ct.Cl. 1999) Incorporates some FAR EPA clause 1. With only footnote discussion incorporates the clause stating that it reflects a significant and deeply ingrained strand of public procurement policy.

2. Also states that "the law, moreover, does not allow the government to benefit from such violation."


Relevant Board Decisions 2007 to Present

Case Holding
Bay Shipbuilding Company, CBCA No. 54, 07-2 BCA 33678 (2007) Incorporates FAR 52.233-1, Disputes (Note that a prior case previously incorporated this clause.)
Costar III, LLC, ASBCA No. 56479, 11-2 BCA 34830 (2011) Incorporates FAR 52.222-43, Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Act and Service Contract Act Labor Standards – Price Adjustment (Multiple Year and Option Contracts)
Spaceway Gateway Support, LLC., ASBCA No. 55608, 13 BCA 35232 (2013) Incorporates FAR 45.302-3(c) (1984) prohibition on profit or fee
ASFA Construction Industry and Trade; ASBCA No. 57269, 15-1 BCA 36034 (2015) Incorporates FAR 52.249-2, Termination for Convenience (Note that a 1984 case previously incorporated the clause at FAR 52.249-2.)
K-Con, Inc. ASBCA No. 60686, 17-1 BCA 36632; recond. denied. (2017) Incorporates FAR 52.228-15, Performance and Payment Bonds


1 312 F.2d 417 (Ct. Cl. 1963).

2 The Armed Services Procurement Regulation ("ASPR") was a precursor to the FAR and DFARS.

3 312 F.2d at 426.

4 Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States, 426 F.2d 314, 317 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

5 991 F.2d 775 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

6 Id. at 779.

7 Id.; see also S.J. Amoroso Co., Inc. v. United States, 12 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (incorporating as a matter of law the requirements of the Buy American Act statute and regulations).

8 Ralph C. Nash & John Cibinic, The Christian Doctrine: What is the Rule?, 10 Nash & Cibinic Rept. ¶ 48 (Sep. 1996).

9 Dawkins Gen. Contractors & Supply, Inc., ASBCA No. 48535, 03-2 BCA ¶ 32305 (Jul. 14, 2003) (incorporating FAR 52.232-7, Payments under Time-and-Material and Labor Hour Contracts); Rehabilitation Servs. of N. Cal., ASBCA No. 47085, 96-2 BCA 28324 (Apr. 26, 1996) (incorporating FAR 52.245-2, Government Furnished Property).

10 Id.; see Empresa De Viacao Terceirense, ASBCA No. 49827, 00-2 BCA ¶ 31,120 (Sep. 25, 2000); Lockheed Martin Librascope Corporation, ASBCA No. 50508, 00-1 BCA ¶ 30,635 (Oct. 29, 1999); Lambrecht & Sons, Inc., ASBCA No. 49515, 97-2 BCA ¶ 29,105 (Jul. 7, 1997); F2M, Inc., ASBCA No. 49719, 97-2 BCA ¶ 28982 (May 6, 1997); Computing Application Software Tech., Inc., ASBCA No. 47554, 96-1 BCA ¶ 28,204 (Feb. 14, 1996); Old Dominion Sec., Inc., ASBCA No. 47001, 95-1 BCA ¶ 27,366 (Dec. 13, 1994); BellSouth Comms. Sys., Inc., ASBCA No. 45955, 94-3 BCA ¶ 27,231 (Sep. 27, 1994); Montana Refining Co., ASBCA No. 44250, 94-2 BCA ¶ 26,656 (Jan. 25, 1994).

11 K-Con, Inc. v. Sec. of the Army, 908 F.3d 719 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

12 Id. at 725-26.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions