United States: 6th Circuit Credits Documentation In Age Discrimination Case

Last Updated: February 14 2019
Article by Kara E. Shea

As this recent case demonstrates, consistent documentation can be your saving grace in defending a wrongful termination lawsuit, while inconsistent enforcement of rules can be your downfall.

Facts

Ramona DeBra worked as a teller for JP Morgan Chase & Company for about 12 years. In her later years at the bank, she worked at two different branches under two different supervisors. Eventually, she began spending the majority of her time at the second branch, which became her primary branch, and that branch manager, Kevin Sexton, became her primary supervisor.

DeBra wasn’t subjected to formal discipline until 2014. Before then, she generally received “meets expectations” performance ratings. However, her supervisors indicated in two of her performance reviews that her cash-handling abilities were an area for improvement. One review noted, “Ramona needs to remain focused at all times to detail and accuracy. Immediate attention to bank assets is a must.” Supervisors’ notes from past years also indicated that DeBra had made several cash-handling mistakes and was counseled for those incidents. Still, she wasn’t formally written up and continued to receive passable performance reviews.

Things changed when DeBra began to report primarily to Sexton. She later testified that she heard Sexton say “he didn’t want to get close to a person, because it would be more difficult to fire that person,” which she concluded meant he was already planning to terminate her from the outset of their relationship. Almost immediately after becoming branch manager, Sexton began to document DeBra’s cash-control errors. Some of the errors were minor, such as leaving $5 in the cash counter, and others were more significant, such as failing to return a debit card to a customer.

In December 2013, Sexton contacted DeBra’s other branch manager to see if she was committing similar errors at his branch. The branch managers put her on a performance improvement plan (PIP) in January 2014. The PIP outlined several performance issues and areas for improvement and stated that she could face “corrective action, up to and including termination,” if she didn’t improve. The PIP also indicated that she would receive a final review to assess her performance on February 3. DeBra was surprised to receive the PIP—she felt it was unnecessary since she had never been formally disciplined during her time at the bank.

During the PIP period, DeBra made two additional cash-control errors, including leaving her coin vault unsecured and being $100 short. After the PIP expired (seemingly without the final review on February 3), DeBra continued to make mistakes. On February 24, she was given a final written warning for unsatisfactory performance. The warning listed the two errors she made while the PIP was in effect as well as some of her more recent errors.

Sexton documented three additional errors by DeBra in March 2014. At that point, he and the other branch manager talked to their district manager about terminating DeBra. Sexton testified he was the first to suggest termination. The other branch manager didn’t think DeBra’s mistakes at his branch were enough to justify termination, but he agreed with the termination decision based on the “totality of the issues.” Sexton, the other branch manager, and the district manager spoke to HR, which approved the termination decision. DeBra was fired on April 14. She was 59 years old at the time of her discharge.

DeBra filed a discrimination charge with the state human rights commission and eventually filed a lawsuit in which she claimed she was discriminated against on the basis of her age, in violation of the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which prohibits discrimination in employment against individuals who are 40 or older. She claimed she was targeted for disciplinary action while younger employees who made similar or worse mistakes were not. The trial court granted summary judgment to Chase, ruling DeBra hadn’t established the basic elements of her case and wasn’t entitled to take her claims to a jury. She appealed to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to Tennessee employers).

Court’s ruling

Under the ADEA, an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that age was the “but-for” cause of the employer’s adverse action. In other words, she must show that, if not for her age, she wouldn’t have been terminated. The court noted that the bank provided a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for terminating DeBra—namely, her performance issues. Thus, the burden shifted to her to show that her performance issues weren’t the real reason she was fired, but were a pretext (or a cover-up) for age discrimination.

The court noted there are several ways an employee can demonstrate pretext. For instance, DeBra could have argued that she didn’t really commit the errors she was accused of committing. However, she didn’t really attempt to dispute that she made the mistakes. Rather, she continued to insist that although she might have made the errors, Chase singled her out for disciplinary action while allowing younger employees to get away with similar or worse errors.

The court agreed that presenting evidence of younger “comparators” who engaged in similar conduct but received better treatment is one way to prove pretext. In DeBra’s case, however, the court didn’t buy that argument. The court acknowledged she presented evidence that younger employees (including one in her late 20s) made similar or worse errors than hers, such as leaving a branch unlocked or leaving a cashbox unsecured, but weren’t terminated. The problem with that evidence, concluded the court, was that her alleged comparators reported to branch managers other than Sexton.

In fact, for the most part, the other employees who “got off the hook” reported to the branch manager who had tolerated DeBra’s errors until Sexton came into the picture as her primary supervisor. The court concluded the other manager had a more “yielding nature” and was simply less strict than Sexton. But being a tougher manager didn’t make Sexton’s actions discriminatory unless there was some proof he tended to favor younger employees over older employees. DeBra wasn’t able to offer such evidence. In fact, the bank presented evidence that Sexton had given glowing reviews to an employee three years older than DeBra and had terminated younger employees after terminating her.

The court agreed with the trial court that DeBra couldn’t prove her claims and affirmed the dismissal of the case without a trial. One judge did dissent from the opinion, stating that certain comments Sexton made to DeBra were problematic, including his statement that he didn’t want to get close to people because it would be difficult to fire them. The dissenting judge also pointed out that the write-ups the bank gave DeBra didn’t contain details of all the alleged incidents that led to her termination.

Finally, the judge concluded that while the more lenient manager may not have driven DeBra’s termination, he was one of her supervisors and “went along” with it while not requesting the discharge of other underperforming employees working under his supervision. For all of those reasons, the dissenting judge concluded that the case should have been sent to a jury to decide. Despite the dissent, Chase won the case. Ramona DeBra v. JPMorgan Chase & Company, No. 17-1411.

Practical guidance

This case demonstrates how the sometimes tedious day-in, day-out work of dealing with employee performance issues can end up helping (or hurting) you in a lawsuit. The employer did many things right here. Although the employee apparently had a long history of performance issues, the employer recognized it shouldn’t terminate her until it documented her issues over the course of a few months. Its documentation efforts pretty much prevented the employee from later disputing her errors.

Another positive was that the management team brought HR into the loop to ensure the appropriate protocols were followed leading up to the termination. Also, the record doesn’t reflect this, but we can suppose that HR (perhaps with the help of inside or outside counsel) walked through the risk factors before terminating the employee, including conducting an investigation into whether the supervisor requesting her discharge seemed to have a track record of targeting older employees. All of those factors worked very well for the employer in getting the case dismissed.

On the other hand, the backstory on this employee includes some lessons to be learned. First, it appears that discipline throughout the bank was somewhat inconsistent, with supervisors seemingly having very different ideas about when progressive discipline was warranted. That’s problematic for several reasons.

First, an employee who happens to work for a lenient supervisor may truly not be aware that her performance is subpar. The employee in this case said she was “surprised” to receive her first write-up, and she was probably telling the truth since she seems to have committed pretty much the same errors for more than a decade with zero repercussions. Lenient supervisors also tend to set up the stricter supervisors who follow them for allegations of unfairness or, in this case, discrimination. Not to mention the fact that the employees who work for stricter supervisors probably aren’t too happy being subjected to what they may feel is a double standard.

While it may not be possible to get all supervisors thinking and acting the same way—hopefully, somewhere between too strict and too wish-washy—your written policies should provide clear guidance on your progressive discipline protocols, and supervisors should be periodically trained on your standards for progressive discipline. Your supervisory training should include an explanation of why consistency matters and how a lack of consistency can make you vulnerable in a dispute with a terminated employee.

This article originally appeared in the Tennessee Employment Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Sign Up
Gain free access to lawyers expertise from more than 250 countries.
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Industry
Mondaq Newsalert
Select Topics
Select Regions
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions