United States: After The Lender Case — Securities Law Restrictions That Apply To Family Offices Managing Other People's Money

As we discussed in our prior Stroock Special Bulletin (our "Prior Bulletin"),1 Lender Management, LLC v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo. 2017-246 (2017) provides family offices with a potential pathway for obtaining trade or business expense deductions for income tax purposes in connection with rendering investment management services.  Our Prior Bulletin also noted the existence of certain additional considerations that were not discussed in the Lender case, but which could potentially be highly relevant in determining whether the result in Lender may be applied successfully in other family office contexts.  One of the additional considerations that we observed was the need for a family office to carefully consider securities law restrictions that can apply to managing others' financial assets.  This Stroock Special Bulletin picks up on that specific point, and addresses some of the securities law restrictions that may apply in connection with the establishment of a family office that seeks to follow the Lender model.  

The Income Tax Issue Presented in Lender, and Lender's Relevant Facts

We start, by way of background, with a review of the facts of the Lender case and the income tax considerations that were addressed by the Tax Court in its decision.

The principal issue in Lender was whether the family office ("Lender Management") carried on a trade or business.  Lender Management provided direct investment management services to three separate limited liability companies ("LLCs"), the beneficial owners of which were entirely Lender family members.  Each of the LLCs was treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.  Lender Management also managed certain "downstream entities" in which one of the investment partnerships had a controlling interest, and investors in some of these downstream entities included persons who were not members of the Lender family.  (Slip op. at 11)  Lender Management's operating agreement permitted it "to engage in the business of managing the Lender Family Office and to provide management services to Lender family members, related entities and other third-party nonfamily members."

If the name "Lender" sounds familiar, there is a good reason for it.  The family patriarch, Harry Lender, founded "Lender's Bagels," which was the font of the family's wealth.  The Lender family members here were in some cases grandchildren and great-grandchildren of Harry.  They were both geographically, and in temperament, very much dispersed.  So although it was an extended family by pedigree, the Tax Court's memorandum decision made it very clear that, for all intents and purposes, the relationships between Lender Management and its "clients" were effectively at arm's length and that Lender Management could have been terminated as an investment advisor at any time by the investment partnerships.

Among other key facts:

  • More than 50% of the assets under management were invested in private equity;
  • Lender Management also provided individual investors in the investment LLCs with one-on-one investment advisory and financial planning services;
  • Compensation was paid to Lender Management for the investment management services that it provided in the form of profits interests (or carried interests) in the various investment partnerships that it advised;
  • The taxpayer (Lender Management) therefore received not just a return on its investment, but compensation attributable to its services provided to others;
  • Lender Management employed five employees during each of the tax years at issue; and
  • The key person at Lender Management (Keith Lender, who was Harry Lender's grandson) worked approximately 50 hours per week in Lender Management, had a business degree from Cornell University and an MBA from Northwestern University, and prior to joining Lender Management worked for several years in marketing and brand management for major corporations.

The Tax Court determined that the activities of Lender Management – which involved providing investment management services to others for profit (although the others were all part of the Lender extended family or their related entities) -- were sufficient to constitute a trade or business to give rise to fully deductible trade or business expenses under IRC section 162.

The Internal Revenue Service had contended that these expenses were not trade or business expense deductions under IRC section 162, but instead were deductible under IRC section 212 – which meant that, as miscellaneous itemized deductions, they were subject to the 2% of adjusted gross income ("AGI") floor and the alternative minimum tax.  (Importantly, under the new tax law, IRC section 212 expenses are no longer tax deductible.)   The Internal Revenue Service basically asserted that the family was managing its own money, and that family attribution rules should apply where the clients are family members.

The critical distinction that the Tax Court drew in Lender was between [A] trade or business expenses and [B] investment expenses.  Commenting on this distinction, the Tax Court observed that "[n]o matter how large the estate or how continuous or extended the work required may be, overseeing the management of one's own investments is generally regarded as the work of a mere investor."  (Slip op. at 25 (quoting Higgins v. Comm'r, 312 U.S. 212, 218 (1941))  In addition, "[e]xpenses incurred by the taxpayer in trading securities or performing other investment-related activities strictly for his own account generally may not be deducted under section 162 as expenses incurred in carrying on a trade or business."  (Slip op. at 25 (citing Higgins, 312 U.S. at 218))  The Tax Court further observed that transactions within a family group are generally subject to heightened scrutiny.

Notwithstanding this heightened scrutiny due to the family group relationship, the Tax Court concluded that the record before it demonstrated that Lender Management provided investment management services to others for profit.  According to the Tax Court, "selling one's investment expertise to others is as much a business as selling one's legal expertise or medical expertise.  Investment advisory, financial planning, and other asset management services provided to others may constitute a trade or business."  (Slip op. at 27)  As such, Lender Management's activities were sufficient to constitute a trade or business to give rise to fully deductible trade or business expenses under IRC section 162.

Thus, the use of a family office management company in Lender under the facts presented effectively converted non-deductible expenses (miscellaneous itemized deductions) into above-the-line fully deductible trade or business expenses.  Lender Management's profits interests in the investment partnerships, in turn, reduced income for those partnerships.

As we noted in our Prior Bulletin, commentators have observed that,  under Rev. Rul. 78-195, 1978-1 C.B. 39, the ability of the family office to deduct its general office expenses under IRC section 162 may be further enhanced if the family office entity is instead structured as a "C corporation."  In that Revenue Ruling, a C Corporation that was formed for the express purpose of investing in real property purchased a tract of unimproved, non-income-producing real property, which it held for two years and sold without having made any substantial improvements. The corporation did not make any significant efforts to sell the property and did not engage in any other transactions in real or personal property or in other commercial activities. During the period that it held the property, the corporation incurred expenses for interest, real property taxes, accounting fees, and general office costs.  The Internal Revenue Service held that the accounting fees and general office costs were expenses related to investment property of the C Corporation and, as such, were deductible by the C Corporation under IRC section 162 in the year paid or incurred (except to the extent that such expenses may need to be capitalized).

We also noted certain caveats:

  • Importantly, the Lender case solely involved the question of income tax deductions under IRC section 162.  It does not address any other issues, such as whether the transfer of a carried interest — which was a junior class of equity under these facts, as other classes of equity were preferred to it in receiving distributions from the investment partnerships that Lender Management advised — may constitute a "distribution right in a controlled entity" so as to potentially trigger the application of the deemed gift rules of Section 2701 of the Internal Revenue Code.  That issue needs to be carefully considered as well.
  • In addition, being deemed engaged in a trade or business could potentially trigger certain collateral tax consequences.  Depending upon the circumstances, this could potentially include ordinary income treatment on certain trading profits and potential exposure to additional state, local and unincorporated business taxes.
  • Moreover, a family office needs to carefully consider securities law restrictions on managing others' financial assets.  Accordingly, securities law counsel should be consulted as well in connection with the establishment of a family office that seeks to follow the Lender model.2 
Securities Law Restrictions That Apply to Managing Others' Money That Family Offices Seeking to Align Their Facts to the Lender Case Need to Carefully Consider

A family office that manages others' financial assets for profit — as in the Lender case — must carefully consider whether it needs to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") or a state regulator, or is exempt from such registration.

In 2011, the SEC adopted the "Family Office Rule,"3 which excludes certain family offices from having to register with the SEC as an "investment adviser" under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act").  The rationale for this rule is that family offices are generally sophisticated, and its clients are less in need of the protections that the Advisers Act affords to the general public.  The SEC has periodically commented on details related to the Family Office Rule, most recently in March 2018.4 

The main requirement of the Family Office Rule is that the advisory clients of the family office must be "Family Clients."5  This sounds simple enough, but it is actually a more convoluted definition than one may think.  Family Clients include current and former family members (as further discussed below), current and former key employees, the estates, trusts and charities of, and companies owned and controlled by, such persons and affiliated trusts and nonprofit organizations, each meeting certain (sometimes complex) requirements. 

Who counts as a "key employee" is a question with a not-so-simple answer.  Key employees generally include executive officers, directors, trustees, general partners or persons serving in a similar capacity and persons who have regularly participated in the investment activities of the family office for at least one year.

This leads to the next question — what is a family member for this purpose?  The strict definition is that a family member includes all lineal descendants up to ten (10) generations removed from a common ancestor.   This definition is intentionally broad and encompasses many types of family members, including step and foster children as well as former family members who are no longer part of the family due to divorce or otherwise.  The Family Office Rule does not include in-laws related through the spouse of the common ancestor.6  In addition, the Family Office Rule specifically requires that the family members be from one family; multiple family offices cannot rely on the Family Office Rule. 

Another qualification under the Family Office Rule is that the family office must be wholly owned by Family Clients and controlled by family members.  This may sound easy enough, but there are nuances to this definition which include the fact that the key employees (who are acceptable Family Clients and owners of a family office) cannot control the family office by having influence over management.  Key employees can serve as officers, but they should not make ultimate decisions at the senior executive or board level. 

Perhaps the most critical element of this requirement is that family offices cannot hold themselves out to the public as an investment adviser.7  The Family Office Rule does not apply if the family office intends to make its services available outside of the family and makes it known that it is soliciting accounts. If these types of activities are occurring, the family office must consider appropriate registration. 

Yet another issue to consider is the nature of the services that the family office is providing.  Family offices often provide services other than rendering investment advice, such as tax and financial planning, and need to ensure that any service that is considered investment advice under the Advisers Act is qualified as such, and that the clients of advisory services are Family Clients. 

Finally, just because a family office is managed and exempt from registration under the Advisers Act doesn't mean that other federal securities and similar laws do not apply.  Other laws that can apply to family offices include the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Commodity Exchange Act.  These laws can apply to such matters as client qualifications, product registration, transactional filings, public reporting and compliance issues.  In addition, certain market-protective rules can apply to family offices, such as the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and insider trading restrictions.

In sum, family offices that wish to follow the Lender model to obtain trade or business expense deductions for rendering investment management services must do more than simply obtain tax advice.  They must go the further step of consulting securities counsel to ensure that they do not run afoul of the web of securities law restrictions that can otherwise ensnare the unwary.

*** *** ***

Stroock's Family Office Practice Group continues to monitor all developments in the family office space and in planning for wealthy individuals and their families, and will provide updates, including with respect to the U.S. Department of Treasury's and the Internal Revenue Service's issuance of guidance to address open points in the 2017 Tax Reform Legislation.


1 https://www.stroock.com/siteFiles/Publications/TheLenderCaseMatz.pdf

2  The remainder of this Stroock Special Bulletin addresses this concern and the standards that apply, including under the structure that is described in the Lender case.  

3 Advisers Act Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1

4 https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/guidance/familyofficefaq.htm

5 Advisers Act Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(b)(1)

6 https://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/guidance/familyofficefaq.htm - Question III.1

7 Advisers Act Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1(b)(3)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions