United States: Frankenstein And Copyright: 5 Things You Should Know

Last Updated: October 25 2018
Article by David A. Kluft

The first edition of Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus, was published in 1818, two hundred years ago. Originally offered to the public as an anonymous work, Frankenstein was both the apogee of the gothic horror novel and the birth of the science fiction genre.

The public did not learn until years later that this masterpiece had been penned by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. Shelley had written the work on a rainy day in 1816, when she was only nineteen. Incredibly, twenty-year-old John Polidori was simultaneously inventing the vampire genre just down the hall in the same Geneva villa.

The actual publication date of the first edition was January 1, 1818, but the Halloween season is as good a time as any to commemorate the two-hundredth anniversary of Frankenstein and its relationship to copyright law. Here are five things you should know.

1. Shelley sold the Frankenstein copyright for £30.

The first edition of Frankenstein was printed by the London publishing house of Lackington & Co., which agreed to give Shelley one-third of the profits from a 500 copy run. Shelley's share came to about £41.

In 1823, the first stage version of Frankenstein (called Presumption, or The Fate of Frankenstein) was produced by Richard Peake. Shelley reportedly enjoyed the play, but her approval wasn't important, because at the time she had no rights to assert against it. The year before, her buddy Lord Byron had gone to court to enjoin an unauthorized theatrical version of one of his own works, only to be told by the King's Bench (in Murray v. Elliston), that the play was a " fair abridgment" of his work over which he had no say. Notwithstanding the state of the law, Shelley's family was able to take advantage of the publicity surrounding Peake's play to print and sell a revised second edition of Frankenstein.

In 1831, publishers Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley asked Shelley to create a third edition for their " Standard Novels" series, and this is the version with which we are most familiar today. Among the most prominent changes was a new introduction explaining how the novel was conceived, a revised backstory for Elizabeth, and the introduction of galvanism as the possible agent of resurrection.

Colburn and Bentley's request for these revisions appears to have been motivated in part by the desire to create a brand new work in which they could own the copyright. In fact, some scholars have suggested that this classic version of Frankenstein may never have come into being but for the incentives and prohibitions of copyright law. Shelley transferred the copyright in the third edition to Colburn and Bentley for £30, the last money she would ever see from the book.

2. The monster is in the public domain, but not the one you are picturing.

Shelley's description of the monster was of an outsized 8-foot tall man with lustrous black hair, white teeth and tight yellow skin. The illustration to the 1831 edition, a big naked guy with really good abs, remains more or less faithful to that description. The popular depiction of the monster began to change when Edison Studios produced the first film version of Frankenstein in 1910 and introduced a fully clothed but disheveled fiend with white makeup and an Edward Scissorhands vibe.

But when I say "Frankenstein," you are not thinking of any of those early depictions. The flat-topped, neck-bolted monster we know and love was born in 1931, when Boris Karloff starred in Universal Pictures' film version of Frankenstein, directed by James Whale. Sure, the copyright in the original Frankenstein story had already fallen into the public domain, but by then Universal's movie (and sequels and derivative works) resurrected a whole new era of Frankenstein copyright and trademark rights based on the film's visuals, especially Karloff's appearance as fixed on celluloid.

We haven't found any published opinions pertaining to Universal's enforcement of these rights, but there are lots of anecdotes out there. Other Frankenstein film and comic book franchises have reportedly gone to great lengths to design around the Karloff look. In 1971, a Shasta soda ad supposedly had to be reshot because the makeup artist created something too close to the Karloff monster. And as recently as 2010, the author of the poster book Electric Frankenstein reported getting a cease and desist letter warning him to stay away from the combination of five visual elements that make up the Universal character's appearance: bolts, green skin, big forehead, scar, and flat-top.

I know what you're thinking: how did Herman Munster get away with it all those years? Easy ... Universal owns him too.

3. Bread good . . . Fire bad.

In the 1980's, E.J. Novak and Debra Studer created the "Video Vault," a series of comedy sketches in which veteran talk show host Joe Franklin conducted various impossible interviews with historical and literary characters. Frankenstein's monster appeared in one segment (alongside the Wicked Witch). The monster greeted the host with "Joe Franklin – Friend – Joe Franklin – good," and didn't say much more after that except "Grrrr." In August 1985, Novak and Studer submitted an unsolicited demo tape to Saturday Night Live.

A couple years later, Saturday Night Live featured a skit called "Succinctly Speaking," a parody talk show in which Nora Dunn interviewed Tarzan (Kevin Nealon), Tonto (Jon Lovitz), and Frankenstein's monster (the late great Phil Hartman). In response to some simple questions, the monster answered "Bread Good" and "Fire Bad," but then he growled and stormed off the set when asked for his views on the INF treaty.

Novak and Studer sued NBC and others for this and similar alleged copying of their work. The Southern District of New York granted summary judgment for NBC on most of the claims, including those pertaining to the "Succinctly Speaking" skit. The Court observed that the only similarities between the works were (a) the basic idea, which was not protectable; and (b) stock elements that were as a practical matter indispensable for a particular topic (and thus, under the scénes á faire doctrine, not the proper subject for a copyright action).

Although the Frankenstein skit was out of the case, certain other claims hung around for a couple more years (one involving a mafia character played by Don Novello a/k/a Father Guido Sarducci). Novak and Studer, acting pro se, used their court filings as an opportunity to hone their comedy skills. Among other things, they insisted on referring to opposing counsel as "Laurel and Hardy." Judge Robert Sweet found this behavior "not only unseemly and unfunny, but intended to harass" and eventually sent the plaintiffs packing with a dismissal and a $3,500 sanctions penalty.

4. Big Frank's got a lot of heart.

M.H. Segan, a Massachusetts toy company, pitched its "Frankenstuff" plush toy concept to Hasbro in 1986. Frankenstuff was "a somewhat friendly looking juvenile Frankenstein's monster whose chest and head can be zipped open to reveal all kinds of interesting and fun toys and goodies." Alongside the familiar green skin, square head and neck bolts, Frankenstuff had a babyish face, a purple robe and large hands. When you unzipped the chest cavity, you saw a red heart with two green and yellow gears comprising a clockwork-like mechanism.

Hasbro rejected the idea, but then in 1993 it introduced "Big Frank," a talking plastic toy in a bright orange suit with a babyish face, big hands, green skin and square head. His chest had a door built in to it; when you opened it, you saw a plastic clockwork-like heart mechanism featuring blue and yellow gears.

Segan filed suit for copyright infringement in the Southern District of New York. On a motion for summary judgment, Hasbro argued that Segan's Frankenstuff copyright was invalid because it was derivative of the Universal version of the monster and, unlike Hasbro, Segan did not have a license from Universal. The Court acknowledged that there were many similarities between Segan's design and Universal's property, but held that there were disputed issues of material fact as to whether Frankenstuff was truly derivative of Universal's design, or merely "stirred one's memory" of that design. The Court also held that summary judgment was not appropriate as to whether Frankenstuff and Big Frank were substantially similar to each other, as there were more than de minimis substantial similarities in protected expression, in particular the heart mechanism.

5. Frankenstein saved your VCR!

Finally, remember that time Frankenstein's monster saved your VCR? Ok, that's a bit of an exaggeration, but the monster was right there in the middle of one of the Supreme Court's most important fair use cases.

By 1976, consumers had started to discover the joys of home video, and were using Sony Betamax devices to record their favorite programs from broadcast television. Universal (and other movie studios) filed a copyright case alleging that, by making this consumer copying possible, Sony was secondarily liable for massive copyright infringement.

In order to bring a case for secondary infringement, the movie studios had to prove some primary infringement. Towards that end, the plaintiffs presented evidence of five consumers who, although not themselves defendants, were the primary infringers for whose acts Sony was allegedly secondarily liable. One of these consumers was Marc Wielage, who purchased a Sony Betamax 7200 so he could tape his favorite Universal monster movies, such as Frankenstein , House of Frankenstein and Son of Frankenstein, and watch them at a time of his convenience.

The California Central District Court held that Wielage's copying amounted to non-commercial "time-shift" viewing of material made available over the public airwaves, and was therefore a fair use. The Ninth Circuit reversed, and the case made it all the way to the Supreme Court. In Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed with the District Court that the sale of home video recorders to the public did not constitute secondary infringement because the underlying challenged use of the devices, unauthorized home time-shift viewing, was fair use.

Unfortunately for Frankenstein fans, the individual examples of consumer infringers didn't make it into Justice John Paul Steven's majority opinion. However, Justice Stevens understood that his decision was not only saving the home recording industry generally, but specifically making the world safe for Marc Wielage's Betamax copy of Bride of Frankenstein.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
13 Nov 2018, Webinar, Boston, United States

Social media platforms present countless opportunities for companies looking to connect to consumers and clients in real time.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions