United States: Six Degrees Of Separation: Eleventh Circuit Upholds A Broad ‘Related Claims' Provision

Last Updated: October 23 2018
Article by Amanda D. Proctor

"Related Claims" provisions in directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) policies, while common, can spawn disagreement as to scope and application. Beyond these substantive questions, an issue arises as to what information a court may consider in determining whether two or more claims are "related" within the meaning of a given policy. The Eleventh Circuit recently analyzed this issue in Health First, Inc. v. Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation, No. 17-11181 (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2018).

In Health First, the insured (Health First, Inc.), a Florida health care company, obtained D&O and E&O claims-made policies from various insurers, including Executive Risk Indemnity Inc., Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Capital Specialty Insurance Corp., Darwin National Assurance Co., and Darwin Select Insurance Co. Each policy contained a "related claim" provision, which generally provided that "[a]ll Related Claims, whenever made, shall be deemed to be a single Claim and shall be deemed to have been first made' whenever the earliest related claim was made." "Related Claims," in turn, were defined by the policies as:

[A]ll Claims for Wrongful Acts based on, arising out of, directly or indirectly resulting from, in consequence of, or in any way involving the same or related facts, circumstances, situations, transactions or events or the same or related series of facts, circumstances, situations, transactions or events, whether related logically, causally or in any other way.

Beginning in 1998, Health First was sued in a series of six suits by different plaintiffs alleging various forms of anticompetitive behavior. In the first two suits filed by Wuesthoff Health Systems ("Wuesthoff I" and "Wuestoff II") in 1998 and 1999, the plaintiff alleged that Health First used its regional market dominance to coerce health insurers and physicians to stop working with Wuesthoff.

In 2005 and 2007, Wuesthoff later filed two additional suits ("Wuestoff III" and "Wuestoff IV") alleging that Health First engaged in anticompetitive behavior because "Health First's managed-care plans referred patients exclusively to Health First facilities," which placed independent plans at a competitive disadvantage. The Wuesthoff III complaint further alleged that "Health First had initiated an unsuccessful regulatory challenge to Wuesthoff's expansion into South Brevard County, and then attempted to expand its own operations into Central Brevard County, where Wuesthoff was based, in an attempt to directly target Wuesthoff."

Following the Wuesthoff suits, Dr. Richard Hynes and his employer, the B.A.C.K. Center, filed a class action ("Hynes") in May 2007 alleging that the insured engaged in anticompetitive behavior by "reward[ing] providers who referred patients exclusively to Health First facilities and punish[ing] providers who did not." Finally, Omni Healthcare, the Intervention Spine Institute of Florida, and individual medical providers filed suit in September 2013 ("Omni") alleging that Health First engaged in anticompetitive behavior by denying referrals to Omni from Health First affiliates and hospital privileges at Health First hospitals.

Health First reported all of these suits to its insurers for coverage. Executive Risk, the insurer for the 1997 and 1998 policies, accepted coverage for Wuesthoff I-IV, and Hynes, which collectively exhausted the policy limits for the 1997 and 1998 policies. The insurers, however, refused to accept the remainder of the suits for coverage under later policies because the insurers had concluded that all of the suits were related to Wuestoff I and II.

Health First then filed suit seeking declaratory relief and damages for the insurers' failure to provide indemnification for Wuesthoff III, IV, Hynes, and OMNI cases under its later insurance policies. The insurers moved for summary judgment arguing that the complaint allegations in the six suits demonstrated that the claims asserted therein were "related" within the meaning of their respective policies. Health First, however, argued that the facts developed in the underlying suits demonstrated that the claims were not "related" within the meaning of the policies.

The district court rejected Health First's argument and granted summary judgment in favor of the insurers. In doing so, the district court reasoned: "[c]ourts do not require a showing of the actual facts to determine whether multiple claims are related. Rather courts often focus on and compare the underlying allegations to determine if multiple claims are related under an insurance policy's related claims provision." After reviewing the allegations in the various lawsuits and the policies at issue, "[t]he [district] court determined that all the lawsuits described conduct from a 'common scheme' that Health First had undertaken 'with the overarching goal of furthering their own success, dominating the South and Central Brevard County healthcare markets, eliminating competition, and establishing a monopoly in the healthcare service industry.'" As such, all the lawsuits were "related" to Wuesthoff I and II and thus were not covered by the later policies.

On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed both the district court's decision to limit its inquiry to the allegations in the underlying lawsuits, as well as its conclusion that the suits were "related." With respect to the first issue, the court recognized that generally the duty to indemnify under Florida law is governed by the facts developed in the underlying suit against the insured. Nevertheless, the court noted that the duty to defend — which is broader than and encompasses the duty to indemnify — is based solely on the facts as alleged in the complaint. Thus, if a duty to defend does not exist in the first instance, there can be no duty to indemnify. Based on this rationale, the Eleventh Circuit approved the district court's reliance on the allegations of the underlying complaints to determine whether there was any set of facts alleged therein that could possibly give rise to coverage under the later policies.

Importantly, however, the Eleventh Circuit did not foreclose the court's ability to look beyond the underlying complaints to determine claims are "related" within the meaning of any given policy. In that regard, the court stated:

Critical to our decision is that Health First has not pointed, either in the District Court or on appeal, to any extrinsic evidence showing that the allegations made in the complaints were actually unrelated. At no point in the District Court or before this Court has Health First presented any affidavits or other evidence hinting at a genuine dispute of material fact. And as pointed out at oral argument, Health First was the defendant in all the relevant actions, many of which had already settled. As a result, Health First was better positioned than any of the insurers to present evidence from those underlying cases to strengthen its position, but it chose not to do so.

Thus, if Health First had pointed to extrinsic evidence, the district court may have considered it.

As to the second issue, the Eleventh Circuit similarly agreed that the claims were related to Wuesthoff I and II. In so holding, the Eleventh Circuit noted that the definition of "related claims" in the policies was extremely broad, encompassing claims "in any way involving the same or related facts...whether related logically, causally or in any other way." The "in any other way" language, for the court, means that "a somewhat attenuated connection" would suffice for two or more claims to be related. Viewed against this definition, the court held that the suits clearly alleged "a continuing pattern of anticompetitive behavior" by Health First, which would fall within the scope of the "related claims" provision.

There are two important takeaways from the Health First decision for insurance practitioners. First, while the "related claims" analysis may be a fact-intensive inquiry, the allegations in the complaints are often sufficient for the analysis. If the allegations themselves show no facts under which the claims could be unrelated, then an analysis of extrinsic facts may not be necessary. Second, "related claims" provisions, if drafted broadly, can have sweeping impacts on the extent of available coverage. In Health First, the "related claims" provision operated to bar coverage for a lawsuit filed 15 years after the initial claim. As the Eleventh Circuit court explained, "[i]n the end, Health First is stuck with the policies it paid for."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions