United States: Are Rumors Of The Demise Of The Public Company Greatly Exaggerated?

Last Updated: August 21 2018
Article by Cydney Posner

As you've surely read and heard, there's been a tremendous amount of hand wringing, particularly at the agency and congressional levels, about the steep decline in the number of public companies and IPOs. For example, in congressional testimony in 2017, SEC Chair Jay Clayton expressed concern regarding the decline in the number of public companies, contending that it is Mr. and Ms. 401(k) who bear the cost of this trend because they now have "fewer opportunities...to invest directly in high quality companies." (See this PubCo post.) The topic has also been taken up by various House committees, SEC advisory committees and SEC forums, as well as by securities and industry organizations. (See this PubCo post, this PubCo post and this PubCo post.) However, in this article, a Cambridge professor cries "nonsense": the primary dangers to public company status, such as buyouts by private equity and a recent bias against conducting IPOs, do not pose "an existential threat to the American public company." While there are certainly fewer public companies than in decades past, "the public company remains as crucial a feature of the American economy as it has ever been."


In his testimony, Clayton attributed much of the decline in the number of IPOs to regulatory overload: "fewer companies are choosing to go public in their growth phase or at all and, consequently and significantly, there are fewer investment opportunities for Main Street investors. It is clear to me that our public capital markets are relatively less attractive to growing businesses than in the past. Based on my review and discussions with Commission staff and others, the reporting, compliance and oversight dynamic between private and public markets appears out of sync. Costs—ranging from direct compliance costs to the consumption of management and employee bandwidth—for public companies, particularly smaller and medium-sized companies, far outstrip those of comparable private companies. Thus, many companies with the choice of going public may be incentivized to stay private or stay private longer."

But a well-armed Senator Elizabeth Warren took Clayton on. In 1996, she said, the dot.com peak, there were 624 IPOs with a deal volume of $36 billion. From 2012 to 2016, there were about half that number of IPOs, but they had a higher average annual deal volume, and in 2014, the deal volume for IPOs was $96 billion, almost three times the deal volume in 1996. That means that, even though there were fewer deals, more money was actually being invested than in 1996. Wasn't that better for investors, she asked? Clayton responded that it was better for investors to be able to invest at earlier stages and to ride the growth curve up rather than to invest in more mature companies. He was concerned that there was more private money taking advantage of the growth curve and that these private investors were profiting more than the later public investors. But Warren again looked to the data, which she said showed that investing in fewer bigger IPOs was better for investors. Investors were pouring more money into IPOs now, and the current crop of IPO companies tended to have more revenue and to perform better in the long run than in the past, she said, which should actually benefit Mr. & Mrs. 401(k). He may fear, she suggested, that something is wrong with the market as a result of the rules and regulations, but, in her view, IPO companies now were more stable and, ultimately, that was better for investors. The SEC's mission, she said, was to watch out for investors. Clayton responded that he understood. (See this PubCo post and this PubCo post.)

The author begins by emphasizing the importance of public companies to the US economy: for example, while only 4,300 of America's 28 million businesses are public companies, they are responsible for half of all business capital spending. In addition, it was among U.S. public companies that serious discussions of corporate governance issues took hold. However, there was a "substantial drop in the public company population from the late 1990s through to the late 2000s and there has not been a meaningful rally in the years since...despite the overall number of firms operating in the U.S. increasing from 4.70 million in 1996 to 5.04 million in 2012 and despite the number of companies listed on stock markets outside the U.S. increasing 28 percent over that same period." Part of that decline, the author asserts, is attributable to the attractiveness of private equity buyouts. In addition, the reluctance of promising and sizeable companies—exemplified by the phenomenon of the "unicorn," which used to be rare, but in 2018, numbered 105—to access the public markets, dating from the dot com bust, has dampened IPO activity.

While excessive regulation has been cited as a major deterrent, the author considers it "doubtful... whether regulation has played a major role in dissuading firms from going public." For example, he argues, the period post-JOBS Act provided significant deregulation, but witnessed only a "very modest" increase in IPO activity. Instead, he argues, the "reticence regarding IPOs has in fact been due primarily to market factors. If a privately held company with promising prospects is producing relatively little cash flow, for the proprietors the possibility of raising capital by selling shares to the public can provide a compelling reason to join the stock market. A desire to provide liquidity for current shareholders can do the same." Now, however, there are a variety of private opportunities for liquidity, such as platforms for secondary trading in private companies. With regard to availability of capital, companies can now "scale up more cheaply" than in the past as a result of the increasingly technology-intensive economy and no longer need to have recourse to the public markets as a result of the ready availability of private capital.

None of these factors, the author asserts, portend the doom for the public company as has been portrayed: "In fact, public-to-private buyouts do not pose any sort of existential threat to the dominance of the public company." Although there was a spike in private equity buyout activity in the mid-2000s, the author points out, it screeched to a halt during the 2008 financial crisis and never regained that same altitude, as private equity firms began to diversify their activities. What's more, the author contends, "[p]rivate equity... is now an afterthought amongst America's largest corporations. Of the 20 private companies with revenue exceeding the 2017 Fortune 500's 200th ranked company only... a grocery retailer that also placed 49th in the Fortune 500...was under private equity control." While "public-to-private buyouts continue to occur, they are not currently transforming the face of American corporate capitalism" as had previously been predicted.

And, even if fewer companies conduct IPOs, they often still end up on the public market, even if indirectly: with regard to "prosperous start-ups, they most often do end up linked to the stock market, albeit quite often through the indirect route of being acquired by a company that is already publicly traded. A by-product is that, while there are fewer public companies than there used to be, those which are listed on the stock market are larger than they were formerly." Accordingly, the author maintains," the economic significance of the public company has not been fundamentally compromised." What this means is that, for a promising start-up, a sale of the company to a large established public company has "has since 2000 grown considerably in popularity in relation to IPOs as an 'exit' mechanism." As a result, "the assets most often end up in the public company realm, albeit by a different route."

Moreover, he predicts, "if a sale to an established company is not forthcoming, regardless of misgivings among the proprietors about going public a combination of the financial and liquidity factors that prompt IPOs will likely tip the balance over time in favour of a public offering. While exit options for shareholders in private companies have improved, the stock market remains the most convenient venue for selling shares. As for raising cash, even the best-resourced unicorn is unlikely to have the financial wherewithal to carry out large scale acquisitions."

In addition, he contends, companies "have been staying private for longer, not forever"; the median age of companies conducting an IPO is 50% higher now than 20 years ago, with the result that "companies moving to the stock market are bigger than used to be the case. This is evidenced by the fact that the decline in annual aggregate IPO proceeds since 2000 has been much less precipitous than the decline in the number of IPOs."

But is it the case that "the decline of the American public company is less precipitous than is widely perceived but is occurring nevertheless"? Not in the author's view. In fact, he contends,

"public companies arguably are currently as important relative to the U.S. economy as they ever have been, if not more so. The relationship can be measured by reference to the ratio of the aggregate market capitalization of publicly traded stocks to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Due to a stock market rally that began following the 2008 financial crisis, by 2015 the ratio was close to previous all-time highs.... With stock prices having increased markedly since then, the stock market has probably never been bigger in relation to the American economy than it is now."

Although the number of public companies has declined, their market caps are much larger: "In 2017 the market capitalization of listed U.S. companies averaged almost $7 billion, more than 10 times as much on an inflation-adjusted basis as the equivalent figure for 1976." The author recognizes that one result of this trend is that "public investors have less scope to capture the upside with fledgling companies experiencing rapid initial growth and to gain exposure to fast-growing industry segments"—as noted above, a complaint regularly voiced by the SEC Chair Clayton. "Nevertheless," he concludes "the public company continues to dominate the big business landscape in the U.S. and current trends suggest the pattern should endure."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions