United States: NJ Confirms The Court's Gatekeeper Function And Joins The Slow March Toward State-Court Acceptance Of Daubert

Twenty-five years after the United States Supreme Court's seminal decision on the admissibility of expert evidence, New Jersey has confirmed that it accepts the factors identified in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as part of its expert admissibility analysis in civil cases. In re: Accutane Litigation, No. A-25-17, -- A.2d --, 2018 WL 3636867 (N.J. 2018). The In re Accutane opinion completes New Jersey's march away from the "general acceptance" test originally articulated in Frye v. United States, towards a methodologybased approach for expert reliability that began in 1991 with the pre-Daubert case, Rubanick v. Witco Chem. Corp., 593 A.2d 733 (N.J. 1991). The Court determined that Daubert had the same goals as New Jersey's preexisting precedent related to expert admissibility, specifically, both support a methods-based test and both ask whether an expert's opinions and reasoning are scientifically valid. Thus, the Court held, the Daubert factors "dovetail with the overall goals of [New Jersey's] evidentiary standard and would provide a helpful – but not necessary or definitive – guide for our courts to consider when performing their gatekeeper role concerning the admission of expert testimony." In re Accutane, 2018 WL 3636867 at * 32.

The difference between Daubert and Frye is material and often outcome determinative. Theoretically, the Frye standard is more restrictive, however most Courts applying Frye do not focus on the "gatekeeping" aspect of the judicial function. Therefore, while, in theory, Daubert allows more questionable opinions into the Courtroom, the rigorous "gatekeeping" requirements often end up being the important part of the decision to litigants. "Gatekeeping" has long been part of New Jersey law, particularly by application of the "net opinion" rule. Buckelew v. Grossbard, 87 N.J. 512 (1981). In In re Accutane, the Court was careful to reaffirm the value of providing guidance to trial courts: "[r]ecognizing proper gatekeeping when it is performed provides a discernible pathway for other courts to follow." In re Accutane, 2018 WL 3636867 at *28; see also Landrigan v. Celotex Corp., 605 A.2d 1079, 1086 (N.J. 1992) ("Defined landmarks guide a trial court in making this determination")

In re Accutane does not purport to overrule preexisting New Jersey law on expert admissibility; instead it clarifies that the original Daubert factors are harmonious with and encompassed by New Jersey law. It is clear that New Jersey does not have a preference for "let it all in" judicial analysis, and judicial exclusion of questionable evidence will be given substantial deference by appellate Courts. Trial courts can and must weigh expert methodologies and potential testimony with great rigor, giving trial courts "permission," and even charge, to take their gatekeeper roles seriously:

When this Court modified the general acceptance standard to adopt a more relaxed approach for causation expert testimony in toxic tort litigation, and later for all medical cause-effect expert testimony, it envisioned the trial court's function as that of a gatekeeper -- deciding what is reliable enough to be admitted and what is to be excluded. Those are not credibility determinations that are the province of the jury, but rather legal determinations about the reliability of the expert's methodology. . . Charged with determining whether to admit expert testimony, the trial court is responsible for advancing the truth seeking function of our system of justice.

Even if it only represents a "recap" of existing New Jersey law, by recognizing the Daubert factors, In re Accutane brings New Jersey in line with the majority of other states, thus advancing uniformity in expert evidence rules, and ultimately limiting the potential for forum shopping. With the addition of New Jersey, the courts of 41 states and the District of Columbia now look to the Daubert factors to assess expert reliability. Others may soon follow.

It will be interesting to watch whether the last remaining Frye stalwarts, like Florida, Pennsylvania, California, and New York, find decisions like In re Accutane persuasive enough to consider a shift towards Daubert and a consistent, nationwide standard for the judicial role of gatekeeping and for expert admissibility. Florida, which currently adheres to the Frye "general acceptance" test, is a candidate to fall into line next. In March 2018, the Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Delisle v. Crane Co., et al., SC16-2182, in which the court was asked whether recent legislative changes to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure incorporated the Daubert standard. New York has also made some fits and starts towards making gatekeeping a serious judicial obligation, even without abrogating Frye. See Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp., 857 N.E. 2d 1114 (N.Y. 2006).

Of additional interest to those practicing in toxic tort and other exposure-based litigation is the Court's approval of the trial court's analysis regarding the proper role of epidemiology. In particular, the court agreed that selective "cherry picking" of which epidemiological studies to rely upon is unacceptable, and favorably pointed to the hierarchy of evidence set forth in the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (which places animal studies and case reports at the bottom). In addition, the Court noted with disapproval application of the so-called "Bradford Hill" criteria1 absent a study demonstrating an actual association between the exposure and the disease in question. This approach is consistent with other recent decisions in New Jersey, including the unpublished decision in Carl v. Johnson & Johnson, ATL-L-6546- 14, ATL-6540-14, 2016 WL 4580145 (N.J. Super. Sept. 2, 2016) (finding fault with Plaintiffs' experts' selective reading of epidemiology, while also not being able to explain to the trial court's satisfaction the biological plausibility of talc causing cancer).

That New Jersey, home to much of the pharmaceutical industry, has welcomed questionable expert methodology in toxic tort cases, has always posed an odd disconnect. Whether plaintiffs will now have to look elsewhere to find a friendly forum remains to be seen, but what is clear is that the appellate Courts in New Jersey will back lower Courts that wish to take a gatekeeper role seriously.


1. The Bradford Hill criteria include a weighing of the following factors if an association between an exposure and the injury is found: (1) strength of association (i.e., is the association strong and statistically significant?); (2) consistency of the relationship whether it has been repeatedly observed in other persons?) (3) specificity of association (i.e., is there a particular association between the substance and the condition it purportedly causes?); (4) temporality (are the cause and effect bound in time, or as Hill states, "which is the cart and which is the horse?); (5) biological gradient (does the association reveal a dose-response curve?); (6) plausibility (i.e., whether there exists a biologically plausible mechanism by which the agent could cause the disease?); (7) coherence (does cause-and effect interpretation of the data conflict with the history and biology of the disease?); (8) experiment (is the frequency of the associated events affected by reducing the amount of the suspected substance?); (9) analogy (should science anticipate similar results from a consideration of alternative explanations?). Hill AB, The environment and disease: association or causation?, Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58:295–300 (1965).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions