United States: Learning From Apple v Samsung

Last Updated: August 1 2018
Article by Richard M. LaBarge

If you use design patents or have competitors who do, a recent decision in the Apple v Samsung war deserves attention. This article offers ideas for those patenting their company's designs, for those designing around competitors' patents, for those being charged with design patent infringement, and for those asserting infringement.

As background, the patent statute (37 CFR 289) authorises the owner of a design patent to recover the "total profit" that an infringer makes from use of the patented design on "any article of manufacture". In its 2016 Apple v Samsung decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the "article of manufacture" referenced isn't necessarily the product that the defendant sold.

The court didn't say how to identify the right "article of manufacture", and sent the case back to the Federal Circuit to decide that. That court, in turn, remanded the case to the trial court. There, the jury was finally instructed to base a damage award on whatever product "most fairly... embod[ied] Samsung's appropriation of Apple's patent designs". The jury was instructed to consider:

  • What the patent itself said about what was patented;
  • The relative prominence of the claimed design on the overall product;
  • The degree to which the design can be considered "conceptually distinct" from the overall product; and
  • The physical connectedness between the patented design and the rest of the overall product.

The jury wasn't asked to spell out what it considered to be the right article of manufacture but, in its May verdict, awarded Apple damages for design patent infringement of $533m: roughly half of Samsung's profits on its infringing smartphones.

The trial court's instructions might not have stood on appeal. But those last decisions inspire some ideas.

Applying for a design patent

If your company is (for example) an automaker that has designed a new cup holder for its cars, you might be inclined to try to patent that cup holder. And patenting a design for a cup holder could put your company in a good position to recover the profits of companies that sell replacement cup holders. But it's not clear how damages would be measured when competing automakers simply put infringing cup holders in their cars.

If your design is patentable as a design for a cup holder, then (under current law) it's probably also patentable as a design for "a vehicle" itself".1 And if you patent that cup holder as a design for "a vehicle" (identifying the vehicle as the "article of manufacture" on which the design is used), then you might argue that the defendant's vehicle should be the appropriate "article of manufacture" on which to base a damage award under the statute.

On its face, the statute seems to presume that the patented design is ornamental enough to sell whatever product you decide to name as the "article of manufacture". That presumption doesn't always align with market realities – it is unlikely that anyone would buy a car because of the ornamental design of its cup holders. To address the disconnect between what the statute seems to presume and what sometimes happens in the market, the Supreme Court authorised courts to conclude that some other "article of manufacture" might be the appropriate one to consider when assessing damages.

Even with that new wrinkle, an automaker who wants to stop other automakers from copying its cup holder might still be better off patenting a design for "a vehicle" than patenting the same design as a design for "a cup holder". The Supreme Court didn't say you can't recover the profits on the sale of the product that the infringer actually sells, it only said that it is no longer automatic that you can get those profits as damages. So, if your competitors sell cars, you might want to patent your designs as designs for cars even if the design is "just" the shape of a new cup holder in those cars.

You might also consider changing the way you illustrate the design in your patent drawings. Design patent drawings commonly use both solid and broken lines, with the design being defined by what is shown in solid lines, and the broken lines being generally ignored. Some practitioners use solid lines only for the elements of the product that are crucial to evoke the desired aesthetic impression. If the design resides in the shape of a cup holder in your car, then only that cup holder is shown in solid lines. But instead of showing only the cup holder in solid lines, you might now consider showing some generic features of the car – such as the back wheels – in solid lines too. Because the rear wheels on your competitors' cars will probably look very similar to yours (they are, after all, just wheels), then showing those details in solid lines might not narrow the effective scope of your patent much. But it could make it harder for an infringer to assert that your claimed design conceptually and physically resides only in the cup holder. That, in turn, could strengthen your damage case against a competing automaker.

Designing around a competitor's product

Let's change the example. If you fear that a competitor will claim that the casing on your new smartphone looks too similar to the casing on its smartphone, you might check if it is practical to have the casing engineered as a separate structural component of your phone. If your company is sued, replacing that component might be easier than redesigning the whole phone. And having the casing as a separate structural component could help you argue that the infringing "article of manufacture" is that separate casing component, not the overall product. If you can win on that, it could reduce your potential damages exposure significantly.

If it's practical to put the disputed ornamental elements on a separate structural component, then you might also consider offering to sell that component to your customers at a reasonable price. If you charge $500 for your phone, but offer replacement casings for $25, then you may have evidence and an argument that no more than 5% ($25/$500) of your smartphone profits are attributable to the shape of the casing.

Defending an infringement claim If you've already been sued, then consider developing a separate name for the portion of your overall product that bears the pertinent design elements of your accuser's patent and point to that portion as the "article of manufacture" for damages purposes. Wouldn't it be unfair to have to turn over the profits on the whole product when so much of the value resides in its other parts?

If the claimed design is only a trivial part of why a customer would ever buy the overall product, then also consider arguing that the patent should be struck down on the grounds that it is not sufficiently ornamental to support the design patent. To be valid, a patented design must not only be new and original, it must also be ornamental. See 35 USC § 171(a). Consider arguing that while the design in question might be ornamental enough to support a patent on the particular component on which it is used, it's not sufficiently ornamental to support a patent on the overall product ie, it's not ornamental enough to make people buy the overall product, as the damage statute seems to presume.

Yes, you'll be fighting uphill against a presumption that any issued patent is valid. And it is true that some cases seem to suggest that it's a low bar for meeting the ornamental requirement. But cases like In re Stevens, 173 F. 2d 1015 (CCPA 1949) suggest that even designs that have ornamental aspects may not meet the ornamental requirement if they aren't ornamental enough to sell the claimed product. In that case (and some others like it), the ornamental aspects of the product were found to be unlikely to sell the product because they were hidden from view in ordinary use. But you might argue that what's important about the cases isn't the factual reasons why the ornamentation was inadequate to sell the product, but rather the courts' conclusion that designs that aren't ornamental enough to sell the claimed product shouldn't be patentable.

Bringing an infringement claim

At trial, you'll probably drum home that the "article of manufacture" in question is the defendant's overall product. The fact finder might be asked to spell out what it considers to be the right article of manufacture, and if you've used that particular jargon enough, it might reflexively call to mind the defendant's overall product.

If there is a jury, you might also consider asking for an instruction that the product identified in the title and the claim of the patent be presumed to be the article of manufacture in question. That might be a stretch, but it would be no stretch to say that "the article of manufacture" for which the design is patented is the product named in the title and claim of the patent. Federal regulations (37 CFR 1.153) specifically require that.


1. To claim the car (rather than the cup holder itself) is easy. You just change the title and the wording of the claim, and show the cup holder installed in a simplified car body shown in broken lines.

Originally published in Intellectual Property Magazine. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Archer & Greiner P.C.
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Archer & Greiner P.C.
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions