United States: GAO Rejects US Army's Misuse Of P-OTA Authority

Last Updated: June 29 2018
Article by Steven M. Masiello, Joseph G. Martinez, Thomas Rath and Joel Hamner

On May 31, 2018, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a decision reaffirming its willingness to police an agency's decision to utilize a so-called "other transaction agreement," or OTA, when doing so deviates from the limited purposes for using OTAs in lieu of procurement contracts. Specifically, Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle) challenged the US Army's (Army) award of a follow-on production OTA (P-OTA) to REAN Cloud, LLC (REAN).1 The GAO sustained Oracle's protest, concluding that the Army failed to articulate the possibility of a follow-on P-OTA in the original, prototype OTA and improperly awarded the P-OTA before the original, prototype OTA was complete. In addition, the GAO addressed procedural issues that will shape future protests in the context of OTAs, including applying a broad definition of "interested party" when determining that Oracle had standing to protest the award and confirming GAO's jurisdiction to consider a protest related to an OTA. Despite the protestor-friendly outcome on these issues, GAO's decision in this case also confirms that agencies have broad authority to use OTAs by holding that "pilot" or "test" programs, as well as projects designed to demonstrate a contractor's capabilities, may fit within the ambit of prototype OTA efforts—even if the capabilities being tested or demonstrated are already commercially available.


In mid-June 2016, the DoD's Defense Innovation Unit (Experimental) (DIUx) published a Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) Special Notice informing companies in the technology industry of forthcoming "award[] funding agreements." The CSO advertised that the forthcoming agreements contemplated future, prototype projects with the potential for "follow-on funding for promising technologies . . . and possible follow-on production." Then, in March 2017, the DIUx issued an Area of Interest statement (AOI) related to an emergent TRANSCOM software need. The AOI sought the submission of solution briefs related to "the prototyping of a robust and scalable software development environment to enable the modernization of [DoD] command and control systems in a cloud infrastructure." Throughout March 2017, the DIUx received 21 solution briefs, including one from REAN. Oracle did not submit a solution brief. From the 21 briefs submitted, TRANSCOM, Army Contracting Command–New Jersey (ACC–NJ), and the DIUx selected five companies to conduct a subsequent presentation where each company would demonstrate its proposed solution. Following presentations, TRANSCOM, ACC–NJ and the DIUx selected two companies, including REAN, to receive a request for prototype proposal (RPP). Neither the RPP nor REAN's proposal referred to a possible follow-on production transaction. On May 10, ACC–NJ executed a determination and findings (D&F) to approve the use of its other transaction authority for the award of a prototype OTA to REAN.

From May to November 2017, REAN worked on developing a "repeatable automated [software] methodology" that would migrate the legacy TRANSCOM applications to a government-authorized commercial cloud environment. On November 8, TRANSCOM concluded that REAN had "performed the requirements" of the prototype OTA, despite the fact that work relating to one OTA modification was still ongoing. On November 14, ACC–NJ notified REAN that "as a follow-on to the successful completion of the prototype OTA," it intended to enter into a P-OTA for REAN to "deploy, implement and sustain" the software product it had developed. On February 1, 2018, ACC–NJ executed a D&F concluding that the requirements of 10 USC section 2371b had been met and ACC–NJ could award the P-OTA. That same day, REAN and ACC–NJ executed the P-OTA.

The P-OTA had a not-to-exceed value of US$950 million and was structured similar to an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) ordering agreement that was available for use by other DoD entities through an order placed by ACC–NJ. On February 2, ACC–NJ placed the first order against the P-OTA at a value of over US$14 million. On February 12, the Army posted the notice of award on FedBizOpps. On February 20, Oracle filed the protest. On March 1, the DoD chief management officer and the undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment directed the DIUx to reduce the value of the production agreement to a ceiling of US$65 million and to limit the services provided to TRANSCOM alone.


Oracle argued (and the GAO agreed) that the Army's use of P-OTA authority failed to comply with 10 USC section 2371b because the Army: (i) failed to articulate the possibility of a follow-on P-OTA in the original, prototype OTA; and (ii) improperly awarded the P-OTA prior to completion of the original, prototype OTA.

Prior to reaching those issues, the GAO addressed two important threshold matters. First, it reiterated that it has jurisdiction and will consider protests alleging that an agency improperly used an OTA when a competitive procurement was required instead. In other words, while the GAO will not hear protests challenging an agency's decision to award an OTA to a particular entity, it will determine "whether the agency's use of its discretionary authority [to use an OTA vehicle] was proper, i.e., knowing and authorized."

The second threshold issue considered by the GAO was whether Oracle was an interested party to protest, given that it did not submit a solution brief. The GAO agreed with Oracle's argument that neither the CSO nor the AOI provided adequate notice of the agency's intent to issue a P-OTA and that this provided "a sufficient basis for the protester to argue that it would have submitted a solution brief had the AOI reasonably described the intended procurement." The GAO's holding is consistent with protests challenging the award of a task order on the grounds that the order exceeds the scope of the underlying contract. In that situation, the GAO has held that a party that would have been capable of submitting a proposal had the order been the subject of an open competition has standing to protest that competitive procedures were not used. Extending this logic to OTA and follow-on P-OTA situations may increase the potential for third-party protests.

Turning to the merits, the GAO first rejected Oracle's argument that the commercial availability of similar cloud-based capabilities rendered the original, prototype transaction an improper use of OTA authority. The GAO relied upon the broad definition of a "prototype project" in the DoD's Other Transaction Guide for Prototype Projects, rather than Oracle's recommended dictionary definition. The DoD definition considers "pilot" and "test" programs, as well as projects designed to demonstrate a contractor's capabilities, to fall within the scope of prototype OTA procurement efforts, even if the capabilities being tested or demonstrated are commercially available. The GAO's deference to the DoD on this matter encourages the use of prototype OTA authority, generally—a policy that is also reflected in the 2018 NDAA.

Concerning the parties' statutory contentions, the GAO's analysis was relatively demanding with respect to issues within its scope of review. Consistent with its discussion of jurisdictional matters, the GAO focused on the DoD's compliance with the statute authorizing the issuance of the P-OTA. Under 10 USC section 2371b(f), the DoD has authority to enter into a follow-on production transaction or contract following a successful prototype OTA. The DoD may award the subsequent production transaction or contract to the same participants as the prototype OTA without the use of competitive procedures if: "(A) competitive procedures were used for the selection of parties for participation in the transaction; and (B) the participants in the transaction successfully completed the prototype project provided for in the transaction.2 

The GAO found that the Army's reference to "possible follow-on production" in the CSO was insufficient to meet these requirements. Thus, the Army's failure to articulate the possibility of a follow-on P-OTA in the original, prototype OTA proved fatal to its attempted exercise of P-OTA authority. Secondly, the GAO held that the Army improperly awarded the P-OTA prior to completion of the original, prototype OTA. The government argued that because the unfinished work was part of a modification to the original scope of work under the prototype OTA, REAN had successfully completed "those 'parts of the prototype' project that were included in the P–OTA." The GAO found this argument unpersuasive. It reasoned that if the tasks under the modification "were not properly part of the 'prototype project,' then they would not be included in the Army's award authority under 10 U.S.C. §2371b(a)." Thus, the Army's attempted exercise of P-OTA authority was doubly flawed.


The GAO's recent decision encourages broad use of OTA authority through its adoption of agency-developed guidance in defining the scope of applicable, prototype projects. However, this holding is equally likely to encourage third-party protests in the prototype OTA and P-OTA contexts. In light of these developments, contractors should monitor the government's use of its OTA and P-OTA authority in their own transactions and in transactions where the government potentially fails to properly use an OTA instead of a procurement contract.


1 See Oracle Am., Inc., B-416061, 2018 WL 2676823 (Comp. Gen. May 31, 2018) (opinion released June 5, 2018).
2.10 USC §2371b(f)(2)(A)–(B).

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions