United States: US Employment Litigation Round-Up For May 2018

Recent Cases and New Laws Affecting Employers

Epic Systems and Dynamex: Landmark Decisions from the US Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court

In the past several weeks, the US and California Supreme Courts have each issued important decisions affecting the rights and duties of employers and employees:

  • On May 21, the US Supreme Court ruled in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285, that arbitration provisions with class waivers in employment agreements do not violate the National Labor Relations Act and instead are generally enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act. As a result, employers and employees will be able to enter into enforceable agreements requiring arbitration of employment disputes on an individual basis so long as those agreements provide individual workers with fair procedures for dispute resolution. Mayer Brown lawyers filed an amicus brief  with the Supreme Court on behalf of the US Chamber of Commerce, and they have written a blog post examining Epic Systems in more detail, which is available here.
  • On April 30, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018), in which it adopted a new, narrower test for determining whether a worker can properly be classified as an independent contractor under California's Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders. The new test requires the worker to: (a) be free from the control and direction of the hiring entity, (b) perform work outside the hiring entity's usual course of business and (c) customarily be engaged in an independently-established trade, occupation or business. This test will make it significantly more difficult for California employers to classify workers as independent contractors. Another Mayer Brown article analyzing Dynamex and its expected impact is available here.

Seventh Circuit Permits Outside Job Applicants to Assert Disparate Impact Claims under the ADEA, Creating Circuit Split

Decision: In Kleber v. CareFusion Corp., the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that job applicants can assert disparate impact claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA") against prospective employers. The plaintiff had responded to a job posting that sought applicants with no more than seven years of relevant experience. Kleber applied for the job despite having far more than seven years experience. CareFusion did not select him for an interview and eventually filled the position with a 29-year-old applicant. Kleber filed suit against CareFusion, alleging that the experience cap violated the ADEA because it had a disparate impact on older job applicants. The district court dismissed the case, holding that the ADEA's disparate impact provisions do not cover outside job applicants. The Seventh Circuit reversed and held that the ADEA protects both outside job applicants and current employees, explaining that it would be "arbitrary and even baffling" to interpret the statute so as to allow an internal applicant to sue for a disparate impact violation, while precluding an external applicant from doing so. The holding directly conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit's recent decision in Villareal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 839 F.3d 958 (11thCir. 2016) (en banc), which held that only current or former employees can bring ADEA disparate impact claims.

Impact: This ruling opens the door for a new line of lawsuits by employees challenging the disparate impact of employer recruiting and hiring practices. Employers should therefore consider whether their hiring and recruiting practices have a disproportionately negative impact on certain groups of applicants. In addition, the use of experience caps as a basis for a disparate impact claim will make it more challenging for employers to establish parameters to avoid hiring "overqualified applicants" in more junior-level positions.

District Court in California Rules That All Forms of Compensation Must Be Included in Regular Rate of Pay When Paying Rest Period Premiums

Decision: In a recent class action against a major financial services institution, plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit in the District Court for the Central District of California alleging, inter alia, that they were not provided with rest periods pursuant to California law. After litigation of the merits, the primary legal dispute before the court centered on how to calculate the premium payment that class members were entitled to receive for the failure to provide rest periods. Specifically, Labor Code section 226.7(c) mandates payment of one additional hour of pay at the employee's "regular rate of compensation" for each workday that rest periods are not provided. The employer in Ibarra contended that the "regular rate of compensation" should be based on the employee's hourly rate of pay, while the plaintiffs contended that the hourly rate should include all forms of compensation earned during the relevant pay period, including commissions and other non-discretionary pay.

The court held that the employee's "regular rate of compensation" under section 226.7 is not limited to the employee's hourly rate of pay but must include other forms of compensation. The court explained that the employees' "normal compensation was not comprised solely or even primarily of pay calculated at an hourly rate. By definition, it included hourly pay, incentive pay, and overtime premiums, and the hourly pay was stated to be only an advance on commissions." In so ruling, the court parted ways with several district courts in California that had ruled that section 226.7's "regular rate of compensation" language is distinguishable from Labor Code section 510's "regular rate of pay" language, which requires all forms of non-discretionary compensation to be included in the employee's "regular rate" for overtime premium pay purposes. The result was that the court awarded the class members approximately $97.2 million in damages, four times the damages that would have been owed had the premium pay been calculated using just the hourly rate of pay.

Impact: In light of the split among district courts regarding the appropriate method for calculating meal and rest period premiums, it is not clear how broad an impact this decision will have on California employers. The decision could arguably be limited to circumstances in which the employee's hourly rate of pay is not the primary factor in determining an employee's wages, such as where compensation is based on a combination of hourly pay and commissions. However, there is risk associated with such an interpretation given the court's determination that the language in Section 226.7 and Section 510 are not distinguishable. Additional guidance on this question may be forthcoming, as the employer has filed a notice of appeal of the district court's judgment to the Ninth Circuit.

Ninth Circuit Decision Eases Plaintiffs' Burdens in Wage & Hour Class Actions

Decision: In Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center, No. 15-56460, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court decision denying class certification in a wage-and-hour class action and in the process may have eased the burden on plaintiffs seeking to certify classes in future cases. In Sali, nurses filed a putative class action against their employer alleging a number of wage-and-hour violations, including failure to pay wages based on the employer's policy of rounding employee clock-in and clock-out times to the nearest quarter hour. The plaintiffs moved to certify a "rounding time" class. In support of that motion, plaintiffs submitted a declaration by a paralegal, who had created a spreadsheet based on the plaintiffs' payroll records to demonstrate that plaintiffs were underpaid due to the employer's rounding policy. The district court denied class certification in part on the ground that the paralegal's declaration was not admissible evidence, meaning plaintiffs had failed to offer any admissible evidence of their injuries.

The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that "[i]nadmissibilty alone is not a proper basis to reject evidence submitted in support of class certification." The court reasoned that "[l]imiting class-certification-stage proof to admissible evidence risks terminating actions before a putative class may gather crucial admissible evidence" through discovery. In so ruling, the Court deepened a split among the courts of appeals about whether admissible evidence is required to support class certification. The Ninth Circuit's decision sided with the Eighth Circuit but the Third, Fifth and Seventh Circuits have directly or indirectly held that admissible evidence is required.

Impact: The Ninth Circuit's decision in Sali has the potential to make the wage-and-hour class certification process easier for plaintiffs and their counsel. The Sali plaintiffs' strategy of relying on a paralegal's analysis of their compensable time, rather than an expert's analysis, could save plaintiffs' substantial costs by avoiding the need to retain experts for certification purposes.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2018. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions