United States: New Law On The Tax-Deductibility Of False Claims Act And Other Government Settlements

The recent tax reform law, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Tax Act), amended 26 U.S.C. § 162(f), the provision governing the tax-deductibility of settlement and judgment payments to governmental entities. 1 Section 162(f) applies to a broad range of settlements that resolve both federal and state matters, including False Claims Act (FCA) cases, securities actions, environmental enforcement, and consumer protection matters.

As before the Tax Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, continues to set forth a general rule of tax deductibility for "all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business." 2 But under § 162(f) as amended by the Tax Act, government settlements will be deductible only where three preconditions are satisfied. First, the settlement agreement itself must identify the payment as restitution or as an amount paid to come into legal compliance. 3 Second, when claiming the deduction, the taxpayer must independently establish that the payment is restitution or compliance-related. 4 Third, the payment cannot be deducted if it reimburses the government's investigation or litigation costs. 5

Just as importantly, a newly created provision, 26 U.S.C. § 6050X, requires that the settling government must, at the time of settlement, notify both the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the taxpayer of how the government characterizes the settlement payment (e.g., whether for restitution or remediation). Settlements are routinely paid out from earned income that has already been taxed, but historically, the federal government—particularly in FCA matters—complicated taxpayers' ability to deduct those payments by refusing to characterize the payments in the agreement. But now, § 6050X will force the government to take a position.

These changes raise more questions than they answer, especially because it is unclear how settling governments will leverage the new requirement that they characterize payments at the time of settlement. Regardless, anyone who negotiates a settlement with the government should understand the new law well ahead of any resolution.

I. The Old Law

Before the Tax Act amendments, § 162(f) contained a seemingly simple exception to the general rule permitting deductions for ordinary business expenses: "No deduction shall be allowed . . . for any fine or similar penalty paid to a government for the violation of any law." 6 Treasury regulations and case law fleshed out that provision's meaning. Compensatory damages paid to the government were deductible, 7 including funds paid to compromise claims without admitting liability. Conversely, fines, penalties, and amounts paid "in lieu of" such fines or penalties were non-deductible. 8

For example, when executing federal FCA settlement agreements, the internal policies of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) required its civil fraud attorneys to use tax-neutral language. As a result, determining deductibility became a fact-intensive inquiry for both the settling party (in deciding what position to take for purposes of its tax return and financial statements) and the IRS (in examining the tax treatment on audit).

The IRS used to treat the FCA's basic loss value of "single" damages as compensatory and therefore deductible (if incurred in the ordinary course of business). 9 The IRS also took the position that FCA relator's fees were compensatory and thus deductible expenses. 10 But the FCA authorizes the federal government to recover up to treble damages and penalties, and courts held that additional amounts beyond single damages and certain costs could be either punitive or compensatory, depending on the parties' intent. 11 Accordingly, if the facts showed that the parties intended for double or treble damages to be punitive, that portion of the payment was typically deemed non-deductible. 12

Thus, under the old law, the first step in establishing the deductibility of any government settlement was to determine whether the parties expressly allocated the settlement funds between compensatory and punitive payments. But, in the FCA context, DOJ policies instructed its attorneys to avoid any language that would let the private party argue to the IRS that the settlement was compensatory and thus deductible. Without such an allocation in the text of the settlement agreement, both the settling payor (in determining its position for tax purposes) and the IRS (if examining the treatment on audit) would then examine the calculated damages amount, the parties' negotiating history, and the government's claims in the underlying investigation or litigation to determine the parties' intent.

II. The Revised Law

The Tax Act substantially revised § 162(f). Those revisions are generally effective as to all amounts "paid or incurred on or after" the Tax Act's enactment on December 22, 2017. 13 As amended, § 162(f) generally prohibits tax deductions for money paid "to, or at the direction of, a government or governmental entity in relation to the violation of any law or the investigation or inquiry by such government or entity into the potential violation of any law." 14 Although the statute does not define "a government," the prior version also used the phrase "a government," and Treasury regulations made clear that this included the United States' federal, state, and local governments as well as governments of foreign countries. 15 Under the amended version of § 162(f), a "governmental entity" can also include nongovernmental regulatory bodies that "exercise[] self-regulatory powers (including imposing sanctions) in connection with a qualified [trade] board or [securities] exchange," or even potentially "as part of performing an essential governmental function." 16

Despite the amended statute's default prohibition on deducting government settlement payments, it also makes an exception for "amounts constituting restitution or paid to come into compliance with law." 17 Three preconditions must be satisfied. First, the settlement agreement itself must identify the payment "as restitution or as an amount paid to come into compliance with [the] law" that was allegedly violated. 18 Second, when claiming the deduction, the taxpayer must establish that the payment "constitutes restitution (including remediation of property) for damage or harm which was or may be caused by the violation of any law or the potential violation of any law," or "is paid to come into compliance with any law which was violated or otherwise involved in the [underlying] investigation or inquiry." 19 This requires that the taxpayer do more than cite the agreement's "identification" of the payments as restitution or compliance-related. 20 Third, the payments cannot be made to reimburse "the government or entity for the costs of any investigation or litigation." 21

The Tax Act also created a new reporting requirement for a settlement's governmental party, codified at 26 U.S.C. § 6050X. This new provision requires that the "appropriate official of any government" submit a report to the IRS that identifies both the total settlement amount and the portions paid as restitution or for compliance-related purposes. 22 "Appropriate official" is defined as "the officer or employee having control of the suit, investigation, or inquiry" or someone "appropriately designated." 23 In the federal context, this may often be an enforcement attorney at DOJ or another agency; at the state level, this may often be a member of the state attorney general's office.

The new governmental reporting requirement is triggered if the settlement equals or exceeds $600 (although that amount may be adjusted "as necessary in order to ensure the efficient administration of the internal revenue laws"). 24 The report must be filed "at the time the agreement is entered into"; the report must identify the total settlement amount; and the report must also identify the settlement amounts "which constitute[] restitution" and which are "for the purpose of coming into compliance with any law which was violated or involved in the investigation or inquiry." 25 At the time of the report's submission, every party to the settlement must also receive "a written statement" showing the amounts reported for the total settlement and whether they relate to restitution or compliance purposes26

III. Implications

If taxpayers hope to claim tax deductions for government settlements (and have such deductions upheld by the IRS on audit), the Tax Act now forces the issue onto the negotiating table. For heated negotiations, these new statutory provisions could raise significant hurdles to closing the deal.

Before settlement, the parties must now negotiate how the agreement will characterize payment. If the agreement does not characterize a payment as restitution or compliance-related, the payment cannot be deducted. There is no explicit requirement that the government must agree to include a payment characterization in a settlement agreement. Thus, taxpayers seeking to claim deductions must potentially negotiate not just the characterization, but also negotiate to include the final negotiated characterization in the agreement itself. Fortunately, the new reporting requirement effectively forces the governmental party to negotiate about the payment's characterization, because it must ultimately report a characterization to the IRS and the settling taxpayer. Therefore, taxpayers might consider insisting upon reviewing the government's proposed submissions to the IRS and the taxpayer before agreeing to the substantive settlement.

If a taxpayer will not be admitting liability or non-compliance, but wishes to later claim a tax deduction, the safest settlement language should hew closely to the statute. One possibility is to characterize the payment as "restitution for damage or harm which . . . may be caused by . . . the potential violation of" the laws in dispute. 27 However, it is unclear whether the IRS or other parties may interpret such language as an admission, notwithstanding any disclaimers elsewhere in the agreement.

Moreover, characterizing the payment's purpose is necessary but not sufficient to establish its deductibility. The government's report to the IRS might be helpful evidence of deductibility, but as before the Tax Act, the IRS may require that taxpayers present additional materials. Therefore, the taxpayer should continue to clearly document their negotiations with the government about the restitution amount, as well as the government's pre-settlement allegations and calculations of damages.

And although the Tax Act now prohibits deductions for payments to cover the government's legal costs, it is silent about similar payments to cover related third-party legal costs. In particular, the FCA authorizes relators to recover their reasonable attorney's fees and costs from FCA defendants, even when the case ends through settlement. 28 Such payments to relators are explicitly authorized by statute, so they arguably do not fall within the general prohibition on deducting payments to "to, or at the direction of, a government or governmental entity."29

As with many of the tax changes made by the Tax Act, it remains an open question how the IRS will actually apply and enforce the new deductibility provisions. But at a minimum, taxpayers who are negotiating or on the verge of signing government settlement agreements should be careful not to ignore the new preconditions for later claiming deductibility. And as a practical matter, taxpayers should begin addressing these issues and creating supporting documentation even before entering negotiations.

Footnotes

1 See generally  Pub. L. No. 115-97, H.R. 1 (Dec. 22, 2017), §13306.

2 26 U.S.C. § 162(a).

3 See 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A)(ii) (2018).

4 See  26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A)(i)(I) & (II) (2018).

5 See26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(B) (2018).

6 26 U.S.C. § 162(f) (pre-Tax Act)

7 Treas. Reg. § 1.162-21(b)(2) ("Compensatory damages (including damages under section 4A of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 15a), as amended) paid to a government do not constitute a fine or penalty.").

8 26 U.S.C. § 162(f); see,  e.g., Allied Signal, Inc. v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 1992-204 (Apr. 6, 1992), 1992 WL 67399 (amounts paid in lieu of fines or penalties nondeductible).

9 See  I.R.S. Field Serv. Adv. (May 26, 1995), 1995 WL 1918241 ("(T)he 1/3 or 1/2 portion of the damages representing the Government's loss is compensatory damages expressly excluded from the definition of fines or penalties in section 162(f) . . . and is therefore deductible under section 162(a).").

10 See  I.R.S. Coordinated Issue, False Claims Act Settlements with the Department of Justice (DOJ) (Sept. 5, 2008);see also Roco v. Comm'r, 121 T.C. 160, 165 (2003) (observing that relator's fees payments are "not a penalty imposed on the wrongdoer"); I.R.S. Chief Counsel Att'y Mem. 2007-015 (July 27, 2007) ("This conclusion is based upon the facts provided, one of which is that the settlement agreement clearly states that the relator would receive its fee and the agreed amount of that fee is specifically outlined in the settlement agreement.").

11 See I.R.S. Coordinated Issue, False Claims Act Settlements with the Department of Justice (DOJ) (Sept. 5, 2008); see also Waldman v. Comm'r, 88 T.C. 1384, 1387 (1987) ("Where a payment ultimately serves each of these purposes, i.e., law enforcement (nondeductible) and compensation (deductible), our task is to determine which purpose the payment was designed to serve.").

12 See Talley Industries, Inc. v. Comm'r, 116 F.3d 382, 387 (9th Cir. 1997); Cook Cnty., Ill. v. United States ex rel. Chandler, 538 U.S. 119, 130 (2003); Grossman & Sons v. Comm'r, 48 T.C. 15, 31 (1967).

13 See Pub. L. No. 115-97, H.R. 1 (Dec. 22, 2017), §13306(a)(2) (note). However, these revisions are not applicable for amounts paid or incurred under any binding order (with court approval, if required) or agreement that was entered into before December 22, 2017.

14 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(1) (2018) (emphasis added).

15 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-1(a).

16 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(5)(A) & (B) (2018).

17 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2) (2018) (capitalization omitted).

18 See  26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A)(ii) (2018).

19 See 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A)(i)(I) & (II) (2018). If the restitution is for failing to pay taxes, that amount can be deducted if it would have been deductible if originally paid on time. Id.§ 162(f)(2)(A)(iii) (2018).

20 See  26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A) (2018).

21 See  26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(B) (2018).

22 See 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(a)(1) (emphasis added).

23 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(c).

24 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(a)(2)(A)(ii) & § 6050X(a)(2)(B).

25 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(a)(3);See 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(a)(1)(A) (return must set forth "the amount required to be paid as a result of the suit or agreement" to which § 162(f)(1) applies)); 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(a)(1)(B) & (C).

26 See 26 U.S.C. § 6050X(b) ("Every person required to make a return under subsection (a) shall furnish to each person who is a party to the suit or agreement a written statement showing—(1) the name of the government or entity, and (2) the information supplied to the Secretary under subsection (a)(1). The written statement required under the preceding sentence shall be furnished to the person at the same time the government or entity provides the Secretary with the information required under subsection (a).")

27 See 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(2)(A)(i)(I) (2018).

28 See 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(1) & (2).

29 See 26 U.S.C. § 162(f)(1) (2018).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions