United States: Selling Products In California: Navigating Product Regulations

Last Updated: November 7 2017
Article by Sandra Edwards

Big Picture: Product Liability in California

California applies its strict product liability laws to all products put into the stream of commerce and sold to the public, and those laws govern a wide array of products.  In California, unlike some states, a plaintiff need not prove the product was unreasonably dangerous or that the defect was hidden or concealed.  Simply put, a manufacturer, distributor or retailer is liable in tort if a defect in the manufacture or design of the product causes injury while the product is being used in a reasonably foreseeable way.  Liability for injuries resulting from those products extends to all parties in the "stream of commerce," which includes companies involved in the design, manufacture, production, distribution, and sales of those products.  

Most plaintiffs tend to allege, at a minimum, theories of strict product liability, negligence, and/or breach of warranty as a basis for liability.  All three theories may be pled in the alternative. This article focuses more narrowly on the theory of strict product liability under California law, for which there are three avenues of pleading and recovery.  Namely, that the plaintiff was harmed by a product distributed/manufactured/sold by the defendant that: (1) contained a manufacturing defect, (2) was defectively designed; and/or (3) did not include sufficient warnings of potential safety hazards.   Although the plaintiff must establish that the product was defective at the time it was sold, liability can be imposed when the defendant should have foreseen the post-sale alteration and could have designed the product to prevent – or diminish the risk of – that alteration.  Strict product liability may be invoked by consumers and users of the product, but also by anyone to whom an injury from the defect is "reasonably foreseeable."   Strict product liability actions may encompass both latent and patent defects.

a.         Manufacturing Defect

A plaintiff proves the existence of a manufacturing defect by establishing all of the following: 

  • that the defendant manufactured, distributed, or sold the product;
  • the product contained a manufacturing defect when it left the defendant's possession;
  • the plaintiff was injured; and
  • the product was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's injury.

 In broad strokes, a product contains a manufacturing defect when it differs from the manufacturer's intended result, or from other ostensibly identical units of the same product line.

b.         Design Defect

A product is defectively designed when it is built to its intended specifications, but the design itself is inherently defective, which renders the product unsafe and causes some harm or injury.  A plaintiff may prove his or her injury was the result of a design defect through evidence that a different design would have prevented the injury.  In California, two tests govern: the consumer expectations test and the risk-benefits test, either of which may be used.  Under the consumer expectations test, the plaintiff must prove that the design was defective because the product did not perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would have expected it to when used, or misused, in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way, and that resulted in plaintiff's injury.  A consumer expectations instruction may be given even if the mechanism by which the injury resulted requires expert testimony.   Unlike the risk-benefit test, "state of the art" medical and scientific knowledge at the time the product was manufactured is not factored into determining whether a product failed to meet this test.

The risk-benefit test requires the plaintiff to prove that the design of a product was a substantial factor in causing the harm/injury; the defendant then has the opportunity to prove that the intended benefits of the designed product outweigh its risks.  A number of factors are considered in making this determination, including: the likelihood the harm would occur; the feasibility of an alternative safer design; the cost of an alternative safer design; and the disadvantages of that alternative design.

It is worth noting that a product may be defective even if its design does not deviate from the industry norm, and compliance with a government safety standard does not automatically preclude liability.

c.         Failure to Warn

The final potential avenue for recovery under California strict product liability laws is the  failure to warn doctrine. Under this theory, the plaintiff must prove that the product had potential risks or side effects that were known or knowable in light of general industry knowledge at the time of manufacture, distribution, and/or sale; that ordinary consumers would not have recognized those potential risks or side effects; that the defendant failed to adequately warn or instruct of those potential risks; and that the failure to properly warn was a substantial factor in causing the harm or injury.

Failure to warn claims can be based on allegations of inadequacy of the warning, or on the absence of a warning.   Adequacy of the warning is evaluated in light of the existing knowledge at the time the product was manufactured, and is ordinarily a question of fact.   When the sole claim is failure to warn, the defendant is entitled to present evidence of the "state of the art," that is, the particular risk was neither known nor capable of being known by the application of scientific knowledge at the time of manufacture or distribution.    

d.         Some California Nuances

There are many defenses that are more uniquely alleged in California.  Some interesting defenses include the  component parts doctrine, which provides that the manufacturer of a component part is not liable for injuries caused by the finished product into which the component has been incorporated, unless the component itself was defective and substantially contributed to or caused the harm.  Second, depending on the type of product at issue, there may be a number of exceptions and/or defenses that apply, such as the learned intermediary doctrine for  pharmaceutical and medical devices.  For failure to warn claims, a "sophisticated user" defense may also be available.

Now, What is California's Proposition 65 About?

In 1986, California voters approved an initiative known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known by its original name of Proposition 65.  Proposition 65 requires the State to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm.  This list, which must be updated at least once a year, has grown to include approximately 900 chemicals since it was first published in 1987.

Proposition 65 requires businesses to notify Californians about certain chemicals in the products they purchase, in their homes or workplaces, or that are released into the environment. Proposition 65 also prohibits California businesses from knowingly discharging significant amounts of listed chemicals into sources of drinking water.  Proposition 65 regulates three exposure pathways to a Proposition 65-listed substance: (1) consumer product exposure, (2) occupational exposure, and (3) environmental exposure.  Each exposure pathway varies from the others, and each triggers different warning obligations.  It is therefore critical that a company subject to Proposition 65 identify which of these exposure pathways could apply.

Proposition 65, codified at California Health and Safety Code ("HSC") § 25249.6, states the following:

No person in the course of doing business shall knowingly and intentionally expose any individual to a substance known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without first giving clear and reasonable warning to such individual. 

The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) administers the Proposition 65 program.  OEHHA, which is part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), also evaluates all currently available scientific information on substances considered for placement on the Proposition 65 list.

Enforcement of Proposition 65 is by the California Attorney General's Office, by a local district attorney or city attorney (for cities with a population in excess of 750,000) or, most commonly, by private citizens or organizations bringing citizen suit claims for alleged violations.  HSC § 25249.7.  If found to be in violation, the statute provides for a civil penalty of up to $2,500 per day for each violation.   Id. at § 25249.7(b).  In determining the penalty amount, the court is required to consider the nature and extent of the violation, the number and severity of the violations, the economic effect of the penalty to the violator, whether the violator took good faith corrective measures, the willfulness of the misconduct, the deterrent effect of the penalty, and any other factor justice may require.  Id.  In practice, this can significantly vary the assessed penalty.

a.         What types of chemicals are on the Proposition 65 list?

The list contains a wide range of naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals that are alleged to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm.  These chemicals include additives or ingredients in pesticides, common household products, food, drugs, dyes, or solvents.  We often see private enforcer actions around lead, cadmium, DEHP and other phthalates, and BPA.

b.         What requirements does Proposition 65 place on companies doing business in California?

Businesses are required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and intentionally exposing anyone to a Listed chemical.  This warning can be given by a variety of specified means, such as by labeling a consumer product, posting signs at the workplace, distributing notices at a rental housing complex, or publishing notices in a newspaper.  Once a chemical is listed by OEHHA, businesses have 12 months to comply with warning requirements.

Proposition 65 also prohibits companies that do business within California from knowingly discharging listed chemicals into sources of drinking water. Once a chemical is listed, businesses have 20 months to comply with the discharge prohibition.

Businesses with fewer than 10 employees and government agencies are exempt from Proposition 65's warning requirements and prohibition on discharges into drinking water sources.  Businesses are also exempt from the warning requirement and discharge prohibition if the exposures they cause are so low as to create no significant risk of cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm.

c.         What does a warning mean?

If a warning is placed on a product label or posted or distributed at the workplace, a business, or in rental housing, the business issuing the warning is aware or believes that one or more listed chemicals is present.  By law, a warning must be given for listed chemicals unless exposure is low enough to pose no significant risk of cancer or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm.

For chemicals that are listed as a carcinogen, the "no significant risk level" is defined as the level of exposure that would result in not more than one excess case of cancer in 100,000 individuals exposed to the chemical over a 70-year lifetime.  In other words, a person exposed to the chemical at the "no significant risk level" for 70 years would not have more than a "one in 100,000" chance of developing cancer as a result of that exposure.

For chemicals that are listed as causing birth defects or reproductive harm, the "no observable effect level" is determined by identifying the level of exposure that has been shown not to pose any harm to humans or laboratory animals.  Proposition 65 then requires this "no observable effect level" to be divided by 1,000 in order to provide an ample margin of safety.  Businesses subject to Proposition 65 are required to provide a warning if they cause exposures to chemicals listed as causing birth defects or reproductive harm that exceed 1/1000th of the "no observable effect level."

OEHHA develops "safe harbor numbers" for determining whether a warning is necessary or whether discharges of a chemical into drinking water sources are prohibited.  According to OEHHA's website, a business may choose to provide a warning simply based on its knowledge, or assumption, about the presence of a listed chemical without attempting to evaluate the levels of exposure.

d.         What are safe harbor numbers?

A business has "safe harbor" from Proposition 65 warning requirements or discharge prohibitions if exposure to a chemical occurs at or below these levels. These safe harbor levels consist of No Significant Risk Levels for chemicals listed as causing cancer and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for chemicals listed as causing birth defects or other reproductive harm. OEHHA has established over 300 safe harbor levels to date and continues to develop more levels for listed chemicals.

e.         What if there is no safe harbor level?

If there is no safe harbor level for a chemical, businesses that expose individuals to that chemical would be required to provide a Proposition 65 warning, unless the business can show that the anticipated exposure level will not pose a significant risk of cancer or reproductive harm. OEHHA has adopted regulations that provide guidance for calculating a level in the absence of a safe harbor level.  Regulations are available at Article 7 and Article 8 of Title 27, California Code of Regulations ("CCR").  Determining anticipated levels of exposure to listed chemicals can be very complex, and usually requires the assistance of a toxicologist or other consultant.

What's Different About the New Regulations?

The new warning regulations go into effect into effect on August 30, 2018.  However, the new regulations expressly provide that businesses can begin complying with them prior to the effective date.  So while compliance with the old regulations will continue to constitute "clear and reasonable" warning under Proposition 65 until August 30, 2018, compliance with the new regulations will constitute "clear and reasonable" warning under Proposition 65 both before and after August 30, 2018.

Proposition 65 regulations broadly define a "consumer product exposure" as an exposure to a Proposition 65-listed substance that results from a person's acquisition, purchase, storage, consumption, or any reasonably foreseeable use of a consumer product, including the consumption of food.  27 CCR § 25600.1(d).  "Consumer product" is in turn defined in the new regulations as any "article, or component thereof, including food, that is produced, distributed, or sold for personal use, consumption, or enjoyment of a consumer."  Id. at § 25600.1(e). 

The term "consumer" is not defined.  However, the definitions of other specified terms make clear that this exposure pathway is concerned with retail products that are sold for personal use.  As stated above, any exposure resulting from a "reasonably foreseeable use" of a consumer product will be deemed to be a consumer product exposure.

Of particular relevance to this article, the new regulations establish significant new standards for Proposition 65 warnings for consumer products in California.  For example, the warning itself is revised to generally require identification of the listed chemical that poses exposure from the product; where more than one listed chemical is contained in the product and poses exposure, the new regulation allows either the identification of the multiple chemicals or the use of the term "including and identification of one of the chemicals ("This product can expose you to chemicals including [name of one or more chemicals] which is [are] known to the state of California to cause .  .  .  ").  The new warning language also includes a URL to the OEHHA website for further information.  See 27 CCR §25603.

The new regulations also specify responsibilities for communication of Proposition 65 warnings.  Proposition 65 has consistently been construed as requiring a warning that is clear and reasonable to a consumer at the time they are deciding to purchase or, in some situations, use the product (exposure prohibited "without first giving a clear and reasonable warning."  See HSC §§25249.6, 25249.11(f).  The express terms of the statute also seek to minimize burden on retailers by placing primary responsibility on the "producer" or "packager" of the product.  The new warning regulations provide much greater detail in defining the responsibilities of manufacturers, producers, packagers, importers, suppliers, distributors and retailers of consumer products.  See 27 CCR §25600.2.

The new regulations also provide much greater detail regarding the methods for communication of Proposition 65 warnings for consumer products, including for online and catalog sales.  Specifically, in addition to specifying labels, shelf signs, shelf tags at each point of display of the product at brick and mortar stores, for online sales the new regulations require the warning be provided either in full text or a "clearly marked hyperlink" on the product display page "or otherwise prominently displaying the warning to the consumer prior to completing the purchase."  See 27 CCR §25602(b).  The new regulations contain similar requirements for catalog sales.  See 27 CCR §25602(c). 

Finally, the new regulations recognize that a party to an existing, court-ordered consent judgment specifying Proposition 65 warning requirements will continue to be deemed to be in compliance with Proposition 65 if they continue to comply with the warning requirements of the consent judgment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions