United States: High Alert For California Employers And Employers Nationwide For The Second Wave Of FCRA Class Actions

Last Updated: October 20 2017
Article by Rod M. Fliegel, Alison S. Hightower and Allen P. Lohse

The flurry of Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") class actions against employers started in or about 2012 and was not limited to California.1 Many of those lawsuits resulted in significant payouts for violations of one or more of the FCRA's no-harm, hyper-technical requirements. The U.S. Supreme Court's most recent opinion on Article III standing and "concrete injury-in-fact" (Spokeo) has helped employers slow down, but not stop, the FCRA juggernaut.2 Employers across the U.S., and particularly in California, should remain vigilant about their compliance with the FCRA and related state laws.3 The dozens of class action filings in California make the threat even more acute in the Golden State.4

FCRA Overview

The FCRA imposes requirements on employers who use "consumer reports" or "investigative consumer reports" for "employment purposes." A consumer report is known as a credit report or a background report prepared by a consumer reporting agency ("CRA"). An investigative consumer report is a specific type of consumer report whereby the CRA obtains information through personal interviews (e.g., an in-depth reference check).

Broadly speaking, the FCRA's requirements on employers may be divided primarily into two categories: (1) requirements that employers must follow before obtaining a consumer report from a CRA, and (2) requirements employers must follow if they intend to take "adverse action" against an individual based even in part on information contained in the consumer report.

As to the former, before an employer may obtain a consumer report from a CRA, typically it must make a "clear and conspicuous" written disclosure to the consumer in a "document" that consists "solely" of the disclosure that a consumer report may be obtained. The applicant or employee must provide written authorization for the employer to obtain any consumer report. (In some circumstances, motor carriers must follow related but distinct requirements.)

As to the latter, before an employer may take adverse action against an individual based even in part on information contained in the consumer report, typically it must provide the employer with a copy of the report and the CFPB's summary of FCRA rights (known as the "pre-adverse action notice"). The employer then must wait to take the adverse action until the individual has had a meaningful opportunity to review the report and summary. If the employer still intends to take the adverse action, the employer must then provide a second, specific notice (known as the "adverse action notice"). (Again, in some circumstances, motor carriers must follow related but distinct requirements.)

FCRA Class Actions

One of the more popular FCRA claims challenges the employer's background check disclosure form. These class actions tend to target disclosures that are included within the employer's job application (whether hosted on-line, or presented on paper, or both), or if separate from the job application, that include alleged impermissible ("extraneous") text, such as a release of liability.5

Increasingly, the plaintiff's bar in California, including regular players in the wage and hour arena, have been expanding their practice to include FCRA claims. Familiar examples include Capstone Law, Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik LLP and Setareh Law Group. There are several reasons for the recent increase in California FCRA suits.

Statutory Damages: For "willful" violations, FCRA allows consumers to recover actual or statutory damages. The range of statutory damages is $100 to $1,000. The appeal of such damages obviously is to try to avoid the individualized issues that can make it more difficult for the plaintiff to prosecute claims on a class-wide basis.

Concurrent Jurisdiction in State Courts: Congress provided concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute FCRA actions in either federal court or state court. This allows for the attorneys to file the actions in the plaintiff-friendly state courts of Los Angeles and San Francisco, among others. Just recently, a FCRA disclosure class action was certified in state court in Los Angeles.6

California's FCRA: Many of these new filings combine FCRA claims with claims for violation of California's primary version of the FCRA: the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act ("ICRAA"). The ICRAA's hyper-technical requirements are similar to the FCRA.7

Plaintiff-Friendly Rulings in the Ninth Circuit: A FCRA claim initially filed in state court can usually be removed to federal court based on, at a minimum, federal question jurisdiction. But for cases filed in California, this typically means that the removed action proceeds in a district court within the Ninth Circuit. This year the Ninth Circuit has issued two significant plaintiff-friendly rulings in FCRA class cases.

In Syed v. M-I, the Ninth Circuit became the first appellate court to rule on the lawfulness of a liability waiver in a background check disclosure.8 Before this, federal district courts had not been able to agree on when the inclusion of such text in the disclosure is unlawful and, if so, whether the plaintiff can clear the next hurdle of proving a willful theory of liability. The latter is important because if a plaintiff can show the employer acted "willfully," then the plaintiff does not have to prove "actual damages," which makes it easier for the plaintiff to attempt to certify the class. Thus, many FCRA litigators have been waiting for a federal appellate court to weigh in. In Syed, the Ninth Circuit ruled that an employer acted willfully in violation of the FCRA when it included a liability waiver in its FCRA disclosure. Despite the FCRA's undefined terms and disagreement in the lower courts on what form of disclosure complies with the FCRA, the Ninth Circuit held that the FCRA unambiguously requires that the disclosure "consist solely" of the disclosure language, which does not allow for a release. In the wake of Syed, any FCRA disclosure case pending in a California district court will have to contend with this decision, which could be problematic both for defending the underlying alleged violation as well as the plaintiff's claim that the employer acted "willfully" by including "extraneous" information in the disclosure.

On remand, the Ninth Circuit also issued a plaintiff-friendly opinion on standing in Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.9 The defendant Spokeo provided a "people search engine" that compiles consumer data and builds individual consumer profiles. The plaintiff alleged that Spokeo published a report on him that contained "flattering inaccuracies," which portrayed him as the holder of a master's degree, relatively affluent, and married with children. The plaintiff filed a FCRA suit alleging Spokeo failed to "follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy" of the information in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b). The district court dismissed the case for lack of standing, finding the plaintiff alleged only a bare violation of the statute divorced from any actual injury. The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding injury based on violation of the statute. In May 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's opinion and declared that a plaintiff does not "automatically" have the requisite injury-in-fact "whenever a statute grants a person a statutory right and purports to authorize that person to sue to vindicate that right." The Supreme Court held that the Ninth Circuit erred by implicitly relying on Spokeo's alleged statutory violation, without more, to find a "concrete" injury. The Supreme Court remanded to the Ninth Circuit to address whether the plaintiff suffered a "concrete" injury," and the Ninth Circuit recently found that he had. The Ninth Circuit ruled that the FCRA statute at issue was intended to protect "concrete interests" of consumers and that the plaintiff had suffered a "concrete" injury "to [his] employment prospects by [Spokeo] misrepresenting facts that would be relevant to employers." Thus, the Ninth Circuit adopted a plaintiff-friendly standard for Article III standing and, in doing so, separated itself from other circuits that have taken more defense-friendly stances in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling. Therefore, while lack of Article III standing is a common defense to FCRA claims, that defense has been somewhat weakened in Ninth Circuit courts.

Next Steps for Employers

The resurgence of persistent nationwide FCRA class action filings is no coincidence. The plaintiff's bar will continue to pursue actions against employers that operate in plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions like California. Employers must stay alert and remain vigilant—especially during transitions to new applicant tracking systems, different background vendors, and other HRIS systems relevant to background screening. To help mitigate risk, especially the risk of willful FCRA violations, employers also should consider arranging for a privileged review of their background check processes, policies and procedures. Employers, of course, also should continue to be mindful of their obligations under the proliferating state and local ban the box laws, including the Golden State's latest law (AB1008).10


1. See Rod Fliegel, Weathering the Sea Change in Fair Credit Reporting Act Litigation in 2014, Littler Insight (Jan. 6, 2014).

2. See Rod Fliegel and Phil Gordon, U.S. Supreme Court Holds Not Every Violation of a Federal Statute is a Ticket to File a Federal Court Lawsuit, Littler Insight (May 17, 2016).

3. See Rod Fliegel and William Simmons, The Swelling Tide of Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Class Actions: Practical Risk-Mitigating Measures for Employers, Littler Report (Aug. 1, 2014).

4. See Rod Fliegel and Allen Lohse, Ninth Circuit Revisits Article III Standing For An Alleged FCRA Violation, Littler Insight (Aug. 15, 2017).

5. See Rod Fliegel, Ninth Circuit is the First Appellate Court to Rule on "Extraneous Text" in a FCRA Background Check Disclosure, Littler Insight (Jan. 25, 2017)

6. See Rod Fliegel, California Court Certifies FCRA Class of Over 40,000 Applicants (Jul. 17, 2017); Rod Fliegel, Ninth Circuit is the First Appellate Court to Rule on "Extraneous Text" in a FCRA Background Check Disclosure, Littler Insight (Jan. 25, 2017)

7. There is also a threshold question of whether the ICRAA is even constitutional. That issue is currently on appeal to the California Supreme Court.

8. Supra note 5.

9. Supra note 4.

10. See Rod Fliegel and Allen Lohse, California Statewide Ban-the-Box Law Signed By Governor, Littler Insight (Oct. 16, 2017); Rod Fliegel and Christina Cila, City of Los Angeles Mayor to Sign Long-Awaited "Ban the Box" Law, Littler Insight (Dec. 9, 2016); California Employers Are Subject to New Requirements When Using Criminal History, Littler Insight (Feb. 21, 2017); Rod Fliegel San Francisco's OLSE Issues "FAQs" On Fair Chance Ordinance, Littler Insight (Dec. 17, 2014).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Rod M. Fliegel
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions