United States: PTAB Hints At How Follow-On Petitions Might Succeed

Last Updated: September 27 2017
Article by Jennifer Bush

The recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in General Plastic Industrial v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (PTAB September 6, 2017; Paper 19) has caused many commentators to note that patent owners should be pleased with the decision as favorable to them. Indeed, the PTAB articulated that "multiple, staggered petition filings, such as those here, are an inefficient use of the inter partes review process and the Board's resources." However, historically less than 50% of follow-on petitions by the same petitioner have been instituted. Therefore, it's not clear that the decision in General Plastic will effect much of a change in the already-low institution rate of follow-on petitions. The language used by the expanded panel that "there is no per se rule precluding the filing of follow-on petitions" and that "there may be circumstances where multiple petitions by the same petitioner against the same claims of a patent should be permitted" indicate that the institution of such "follow-on" petitions should be considered exceptional.

For petitioners seeking to file follow-on petitions, however, the General Plastic decision provides guidance as to what may be considered such exceptional circumstances, by providing hints for how to maximize the chances of having a second petition instituted.

The Seven NVIDIA Factors

The expanded panel in General Plastic considered the seven factors originally laid out in NVIDIA v. Samsung Elec. (PTAB May 4, 2016; Paper 9). These factors can be shorthanded as follows:

(1) whether the same petitioner, patent, and claims are at issue;

(2) was second petition art known/should have been known when first petition was filed;

(3) had Patent Owner Preliminary Response or Institution Decision been received in the first petition at the time of filing the second petition;

(4) time elapsed between knowledge of art filed in second petition and petition filing;

(5) whether second petition explained time elapsed since first petition filing;

(6) PTAB resources; and

(7) one year final determination requirement.

The board designated this list of seven factors as a "baseline" and "non-exhaustive" list, leaving the door open for "additional factors [that] may arise in other cases."

A petitioner's control over factors 2 through 5 seemed particularly important to the General Plastic decision, whereas factors 1, 6, and 7 seemed less so. Factor 1 favored the patent owner, and the remainder of this article addresses those petitions that indeed are filed by the same petitioner, on the same patent and same claims. Factor 6—at least as it was articulated in General Plastics—generally is going to favor the petitioner: "the Board's resources would be more fairly expended on initial petitions, rather than follow-on petitions." Factor 7 most frequently is a consideration factoring into the number of grounds instituted and doesn't appear to favor one party over the other.

The Importance of Timing

The most important consideration for a petitioner based on the seven NVIDIA factors appears to be time, as three of the seven factors address some aspect of the timing of the follow-on petition. Factor 3 addresses whether a POPR and/or institution decision has been issued in the first petition. These timelines are two and five months, respectively, from the notice of a filing date being accorded to the first petition. Factor 4 addresses the amount of time elapsed between knowledge of art relied on in the second petition and the second petition filing (which knowledge may pre-date the filing of the first petition in the case of overlapping art between the two petitions). Factor 5 addresses whether a petitioner has provided an adequate explanation of the time elapsed between petition filings.

Of these, the act of filing the follow-on petition after the institution decision in the first petition (factor 3) appeared to raise the biggest red flag for the PTAB. The expanded panel in General Plastic cautioned against using the first institution decision "as a roadmap" for the follow-on petition, citing its decision in Butamax Advanced Biofuels v. Gevo (PTAB Oct. 14, 2014; Paper 8), in which it called follow-on petitions "second bites at the apple." As in other cases, the PTAB found such "staggered" petitions "unfair" to the patent owner, noting that first petition institution decisions should not be used as a "feedback loop" for petitioners to perfect their challenges, citing Travelocity.com v. Cronos Tech. (PTAB June 15, 2015; Paper 7), and that second petitions are not a time for modifying challenges to cure the board-identified deficiencies of a prior petition.

The expended panel in General Plastic said it believed the nine months that had elapsed between the filing of the first and second petitions (factor 5) was too long. Importantly, this date was a full four months after the institution decision was issued in response to the first petition (factor 3). Factor 4 seemed to weigh less heavily in this case than factors 3 or 5, seemingly because the petitioner did not begin an additional search for relevant art until after the institution decision in the first case (going to factor 3). This timing seemed to weigh more heavily than the relatively short timeframe that the new art was known, and also appeared to contribute to the weight of factor 2 (whether art was known/should have been known).

The best bet for a petitioner seeking to file a follow-on petition on the same patent and the same claims seems to be to file it as soon as feasible, and provide a well-articulated rationale for the time elapsed between the first and second petition filings. If a petitioner can file the second petition within two months—before the POPR due date or, at minimum, within five months—before the PTAB has rendered an institution decision in the first case, a petitioner has a stronger basis to argue, at minimum, that it did not use the institution decision "as a roadmap" to cure deficiencies in the first filing.

Along with reducing the time between filings to two-to-five months, if a petitioner can articulate a persuasive rationale for the delay, such as changed circumstances or procedural issues, the PTAB seemed willing to consider those arguments. Several times the expanded panel in General Plastic noted that the petitioner provided "no meaningful explanation for the delay in filing the follow-on petitions" and "no explanation...of any unexpected circumstances," indicating that some rationales for delayed filings may be convincing to the board. The board provided one piece of further guidance, noting that in this case the second petition "was not the consequence of a position that the patent owner surprisingly advanced or the board surprisingly adopted"— hinting at circumstances that might serve as a legitimate basis for a follow-on petition.

Petitioners should continue to keep in mind that the concept of institution is discretionary. By addressing the seven NVIDIA factors head-on in a follow-on petition, a petitioner may provide the PTAB with the rationale it needs to show support for a discretionary decision to institute. In addition, a persuasive argument may end up holding even more weight if the PTAB panel finds something in the petitioner's rationale that could support "other factors" for which the expanded panel in General Plastic left open the possibility.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
22 Aug 2018, Speaking Engagement, Koln, Germany

The panel discusses recent European legal developments around what you can and cannot put in your game – from the design of in-app purchases and rewarded ads to current age-rating trends and the ubiquitous loot box.

23 Aug 2018, Other, Washington, DC, United States

In August, NELI will present the nation's foremost annual public sector training surveying EEO and employment law developments impacting federal, state and local government employment, examining the effect of these developments on current practices, and providing practical advice to ensure compliance in the areas listed below:

5 Sep 2018, Other, Chicago, United States

As the world’s economies grow increasingly integrated through trade, acquisitions and joint ventures, U.S. international tax laws impact a greater percentage of businesses and transactions.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions