United States: PTAB Hints At How Follow-On Petitions Might Succeed

Last Updated: September 27 2017
Article by Jennifer Bush

The recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision in General Plastic Industrial v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (PTAB September 6, 2017; Paper 19) has caused many commentators to note that patent owners should be pleased with the decision as favorable to them. Indeed, the PTAB articulated that "multiple, staggered petition filings, such as those here, are an inefficient use of the inter partes review process and the Board's resources." However, historically less than 50% of follow-on petitions by the same petitioner have been instituted. Therefore, it's not clear that the decision in General Plastic will effect much of a change in the already-low institution rate of follow-on petitions. The language used by the expanded panel that "there is no per se rule precluding the filing of follow-on petitions" and that "there may be circumstances where multiple petitions by the same petitioner against the same claims of a patent should be permitted" indicate that the institution of such "follow-on" petitions should be considered exceptional.

For petitioners seeking to file follow-on petitions, however, the General Plastic decision provides guidance as to what may be considered such exceptional circumstances, by providing hints for how to maximize the chances of having a second petition instituted.

The Seven NVIDIA Factors

The expanded panel in General Plastic considered the seven factors originally laid out in NVIDIA v. Samsung Elec. (PTAB May 4, 2016; Paper 9). These factors can be shorthanded as follows:

(1) whether the same petitioner, patent, and claims are at issue;

(2) was second petition art known/should have been known when first petition was filed;

(3) had Patent Owner Preliminary Response or Institution Decision been received in the first petition at the time of filing the second petition;

(4) time elapsed between knowledge of art filed in second petition and petition filing;

(5) whether second petition explained time elapsed since first petition filing;

(6) PTAB resources; and

(7) one year final determination requirement.

The board designated this list of seven factors as a "baseline" and "non-exhaustive" list, leaving the door open for "additional factors [that] may arise in other cases."

A petitioner's control over factors 2 through 5 seemed particularly important to the General Plastic decision, whereas factors 1, 6, and 7 seemed less so. Factor 1 favored the patent owner, and the remainder of this article addresses those petitions that indeed are filed by the same petitioner, on the same patent and same claims. Factor 6—at least as it was articulated in General Plastics—generally is going to favor the petitioner: "the Board's resources would be more fairly expended on initial petitions, rather than follow-on petitions." Factor 7 most frequently is a consideration factoring into the number of grounds instituted and doesn't appear to favor one party over the other.

The Importance of Timing

The most important consideration for a petitioner based on the seven NVIDIA factors appears to be time, as three of the seven factors address some aspect of the timing of the follow-on petition. Factor 3 addresses whether a POPR and/or institution decision has been issued in the first petition. These timelines are two and five months, respectively, from the notice of a filing date being accorded to the first petition. Factor 4 addresses the amount of time elapsed between knowledge of art relied on in the second petition and the second petition filing (which knowledge may pre-date the filing of the first petition in the case of overlapping art between the two petitions). Factor 5 addresses whether a petitioner has provided an adequate explanation of the time elapsed between petition filings.

Of these, the act of filing the follow-on petition after the institution decision in the first petition (factor 3) appeared to raise the biggest red flag for the PTAB. The expanded panel in General Plastic cautioned against using the first institution decision "as a roadmap" for the follow-on petition, citing its decision in Butamax Advanced Biofuels v. Gevo (PTAB Oct. 14, 2014; Paper 8), in which it called follow-on petitions "second bites at the apple." As in other cases, the PTAB found such "staggered" petitions "unfair" to the patent owner, noting that first petition institution decisions should not be used as a "feedback loop" for petitioners to perfect their challenges, citing Travelocity.com v. Cronos Tech. (PTAB June 15, 2015; Paper 7), and that second petitions are not a time for modifying challenges to cure the board-identified deficiencies of a prior petition.

The expended panel in General Plastic said it believed the nine months that had elapsed between the filing of the first and second petitions (factor 5) was too long. Importantly, this date was a full four months after the institution decision was issued in response to the first petition (factor 3). Factor 4 seemed to weigh less heavily in this case than factors 3 or 5, seemingly because the petitioner did not begin an additional search for relevant art until after the institution decision in the first case (going to factor 3). This timing seemed to weigh more heavily than the relatively short timeframe that the new art was known, and also appeared to contribute to the weight of factor 2 (whether art was known/should have been known).

The best bet for a petitioner seeking to file a follow-on petition on the same patent and the same claims seems to be to file it as soon as feasible, and provide a well-articulated rationale for the time elapsed between the first and second petition filings. If a petitioner can file the second petition within two months—before the POPR due date or, at minimum, within five months—before the PTAB has rendered an institution decision in the first case, a petitioner has a stronger basis to argue, at minimum, that it did not use the institution decision "as a roadmap" to cure deficiencies in the first filing.

Along with reducing the time between filings to two-to-five months, if a petitioner can articulate a persuasive rationale for the delay, such as changed circumstances or procedural issues, the PTAB seemed willing to consider those arguments. Several times the expanded panel in General Plastic noted that the petitioner provided "no meaningful explanation for the delay in filing the follow-on petitions" and "no explanation...of any unexpected circumstances," indicating that some rationales for delayed filings may be convincing to the board. The board provided one piece of further guidance, noting that in this case the second petition "was not the consequence of a position that the patent owner surprisingly advanced or the board surprisingly adopted"— hinting at circumstances that might serve as a legitimate basis for a follow-on petition.

Petitioners should continue to keep in mind that the concept of institution is discretionary. By addressing the seven NVIDIA factors head-on in a follow-on petition, a petitioner may provide the PTAB with the rationale it needs to show support for a discretionary decision to institute. In addition, a persuasive argument may end up holding even more weight if the PTAB panel finds something in the petitioner's rationale that could support "other factors" for which the expanded panel in General Plastic left open the possibility.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2017, Conference, California, United States

CALOBA is excited to bring you our General Counsel (GC) roundtable event. Our distinguished panel of top legal counsel will share their experiences at the helm of some of the top technology companies.

30 Oct 2017, Seminar, California, United States

This program will address some of the hottest legal and policy topics that online platforms have brought to the fore: free speech, hate speech, fake news, privacy and surveillance, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, changing notions of “ownership” of information and software-enabled consumer products, and the perennial issue of copyright.

8 Nov 2017, Conference, California, United States

Fenwick & West is proud to be participating in PLI’s 49th Annual Institute on Securities Regulation scheduled for November 8-10, 2017 at The Roosevelt Hotel in New York City. The Institute is considered the premier conference, as well as one of the longest running, in the securities law field.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.