United States: Ruling Elevates Conflicts Considerations In Insurance/Tripartite Relationship Cases

Peter Jarvis is a Partner for Holland & Knight's Portland office.

Trisha Thompson is an Associate for Holland & Knight's Portland office.

After Washington Supreme Court Decision, Insurer-Paid Defense Lawyers Should Further Assess the Need for Client Consent in Reservation of Rights Situations

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Relationships between insurer, insured and insurer-appointed defense counsel – also known as the "tripartite relationship" – have long been recognized as a potential source of conflicts of interest. By a 5-4 majority in Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., the Washington Supreme Court appears to have expanded the need for insurer-paid lawyers in that state to assess the potential for such conflicts.
  • At least until further clarification is provided by future judicial decisions, insurer-paid defense lawyers in Washington State who are handling cases in which there are reservation of rights would be well-advised to seek informed consent from their insured clients.
  • Although different states treat these issues differently, the opinion is nonetheless worth noting – at least for states that do not have clear case or statutory law on these issues.

The relationships between insurer, insured and insurer-appointed defense counsel – often referred to as the "tripartite relationship" – have long been recognized as a potential source of conflicts of interest. See, e.g., Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., W. William Hodes & Peter R. Jarvis, The Law of Lawyering §§13.23-.25 (4th ed. 2015). By a 5-4 majority in Arden v. Forsberg & Umlauf, P.S., No. 93207-7, 2017 WL 4052300 (Wash. Sept. 14, 2017), the Washington Supreme Court appears to have expanded the need for insurer-paid lawyers to assess the potential for conflicts of interest and the consequent need to obtain informed client consent before proceeding. Although different states treat these issues differently, the opinion is nonetheless worth noting – at least for states that do not have clear case or statutory law on these issues.

Washington Supreme Court Decision

It has long been understood in Washington State that, absent express arrangements to the contrary, a Washington lawyer hired by an insurer to represent an insured represents only the insured and not the insurer. Tank v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 105 Wash.2d 381, 715 P.2d 1133 (1986). This does not mean, however, that conflicts of interest cannot exist. In Arden, the lawyer hired by the insurer had previously represented the insurer on coverage issues in the past and had also represented insureds of the insurer in many matters. The Arden plaintiffs asserted, inter alia, that the insurer-paid lawyer had a duty to disclose these relationships to the plaintiffs and to obtain plaintiffs' informed consent before undertaking or continuing the representation.

All nine Washington Supreme Court justices agreed that the defendant law firm was entitled to summary judgment because the plaintiff could not prove causally connected damages. As the justices all noted, the insurer had settled the case entirely at its own cost and the plaintiffs had not demonstrated any legally cognizable economic or non-economic damages. The majority went further, however, and also addressed the additional question whether the situation gave rise to a conflict – something that the minority believed need not and should not be addressed.

The majority analyzed the conflicts question under Washington Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7(a)(2), which, like ABA Model Rule 1.7(a)(2), provides in part that a current or concurrent client conflict of interest will exist "if there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer." The majority first stated that a "significant risk" meant that the conflict does not need to materialize to require disclosure under the Rule. The majority then added that an attorney or firm that had an established relationship with an insurer could, in some instances, be "materially limited" in the ability to represent the interests of only the insured. This meant that a conflict of interest could exist – a question that requires case-by-case analysis and that seemingly cannot be resolved in the abstract. As the majority noted, for example, the record before it included expert testimony both that there was and was not a conflict of interest.

Given that the plaintiffs did not prove any causally connected damages, the majority did not deem it necessary to decide whether, on the record before it, a conflict of interest was present as a matter of fact or law. Nonetheless, and at least pending further clarification through subsequent developments in case law, the decision not to decide whether a conflict existed should cause Washington insurer-paid lawyers to approach this part of their practice with greater care.

The Arden majority did not assert that when, as in most situations, an insurer provides a defense that is not subject to a reservation of rights either at the outset or as a matter develops, there will be a conflict. In such situations, only the insurer's financial interests are at stake. The Arden majority believed, however, that when an insurer asserts a reservation of rights either at the outset or as a matter develops, it will at least sometimes be necessary to assess whether the insurer-paid lawyer has a conflict that might cause that lawyer to favor the interests of the insurer over the insured.

Additionally, the majority did not address how significant any risk of a conflict must be before a duty to obtain informed consent exists.

Takeaways and Considerations

Given, for example, that insurers cannot reasonably be expected to hire new and different counsel for every reservation of rights matter (and given also the need for insurers to retain counsel whom they have reason to believe to be competent), one can hope that the mere fact of past or even concurrent representations by an insurer-paid lawyer of other insureds will not give rise to a conflict. Nonetheless, it would seem that at least until clarification is provided by future judicial decisions, Washington insurer-paid defense lawyers handling cases in which there are reservation of rights would be well-advised to seek informed consent to proceed from their insured clients.

For example, Washington insurer-paid defense lawyers in reservation of rights cases might wish to consider sending insured clients something along the following lines:

As you know, you have been named as a defendant in [Case]. This Firm has been appointed by [Insurer] to represent you in [Case], and you will therefore be this Firm's only client in [Case]. I am writing to you at this time to call your attention to two aspects of the Firm's representation of you and to seek your consent to proceed notwithstanding these aspects.
First, and as you know, [Insurer] is defending you in [Case] subject to a reservation of rights. This means that at least for the time being, [Insurer] will pay all defense costs and legal fees relating to the case but that [Insurer] has reserved the right not to pay any judgment or settlement that may be entered against you. The Firm cannot advise you with respect to disputes or issues that you may have regarding the scope of your insurance coverage under the policy with [Insurer]. The Firm can only recommend that you obtain legal advice or assistance about such matters with independent counsel of your choice and at your own cost and expense.
Second, you should know that the Firm has had and expects to continue to have other interactions with [Insurer]. For example, the Firm has represented and expects to continue to represent other insureds of [Insurer] in other cases that are factually and legally unrelated to your case. In addition, the Firm has represented and expects to continue to represent [Insurer] itself in insurance coverage disputes with other insureds on matters that are factually and legally unrelated to your case. The Firm has not and will not give any legal advice or assistance to [Insurer] regarding the duties that it does or may owe to you in this case. In addition, I do not believe that my Firm's other contacts with [Insurer] will affect the Firm's ability to represent you competently and diligently because the Firm will take advice and direction solely from you and not from [Insurer] in connection with this case. Nevertheless, you have a right to consider for yourself and to consult with independent counsel of your choice whether you wish to accept representation by this Firm under these conditions or to discuss the potential appointment of other counsel with [Insurer]. You are not required to consult with other counsel if you do not wish to, however. The choice is yours.
Please consider this [email/letter] with care and then let me know if you have any questions or concerns that you would like me to address before you make a decision. If you are willing to allow the Firm to proceed after whatever review you deem appropriate, please let me know in writing [by return email/by signing the enclosed extra copy of this letter and returning it to me for my files by email or in the enclosed prepaid envelope].

Please note that this draft language is just a suggested starting point. We are not stating that everything that is in this draft must be included to have an effective conflicts waiver in the State of Washington, nor are we stating that additional disclosure may not be necessary in particular Washington cases. In addition, the appropriate approach to be taken in other states will necessarily be controlled by the laws of those states.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions