United States: Self-Inflicted Wounds Hinder The Quest For Energy Dominance

Last Updated: September 26 2017
Article by Fred Wagner

Politicians overuse the catch-phrase "war on..." to describe actions alleged to be hostile toward a wide range of social institutions and public policy.  There have been declared wars on everything from drugs to marriage and Christmas.  The "war on" refrain now has been applied to all things related to domestic energy development.

To combat this war, federal agencies are rethinking and reforming approaches to the permitting and environmental review for actions such as coal leasing on public lands or approving oil and gas pipeline construction.  Unfortunately, as in any war, soldiers must be aware of their surroundings and the dangers of falling victim to friendly fire.  As several federal court decisions issued in the last month or so demonstrate, some casualties have already been suffered.

High on the list of evidence of the war on coal and all traditional energy development was guidance issued by the Obama administration's Council on Environmental Quality describing how the downstream effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of mineral or oil and gas resources should be analyzed.  That guidance was quickly rescinded after the Inauguration.  Some officials forgot, however, that this particular war is fought on multiple fronts.  While executive orders and regulatory reform address actions by the federal bureaucracy, the judicial branch still has soldiers on the battlefield.

Public interest groups have filed a long series of legal challenges to a variety of federal decisions concerning the management of energy resources, including whether and how much public land should be made available for exploration, and how and where extracted energy resources should be transported.  These challenges have one thing in common – claims that the government did not adequately assess (or failed to assess at all) indirect downstream GHG emissions from using extracted energy resources.

The government's defense against these allegations has been relatively consistent.  First, the long-term GHG emissions impacts from an individual decision are too speculative to enable an agency to make a reasonable assessment of impacts felt on a global scale.  Second, a decision not to make certain energy resources available (choosing the "no action" alternative) would have no impact on global GHG emissions, because resources from some other market would be used in place of the coal or oil and gas that would not be extracted.

In this summer's first important ruling, a district court in Montana remanded for further review the Interior Department's Office of Surface Mining and Enforcement environmental assessment of an individual application for a Mining Plan Modification.  Despite including a fairly lengthy description of climate issues and the potential for downstream impacts from GHG emissions resulting from the burning of coal that would be mined as a result of the proposed action, the agency concluded that "the state of climate change science does not allow any given level of emissions to be tied back to a quantifiable effect on climate change."

The court found this conclusion to be arbitrary and capricious, agreeing with Plaintiffs that the agency should have conducted some level of quantitative analysis regarding potential emissions.  The absence of this analysis was highlighted by a detailed quantitative analysis of the coal lease's monetary benefits, resulting from mining jobs, to coal sales revenue and royalties.  Attempting to quantify the benefits of the proposed action, but refusing to prepare a similar analysis of costs, in the court's judgment, meant that the agency failed to take a "hard look" at the potential GHG impacts.

The D.C. Circuit reached the same conclusion with respect to a challenge to FERC's environmental impact statement for construction of three new interstate natural-gas pipelines.  Like its Interior counterparts, FERC asserted that it would be impossible to know how many GHGs would be emitted as a result of the pipeline's construction.  Was this analysis truly impossible, the court asked, when the agency had estimated how much gas the pipeline would transport?  The Commission could have used available government tools to make an emissions estimate per unit of energy generated by various types of downstream plants.  Since GHG emissions are a clear "indirect effect" of the proposed action, the court told the agency to either perform the analysis or explain why it could not have done so.

The Tenth Circuit issued yet another relevant decision last week, this one remanding the Bureau of Land Management's approval of four coal leases in the Wyoming Powder River Basin.  The agency claimed that the "no action" alternative (failing to issue the leases) would not have any appreciable effect on overall GHG emissions.  Using what the court called the "perfect substitution" assumption, the BLM stated that if these particular leases did not proceed, utilities would find coal from other sources, therefore creating a net neutral quantity of GHG emissions.  Agreeing with the plaintiffs, the court's review of the record found no analysis or data supporting that key assumption.  The court found that failing to disclose the basis for its rationale led to "an uninformed agency decision" and a lack of full public disclosure.

These will not be the only opinions addressing this issue—many similar claims are in the litigation pipeline.

Why are these wounds "self-inflicted"?  In each case, the decision-maker could have included in the record some data, using widely available analytical tools, to address the question of downstream effects of GHG emissions.  None of the ultimate conclusions would have changed.  The only difference would be that those conclusions would have some basis in fact, and the public could see the agency's rationale.  This additional work would not be burdensome; it could be done in a matter of days and summarized in a few pages.  The odds of costly delays to administrative actions supporting domestic energy development would be substantially lowered, as the government would invariably prevail in any future litigation over the adequacy of those sorts of analyses.

Sometimes the key to winning a war is making rational decisions over which smaller battles should be waged, and which ones should be avoided.  With respect to the analysis of the downstream effects of GHG emissions, courts around the country are sending a clear signal to the federal government:  a "war" waged to avoid analysis of the downstream effects of GHG emissions may not be worth fighting.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions