United States: Deja Vu: Bursting The Digital Bubble

Last Updated: September 25 2017
Article by Douglas Wood

Economist Hyman P. Minsky's views on boom to bust in Stabilizing an Unstable Economy are often cited as a roadmap for market evolution. His progression theory begins with displacement and then moves to boom, euphoria, profit taking, and finally, panic. For purposes of this article, I cull Minsky's five mile markers down to a few and go back to the 17th Century as a precursor of the digital collapse just around the corner.

In 1634, a tulip bulb was one of the most desired commodities one could buy. Prices rose year after year and a single tulip bulb could change hands many times in just one day. Public auctions drove prices even higher. Speculators made fortunes.

Then suddenly in 1637, the bottom fell out of the tulip market. Prices dropped like a stone until they hit bottom and fortunes were lost; lives were ruined — all due to a flower bulb.

While the demise seemed sudden, it actually required a number of steps to progress from boom to burst to bust.

First, the market needed a new and desired commodity. No one had ever seen tulips in Holland before the first one arrived from Mediterranean traders around 1554. The desire to have a bulb or two spread and the mania — the boom — began. At first, prices remained stable because the supply could satisfy the ever-growing demand. But demand eventually outstripped supply and prices soared.

Digital has been the "new commodity" on the block for some time, but could demand outstrip supply in digital? Or is digital supply scalable at any demand level? After all, in 1995 there were estimated to be 16 million internet consumers who by 2017 reportedly grew to more than 3.8 billion (roughly half of the world's entire population). So why will this market not continue to grow and satisfy demand with what seems an inexhaustible supply?

Consider recent market shifts where demand for quality over quantity is rising as marketers are justifiably concerned about non-human and sourced traffic, brand safety, walled gardens, digital fraud, viewability, measurability, and more, all making the addiction to digital less desirable. If this is true, the supply in such a market is not scalable. Premium sites and real people (who have the wherewithal to purchase goods and services) are not endless commodities. Marketers are beginning to wake up to reality. In truth, the supply of quality sites free of fraud and visited by real humans is limited and the demand for them increasing.

Second, there needs to be a commodity with a perceived value in a sustainable market. To the 17th century buyers intent on planting gardens, the tulip was worth the price paid. Initially supply could keep pace with demand and buyers had leverage. It was a free, sustainable market where consumers had a say.

In digital, a combination of minimal criminal intrusion in the mid-1990s, coupled with blissful ignorance of the growing problem through the past decade, fueled a belief that reaching so many eyeballs at such a low CPM had great, sustainable value. As the market investment grew by billions year after year, advertisers were happily awash in eyeballs and the digital supply chain ecstatically awash in cash. It was a marketing nirvana.

Consider, however, how both the demand and sell sides of digital are dominated by a handful of players whose interests, at their core, may not be to eradicate the thieves and con artists infecting digital but to keep the markets non-transparent while creating a perception that whatever steps they've taken will bring the market to an "acceptable level" of fraud. In August, Google reportedly refunded millions to buyers victimized by fraudulent sites linked to searches. But is Google doing anything to solve the problem? Better yet, when will Google allow independent audits to verify the legitimacy of its traffic? The same questions can be posed to Facebook. Until such transparency is embraced, is such a market, indeed, sustainable? In decades past, would brands have accepted such a model in network television or national print?

Third, as the boom ensues and frenzy grows, the door opens to speculation and greed. Unlike tulip bulb buyers who intended to plant the seeds they purchased, tulip bulb speculators had no interest in taking delivery or planting a single one of them. Their goal was to drive up costs, buy and sell over and over again, and skim a few cents on each trade.

Unlike the rising costs of tulips in 1637, digital drives down CPMs and gets greater reach for less cost. So why is there any analogy to tulip bulbs and ill-gotten profits for speculators? The answer is pretty simple: illusory volume coupled with blissful ignorance.

The fiction in digital is that driving down CPMs is a good deal. As many are realizing, it's not. In reality, the only way cheaper CPMs happen is to resort to sourced traffic and all the fraud within it. So in truth, as a brand spends more in total costs to achieve ever more efficient CPMs, its true costs for legitimate, human traffic skyrocket. For the speculator, that's fine. The ever-increasing spend lines their pockets with profits. According to Statista, U.S. marketers spent nearly $60 billion on digital advertising in 2015. That spending is expected to exceed $113 billion in 2020. Nice deal.

As Ron Pullem, CEO of Ocean Rainbow Consulting, puts it, "This year advertisers are actively reassessing the true value of a digital brand exposure 'managed' through the opaque interface of ATDs, DSPs, and walled gardens. If recent digital budget cuts reported in the press are any indication, then the true value of digital has been down-graded and confidence is on the wane."

To further complicate the ecosystem, the ever-expanding subterranean world of incentivized/sourced traffic, bot fraud, and re-brokered human click farms fosters an illusion of abundant supply. This illusion is reinforced by a duopoly in digital media and an oligopoly in media buyers nurturing and obscuring this subterranean world.

So will digital face the fate of the tulip or will it defy the Minsky conundrum?

A warning the digital bubble may be about to burst occurred in 2016 when the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) released an investigative report by K2 Intelligence alleging a litany of non-transparent schemes by media buying agencies and hidden profits in media sales, particularly digital. This was followed in 2017 by a second warning — an ANA report confirming significant dilution of a brand's investment in programmatic buying amid refusals by major demand-side participants to be transparent as they allegedly siphon more and more dollars before a brand's investment reaches a publisher.

Last month, shortly after some major advertisers announced significant cuts in digital spending, WPP reported its financial performance will likely be flat for the first time in memory. Among the holding companies, WPP has been a bellwether for the future, managing the marketplace with brilliant finesse. While the goliath had a number of reasons to explain the decline, few can argue the growing doubts about the integrity of the digital marketplace and the lack of controls to address abuse is a major part of the problem.

But perhaps WPP's performance isn't the tipping point. We may have to wait until May 2018 when new European regulations mandate unprecedented limitations on how marketers use online data. Randall Rothenberg, president and CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, describing the new rules, wrote the regulations will "strip European publishers of the right to monetize their content through advertising, eviscerating the basic business model that has supported journalism for more than 200 years." How many times have we seen misguided government regulation destroy innovation?

A marketer's role is to drive the top line — and, by extension, the bottom line. That bottom line is the ultimate measure of ROI and the worth of every media platform. It isn't working in digital.

Yet at the same time, Digiday reported last month that Tremor Video sold its demand-side platform to Taptica for $50 million, Singtel-owned Amobee acquired demand-side platform Turn for $310 million in February, and Sizmek announced in July that it would buy DSP Rocket Fuel for $145 million. A lot of money is trading hands as consolidation and specialization grab hold. Is a consolidated model sustainable? For how long?

While all of this paints a rosy picture for a few players, sooner or later someone will wake up and realize quality supply is diminishing. Volume will slow and CPMs (or whatever cost measurement one uses) will rise. The market will consolidate and profits for the middlemen will drop. That is not to say a programmatic market will not survive. After all, there's still room for tulips as there will be for programmatic. Just not the provocative and profitable party it is today.

And last but not least, we have the holy grail that has perplexed marketers since traveling salesmen first sold elixirs — return on investment.

For tulips the tipping point came down to the realization that there were plenty of other pretty flowers that cost a lot less and left the gardener with the same sense of calm. So the beautiful allure of tulips simply didn't justify the costs. Has this realization occurred in digital?

As Robert Liodice, CEO at the ANA puts it, "Marketers have truly been mesmerized by the 'shiny crystal.' But like the Grand Wizard of Oz, it is proving to be a pedestrian media that has done little to influence brand or business growth. So while true costs, criminal behavior measurability, viewability, and more are all very appropriate factors in media buying, the bottom line is the bottom line — there is no growth."

Think about the mad rush to digital we've witnessed for the past 10 years and compare it to real growth. The evidence that digital is a dismal failure for marketers is overwhelming despite the billions upon billions plowed into the media:

  • In the 2016 Fortune 500 listing, 259 out of 500 companies showed declining revenues; 239 had declining after tax profits.
  • In 2015, retail sales declined 2.3 percent and declined by 7.3 percent in 2016.

It begs the question: Is this ecosystem nothing more than a Ponzi scheme that lines the pockets of those who ply their trade in the chasm that lies between the advertiser and the publisher?

Eventually, as advertisers awaken to the reality that all the promises about digital and programmatic are pipedreams, there will no longer be enough buyers to sustain an unregulated and bloated market. The current model will collapse. After all, a marketer's role is to drive the top line — and, by extension, the bottom line. That bottom line is the ultimate measure of ROI and the worth of every media platform. It isn't working in digital. Period.

Pop!

Memo to the programmatic and digital evangelists, speculators, and profiteers:

The bubble is bursting. The boom is over. Enjoy the tulips.

Originally published by Association of National Advertisers.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Douglas Wood
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions