United States: Boundaries Defined For The Doctrine Of Continuous Employment

Last Updated: September 29 2017
Article by Sherrill N. Britt

In this day and age, employees are required to lodge away from home for days and weeks at a time to be near an employer's job site or to conduct business for the employer.  Unfortunately, there are situations when, while travelling and lodging away from home, employees sustain injuries in locations other than an employers' premise or place of business.  In Georgia, for an injury to be compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act, it is well established that the injury must both "arise out of" and occur "in the course of" employment.  O.C.G.A. § 34-9-1.  The term "arise out of" relates to a causal connection between the conditions of work and the injury, and the term "in the course of" refers to the time, place, and circumstances under which the accident takes place. Stokes v. Coweta County Bd. Of Educ., 313 Ga. App. 505 (2012).  Keeping in mind the two primary elements for a workers' compensation claim, how are injuries sustained when employees are travelling and lodging in locations away from home, to perform a job or conduct business for the employer, handled under the Georgia Workers' Compensation Act?

As a general rule, an injury sustained when an employee is going to or coming from work does not arise out of and in the course of employment.  As a result, those injuries are not compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act.  Nonetheless, in Georgia, there is an exception to the "going and coming" rule under the doctrine of continuous employment, or the travelling employee theory.  Under the doctrine of continuous employment, "activities performed in a reasonable and prudent manner for the health and comfort of the employee, including recreational activities, arise out of and in the course of employment for an employee who is required by his employment to lodge and work within an area geographically limited by the necessity of being available for work on the employer's job site."  Ray Bell Const. Co. v. King, 281 Ga. 853 (2007).

In Ray Bell, the Supreme Court of Georgia found that the employee's injuries were compensable under the doctrine of continuous employment.  The employee in Ray Bell was a Florida resident who was working on a job site in Georgia, and temporarily lodging in Georgia in an apartment furnished by the employer.  The employee was injured in Georgia, as a result of a motor vehicle accident while driving an employer-provided vehicle.  At the time of the accident, the employee had just finished a personal errand to deliver furniture and was headed back to either the job-site or the lodging provided by the employer.  Consequently, the Court determined that the employee was covered under the doctrine of continuous employment because the deviation from a personal errand had ended and the employee had resumed the employer's business at the time of the injury.  The language the Court used in Ray Bell, such as "for the health and comfort of the employee, including recreational activities," appears to cover any and all injuries sustained while an employee is requested to work and lodge away from home.  However, in several recent decisions, the Court of Appeals establishes some boundaries on the doctrine of continuous employment.

In a 2017 decision, the Court denied compensability for an ankle injury sustained by an employee who was living in lodging paid for by the employer.  Avrett Plumbing Co., et al. v. Castillo, A16A1808 (March 10, 2017).  In Castillo, the employee was an hourly employee who was hired by the employer to work on a plumbing job in Augusta.  The employee's work hours were from Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and he was only paid for hours worked while performing his job duties.  Since the employee did not live in Augusta, the employer provided lodging in a hotel room during the work week.  However, the employer allowed the employee to use the hotel room on weekends because the room was paid for seven days a week due to the rental-agreement.  The employee often chose to stay in Augusta on weekends due to car trouble and the financial expense of travelling home, since expenses to travel home were not paid by the employer.  The employee was neither required to stay in Augusta on the weekends nor paid for any hours over the weekend.  On a Sunday afternoon, the employee, who stayed in Augusta over the weekend in the hotel room furnished by the employer, went out to buy groceries, tripped and broke his ankle.  The employee filed a workers' compensation claim for his ankle injury, under the doctrine of continuous employment, but the claim was controverted by the employer.  After a hearing, the ALJ awarded benefits, finding a compensable injury.  The employer appealed and the Appellate Division reversed, finding that the employee was not a "continuous employee" at the time of the injury.  Ultimately, the issue landed before the Court of Appeals, who held that the evidence supported the Appellate Division's decision that the employee's injury was not covered under the continuous employee theory.

In Castillo, even though there was no dispute that the employee was required to lodge away from home to perform his job, and that a hotel room was furnished by the employer, the Court found that the employee was not mandated by the employer to be in Augusta on Sundays and, thus, the employee was not a continuous employee on the weekend.  The Court focused on the fact that the employer allowed the employee to use the hotel room on the weekend as a personal convenience, but the employee was not required by his employer to be in Augusta on a Sunday.  As a result, the employee's injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment under the doctrine of continuous employment.

In a 2012 case, Medical Center, Inc. v. Hernandez, workers' compensation benefits were denied for two employees (serious injuries to one employee, and the death of the other employee) as a result of a motor vehicle accident about five minutes from the employer's job site.  319 Ga. App. 335 (2012).  In Hernandez, the two employees, Hernandez and Alvarez-Hilario, lived in Savannah and were hired to work on a construction project in Columbus, Georgia.  The two employees were only required to be in Columbus Monday through Friday; they were neither required nor paid to stay in Columbus on the weekends.  As such, the employer provided lodging at a motel in Columbus for the employees, Monday through Friday, the days they were required to be in Columbus to work at the employer's job site.  On Saturday mornings, the employees would return to Savannah for the weekend and then travel back to Columbus on Monday mornings to resume their job duties for the employer.  The employees were only paid for actual hours worked and were not paid for travel time.  On a Monday morning, the employees were passengers in a personal vehicle of a co-worker, travelling back to Columbus to begin the work week at the job site for the employer.  When the employees were about five minutes away from the job site, they were involved in a motor vehicle accident.  As a result, Alvarez-Hilario was killed and Hernandez was severely injured.  

Thereafter, claims for workers' compensation benefits were filed on behalf of both employees, but both claims were denied by the ALJ, a decision that was upheld by the Appellate Division and Superior Court, on the grounds that the doctrine of continuous employment did not apply to the injuries sustained by the employees in these claims.  The Court of Appeals agreed, and concluded that the employees were off-duty and no longer continuously employed on the weekends. In reaching this conclusion, the Court focused on the fact that the employees were only required to stay in Columbus during the week, and they were only paid for the actual time performing their construction jobs for the employer. The employees were not required to stay in Columbus for the weekend and were not paid for any travel time on the weekend.  As a result, the employees were off-duty, and their coverage under the doctrine of continuous employment would only have resumed when the employees were "back in the general proximity of the place where they were employed, and at a time they were employed to be in that general proximity."  Id.  Since the employees had not reached the job site to begin their work on the construction job for the employer, the injuries were not covered under the doctrine of continuous employment.

What can be learned from Castillo and Hernandez in handling claims for employees who are injured at a time that they are "required by his [or her] employment to lodge and work within an area geographically limited by the necessity of being available for work on the employer's job site?"  In reviewing these recent cases, the Court confirmed that the doctrine of continuous employment has limits.  Like most workers' compensation claims, in analyzing compensability under the doctrine of continuous employment, go back to the basics: who, what, when, where, and why.  In reviewing claims in similar situations with a travelling employee, pay close attention to the facts, particularly since one single factor can determine compensability, or lack thereof, and, ultimately, whether the doctrine of continuous employment will afford coverage under the Workers' Compensation Act.  For example, in Castillo, if the employee had been injured on a Monday night (as opposed to a Sunday night), at a time when he was required to be in Augusta for work, after he finished grocery shopping to return to the employer-provided lodging, would the injury have been compensable?  In Hernandez, if the motor vehicle accident occurred on a Tuesday morning five minutes away from the job site when the employees were travelling from the lodging provided by the employer, would the injuries have been found to be compensable?  The bottom line is that before automatically accepting or denying a claim for a travelling employee who is injured while lodging away from home to be near an employer's job site, gather all of the facts because there are limits and defenses to the doctrine of continuous employment.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions