United States: Substantively Non-Protestable Issues (Post-Award Protest Primer #8)

Last Updated: September 21 2017
Article by Daniel E. Chudd and James A. Tucker

In our last post, we discussed a few procedural rules that can exclude an otherwise meritorious ground from protest.  There are also a number of substantive issues that the GAO's rules exclude from review.  See 4 C.F.R. § 21.5.  We address them below, plus a bonus ground that might as well be non-protestable.

Contract Administration Matters:  Generally, once a contract has been awarded, any disputes between the contractor and the contracting agency are outside the GAO's jurisdiction because the procurement process has concluded.  Any disagreements over contract performance or administration are governed by the contractual disputes process and the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, and adjudicated (if necessary) by the Boards of Contract Appeals or the Court of Federal Claims.  ( See our CDA timeline for an overview of that process.)  Similarly excluded from GAO review are bid protest grounds complaining about contract administration issues involving a different contractor's performance, or speculating that an awardee may not perform the contract as required.  See, e.g., Ashland Sales & Serv. Co., B‑408969, Nov. 1, 2013, 2013 CPD ¶ 256.

Small Business Size Standards and Awardee Size Status:  For procurements set aside for small businesses, the procuring agency must assign a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for the procurement, and that code will determine the employee-count or revenue size standard that eligible offerors may not exceed.  ( See our post on NAICS code appeals here.)  If a firm disagrees with the chosen NAICS code and size standard, or disagrees that a prospective awardee satisfies the size standard, the GAO will not review the protest.  Instead, the Small Business Administration (SBA) is the sole forum for raising challenges of this sort.

Placement of a Procurement Under the SBA's 8(a) Program:  Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act allows agencies to place a contract directly with the SBA, which in turn assigns contract performance to a qualified firm that participates in the SBA's 8(a) business development program.  If an agency decides to go that route rather than allowing non-8(a) firms to compete for the procurement, the GAO will entertain a protest only if the protester can show bad faith by government officials (which is almost impossible to do) or a violation of the 8(a) program's governing regulations.

Affirmative Determinations of Responsibility:  Before an agency awards a contract, it must determine that the prospective contractor is "responsible."  "Responsibility" essentially means that a firm has the technical, financial, ethical, and other capabilities necessary to perform the contract.  See generally FAR Subpart 9.1.  Ordinarily, if the contracting officer determines that a firm is responsible, that determination is entitled to great deference and the GAO will not even review protests challenging the reasonableness of that determination.  The GAO's regulations provide two narrow exceptions to this rule, however:  The GAO will consider a protest if (1) the solicitation established "definitive responsibility criteria" that the awardee objectively did not meet or cannot meet by the time set in the solicitation or (2) "the contracting officer unreasonably failed to consider available relevant information or otherwise violated statute or regulation."  An example of the first exception is, if the solicitation required the awardee to hold a certain security clearance or possess specific experience, the GAO will review a protest alleging the awardee lacks that clearance or specified experience.  See, e.g., J2A2 JV, LLC, B-401663.4, Apr. 19, 2010, 2010 CPD ¶ 102.  An example of the second exception may be that the awardee is demonstrably tottering on the edge of bankruptcy or under a federal fraud investigation, but the contracting officer failed to give appropriate attention to that fact.  See, e.g., FCi Fed., Inc., B-408558.4 et al., Oct. 20, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 308.

Untimely Reported Violations of the Procurement Integrity Act:  The Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) governs improper release or receipt of certain categories of procurement-sensitive information, such as a firm's bid or proposal information, or source-selection materials.  If an offeror learns of a potential PIA violation, it then has 14 days to report it to the relevant agency.  If the offeror does not do so, it is barred from later raising the suspected PIA violation as a protest ground, or from challenging the agency's investigation of (or failure to investigate) the alleged violation.  See, e.g., AIS Eng'g, Inc., B-406186, March 7, 2012, 2012 CPD ¶ 106 at 6. This 14-day clock is independent of the GAO's normal 10-day protest timeliness rule and debriefing exception.

Protests Lacking a Sufficiently Detailed Statement of Legal and Factual Grounds:  If a protester objects to a solicitation or award but does not sufficiently explain the basis of its objection, the GAO will dismiss the protest.  Unlike most of the other grounds discussed in this post, it is not always clear whether a particular protest ground runs afoul of this prohibition.  The GAO recognizes that a certain amount of factual speculation is often unavoidable in a protest, but if a protest is completely disconnected from any relevant facts or allegations, or identifies no cognizable legal ground for protest, GAO will not consider it.  See, e.g., Crown Worldwide Moving & Storage, B-406614, Jul. 17, 2012, 2012 CPD ¶ 208 at 3 n.2 (dismissing protest ground wholly speculating about the contents of the awardee's proposal).

Protests of Procurements by Excluded Agencies:  The GAO has protest jurisdiction over solicitation and contract awards by federal agencies subject to the Competition in Contracting Act.  That includes most procurements by most executive-branch agencies and wholly owned government corporations.  The GAO lacks jurisdiction, however, over certain bodies, such as the U.S. Postal Service.  Although the GAO's regulations also disclaim jurisdiction over "nonappropriated fund activities," the GAO has interpreted that phrase narrowly and has accepted jurisdiction over protests of procurements by the Federal Prison Industries, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, all of which operate with nonappropriated funds.  See Inf. Experts, Inc., B-413887; B-413887.2, Dec. 30, 2016, 2017 CPD ¶ 16; MFM Lamey Grp., LLC, B-402377, March 25, 2010, 2010 CPD ¶ 81; USA Fabrics, Inc., B-295737; B-295737.2, Apr. 19, 2005, 2005 CPD ¶ 82.

Subcontract Awards:  GAO protests involve solicitation challenges and objections to an agency's contract award decision.  The GAO will not consider a protest challenging a contractor's decision to award or not award a subcontract.  There is a narrow exception to this rule where the agency awarding the prime contract has requested in writing that the GAO decide subcontract challenges as nonstatutory protests under 4 C.F.R. § 21.13—something that almost never happens.  There is another very narrow exception for subcontract awards where an agency essentially "takes over" all substantive subcontract award duties from the prime contractor, such that the subcontract award is really "by a Federal agency" rather than by the prime contractor.  See, e.g., Panther Brands, LLC, B-409073, Jan. 17, 2014, 2014 CPD ¶ 54.  This, too, occurs only very rarely.

Suspensions and Debarments:  Federal agencies have authority under FAR Subpart 9.4 to exclude specific entities and individuals from being considered for contract award due to a lack of present responsibility.  If an agency formally has suspended or debarred a contractor, the GAO will not hear a protest challenging that action.  Disappointed bidders occasionally allege they have been "de facto debarred" by an agency outside of the FAR Subpart 9.4 procedures.  See Bilfinger Berger AG Sede Secondaria Italiana, B-402496, May 13, 2010, 2010 CPD ¶ 125 ("A de facto debarment occurs where a firm is excluded from contracting because of a contracting agency's making repeated determinations of nonresponsibility or even a single determination of nonresponsibility as part of a long-term disqualification attempt, without following the procedures for suspension or debarment set forth in FAR Subpart 9.4.").  Although the GAO will entertain protests alleging de facto debarment, the GAO appears never to have sustained a protest on this ground.

Inclusion in the Competitive Range:  During a procurement, agencies may narrow the field of competition before opening discussions.  This is called establishing a competitive range.  Although the GAO will entertain protests objecting to a firm's exclusion from the competitive range, it will dismiss a protest that argues the agency improperly included a particular competitor in the range.  This reflects the GAO's general inclination not to object to agency actions that increase competition.

Debriefing Challenges:  Agencies sometimes play fast and loose with their obligation to provide a meaningful debriefing when a debriefing is required.  ( See our previous discussion of debriefings here.)  Agency noncompliance with the debriefing requirement can undermine a firm's ability to protest effectively, or can drive the firm to waste resources by protesting unnecessarily.  There is, however, no mechanism for challenging an improper debriefing, and the GAO will dismiss a protest ground attempting to do so.  A1 Procurement, JVG, B-404618, March 14, 2011, 2011 CPD ¶ 53 at 5 n.5 ("Our Office will not review a protester's contention that the debriefing it received was inadequate because the adequacy of a debriefing is a procedural matter that does not involve the validity of an award.").  Similarly, agency officials sometimes misspeak during debriefings.  When a debriefing statement or debriefing document suggests a procurement error occurred, but the contemporaneous evaluation and source-selection record documents that the error did not occur, the GAO will rely on the formal record rather than the debriefing communications.  See Coastal Defense, Inc., B-413890, Dec. 19, 2016, 2016 CPD ¶ 371 at 5 (comments allegedly made by the agency during the debriefing provided no basis for sustaining a protest ground where they were contradicted by the official procurement record).

Special Mention – Allegations of Bad Faith:  There is one substantive protest ground that, although not excluded by the GAO's regulations, is almost always doomed to fail:  allegations of bad faith against agency officials.  Disappointed bidders occasionally believe that agency officials have connived specifically to prevent them from being awarded contracts.  In our experience, agency officials occasionally mess things up unintentionally, but very rarely set out to harm any particular offeror.  And, although agency officials are accustomed to protests alleging unreasonable conduct, they are not accustomed to being accused of malice.  Even on those rare occasions where there is potential evidence of bad faith, the legal standard for proving the bad faith of an agency official is so extraordinarily high that such allegations almost always fail.  Before the GAO will sustain an allegation of bad faith, "the record must show 'well-nigh irrefragable proof' that the agency had a malicious and specific intent to injure the party alleging bad faith."  Delta Data Sys. Corp., B‑213396, Apr. 17, 1984, 84-1 CPD ¶ 430 (quoting Kalvar Corporation, Inc. v. United States, 543 F.2d 1298, 1301 (Ct. Cl. 1976)).  Ralph Waldo Emerson observed:  "When you strike at a king, you must kill him."  If a protester does not have incontrovertible evidence of an agency's malicious and specific intent to injure the protester in some prejudicial way, it's almost always best not to strike at the king (and a potential customer) with an allegation of bad faith.

*    *    *

Having discussed the protest grounds you cannot or should not raise, our next posts in this series will explore individual grounds that may lead to a sustained protest.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Daniel E. Chudd
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions