United States: Big Changes At The NLRB

Last Updated: September 21 2017
Article by Ogletree Deakins

XYZ Logistics has certainly had its share of labor troubles lately. Its truck drivers have been represented by the Teamsters for decades, and it has been bargaining a new union contract for what seems like forever. The predecessor contract expired months ago; and, while the company has continued to check off union dues under the provisions of the expired contract, it is giving serious thought to suspending the checkoff in order to exert financial pressure on the union to settle. Also, before the contract expired, XYZ fired John Doe, the union's chief steward, for allegedly driving while impaired. The union timely grieved the discharge, but missed the contractual deadline to file for arbitration. The Teamsters have also just filed an unfair labor practice (ULP) charge over the termination.

Were the problems with the drivers not bad enough, John Smith—one of its warehouse forklift operators—has been openly attempting to unionize the company's warehouse employees for some time. Among Smith's many complaints is the fact that during peak work periods, XYZ uses temporary forklift operators from ABC Staffing Co. to pick up the slack. Smith believes XYZ should instead utilize its own employees and pay them overtime.

When the company first learned of Smith's activities, it sent its corporate vice president (VP) of human resources to the warehouse operation to assess the situation, and he ran into Smith on the loading dock. Upon meeting Smith, the VP asked: "How are things going?" Smith replied: "Not great. Our warehouse manager is a terrible supervisor." The VP replied: "I'll look into that." Smith promptly filed ULP charges over the exchange, and the Board's regional office has issued a complaint alleging that the company unlawfully "solicited grievances" and "impliedly promised" to remedy them in an effort to discourage unionization.

In fact, the efforts of Smith and the Teamsters among the broader unit of warehouse employees had already fizzled, but Smith did find a good deal of support among his fellow forklift operators. Consequently, a few days ago the Teamsters filed a petition seeking an election in a unit of "all forklift drivers employed solely by XYZ Corporation, and by XYZ and ABC Staffing as joint employers."

While frantically compiling the voter eligibility lists and assessing its position on the petition, the company received two more ULP charges. The first claimed that Joe Jones, the lead forklift operator, whom the union claims to be a statutory supervisor, threatened the forklift drivers with a loss of pay and benefits if the union were to win the election. The second alleged that the "harmonious workplace and civility" provision in XYZ's handbook violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) because it would "chill" a reasonable employee from exercising his or her rights under Section 7 of the Act.

While the volume of XYZ's NLRA problems may be unique, their substance is not. Most of them stem from changes in, or expansions of the law by, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the Obama administration; and many, if not all, are likely to be modified or completely overruled by the incoming NLRB majority. For XYZ, however, the fact that change may be coming is only of academic interest—it needs to know what to do with the petition and charges right now. Like most employers, XYZ's decision to settle or contest a ULP case, or to oppose or stipulate in a representation case, is typically guided by three practical considerations: likelihood of success, consequence, and cost.

Settle or contest?

The prospect of a changing Board majority will almost certainly alter an employer's likelihood-of-success calculation in every instance. However, that may not always be the
critical factor. For example, the "solicitation of grievances" complaint certainly appears to be an example of Board overreach and disregard of an employer's statutory free speech rights. As such, it certainly seems a new Board majority would be unlikely to find a violation on these facts. However, standing alone, while this complaint may be aggravating, it is of little practical consequence. Not only is there no monetary remedy at play, but more significantly, the substantive act occurred before the petition was filed. Since it is outside the "critical period" in the lead- up to a representation election, the union cannot use the incident to secure a rerun election if it loses in the pending representation case.

Apart from principle then, the only reasons for not settling the matter would be either the possible negative impact on the election, or the likely insistence by the NLRB that XYZ's settlement must contain a "default" provision. As to the first reason, XYZ can simply wait until after the election to entertain settlement; and, as to the second, it can wait until November of this year to see if a new NLRB General Counsel opts to modify the current "default" policy.

Post-petition conduct. The two other ULPs in the warehouse unit present a different set of considerations. Both charges relate to post-petition conduct and, therefore, could form the basis for election objections. Thus, they could carry a much greater consequence than simply an eventual notice posting. Beyond this, other considerations attach to each. The ULP involving Jones is inextricably bound up with the pending election petition. The determination of Jones's supervisory status may have strategic importance in the context of the ongoing organizing campaign. Accordingly, immediate representation case considerations may well drive XYZ's position on this charge.

On the supervisory issue itself, XYZ will also need to keep in mind that the current Board majority has been so "situational" and inconsistent in its supervisory determinations that the entire extant analytical framework under NLRA Section 2(11) may be headed for reconsideration by the new Board, or even by the federal courts. Even more than the supervisory analysis, the current Board position on the legality of employer handbooks clearly appears headed for substantial revision. Since XYZ's disputed handbook policy appears particularly innocuous and unrelated to any actual employee discipline, XYZ may merely want to stipulate to the salient facts, but refuse to settle any complaint based on the existence of the policy.

The ULPs and potential ULPs involving XYZ's already organized drivers also involve a number of practical considerations. A few years ago the current Board overruled decades of precedent holding that an employer was privileged to terminate dues checkoff once the collective bargaining agreement containing the requirement expired. Given the right case, a new Board will likely reverse that decision and revert to prior law. However, it is unclear if such a case is currently in the Board's decisional pipeline. So, even if XYZ is convinced that the law will be changing, it has to recognize that if it suspends checkoff, it will result in the issuance of a complaint and cause XYZ to incur litigation expenses until such time as the change in the law actually takes place. Moreover,

the suspension of checkoff could color the Board's analysis of any other alleged bargaining misconduct and could alter the parties' respective rights should the union eventually go out on strike. Consequently, although the law will almost certainly change, XYZ must, in this instance, weigh the anticipated bargaining leverage it would gain from checkoff suspension against the costs of defending its position and the effect of having an outstanding ULP during bargaining.

The discharge of John Doe also raises some practical considerations for XYZ. Because the union missed the filing deadline, XYZ could take the position that the matter is not arbitrable. However, this would throw resolution of the discharge to the NLRB, which is traditionally sensitive to claims that an employee is being "singled out" because of his union activity. Consequently, XYZ might want to consider waiving the procedural defect and consenting to arbitration if the NLRB defers the charge.

There is, however, one final wrinkle: The current Board has changed its deferral standards and, as a consequence, Doe may be more likely to get a second bite of the apple on his discharge through the NLRB. This changed deferral standard may well be altered by the new Board, but this matter is likely to move much faster than the pace of change at the Board, so XYZ needs to either evaluate its options under current law or plan on protracted litigation over the discharge.

Representation case issues. XYZ's representation case issues are no less complicated. The "forklift only" unit demand and the "joint-employer" claim regarding ABC Staffing are both clearly problematic and consequential. While a new Board is very likely to revisit and, perhaps, reverse the Obama Board on both the "micro-unit" and joint-employer issues, XYZ simply cannot sit back and wait for the law to change. If it proceeds to election in the requested forklift unit without opposition and loses the election, it will very likely be stuck with that unit since even if a new Board reverses Specialty Healthcare, it is not going to simultaneously invalidate all the micro-units that have previously been certified under the case. Doing so would almost certainly be deemed too destabilizing. Given this consequence, XYZ clearly has to fight the unit issue now.

 That same logic applies equally to the joint-employer issue. The new Board will very likely revisit the current Board's expansion of the joint-employer doctrine. Indeed, it is an issue of such great interest to all stakeholders, with so many ramifications, that it is likely destined for years of litigation before the Board and courts. Moreover, XYZ's situation also involves a corollary to the joint-employer issue—the so- called Miller & Anderson multi-employer unit issue. The new Board majority is very likely to overrule Miller & Anderson and return to a doctrine that finds such multi-employer units are not appropriate absent the consent of both employers. However, whether it is the joint-employer claim or the Miller & Anderson unit configuration, XYZ needs to fight them now or run the risk that it loses the election and is stuck with the requested unit if subsequent changes by a new Board do not apply retroactively.

Uncertainty ahead. As noted, XYZ's issues are not atypical and will be faced by many employers in the coming months. So what is the larger lesson that can be gleaned from the XYZ scenario? Yogi Berra probably provided the best answer to that question when he observed: "It ain't over till it's over." We all know that a host of Obama Board decisions are likely to be revisited by the new Board. That said, no one knows when that will happen, and no one knows exactly what the new Board might do in a given instance.

With respect to the latter point, a new Board may completely overrule, or merely refine or modify, existing Obama Board doctrines. In either event, the practical impact of such future decision-making has way too many variables to be dispositive right now for the particular circumstances of a particular employer. To put it another way, we know that dozens of Obama-era cases will be reconsidered, but we do not know, with certainty, what their exact outcomes will be.

The good news for employers is that they now have the prospect of obtaining a different result at the Board level on a host of representation and ULP case issues. The bad news is that until a new Board issues controlling decisions that apply to an employer's specific issues, the employer is still going to have to litigate the claim in order to preserve and, hopefully, prevail on the given issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions