United States: August 2017 Protest Roundup

Last Updated: September 15 2017
Article by Cynthia O. Akatugba

There is no question that procurement regulations give agencies significant discretion at every step of the procurement process, and protesters often have a hard row to hoe to overcome the agency's exercise of that discretion.  However, agencies often make that task easier by failing to provide full and logical explanations of their decisions that show they have considered all the relevant facts in light of the competing goals of the procurement system, not just the agency's objective.  The following cases from August illustrate this point.

In Veterans Technology, the Court of Federal Claims took the view that the SBA's failure to engage in a fact-specific inquiry into the particular financial and competitive circumstances of the parties resulted in an arbitrary and capricious decision that the protester, Veterans Technology ("Vet Tech"), was not a small business.

On April 1, 2015, the Missile Defense Agency awarded a small business set-aside contract to Veteran Technology, LLC, a joint venture between MDW and DAI, each holding respective ownership interests of 49% and 51%.  In a size protest following the contract award, the SBA Area office concluded that Vet Tech was not a small business because all of its members were not small business.  MDW was affiliated with ECS because at the time Vet Tech submitted its bid, it was economically dependent through contractual or other relationships on ECS, a large business with substantial prime contracts with the Missile Defense Agency.  Seventy percent of MDW's revenue came from subcontracting with ECS, because MDW and ECS together exceeded the size standard s.  On appeal, the Office of Hearing and Appeals ("SBA OHA"), agreed with the area office stating that "as a matter of law, a firm that derives 70% or more of its revenue from another firm is economically dependent on that firm."  Furthermore, Vet Tech did not fit within recognized exceptions to the economic dependency for startup businesses or businesses with very few contracts.  According to SBA OHA, MDW was not a startup business at the time Vet Tech submitted its bid and the contract between MDW and ECS was substantial.

The court expressed concern that the SBA's decision did not take into account whether Vet Tech and MDW were "dominant" in their field of operations, which was the ultimate objective of the SBA's affiliation rules.  Such a determination, according to the court, depends on defining the "relevant geographic and product market" of the businesses and specific factual inquiries.  Generalized statements about the field of work or the nature of the work performed by the enterprises under consideration is insufficient—rather, a "more robust economic analysis is required."  The Court identified several deficiencies in the SBA area office's decision and reasoning and concluded the SBA OHA's decision affirming the area office decision was arbitrary and capricious.  According to the Court, "the SBA Area Office, in the first instance, has discretion to determine whether affiliation exists so that 'firms . . . may be treated as one party.'"  MDW did not have control of Vet Tech by virtue of its stock ownership, and the area office did not discuss other factors that may lead to a conclusion that MDW had control of Vet Tech.  Moreover, the conclusion that MDW was economically dependent on ECS was deficient because among other things, SBA failed to consider the circumstances upon which MDW obtained several of the subcontracts with ECS.  The Missile Defense Agency had directed ECS to award at least one subcontract to MDW.  Judge Braden took the view that if the Missile Defense Agency required MDW to enter a contractual relationship with the ECS, Vet Tech should not be punished for the existence of such relationships.  The Court vacated and remanded OHA's earlier decision and required the SBA to conduct a new size determination in light of the decision.

In another sustained protest, in David Jones, the GAO upheld the protester's contention that an agency's price reasonableness determination based on a single line item was unreasonable.

In response to the solicitation for quotations for a Blanket Purchase Agreement for equal employment opportunity claims investigations for the Department of Veterans Affairs, the protester submitted unit and extended prices for several line items.  The VA concluded that it would not consider the protester for award because its offered price for a single line item was not fair and reasonable, even though the offered prices for the other line items were lower than the agency's benchmarks.

The GAO concluded that the VA had failed to analyze the risks to the government of the high price of a single line item.  According to the GAO, "the VA engaged in no analysis whatsoever to assess whether there was a risk that the protester's high price on the single line item in question would result in the government paying an unreasonably high price for performance of a typical order under the BPA."  Accordingly, the VA's decision to exclude the protester was found to be not reasonable.

In AT&T, the Court of Federal Claims held that the Department of Commerce, Census Bureau's decision to override an automatic stay resulting from a GAO protest was arbitrary and capricious.  Under the Competition in Contracting Act ("CICA"), when a party files a bid protest action at the GAO, the procurement is automatically stayed until the protest action is resolved.  However, an agency may override the stay by notifying the GAO in writing that either "performance of the contract is in the best interests of the United States," or "urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the decision of the Comptroller General concerning the protest."  31 U.S.C. § 3553(d)(3)(C).  In AT&T, faced with a self-imposed deadline to conduct an End-to-End Census test in 2018, the Census Bureau authorized the override of the stay because any delay in continuing with the contract could "introduce adverse risk, unacceptable delays, and costs increases, and jeopardize the missions and quality of the 2020 Census Program."

The court concluded that the override decision did not adequately demonstrate that there were urgent and compelling circumstances compelling override of the CICA stay.  First, the Census Bureau failed to show that any of the issues it anticipated would occur if the stay continued would create an immediate threat to health, welfare, or safety.  According to the court, these are the types of circumstances that typically qualify as "urgent and compelling." Although the census was of Constitutional and Congressional importance, "the risks associated with testing delays are not risks to public safety."  In addition, the court found that the adverse consequences the agency identified were speculative in nature.  Moreover, the agency's procurement schedule itself could not be considered a reasonable basis of assessing the effect of the CICA stay.

The court was equally unconvinced that the agency had no reasonable alternatives during the pendency of the stay.  The Census Bureau's determination and findings did not contain evidence that it had engaged in a meaningful review of other reasonable alternatives.  Nor did the agency include a cost benefit analysis of the potential costs of complying with the stay compared to the decision to proceed with contract performance. The court concluded that allowing the override to stand would weaken GAO as a protest forum and undermine the integrity of the procurement system.  As a result, the court granted protester's request for declaratory relief, finding that the decision to override the CICA stay was arbitrary and capricious.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Cynthia O. Akatugba
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions