United States: AD-ttorneys@law - August 29, 2017


Vacuum rival Dyson claims company's "preference" tags are full of hot air

The Competition Bristles

SharkNinja, manufacturer of the Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away vacuum, made some strong claims regarding the popularity of its product. In television ads and online, the company boasted that "America preferred ... Shark" and that "two out of three" people preferred their vacuum over Dyson's Cinetic vacuum.

Dyson challenged the claims before the National Advertising Division (NAD), which launched a self-regulatory proceeding.

Weak Claims

At the heart of Shark's preference claims was a national in-home use test that the company commissioned using third-party experts. Shark maintained that its performance claims "were supported by the results of [this] double-blind, multi-week, head-to-head, paired-preference study of 355 subjects at eight centers across the United States."

Shark reported that it had provided each subject with new vacuums, one Shark model and one Dyson model each. The subjects were asked to use both vacuums for two weeks in their "household routines" and "in all of the ways (and for all of the tasks) that you would use a vacuum that you owned."

When NAD reviewed the methodology of the study, it was left with concerns that were hard to shake. NAD questioned the study's length, deeming the two-week period to be too short to produce meaningful results. More important to NAD, though, was the nature of the test itself. NAD found that there was no clear direction as to how and under what conditions the vacuums should be used in the test. It also faulted a lack of follow-up questions to document the actual usage of the vacuums by each subject.

The Takeaway

The NAD decision provides guidance regarding the care that advertisers need to take when commissioning studies that measure consumer preference. Companies that want to make comparative claims need to ensure that their experts use methodologies that make meaningful, well-defined comparisons. Shark has agreed to comply with NAD's recommendation that both claims be discontinued.


Misleading "natural" product packaging at heart of dismissed multistate claims

Common Ingredient

Glyphosate is one of the most common herbicides in the world, useful for killing the weeds that stifle crops. First formulated in the 1950s by a Swiss scientist, the chemical had become the No. 1 herbicide in the United States agricultural sector, and the second-most used in homes and gardens by 2007. Experts have described glyphosate as "a one in a 100-year discovery that is as important for reliable global food production as penicillin is for battling disease."

Brought to a Boil

The herbicide was front and center in Kathleen Gibson's class action lawsuit against Quaker Oats, filed in the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in May 2016. Ms. Gibson took exception with Quaker Oats' claim that its products were "natural," "100 percent natural" and "heart healthy," among other such claims, given that traces of glyphosate were found after testing certain Quaker Oats products.

Given glyphosate's ubiquity, it is no surprise that it touches the production life of many different food products. The producers of the oats that find their way into Quaker products use the herbicide while their harvest is in the ground, to aid in the drying of the oats and to produce an earlier and more uniform crop.

Gibson's suit alleged that the presence of the glyphosate, while not unlawful in its own right, undermined Quaker's "Green and environmentally conscious" brand and proved that its advertising was intended to mislead. She brought claims alleging negligent misrepresentation; unjust enrichment; and violation of the Illinois Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, among others.

The Takeaway

The court granted Quaker Oats' motion to dismiss in August. While observing that the consolidated class was bringing a dozen different claims with a similar theme under Illinois, California, Florida, New York and common law, the court noted that the labeling of food is governed by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and not by individual states. The court posed the question: Did Congress intend to pre-empt the field of nutritional and food labeling in this case?

The court ruled that it did, and that the state claims brought by the class could not survive: The Food and Drug Administration's guidance on the term "natural" did not encompass food production methods, effectively removing the use of herbicides before processing as a basis for possible claims. It also noted that the use of the word "natural" did not imply a nutrition or health benefit.


After 5 years of choppy waters, cruise companies settle TCPA class action

High Tide

Philip Chavrat lives in landlocked Columbus, Ohio, but he alleges that he received a flood of telemarketing calls from Travel Services, a marketing company working on behalf of well-known cruise companies Carnival, Royal Caribbean and Norwegian. Chavrat claims he received four separate calls between February 2011 and July 2012, some manned by live representatives and others featuring prerecorded messages.

According to Chavrat, neither he nor anyone in his family had given consent for the calls.

Chavrat filed his original complaint against the telemarketing company and the cruise lines in July 2012 on behalf of himself and a putative class of similarly situated individuals. As the case proceeded, it eventually narrowed to plead alleged violations of the prerecorded calls provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), seeking injunctive relief and the standard TCPA-mandated damages award of $500 to $1,500 per call.

Rough Seas

The case was tumultuous, lasting five years and involving three amended complaints, briefings amounting to more than 3,000 pages, and frequently challenged and interrupted discovery comprising 30 discovery hearings and 15 depositions in four states.

The case slammed to a halt in April 2013, when the litigation was stayed pending a decision from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC was debating whether plaintiffs could sue for vicarious liability under the TCPA for calls that the defendants did not initiate. This was relevant to the case because Mr. Chavrat was seeking to hold both the telemarketer and the cruise lines, which did not place the calls themselves, liable. When the Commission ruled in favor of vicarious liability, the case was revived.

The Takeaway

The Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, approved a motion to settle the case in late July 2017. The settlement established a fund containing $7 million to $12.5 million, varying by the number of claims filed, to cover reimbursements to class members who could demonstrate that their phone numbers appeared in call records produced in discovery. Chavrat received an incentive award, and court costs and attorney fees were included in the final agreement.


Commission: company policies had not changed sufficiently since major incidents

Under the Hood

Uber had something of a difficult year in 2014 in terms of its data privacy. In May, an intruder accessed the personal information of Uber drivers: 100,000 names and driver's license numbers were viewed by the intruder. And then, that November, an Uber employee was accused of accessing the ride history of a journalist who had written extensively about the company.

An internal audit was launched regarding the company's privacy policies. Changes were recommended. But the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was watching, and it believed that the company hadn't changed enough.

Where Are My Keys?

This August, Uber settled allegations made by the Commission that the company had continued to fail to protect its customers' privacy.

The Commission claimed that Uber's automated monitoring system, which had been established in response to its internal review, had been abandoned less than a year later. Internal access to private data was rarely monitored after that point.

Moreover, the FTC claimed that Uber failed to implement straightforward and affordable strategies to secure its data. For instance, in the May 2014 hack, the intruder gained entry to the company's systems by using a special access key published openly on the web by an Uber engineer. The Commission also noted that the company stored consumer information in plaintext, readable format in the Internet's storage "cloud."

The Takeaway

The settlement prohibits Uber from misrepresenting its efforts to monitor internal access to personal customer information and its efforts to secure its data generally. The company must institute a comprehensive privacy and confidentiality policy to protect customer information. And the agreement requires 20 years of independent audits to verify that the FTC's concerns are addressed.

Uber's rise has been phenomenal, and it has at times claimed that its privacy problems are due to its rapid growth. This agreement underscores the necessity of a privacy policy that "scales" alongside enterprises. Companies – especially new companies that depend on leveraging data as a matter of course – need to ensure that the security of their data grows in lockstep with their business as a whole.


Mike and Ike boxes contain air

You Know ... Those Guys

Mike and Ike brand candy made an advertising splash a few years ago, with a campaign built around the "breakup" of the not-quite famous pair whose names are the brand. Boxes of the candy appeared with one or the other name scratched out, and short missives from Mike or Ike appeared on the back of the boxes explaining the breakup – Just Born, the maker of the candy – even commissioned a movie trailer built around the concept.

The campaign was very popular, in part because it played on the candy's simultaneous ubiquity and anonymity: Everyone is familiar with the Mike and Ike box, yet few people probably know much about the product, which has been consumed by Americans in some form or another for more than 75 years.


The Mike and Ike brand hit the headlines again this August but in a less positive way – a class action suit filed in the Southern District of California. Anthony Buso brought claims on behalf of a class of Mike and Ike purchasers against Just Born alleging violations of California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law.

Buso claimed that a box of the candy he purchased was only 70 percent filled with actual product, which triggered the various California statutes. "Judging from the sizes of the container, a reasonable consumer would expect them to be substantially filled with product," the suit maintains.

The Takeaway

'The suit seeks injunctive relief, costs of the suit and attorneys' fees, and damages. This suit is part of an overall increase in slack-fill litigations across the country, as we have reported previously.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions