United States: Beware The Dissolved Corporation: Issues Affecting Diversity Jurisdiction

Rebecca M. Plasencia is a partner in Holland & Knight's Miami office.

All litigators know the general rule that a corporation is deemed a citizen of both its state of incorporation and the state in which the corporation has its principal place of business.1 Where a plaintiff and a defendant are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, a federal district court can exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over the case because there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties.2 But what happens when either the plaintiff or defendant corporation is defunct, inactive, or dissolved? The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to resolve a decades-long split of authority among the Circuit Courts of Appeals on this issue.

All states have enacted laws that allow for a dissolved corporation, limited liability company, etc., to exist for a certain amount of time (varying from state to state) following dissolution for purposes of engaging in all activities necessary to wind up the business and to sue or be sued. Thus, without question, an inactive or dissolved corporation remains a citizen of its state of incorporation for the statutory period prescribed in that state's law. But what happens to its principal-place-of-business citizenship is an issue that has not been resolved by the courts.

Both the Third and Eleventh Circuits have adopted a bright-line rule that an inactive or dissolved corporation has no principal-place-of-business citizenship and remains a citizen of its state of incorporation only.3 In Midlantic National Bank v. Hansen, the Third Circuit defined inactive corporation as "a corporation conducting no business activities."4 In holding that an inactive corporation has no principal place of business, Midlantic relied on the now-rejected "corporate activities" test, noting that because an inactive corporation does not engage in corporate activities, it cannot have a principal place of business.5 Thus, an inactive corporation could only be a citizen of its state of incorporation.

After Midlantic was decided, however, the Supreme Court resolved a split among the Circuit Courts of Appeals regarding the test to be applied in determining a corporation's principal place of business. In Hertz Corp. v. Friend, the Court held that a corporation's principal place of business is where its "nerve center" is located— that is, "where the corporation's high-level officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities."6 Notwithstanding that Midlantic was based on the "corporate activities" test that Hertz expressly rejected for determining principal place of business, the Eleventh Circuit adopted Midlantic's holding, extending it to a dissolved corporation. In Holston Investments Inc. B.V.I. v. LanLogistics Corp., the Eleventh Circuit held that a dissolved corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation only.7 Although the Delaware corporation had at all times maintained its corporate headquarters in Florida, it had dissolved in Delaware in December 2007, and the Florida Secretary of State had processed and filed documents withdrawing the corporation's authority to transact business in Florida in January 2008; the plaintiff sued the dissolved corporation four months later.8 Although at the time the lawsuit was filed, the dissolved corporation was still winding down its affairs, the Eleventh Circuit held that the defendant had no principal place of business and was a citizen of its state of incorporation only, opting for the bright-line rule set forth in Midlantic:

Considering the jurisdictional tests in the various circuits and the guidance of the Supreme Court in Hertz, we join the Third Circuit in holding a dissolved corporation has no principal place of business. This bright-line rule may open federal courts to an occasional corporation with a lingering local presence, but undeserved access to a fair forum is a small price to pay for the clarity and predictability that a bright-line rule provides. Moreover, in our opinion, the Third Circuit rule aligns most closely with the Supreme Court's analysis in Hertz.9

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, on the other hand, has rejected this reasoning and held that an inactive or dissolved corporation must also have a principal place of business for determining citizenship. In Wm. Passalacqua Builders Inc. v. Resnick Developers S. Inc., the Second Circuit held that an inactive corporation must have a principal place of business for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, which it determined is the place in which the corporation last transacted business.10 This holding was reiterated by the Second Circuit in Pinnacle Consultants Ltd. v. Leucadia National Corp., in which the court noted that the diversity statute was designed to preclude any argument that an inactive corporation has no principal place of business.11 Rather, an inactive corporation must be a citizen of both its state of incorporation and its principal place of business, which will be the state where it last transacted business.12

The Fifth and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals have adopted a somewhat middle-ground approach, adopting a "facts and circumstances" test to determine whether an inactive or dissolved corporation has a principal place of business. In Harris v. Black Clawson Co., the Fifth Circuit noted that "while the place of an inactive corporation's last business activity is relevant to determine its principal place of business, it is not dispositive."13 Rather, "as a matter of law, where a corporation has been inactive in a state for a substantial period of time, ... that state is not the corporation's principal place of business."14 Because the defendant had been completely inactive in Louisiana for a substantial period of time—over five years—before suit was filed, the court determined that Louisiana was not the corporation's principal place of business and thus complete diversity existed.15 The Fifth Circuit avoided ruling on whether an inactive corporation must have a principal place of business.16

The Fourth Circuit held in Athena Auto. Inc. v. DiGregorio that a dissolved corporation can have a principal place of business, expressly rejecting the Third Circuit's approach because it overlooked the reality that "[a] corporation's business does not usually end with the abruptness of closing its doors" and that even an inactive corporation can have a "continuing impact" in an area sufficient to preserve its local identity.17 Adopting a test similar to that in Harris, the Fourth Circuit held that the inactive corporation did not have a principal place of business in Maryland as it had been inactive in that state for three years before suit was filed.18 The Fourth Circuit did not need to decide whether the inactive corporation actually had a principal place of business but noted that, if it had to make such a finding, it would apply the nerve-center test.19

Without expressly ruling whether an inactive or dissolved corporation must have a principal place of business, the Tenth Circuit in Coffey v. Freeport McMoran Copper & Gold affirmed a district court's finding that a defendant's business activities were substantial enough to constitute "transacting business" and thus established principal-place-of-business citizenship.20 In that case, the defendant corporation had been acquired by another company but had engaged in environmental remediation activities in response to legal claims from its prior operations.21 The Tenth Circuit—also applying the now-rejected "total activities" test for determining principal place of business—affirmed the district court's ruling that the remediation activity sufficed to establish Oklahoma as the defendant's principal place of business.22

Similarly, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, while not expressly addressing the issue, has acknowledged the possibility that an inactive or dissolved corporation can have a principal place of business. The D.C. Circuit in Ripalda v. American Operations Corp. held that a corporation continues in existence after dissolution if the state of incorporation allows its continued existence to sue or be sued.23 The circuit court left open the question of whether a dissolved corporation must have a principal place of business, noting only that the dissolved corporation had formally withdrawn from Virginia more than a year before suit was filed and thus—absent any contrary evidence in the record—the court could "presume" that "if it still had any principal place of business it was not in Virginia."24

The conflicting circuit court opinions have generated much confusion among the district courts about whether an inactive or dissolved corporation must have a principal place of business and, if so, how to determine that place. This issue is particularly problematic where a corporation has withdrawn its certificate of authority to transact business in a state but is still conducting necessary activities to wind down its business and still exists under the applicable state statute for purposes of suing or being sued.

While the law is in flux, some guidance with respect to dissolved corporations can be gleaned from the Supreme Court's decision in Hertz and from the diversity statute itself. In holding that a corporation's principal place of business is "where the corporation's high level officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities" (i.e., the "nerve center"), the Supreme Court did not distinguish between active or dissolved corporations or focus on the types of activities being conducted to determine a corporation's principal place of business.25 Instead, Hertz expressly recognized the reality that corporations exist in various forms to conduct many different kinds of activities and adopted the nerve-center test to accommodate this reality:

Perhaps because corporations come in many different forms, involve many different kinds of business activities, and locate offices and plants for different reasons in different ways in different regions, a general 'business activities' approach has proved unusually difficult to apply.26

It is not the type of business that is being conducted that determines a corporation's principal-place-of-business citizen-ship; rather, it is the "place of actual direction, control, and coordination" that is dispositive.27 Following this reasoning, it should not matter whether a corporation is engaged in active business practices, such as sales or marketing, as opposed to business activities necessary for winding down a corporation's affairs. Instead, it should only matter where the "place of actual direction, control, and coordination" of those activities is located (whether winding-down business activities or otherwise).

The plain language of the diversity statute further supports the theory that a dissolved corporation should have a principal place of business for diversity purposes. As the statute makes clear, a corporation is deemed to have dual citizenship and is a citizen of both its state of incorporation and its principal place of business.28 The statute makes no distinction between active, inactive, or dissolved corporations. Nor should it. A dissolved corporation does not lose its character as a corporate body after dissolution. Indeed, every state extends the life of a corporation after dissolution for a definite time so that the corporation can prosecute and defend lawsuits and otherwise settle its affairs. Section 1332(c)(1)'s requirement for dual citizenship takes into account the reality that corporations exist after dissolution. Thus, the statute requires a determination, for every corporation, of a principal place of business, which is the place of actual direction and control under Hertz. The fact that the corporation has dissolved and is winding up its affairs does not mean it has no place of direction and control and thus no principal place of business. Rather, because the corporation exists and can sue or be sued, it must have a principal place of business—a nerve center—from which, at a minimum, any litigation is directed.

Until the Supreme Court resolves the conflict among the Circuit Courts of Appeals, however, litigators must be conscious of the problems that can arise when seeking (or attempting to avoid) federal court subject-matter jurisdiction under the diversity statute where one of the parties is an inactive or dissolved corporation.


128 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).

228 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1).

348 F.3d 693 (3d Cir. 1995).

4Id. at 696.


6559 U.S. 77, 80-81 (2010).

7677 F.3d 1068, 1071 (11th Cir. 2012).

8Id. at 1070 n.1.


10933 F.2d 131, 141 (2d Cir. 1991).

11101 F.3d 900, 907 (2d Cir. 1996).


13961 F.2d 547, 551 (5th Cir. 1992).



16Id. at 551 n.12.

17166 F.3d 288, 291 (4th Cir. 1999).

18Id. at 291-92.

19Id. at 292.

20581 F.3d 1240, 1245–46 (10th Cir. 2009).

21Id. at 1246.


23977 F.2d 1464, 1468 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

24Id. at 1469.

25559 U.S. at 90-91.


27Id. at 97.

2828 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.