United States: Fun With GAAP: CMBS At Risk

Last Updated: August 30 2017
Article by Richard D. Jones

Here's a headline for you: We don't know if a conventional CMBS securitization where risk retention bonds are retained by a B-buyer under an industry standard third party purchaser agreement achieves accounting sale treatment. Failure of accounting sale treatment means the selling bank cannot book the gain and does not derecognize the underlying loans resulting in the entire portfolio of loans remaining on its balance sheet for both Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, and presumably, for risk based capital purposes.

As might have been said by that great philosopher of the 20th Century: "You cannot possibly be serious!"

Commercial Mortgage Alert broke the story on Friday, August 11th and so I'm finally going to talk about the issue. I've been itching to do so since early June when I became aware of the problem but it really didn't seem there was a lot of upside for a broad industry discussion of the problem back then while the auditors and the internal finance teams at our banks and other CMBS sponsors were still pondering the issue. But, after a good deal of mulling and to-ing and fro-ing, it's still not resolved so I think it's time to bring fun with GAAP out of the closet.

For the uninitiated, here's the situation. Something that looks a lot like a sale from any commonsensical point of view, might not actually be a sale through the lens of GAAP. GAAP is what the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) says it is. FASB is an independent private sector organization that is recognized by the Securities and Exchange Commission as the designated accounting standard setter for public companies. The problem here is how sale accounting is defined in Topic 860-Transfers and Servicing of the Accounting Standards (a codification, with certain amendments, of FAS 166). The Accounting Standards govern how auditors interpret generally accepted accounting principles.

Now we arrive at the problem. In order to achieve an accounting true sale follow this decision tree (slightly simplified) for the answer:

  • If the seller has no "continued involvement" with the Buyer or with respect to the transferred assets you have a good sale. Move on.
  • If the Seller has "continued involvement" with the Buyer or the transferred assets, then in order to get to sale treatment, the following three things all must be true:

    • there must be a legal true sale opinion or another basis for the auditors to otherwise become comfortable that the assets have been isolated from the potential bankruptcy or insolvency of the Seller; and
    • each transferee, or in the case of a securitization, each third party holder of a beneficial interest in the securitization, has the right to pledge or exchange the asset (or beneficial interest) it receives where no condition both constrains the transferee from taking advantage of its right to pledge or exchange and provides more than a trivial benefit to the transferor; and
    • the transferor has abandoned effective control over the transferred financial assets (e.g. repurchase rights).

If all these things are true, then congratulations, you've got an accounting true sale. If not, sale treatment fails.

The first and third legs of this test do not generally present problems in our structures, but, as you can see, the requirements for Third-Party Purchasers (TPP) under the risk retention rules stress the second leg of this test as the very nature of those requirements is to constrain the ability of the B-Piece buyer to pledge or exchange its interests in the Securitization.

On first blush, this looks like a daunting test for our TPP based risk retention structures to meet.

But perhaps not. First, can anyone really say this is good accounting policy? Conduit CMBS transactions are sales. We call this a moving company business for a purpose. It simply doesn't make sense to conclude restricting the sale or leverage of a small piece of the capital stack done in order to comply with a new regulatory fiat should queer sale treatment. I've never understood the second leg of this test anyway. It seems to be a more subtle restatement of the perfectly legitimate question, which is the subject of the third leg: does the transferor have effective control over the transferred financial assets? Why pick out restrictions on sale or leverage? Why not hat size or proximity to a Confederate general's statue? It doesn't make any sense. Shouldn't the fact that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense matter to how financial statements are prepared?

Also, there are lots of really good textual arguments why this should not cause a securitization to fail sale treatment. First, what's continued involvement? There is no definition of continued involvement in the guidance, but only this precatory observation:

Examples of continuing involvement with the transferred assets include, but are not limited to, servicing arrangements, recourse or guaranty arrangements, or agreements to purchase or redeem transferred financial assets, options written or held, derivative financial instruments that are entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the transfer, arrangements to provide financial support, pledges of collateral, and the transferor's beneficial interest in the transferred financial assets.

This ain't that. On the other hand paying a bunch of expensive lawyers to negotiate and prepare a lengthy legal document whose principal purpose is to prevent the transferor from either selling (for a time) or levering (except for full recourse debt) the B-piece and setting up a comprehensive monitoring procedure wherein the sponsor can monitor the performance of the TPP seems on its face sort of continued involvement-ish.

I have heard some accounting chatter that the mere imposition of the TPP agreement represents continued involvement. I have also heard a suggestion that while imposition of the TPP agreement might not constitute continued involvement, the mere act of monitoring the performance of the TPP might.

I have also heard that if the seller or any of its affiliates has any other role in the transaction (master servers or special servers or trust administrator or trustee, etc. etc.) that that constitutes continued involvement. As the accounting guidance does not define continued involvement in any useful way we get to speculate. So helpful.

As the TPP agreement is like none of the examples of continued involvement in the literature, we can certainly make an argument that the TPP is not the stuff of continued involvement. If there's no continued involvement, there's no problem with sale treatment. Problem solved.

We could also collectively conclude that a restriction on 5% of the interest in the securitization is not meaningful, is not material, and therefore should be disregarded. We could also conclude that since the Seller is required to impose these restrictions by law, that should be the basis of an exemption.

The trouble is that common sense is no better guide for the application of GAAP than it is to the application of the tax code. Our auditing friends, having been made remarkably conservative by a multi-year pattern of, let's face it, being sued for almost anything and everything, are not big on stepping out in front of the crowd with bold interpretations of GAAP.

While perhaps the Big Four might find a way to get to sale treatment on these facts, I find it hard to see the auditors, by themselves, embracing any of these arguments for sale treatment. If not, what next? Well, we can go back to the FASB and get this fixed. Right? Not a good strategy. Been there. I was deeply involved in the industry's engagement with the Board around the original FAS 166 back in 2005-6. Let me tell you. Our issue is a pimple on the backside of the bullocks in FASB land. Way bigger fish to fry. Getting the Board's attention will be no small undertaking. Also, they're not impressed at all with an argument that the accounting treatment negatively impacts business transactions. "We just count 'em. You design the deals." Even if they concluded this was a real issue that needed clarity, they would likely open "a Project", but in Wilton, the completion of a Project could take years. That's particularly not helpful as we report quarterly. Yes, FASB could step in and fix this and fix it quickly. They have the power to do so in a heartbeat. I'm not holding my breath.

Now for the real solution. The SEC can fix all this. The SEC has the power to simply declare what GAAP is. There's simply no good policy reason to embrace the unintended consequences of the application of a standard written in 2009 to a rule that only became effective in 2016 and that ought to resonate with this Commission. From any commonsensical perspective, these are sales and the SEC should do the right thing here.

Moreover, the SEC can do this by itself. This is not a risk retention issue. This doesn't require the SEC to consult with the other five prudential regulatory agencies who all joined hands and developed the risk retention rule. Getting through that maze, is as we've said many times in the past, extraordinarily difficult but here the SEC can simply act and it should. Clarifying GAAP around this issue in no way appears to me to negatively impact the coherence of accounting policy and the underlying good policy prescriptions that drive making distinctions between things that are sales and things that are in fact financings. These are sales. I hope the SEC will act soon. Indeed, I believe they will mount the proverbial white horse this fall and get this done. But time's a wasting. Winter is coming or, in this case, a date with Sarbox certification.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions