United States: Taxation Of Intellectual Property – Selected Tax Issues Involving Corporations And Partnerships

Last Updated: August 25 2017
Article by Elizabeth V. Zanet and Stanley C. Ruchelman

INTRODUCTION

This article will review the basic U.S. Federal tax considerations of intellectual prop­erty ("I.P.") taxation in the context of corporations and partnerships and examine some typical tax considerations when I.P. is held through a corporation or a part­nership.

CORPORATIONS

Acquisitions

A corporation may acquire I.P. in several ways, including

  • receiving a contribution of I.P. from a shareholder,
  • purchasing or licensing the use of I.P. from another person, or
  • creating I.P. in-house.

Under Code §351, a shareholder's contribution of property, such as I.P., to a corpo­ration will be tax-free if

  • the transfer is solely in exchange for stock of the transferee corporation, and
  • the transferor is in control of the transferee corporation immediately after the exchange, which for this purpose means ownership of 80% or more of the total value and 80% or more of the total voting rights with respect to the corporation's stock.

In a Code §351 exchange, the transferee corporation's basis in the contributed I.P. will be the same as that of the transferor shareholder.

If the Code §351 requirements are not met, the shareholder will recognize gain, but not loss, to the extent that the value of the stock exceeds his or her adjusted basis in the I.P. Here, value of shares is closely associated with the value of the I.P. at the time of transfer. Any gain recognized by the transferor shareholder will be added to the transferee corporation's adjusted basis in the contributed I.P. Examples of circumstances in which a shareholder will recognize gain in an otherwise tax-free Code §351 exchange include a transfer where the transferor receives cash or other property in addition to the stock of the transferee corporation.

In the past, there was some doubt as to whether intangible assets, such as I.P., constituted "property" for purposes of Code §351. Though the issue has been set­tled in favor of the taxpayer, an issue that is not clear is whether a transfer of less than all substantial rights in the property, such as a transfer of a license to use the I.P., is a tax-free transfer under Code §351. In Revenue Ruling 69-156,1 the I.R.S. determined that the transfer by a domestic corporation of an exclusive right to im­port, make, use, sell, and sublicense a patent involving a chemical compound to its foreign subsidiary was not a transfer of "property" within the meaning of Code §351. It stated that tax-free treatment under Code §351 is only available when the rights transferred by the shareholder would constitute a sale, not a license, if the transfer were a taxable transfer.

In contrast, in E.I. Dupont de Nemours v. U.S.,2 the Court of Claims held that a carved-out right to a nonexclusive license would qualify for tax-free treatment under Code §351 and that there was no basis for limiting tax-free treatment under Code §351 to transfers that would constitute sales or exchanges if they were not subject to a nonrecognition provision. The I.R.S has recognized that this case has prec­edential value and must be strongly considered, although it has not withdrawn the ruling.3

A shareholder's receipt of stock in exchange for services does not meet the require­ments of Code §351. However, if I.P. is transferred and the I.P. constitutes prop­erty for the purposes of Code §351, the transfer will be tax free under Code §351, even though the shareholder performed services to produce the property. Further, where the transferor shareholder agrees to perform services in connection with a transfer of property, the I.R.S. determined that tax-free treatment under Code §351 will be accorded if the services are "merely ancillary or subsidiary" to the transfer. These ancillary and subsidiary services could include promoting the transaction by demonstrating and explaining the use of the property, assisting in the "starting up" of the property transferred, or performing under a guarantee relating to the effective starting up.4

Under circumstances in which the shareholder must recognize gain on the I.P. trans­fer, the gain will be subject to the recapture rules of Code §1245 if the I.P. was amor­tizable. The rules of Code §§1221 and 1231 must be applied to determine whether the gain is ordinary income or capital gain.

A corporation may acquire I.P. as a separate asset or as part of a trade or business. In the case of separately acquired I.P., the corporation's basis in the I.P. generally will be the purchase price. In the case of I.P. acquired as part of a trade or business, the corporation's basis in the I.P. will depend upon whether the acquisition is an as­set or stock acquisition. In the case of an asset acquisition, the purchase price must be allocated among the assets of the trade or business, including the I.P., under the rules of Code §1060.

In the case of a stock acquisition, the corporation will not receive a step-up in the ba­sis of the underlying assets of the acquired corporation, unless it makes an election under Code §338 to treat the stock purchase as an asset purchase. The purchase price will be allocated under rules similar to the rules of Code §1060.

In the case of self-created I.P. where the corporation capitalizes the costs of developing the I.P., the corporation will have a basis in the I.P. generally equal to the capitalized costs. As discussed below, this basis may be amortized. Alternatively, if the corporation is permitted to deduct all or some of the costs incurred in developing the I.P., the corporation may have no basis or a very low basis in the I.P.

Amortization

Corporations are subject to amortization rules for self-created and acquired I.P., as discussed in our article "Tax 101: Taxation of Intellectual Property – The Basics." Thus, for example, under the rules of Code §197, a corporation generally may amortize its basis in a broad list of acquired I.P. (including, patents, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets and know-how, copyrights, and computer software) if the acquired I.P. is used in a trade or business or an activity carried on for the production of income and was not separately acquired. Though corporate taxpayers have several choices in amortization methods, Code §197 requires straight-line depreciation over a 15-year period. The rules of Code §167 must be applied to determine the amortization permitted for a corporation's self-created and separately acquired I.P.

In the case of contributed I.P., one of two situations may arise:

  • A shareholder may contribute I.P. that was amortizable in the hands of the shareholder.
  • A shareholder may contribute I.P. that was not amortizable in the hands of the shareholder, such as certain self-created I.P.

In the former case, the transferee corporation generally steps into the place of the transferor shareholder and, thus, receives a carryover basis, which must be amor­tized over the remainder of the original amortization period. If gain is recognized on the transfer, the transferee corporation's basis in the I.P. will equal the transferor shareholder's basis plus the recognized gain. The amortization of the I.P. will be bifurcated: The portion of the basis corresponding to the carryover basis will contin­ue to be amortized over the remaining original amortization period, and the portion of the basis that corresponds to the recognized gain will be amortized under a new 15-year amortization period.

In the latter case, the corporation generally will not be permitted to amortize the con­tributed I.P., unless the transferor recognizes of gain. In that case, the recognized gain will be treated as a purchase price, and become the transferee corporation's basis in the I.P., which may be amortized.

Dispositions

A corporation's disposition of I.P. may take several forms, including

  • a sale of I.P. to an unrelated third party,
  • a sale of I.P. to a shareholder, or
  • a distribution of I.P. to a shareholder.

If a corporation sells amortizable I.P. to an unrelated third-party, any recognized gain attributable to the pre-sale amortization deductions will be characterized as ordinary income under the recapture rules of Code §1245. Any remaining gain or loss may be characterized as either ordinary or capital under the rules of Code §§1221 or 1231.

In the case of a sale to a shareholder owning a significant portion of the corporation, any gain in excess of the Code §1245 recapture amount recognized on the sale will be treated as ordinary income under Code §1239, which generally applies to the transfer of property from a corporation to a shareholder if the transferred property is depreciable or amortizable in the hands of the transferee shareholder and the shareholder is considered a related person. For the purposes of Code §1239, the shareholder is a related person if it holds more than a 50% interest in the corpora­tion.

If the shareholder does not meet the Code §1239 ownership threshold, the recap­ture and characterization rules applicable to an unrelated third-party buyer will ap­ply, as discussed above.

I.P. that is amortizable under Code §197 is subject to a loss disallowance rule under Code §197(f) that prevents the recognition of loss in the case of an asset that was acquired in a transaction or a series of transactions if, at the time of the disposition, the taxpayer retains the other intangible assets amortizable under Code §197 that were acquired in the same transaction or series of related transactions. The pur­pose of this rule is to prevent taxpayers from recovering their basis faster than over the 15-year amortization period. The unrecognized loss is not completely forfeited, but rather, it is added to the bases of the remaining intangible assets and amortized over the remaining 15-year amortization period.

The following example illustrates the loss disallowance rule:

In tax year 1, a corporation, C, acquires a trade or business, which includes I.P. assets. C receives a step-up in the basis of the I.P. assets and takes amortization deductions. C utilizes the I.P. assets in business line 1 and business line 2. Subsequently, in tax year 5, C decides to sell business line 1. The sale is structured as an asset sale and includes one of the I.P. assets acquired in the acquisition of the trade or business that occurred in tax year 1. The remaining I.P. assets acquired in the tax year 1 acquisition will not be sold. Under the loss disallowance rule, any loss realized on the I.P. asset sold as part of the sale of business line 1 will not be recognized by C. The loss will be added to the bases of the remaining I.P. assets, essentially mean­ing that the basis in excess of the fair market value of the disposed asset is transferred to the remaining assets.

The loss disallowance rule applies in the case of nonrecognition transactions. Thus, in the above illustration, the loss disallowance rule would apply if C transferred the assets of business line 1 to a corporation in a tax-free exchange for stock under Code §351 and then sold the stock in that corporation.5

For the purposes of the loss disallowance rule, members of a controlled group of corporations are treated as a single taxpayer so that no loss is allowed on the disposition of I.P. by one member of a controlled group of corporations if another member of the controlled group retains other Code §197 intangible assets that were acquired in the same transaction or series of related transactions as the asset that was disposed of.

If a corporation transfers I.P. to a shareholder as part of a nonrecognition transac­tion, such as a distribution that is part of a liquidation of a subsidiary into its parent corporation or a like-kind exchange, the shareholder will step into the shoes of the corporation with respect to the I.P. Thus, the shareholder will receive a carryover basis in the I.P., and if the I.P. was amortizable in the hands of the corporation, the shareholder will continue to amortize the I.P. over the remaining amortization period.

If a corporation distributes I.P. to a shareholder in a transaction that does not qualify for nonrecognition treatment, such as a dividend in-kind under Code §301, a stock redemption under Code §302, or a distribution in complete liquidation under Code §336, the shareholder's basis in the I.P. will be its fair market value and the corpora­tion will recognize gain. To the extent of depreciation recapture under Code §1245, the gain will be taxed as ordinary income. Any additional gain will be treated as cap­ital gain. Note that for the corporation, capital gains and ordinary income are taxed at the same rate. In the event that the corporation has a capital loss carryover from other transactions, the carryover capital losses can reduce capital gains generated from the distribution. Any loss will likely be disallowed to the corporation under the loss disallowance rule discussed above.

PARTNERSHIPS

Joint development projects, involving two or more parties contributing services, per­sonnel, funding, and other resources, are common arrangements for the develop­ment of I.P.

The definition of "partnership" in the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") is broad, en­compassing a "syndicate, group, pool, joint venture, or other unincorporated organi­zation through or by the means of which any business, financial operation, or ven­ture is carried on, and which is not . . . a corporation or a trust or estate."6 Typically, profits and losses must be shared by the participants for there to be a partnership, although the sharing ratio for losses may differ from the sharing ratio for income and gains.

Since the concept of a partnership is broadly defined for tax purposes, if the par­ties to a joint development do not intend to form a partnership for U.S. Federal tax purposes, they must take care to avoid falling involuntarily within the Code's broad definition of partnership. Their arrangement should be governed by documents that demonstrate that the parties are contracting parties, not partners. For example, the sharing of resources such as personnel or facilities, should be covered by fees paid by the using contracting party to the contributing contracting party in order to reimburse the latter for use by the former.

Since limited liability companies with more than one member generally are treated as partnerships for U.S. Federal tax purposes, the tax considerations discussed here also apply to L.L.C.'s.

Acquisitions

Just like a corporation, a partnership can acquire I.P. in several ways, including

  • receiving a contribution of I.P. from a partner,
  • purchasing or licensing the use of I.P. from another person, or
  • creating I.P. in-house.

The contribution of property by a partner to a partnership is governed by Code §721, which states that neither the partner nor the partnership generally will recognize gain or loss on the transfer of property in exchange for an interest in the partnership. Unlike Code §351 (governing the tax-free contribution of property to a corporation, discussed above), Code §721 does not require the partner to be in "control" of the partnership. Thus, a transfer to a partnership is generally tax-free even if only one person transfers property to the partnership and that person ends up owning a small interest in the partnership after the transfer.

A contribution by a partner to a partnership of property encumbered by debt may re­sult in gain recognition to the contributor because Code §752(c) generally treats the partnership as assuming the liability. This often decreases the portion of the liability allocated to the contributor. When a partner's liabilities are decreased by reason of a partnership's assumption of a liability, the partner whose debt allocation is reduced is treated as if a cash distribution were made to that partner.7 Thus, a partner that contributes I.P. subject to a liability to a partnership, may be treated as receiving a cash distribution to the extent of the liability.

Further, debt financing at the level of the partnership is often treated as if the part­ners borrowed the funds and contributed the proceeds of the borrowing to the part­nership. If a partner's share of the debt increases, the partner is treated as contrib­uting cash to the partnership and the outside basis in the partnership increases. If a partner's share of debt decreases, the partner is treated as receiving a distribution of cash from the partnership and the outside basis in the partnership decreases.

The question of whether a partner transferred "property" for the purposes of Code §721 may arise in the case of a partner that transfers to the partnership less than all of its interest in I.P. This transaction is akin to transfer of a right to use I.P. and is analogous to the grant of a license to the corporation by a controlling shareholder. The tax treatment is governed by the same authorities that are applicable to trans­fers under Code §351, discussed above. Similarly, the question of whether a part­ner may provide services with the transfer of I.P. and still preserve tax-free treatment under Code §721 is governed by the same authorities applicable to transfers under Code §351, discussed above.

As in the case of a corporation, a partnership may acquire I.P. as a separate asset or as part of a trade or business. In the case of separately acquired I.P., the part­nership's basis in the I.P. generally will be the purchase price. In the case of I.P. acquired as part of a trade or business, the transaction is treated as the purchase of a going concern. The price must be allocated among the assets of the trade or business, including the I.P., under the rules of Code §1060.

In the case of self-created I.P., if the partnership is required to capitalize the costs incurred in developing the I.P., it will have a basis in the I.P. attributable to the capitalized costs, which may be amortized. The amortization deductions will pass through to the partners. Alternatively, if the partnership is permitted to deduct all or some of the costs incurred in developing the I.P., it will have no basis, or a very low basis, in the I.P. The partners will have received a tax benefit at the time the expenditure is deducted on the partnership tax return.

Amortization

In General

Partnerships are subject to the amortization rules for self-created and acquired I.P. as discussed in ; "Tax 101: Taxation of Intellectual Property – The Basics." Thus, for example, under the rules of Code §197, a partnership generally may amortize its basis in a broad list of acquired I.P. (including, patents, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets and know-how, copyrights, and computer software) if the acquired I.P. is used in a trade or business or an activity that is carried on for the production of income and was not separately acquired. Code §197 requires straight-line depreci­ation over a 15-year period. The rules of Code §167 must be applied to determine the amortization permitted for a partnership's self-created and separately acquired I.P.

Any amortization deduction is determined at the partnership level and is then allo­cated among the partners under the terms of the partnership agreement.

As with transfers to a corporation, discussed above, in the case of I.P. contributed to a partnership, one of two situations may arise:

  • A partner may contribute I.P. that was amortizable in the hands of the partner.
  • A partner may contribute I.P. that was not amortizable in the hands of the partner, such as certain self-created I.P.

In the former case, the transferee partnership generally steps into the place of the transferor partner and, thus, receives a carryover basis, which must be amortized over the remainder of the original amortization period.

As discussed earlier, it is possible for a partner to recognize gain on the contribution of encumbered property to a partnership. However, such gain recognition will not affect the partnership's basis in the contributed property. Thus, unlike with contribu­tions to a corporation, contributions of property to a partnership do not generally re­sult in a bifurcated treatment of the basis of the I.P. asset for amortization purposes.

In the latter case, the partnership generally will be not permitted to amortize the con­tributed I.P., unless the transferor recognizes gain, which is a very rare occurrence in the partnership context.

Effect of a Code §754 Election on Amortization

Generally, the sale of a partnership interest in a transaction that produces a gain – often because the fair market value of the partnership's assets exceeds the part­nership's basis in those assets -- does not trigger any adjustment in the basis of the partnership in its assets. The basis of the partnership in its assets is referred to of­ten as the partnership's "inside basis" in the assets. The partner's basis in the part­nership interest is referred to often as the partner's outside basis in the partnership. Thus, for example, if X acquires an interest in partnership P, at its fair market value, and P holds only one asset with a fair market value that is considerably greater than P's adjusted basis in the asset, the partnership's inside basis in the asset will not be adjusted upward to reflect the fact that X paid fair market value for the interest in P. If partnership P then sells the appreciated asset, X will be allocated his share of the built-in gain from the sale of the asset. X's share of the gain does not take into account the fact that he recently paid fair market value for his interest in P.

To alleviate the unfairness of the foregoing result, a partnership may make an elec­tion under Code §754 to step up the basis in the partnership's assets as they relate to the transferee partner. The basis adjustment is authorized by Code §743(b).8 Again, only the transferee partner benefits from the election. In the above example, if partnership P makes a Code §754 election in connection with X's acquisition of a partnership interest in partnership P, X – and only X – would be entitled to benefit from an increase in the inside basis of partnership P's asset. If partnership P then sells the asset, X's share of any built-in gain would be reduced to reflect the adjust­ed basis that resulted from his purchase of the interest in P.

Similarly, a Code §754 election allows a partnership to elect to adjust the basis under Code §734(b) in partnership property retained after it makes a distribution of money or property to a partner if as a result of a distribution, the distributee rec­ognizes any gain or loss or takes a basis different from the partnership's basis in the case of a property distribution.9 So, for example, assume a partnership having appreciated property and cash distributes cash to only one partner and as a result, that partner recognizes gain because the cash exceeds the outside basis in the partnership. If a Code §754 election is in effect, Code §734(b) allows the partnership to increase its basis in property retained by the partnership. This prevents a dou­ble level of possible gain recognition among the partners – once at the time of the distribution that results in a gain to a partner and a second time when appreciated assets are subsequently sold. On the other hand, if a partnership makes a liquidat­ing distribution to a partner that terminates the entire interest in the partnership, and the amount distributed consists of cash, unrealized receivables, and inventory worth in total less than the outside basis of the retiring partner's interest in the partnership, the retiring partner realizes a loss. If a Code §754 election is in effect, Code §734(b) requires the partnership to reduce its basis in property retained by the partnership. This prevents a double level of possible loss recognition among the partners – once at the time of the liquidating distribution that results in a loss to the retiring partner and a second time when appreciated assets are subsequently sold.

A Code §754 election may result in amortization benefits for I.P. amortizable un­der Code §197 to the extent a taxpayer (a partner or the partnership) obtains an increased adjusted basis in such I.P. An example of a contribution of I.P. that may result in gain involves transfers to partnerships with related foreign partners as pro­vided in temporary regulations promulgated during the final days of the Obama Ad­ministration purporting to limit the scope of nonrecognition treatment when appre­ciated property is transferred to a partnership having non-U.S. persons as partners in certain circumstances.10 For those transfers, immediate gain recognition is man­dated by the temporary regulations. Where gain must be recognized in connection with a transfer to a partnership, a bifurcated approach is followed: the portion of the basis that represents the upward basis adjustment is amortized over a new 15-year amortization period and the remaining basis will continue to be amortized under the remaining amortization period.

Effect of a Constructive Termination on Amortization

If 50% or more of the interests in a partnership are sold within a 12-month period, the partnership is deemed to have terminated.11 The constructive termination is treated as a transfer of all of the assets of the terminated partnership to a new part­nership in exchange for interests in the new partnership, immediately followed by the distribution of the interests in the new partnership to the partners in proportion to their interests in the terminated partnership.

Under a constructive termination, the new partnership's basis in an asset amortiz­able under Code §197 generally will be the same as the terminated partnership's basis in the asset. Thus, amortization will not be impacted by the constructive termination. However, if a Code §754 election is in effect, adjustments to basis may be required. In such cases, the bifurcated approach discussed above must be followed.

Deduction for R&D Expenses

Under Code §162, a taxpayer may deduct the ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on a trade or business. In the case of a start-up business, such as a partnership formed to develop new I.P., Code §162 will not apply if the business is in the development phase and not yet "carrying on" a trade or business.

In contrast, Code §174(a)(1) permits a taxpayer to deduct research or experimen­tal expenditures paid or incurred "in connection with" its trade or business, which has been interpreted to mean that research or experimental expenditures may be deducted during the phase in which a start-up business is preparing to go into busi­ness but is not yet in business.12

Notwithstanding the above, the taxpayer need never be involved in a trade or busi­ness. So, a partnership that is set up to develop a new product and which then sells the I.P. without reducing it to commercial value by using it in a trade or business likely will not be allowed to take the Code §174 research and development ("R&D") deduction.13 Similarly, a partnership that has no plans or ability to market or exploit any products that it might develop likely will not be allowed the Code §174 R&D deduction.14

Dispositions

Disposition of I.P. by a Partnership

In a sale of amortizable I.P. to a third party, the main issues to consider are whether any gain will be characterized as ordinary income under the Code §1245 recapture rules and whether the remaining gain is capital gain, or any loss is capital loss, un­der Code §1231. If the I.P. is not amortizable, the gain or loss may be capital gain or loss under Code §1221.

In a sale of amortizable I.P. to a partner, any gain in excess of the Code §1245 recapture amount will be characterized as ordinary income under Code §1239 if the partner holds a greater than 50% interest in the partnership. If Code §1239 does not apply, the typical characterization rules, discussed above in the context of unrelated party sales, apply. Amounts realized in excess of the Code §1245 recapture amount may be afforded long-term capital gains treatment.

Further, the loss disallowance rule of Code §197(f), discussed above, also applies to partnerships. Thus, no immediate loss is recognized if a group of Code §197 intangibles is acquired and less than all such intangibles are sold. The amount of the loss increases the basis in the retained Code §197 intangibles.

In the case of distributions of I.P. to partners, special basis rules may apply to intan­gible assets amortizable under Code §197 depending on whether the distribution is a non-liquidating or a liquidating distribution. In the case of a non-liquidating dis­tribution of such I.P., under Code §731, the distributing partnership generally does not recognize gain or loss resulting from the distribution, and this nonrecognition treatment means that the distributee partner steps into the shoes of the distributing partnership with respect to the adjusted basis and amortization period of the I.P.

In the case of a liquidating distribution, the distributed property will have a basis equal to the partner's outside basis in his partnership interest. If more than one asset is distributed, the partner's outside basis must be allocated among the assets received in the liquidating distribution. If the allocated basis is less than the partner­ship's basis, the carryover approach, discussed above in the case of non-liquidating distributions, applies. If the allocated basis is more than the partnership's basis, a bifurcated approach must be taken under which the distributee partner will amortize the increase in basis over a new 15-year amortization period and the remaining basis will continue to be amortized in the same manner as it was in the hands of the partnership.

In the case of distributed I.P. that is not amortizable in the hands of the distributing partnership, the distribution to the distributee partner, by itself, generally does not cause the I.P. to be amortizable in the hands of the distributee partner.

Disposition of an Interest in a Partnership that Owns I.P.

Under Code §741, gain or loss from the sale of an interest in a partnership generally is treated as derived from the sale of a capital asset, regardless of the underlying assets held by the partnership. The exception to this rule arises when the partner­ship holds assets described in Code §751, specifically: unrealized receivables15 and inventory items.16 Code §751 assets are sometimes referred to as "hot assets." If part of the sales proceeds from the sale of a partnership interest is attributable to a hot asset, that amount is treated as ordinary income. The rule prevents partners from converting ordinary income into capital gain through a sale of a partnership interest.17

In the I.P. context, the term "unrealized receivables" includes franchises, trademarks, and trade names as described in Code §1253(a).18 Under that provision, a transfer of a franchise, trademark, or trade name is not treated as sale or exchange of a capital asset if the transferor retains any significant power, right, or continuing inter­est with respect to the subject matter of the franchise, trademark, or trade name.19 This provision typically applies to businesses that sell franchises to customers in the ordinary course of business. In a franchise operation, the franchisee is granted the right to use trademarks and tradenames, along with specified know-how, within a specified geographic area on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis in connection with the operation of a business on a standardized basis so that the quality and appear­ance of the business looks alike throughout the territory where franchisees operate. In order to maintain quality and appearance throughout the territory, the franchisor retains certain rights after the "sale" of the franchise. Code §1253 was enacted to prevent franchisors from claiming favorable capital gains tax treatment each time franchise rights were sold to a franchisee. It achieves this by denying capital gains treatment when the franchisor retains significant power, right, or a continuing inter­est in the rights that are sold, since retention of such powers is crucial in maintaining uniformity across the territory.

Code §1253(b)(2) defines "significant power, right or continuing interest" as includ­ing a right to

  • disapprove any part of an assignment of such interest;
  • terminate the interest at will;
  • prescribe standards of quality for products used or sold, or services fur­nished, and of the equipment and facilities used to promote such products or services;
  • require that the transferee exclusively advertise or sell products and/or ser­vices of the transferor;
  • require that the transferee purchase substantially all operating equipment and supplies from the transferor; and
  • require payments that are dependent on the productivity, use, or disposition of the transferred interest.

The regulations under Code §751 are intended to prevent Code §1253 from being circumvented by creating franchising partnerships that could ultimately be sold in transactions producing capital gains in accordance with Code §741. To achieve that goal, Treas. Reg. §1.751-1(c)(4)(viii) states that hot assets include the "potential gain" that would arise from the sale of franchises and related trademarks and trade names and would be treated as ordinary income under Code §1253(a).20

As discussed above, if a partnership makes an election under Code §754, it may adjust the basis of the partnership's assets under Code §734(b) (relating to ad­justments of bases to the assets retained by the partnership after a distribution of property to a partner) and Code §743(b) (relating to adjustments of bases of part­nership properties for a partner acquiring a partnership interest). If the partnership holds I.P. assets, any increase in the bases of these assets as a result of the basis adjustments may provide additional amortization benefits under Code §197.

Similarly, if the disposition of a partnership interest results in a constructive termina­tion of the partnership (as discussed above) and a Code §754 election is in effect, adjustments to basis may be required, which may result in additional amortization benefits under Code §197.

CONCLUSION

I.P. owned or utilized as part of a business, typically is held though a corporation or partnership. As demonstrated above, significant tax issues arise during the life cycle of the I.P.: when I.P. is created, acquired, used, licensed, sold, and in the case of a partnership or L.L.C., the interest in the flow-through entity owning the I.P. is sold. Proper planning is important at each step in the life cycle. Mistakes in tax planning can be expensive.

Footnotes

1 Rev. Rul. 69-156, 1969-1 C.B. 101.

2 471 F.2d 1211 (Ct. Cl. 1973).

3 Field Service Advice 1998-481.

4 Rev. Rul. 64-56, 1964-1 C.B. 133.

5 Treas. Reg. §1.197-2(g)(1)(i)(C).

6 Code §761(a).

7 Code §752(b).

8 Code §743 provides rules for basis adjustment to the partner's adjusted basis in the partnership property when a Code §754 election is in effect or there is a substantial built-in loss (i.e., greater than $250,000) with respect to a partner­ship's adjusted basis in the partnership property. In the case of a substantial built-in loss, the basis adjustment is mandatory (i.e., no Code §754 election is required). Further, though in the above example, the basis adjustment was ad­vantageous to the taxpayer, the required adjustment may be disadvantageous (such as in the case of net built-in loss) because it may require the partner to decrease his adjusted basis in the partnership property, thus decreasing or eliminating the partner's potential loss on a sale of the partnership property. Further, in such a case, no amortization benefit will be obtained in the case of amortizable I.P.

9 Code §734 provides rules for basis adjustment to the partnership's retained property when a Code §754 election is in effect or, in the case of a substantial built-in loss, when a mandatory basis adjustment is required.

10 Treas. Reg. §§1.721(c)-2T and 1.721(c)-3T.

11 Code §708.

12 Snow v. Commr., 416 U.S. 500 (1974) (limited partner in start-up partnership formed to develop new product, but which had no income, was permitted to deduct his share of net operating loss attributable to the R&D deduction under Code §174).

13 Harold J. Green, 83 T.C. 667 (1984).

14 Harris v. Commr., T.C. Memo 1990-80, 58 T.C.M. 1441.

15 I.e., rights to income not previously included under the method of accounting used by the partnership, such as goods delivered or to be delivered or services rendered or to be rendered, to the extent that proceeds therefrom would be treated as a sale or exchange of property other than a capital asset.

16 I.e., an inventory item with fair market value in excess of 120% of partnership's adjusted basis in such item.

17 Code §751.

18 Code §751(c) (flush language).

19 Code §1253(a).

20 Treas. Reg. §1.751-1(c)(4)(viii).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions