United States: Education Newsletter: Volume 1, Number 2

ARIZONA

House Bill 2078 (signed April 17, 2017)

This bill restructures post-secondary credit system for high school students. Unlike dual enrollment programs, a student enrolled in concurrent coursework will attend regular classes at a community college campus. The high school pays the costs of the community college course, provides academic support for the student on the high school campus, and awards high school credit for the course.

Arizona Expands Empowerment Scholarship Accounts

Arizona has also recently expanded its school voucher program to allow all students to be eligible for funding. Previously, only certain students meeting eligibility requirement could get vouchers. This expansion will be incremental over several years and ultimately be available to all students unless otherwise capped. There is a cap of 5,000 additional students per year, which will be topped off at 30,000 students in 2022. Although the bill barely passed the Arizona General Assembly, proponents are still seeking to remove the cap and expand eligibility to all 1.1 million students in Arizona. http://ktar.com/story/1521850/republican-arizona-lawmakers-pass-school-voucher-expansion/

FLORIDA

House Bill 7069 (signed June 15, 2017)

HB 7069 provides a sweeping overhaul of the Florida Charter School program and modifies various charter school provisions, including those related to open enrollment procedures, charter contracts, administrative fees, reporting requirements and the calculation and authorized uses of charter school capital outlay. Chief among the changes are a requirement of school districts to share local millage revenue with charter schools and authorization for high-performing charter schools to establish more than one charter school if it operates near a low-performing school and serves students from that school.

The bill also (a) creates the Schools of Excellence Program to provide administrative flexibility to the state's highest performing schools (b) appropriates $30 million in scholarships to enable students with disabilities to attend private schools (c) requires all public elementary schools to provide 30 minutes of recess (d) creates a "Schools of Hope" program, which would allow charter schools to more easily replace schools that have received consistent Ds or Fs on state report cards, and (e) removes and relaxes some state testing requirements.

INDIANA

House Bill 1382 (signed April 28, 2017)

HB 1382 creates new procedures for renewing a charter where a charter school fails to meet statutory minimum standards. These new procedures allow authorizers to appeal to the State Board of Education for permission to renew in lieu of closing a charter school. The new law also provides that the authority to authorize new charter schools may be suspended if an authorizer renews the charter of, grants a new charter to, or fails to close a school that the State Board ordered closed. Authorizers are now also responsible for ensuring that charter schools are in compliance with legal standards. In addition to authorizer changes, HB 1382 also redefines "virtual charter schools" and requires that these schools adopt student engagement policies, which may permit virtual charter schools to withdraw students who regularly fail to participate in courses.

House Bill 1007 (signed April 20, 2017)

Pursuant to HB 1007, a new course access program has been devised, thus allowing students to choose certain classes to take outside their current public school. The Indiana Department of Education is tasked with establishing an authorization process for course providers and a list of approved courses by June 30, 2018. Negotiations to determine tuition costs will also be left to the Department. Under limited circumstances, such as where the proposed course does not further the student's efforts to meet graduation/certificate requirements or when enrollment in the course would cause the student to exceed normal course load limits, schools will be permitted to block a student's enrollment in courses through the access program.

KENTUCKY

Senate Bill 1 (passed on April 10, 2017)

SB 1 streamlines how students are taught and tested and how teachers are evaluated. In the spring of grades 10 and 11, students must take a college admissions and placement exam paid for by the Kentucky Department of Education (KDE). In certain circumstances, KDE must also pay for the cost of any assessment taken by a high school student to receive an industry-recognized certification, credential or licensure. This bill also requires teachers without continuing service status to be evaluated annually, while teachers with continuing service status must be evaluated every three years, and requires KDE to revise the state accountability system to include an annual overall summative performance evaluation of each school and district.

House Bill 471 (signed March 27, 2017)

This bill provides a funding mechanism for public charter schools in Kentucky, using state and federal funds. This bill follows HB 520 approving charter school in the State of Kentucky. Both bills are effective June 29, 2017.

Other

Kentucky also recently passed bills about School Calendars (SB 50), Bible Literacy (HB 128), and Religious Expression (SB 17).

MICHIGAN

House Bill 4327 (introduced on March 7, 2017)

This bill has been proposed to amend three sections of the Revised School Code to provide a geographic preference for low-income students at public school academies (PSA), urban high school academies, and schools of excellence. If the bill is passed as introduced, PSAs could grant an enrollment preference in a specified area if 70 percent of students in that area qualify for free and reduced-price lunch. The students granted the enrollment preference must also qualify for free and reduced-price lunch. The bill has been introduced in the Michigan House and referred for a second reading, but has not yet been subject to a vote. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2017-2018/billanalysis/House/pdf/2017-HLA-4327-18318A24.pdf

Michigan has also introduced legislation to move all new teacher pension plans to a 401(k) style system, a move which some argue benefits charter schools.

OHIO

HB 49

The Ohio General Assembly passed the state's two-year operating budget on June 30, 2017, which included such measures pertaining to charter schools as:

  • Requiring Department of Education to notify sponsors of their ratings before the evaluations are made public and providing an appeal process to dispute such ratings prior to their release.
  • Repealing Governor Kasich's Straight A program. That program has awarded more than $300 million to local schools since 2014 for projects aimed at improving student achievement or saving money.
  • Appropriating $8 million for "high performing" charter schools for facility improvements and construction.
  • Elimination of social studies state testing requirements in 4th and 6th grade. In lieu of state tests, the bill requires schools to provide instruction and assessment based on locally selected measures.
  • Provides for students to earn integrated credit through courses that address more than one subject area.
  • Requires the Department of Education to develop a framework to use in granting units of high school credit to students who demonstrate subject area competency through work-based learning experiences, internships, or cooperative education.

Governor Kasich did veto such notable provisions as:

  • A provision that would have required the Joint Education Oversight Committee, a bipartisan legislative committee, to hold hearings regarding and approve any changes to the Ohio Department of Education's requirements for student funding audits and reviews—a source of substantial controversy and litigation in recent years.
  • A provision that would have allowed schools to provide state tests in paper and pencil format as opposed to only by computer.
  • A provision that would have exempted private schools with over 75% of enrolled students qualifying as students with disabilities from state testing and graduation requirements.
  • A provision that would have allowed community schools sponsors who had their authority revoked in the 2015-2016 school year to have a path to an exemption for the 2017-2018 school year.
  • A provision that would have allowed Educational Service Centers (ESCs) to sponsor a community school anywhere in the state, rather than limiting this to their home district.
  • A provision that would have eliminated the state's resident educator process for licensure.
  • A provision that would have increased the progress component (i.e., the "value-added" component) of Academic Performance from 20% to 60% in the sponsor evaluation rating.

Ohio v. Polk, 2017-Ohio-2735

The Supreme Court of Ohio concluded that in light of a high school's compelling interest in ensuring that unattended book bags do not contain dangerous items and of the student's diminished expectation of privacy in his unattended bag, the school's protocol requiring searches of unattended book bags to identify their owners and to ensure that their contents are not dangerous did not violate the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court of Ohio reasoned that the search of the student's unattended book bag was limited to fulfilling the purposes of the schools's search protocol—to identify the bag's owner and to ensure that its contents were not dangerous–was not an illegal search, and the firearm and bullets discovered were therefore admissible evidence in the student's resulting criminal trial.

TENNESSEE

House Bill 310 (passed on May 19, 2017)

A link to the bill follows this short summary. HB 310 sets aside Six Million Dollars to create a charter school facilities fund where charter schools across the state can apply for grants to assist with facility needs. This bill also allows local districts to charge an authorizer fee to cover the cost of charter oversight. School boards can levy a fee between 1-3 percent of per-pupil funding depending on how many charter schools are within the district. The fee is capped at $35,000 per school. Among other changes, the bill redefines "charter agreement" to a fixed-term renewable agreement, removes preferences for out of district enrollment and creates an easier process for siblings of students already enrolled in the charter school to enroll. This bill also allows for conditional approval of new charter school so they can begin to raise capital and makes it mandatory that they adopt national authorizing standards for application approval. http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB0310

House Bill 267 (signed May 11, 2017)

This bill increases the authorized application fee for certain charter schools and establishes an annual authorizer fee applicable when an LEA is the chartering authority (up to $2,500) with each charter school application the charter school files. Pursuant to present law, this provision will still apply only to the application for a public charter school to be formed by the creation of a new school (as opposed to converting a school). This bill adds an annual authorizer fee that will apply when an LEA is approved as a chartering authority or renewed as a chartering authority, and to any charter school currently authorized by an LEA.

Except for the authorizer fee, this bill prohibits requiring a charter school to pay a fee as a condition of approval or recommendation of approval from a chartering authority or to purchase any services from the chartering authority. This bill authorizes a public charter school and chartering authority to mutually agree to execute a service agreement, separate from the charter agreement, for performance of services.

District Violated Federal Special Education Laws

A federal judge ruled that the Hamilton County Department of Education violated multiple federal laws protecting students with disabilities when the district removed a student with Down syndrome from a regular classroom setting in one elementary building and segregated him in a comprehensive development classroom in another elementary school building. The judge ruled that a district cannot be so swift to place a student in an environment that is more restrictive than necessary, especially when a less restrictive environment may be better for the child's development. http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2017/jul/17/judge-hamilton-county-schools-violated-federal-laws-special-education-case/438742/

TEXAS

Senate Bill 1480 (passed on June 1, 2017)

In 2011, the legislature established a framework to allow charter schools to participate in the guaranteed bond program of the permanent school fund. SB 1480 gives qualified charter schools access to the total capacity of the program (rather than just the available capacity) equal to the number of charter school students as a percentage of the total public school population. This bill will increase the number of students enrolled in Texas charter schools by providing additional capacity to the Permanent School Fund (PSF) to guarantee the financing of public charter schools. The capacity for the program will go from $1 billion to an estimated $4 billion beginning September 1, 2017.

House Bill 2442 (signed June 15, 2017)

HB 2442 addresses the required minutes of operation for districts and charter schools, the Pledge of Allegiance and minutes of silence, full days and half days, blelnded learning and related funding determinations. In addition, a further facilities funding bill and the Texas Charter Schools Association's top legislative priority, facilities funding (SB 457/HB 2337), was not achieved, but went further in the legislative process and had more support than in any prior session with SB 457 passing out of the Senate, not once but twice.

Senate Bill 1658 (engrossed on April 24, 2017)

SB 1658 establishes a method for disposing of property held by a charter school that has ceased to operate. An open-enrollment charter school ceases to operate if the school's charter has expired or been revoked or if the school has otherwise ceased operation as a public school. At cessation of operation, all remaining funds must be returned to the Texas Education Agency (TEA). While an open-enrollment charter school is in operation, the charter holder holds title to any property purchased with state funds and may exercise complete control over the property as permitted by law. If a charter school ceases to operate, TEA must direct the charter holder to dispose of property purchased with state funds through one of several methods. Decisions made by TEA are final and cannot be appealed.

House Bill 191/Senate Bill 16

Recently bills have been introduced that would create a commission to recommend improvements and adjustments to the public school finance system. Other recent bills addressing school funding include include Senate Bill 2 creating a private school choice program and additional funding for charter and other public school facilities.

WASHINGTON, DC

Council Bill 220313 (introduced on June 6, 2017)

Council Bill 220313 proposes to amend the Healthy Schools Act of 2010 by changing nutrition and wellness policies in district schools. The bill would repeal the reimbursement for meeting lunch nutrition guidelines but would add an annual subsidy for schools implementing breakfast in the classroom. Vegetarian food options will be required. Schools would be encouraged to procure food consistent with the Good Food Purchasing Program. The bill would require schools to post menu, nutrition and sourcing information for school meals on their websites.

Charter School Votes to Unionize

The teachers at a D.C. middle school became the first in the nation's capital to unionize and will move forward with the collective bargaining process. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/for-the-first-time-a-dc-charter-school-has-voted-to-create-a-teachers-union/2017/06/16/935f1a1e-52bc-11e7-b064-828ba60fbb98_story.html?utm_term=.a1ef32534c90

District-wide voucher program

The local D.C. council has opposed the GOP-controlled United States Congress's efforts to turn the entire district into a voucher program. Currently, 1,100 students per year are eligible to use vouchers to attend schools outside of their local district. This includes private, religious schools. This bill has not seen further action in 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/house-republicans-school-voucher-bill-exposes-rift-between-dc-mayor-council/2017/03/07/8c7178b4-0357-11e7-b1e9-a05d3c21f7cf_story.html?utm_term=.327cf1368013

DL v. District of Columbia, No. 16-7076 (D.C Cir. 2017)

The parents of six children sued the District for violations of the Child Find laws under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act by failure to provide special education services to preschoolers with disabilities in a class action certified by the district court. The district court also issued an injunction forcing the District to comply with the laws and the DC Circuit rejected challenges to the injunction, the certification of sub-classes and the mootness.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer (decided June 26, 2017)

The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Missouri Department of Natural Resources violated the rights of Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment by denying the church a grant on account of its religious status. The Court held that governments cannot deny a church a public benefit for which it is otherwise qualified to receive simply because it is a religious institution. This decision may open the door to challenges of Blaine Amendments, constitutional provisions in various states that block public funding to educational in institutions with religious affiliations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Fisher Phillips LLP
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Fisher Phillips LLP
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions