United States: The Importance Of Retaining Evidence Of Receipt

A contractor's ability to recover on a claim may turn on whether the contractor provided timely notice of the claim to the project owner.  Claim notice requirements in contracts are "...legal and binding on the parties in the absence of special circumstances, such as waiver or estoppel."i

Claim notice provisions in construction contracts vary in their specific requirements and should be reviewed on each project, but they typically require that the party making a claim provide written notice delivered in person or sent by registered, certified, or statutory overnight mail (e.g. Fed Ex) to the other party.ii   But what happens to the claim if the owner denies receiving the contractor's notice?  Similarly, is the contractor's right to appeal the owner's decision on a claim lost if the contractor denies receiving the decision within the time allowed for an appeal?

In Georgia, "[e]vidence that a letter was written, properly addressed, with correct postage attached, deposited in the United States mail, and never returned to the sender, creates a rebuttable presumption that the recipient received the letters...." iii (emphasis added)

"Presumptions have two parts: (1) the predicate facts which must be proved to trigger the presumption; and (2) the conclusion presumed by law from those predicated facts."iv  Proof that a letter was written, properly addressed, with the correct postage and deposited in a mail box presumes the conclusion that the letter was received.v

All the predicate facts must be established for the presumption to apply.vi  For example, the presumption did not apply in a case where a properly addressed, stamped letter was "placed in a cigar box in a grocery store" for later delivery.  The sender of the letter could not prove that the letter was deposited in the U.S. Mail, even though evidence was presented that an employee of the store routinely delivered the letters from the cigar box to the post office.  The court's ruling was based, in part, on the fact that the employee that normally delivered the letters from the cigar box did not specifically remember seeing the letter at issue.vii

More than one hundred years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld the presumption of receipt, explaining that "[t]he rule is well settled that if a letter properly directed is proved to have been either put into the post office or delivered to the postman, it is presumed, from the known course of business in the post office department, that it reached its destination at the regular time, and was received by the person to whom it was addressed."viii   Thus, the presumption is based upon the post office normally delivering letters that have the correct address and postage.

But "...perfection for the post office and the 'mailbox rule' was, and never has been, more than a presumption that may be rebutted by other evidence suggesting that the addressee did not receive the letter."ix    As a result, the presumption of receipt can be rebutted by other evidence showing that the letter was not received.

The presumption of receipt is overcome if the undisputed rebuttal evidence shows that the letter was never received, absent additional evidence that discredits or impeaches such testimony.x  In such a case, the presumption  "must yield to the presumption that the addressee, who positively swears that he did not receive it, is swearing the truth, unless some additional circumstance exist to impeach or discredit his statement and to show that perhaps he is not testifying truly." xi  For example, a return receipt signed by the recipient may discredit or impeach the recipient's testimony that he or she never received a letter.

A letter addressed and delivered to a business rather than an individual may, however, require more to rebut the presumption than an individual's testimony that he or she did not receive the letter.xii  For example, the Court of Appeals in Sullivan Enterprises v. Stockton held that "[t]estimony by two officers of the corporation that such notice was not received by either of them is not testimony that the corporation did not receive the notice."  In such a case, every employee who receives mail at the business may need to testify that they did not receive the letter to overcome the presumption.

Testimony that the intended recipient does not remember receiving a letter may be sufficient to rebut the presumption, but the rebuttal will be subject to whether the court or jury finds that such testimony is credible in light of the evidence showing that the letter was properly addressed with sufficient postage and provided to the postal service for deliver.xiii

Refusing to accept delivery of a letter does not avoid the presumption because "[a] refusal to accept a letter delivered to the proper address with adequate postage is the equivalent of receipt of notice." xiv  As a result, to overcome the presumption of receipt the person that was the intended recipient of a letter must show that it neither received nor willfully refused to receive the letter. xv

Georgia's courts have yet to determine whether the presumption applies to e-mails properly addressed and sent; however, Georgia has applied the presumption to other types of communications.xvi

In addition, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, interpreting Georgia law, recently held that the intended recipient's statement that she "do[es] not recall ever receiving that email" was not sufficient to overcome the presumption that she received the email and attachments. When [the sender] has produced evidence showing that it sent an item properly mailed, or in this case emailed, there arises a rebuttable presumption that it was received by the addressee. This presumption cannot be overcome merely by stating in an affidavit that the [intended recipient] never received the [email]."xvii

As the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained:

[A] presumption of delivery should apply to e-mails. A jury is permitted to infer that information sent via a reliable means – such as the postal service or a telegram – was received. We have held that there is no principled reason why a jury would not be able to make the same inference regarding other forms of communication — such as facsimiles, electronic mail, and in-house computer message systems — provided they are accepted as generally reliable and that the particular message was properly dispatched.xviii

In sum, a contractor should take measures to avoid the proof problems of providing timely notice by adopting and adhering to a business practice of obtaining either the owner's signature on a hand-delivered notice, or a delivery receipt on a notice sent by certified, registered, statutory overnight, or electronic mail; otherwise, the contractor runs the risk that the owner may deny receipt and rebut the presumption that timely notice was given.


i Western Surety Co. v. Georgia Dept. of Trans., 757 SE 2d 272, 326 Ga. App. 671 (2014).

ii See, e.g., AIA Document A201-2007, §13.3.

iii Lovell v. Thomas, 279 Ga. App. 696, 632 S.E.2d 456 (2006).

iv Paul S. Milich, Courtroom Handbook on Georgia Evidence, at 539 (Thomas Reuters ed. 2015).

v Id.

vi First Bank of Georgia v. Robertson Grading, 328 Ga. App. 236, 761 S.E.2d 628, 636 (2014) (footnote 21).

vii W.T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Burney, 25 Ga. App. 20, 102 SE 358 (1920).

viii Rosenthal v. Walker, 111 U.S. 185, 193-94 (1884).

x Laborers' International Union Of North America, Local 578 v. NLRB, 594 F.3d 732 (10th Cir. 2010).

x Menke v. First Nat'l Bank of Atlanta,  168 Ga. App. 495,  309 SE2d 835 (1983) (citing W.T. Rawleigh Medical Co., 25 Ga. App. at 21).

xi Parker v. Southern Ruralist Co., 15 Ga. App. 334, 337, 83 SE 158 (1914).

xii Carmichael Tile Co. v. D.W. McClelland, 213 Ga. 656, 100 S.E.2d 902 (1957) (testimony that partner did not receive letter failed to overcome presumption because other partner might have received letter); Sullivan Enter. v. Stockton, 118 Ga. App. 542, 543, 164 S.E.2d 336 (1968).

xiii Ennis v. Atlas Fin. Co., 120 Ga. App. 849, 172 S.E.2d 482, 484 (1969).  But see Vines v. Citizens Trust Bank, 146 Ga. App. 845, 847-48 (1978) (presumption rebutted by testimony that borrower did not remember receiving notice that Bank would strictly enforce loan terms).

xiv Crenshaw v. GA. Underwriting Ass'n, 202 Ga. App. 610 (1992).

xv Edmondson v. Air Svc. Co., 123 Ga. App. 263, 180 S.E.2d 589 (1971).

xvi Abercrombie v. Georgia Distributing Co., 43 Ga. App. 258 (3), 158 S.E. 530, 531 (1931)  (evidence telegram delivered to messenger boy of telegraph company did not establish presumption because there was evidence that the charge for sending the telegraph was paid).

xvii Dixon v. Synchrony Financial, 2015 WL 12720290 at *5 (N.D.. Ga. Aug. 18, 2015) (citing  Corbin v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., 2013 WL 3804862, at *6 (M.D. Fla. July 19, 2013); Dixon v. NBC Universal Media, LLC, 947 F. Supp. 2d 390, 400 (S.D. N.Y. 2013); Abdullah v. American Express Co., 2012 WL 6867675, at **4-5 (M.D. Fla. December 19, 2012).

xviii American Boat Co., Inc. v. Unknown Sunken Barge, 418 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2005).  See also Dempster v. Dempster, 404 F.Supp.2d 445 (E.D. NY 2005).  But see Glenn Constr. Co., LLC v. Bell Aerospace Serv., 785 F.Supp.2d 1258 (M.D. Ala. 2011) (declining to extend the presumption to e-mails absent evidence that the State of Alabama would do so).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions