United States: Redemption Of Interest In US Partnership Not Taxable To Foreign Investor; Tax Court Refuses To Follow Revenue Ruling 91-32

In general, a non-US person is not subject to US federal income tax when he sells stock of a US corporation.1 The US Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), in Revenue Ruling 91-32,2 however, held that US tax was due when a non-US person sold an interest in a partnership, if the partnership is engaged in the conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Although many taxpayers and tax professionals believe that the sale of the stock and the sale of the partnership interest should both be tax-exempt, the rule espoused in Revenue Ruling 91-32 has had a chilling effect on many transactions. Many foreign taxpayers, unwilling to take a position contrary to the ruling, often structured their transactions in a manner that incurred a significant tax burden to avoid the application of the ruling. In a case of first impression, the Tax Court has declined to follow Revenue Ruling 91-32 and held that a disposition of an interest in a US partnership did not give rise to a US tax liability.

On July 13, 2017, the Tax Court released its decision in Grecian Magnesite Mining v. Commissioner,3 in which it held that gain recognized by a foreign corporation (Grecian Magnesite Mining, "GMM") on the disposition of its interests in a US partnership ("Premier") was not taxable in the United States, except to the extent that the gain was attributable to United States real property interests held by Premier. In so holding, the Tax Court rejected the IRS's questionable position in Revenue Ruling 91-32 that gain recognized by a foreign partner upon disposing of its interest in a US partnership conducting a US trade or business is treated as gain from the sale of the partnership's underlying assets for purposes of determining whether such gain is subject to US federal income tax.

Summary of GrecianMagnesite Mining

GMM is a Greek corporation engaged in mining activities in Greece. Other than its interest in Premier, GMM had no office, employees, or business operations in the United States. In 2001, GMM purchased an interest in Premier, an entity treated as a partnership for US federal income tax purposes that was engaged in mining activities in the United States. In 2008, Premier and GMM entered into an agreement for Premier to redeem GMM's interest in exchange for two cash payments. As a result of the redemption, GMM recognized a gain of approximately $6.2 million, which it did not report to the IRS. On audit, the IRS and GMM agreed that $2.2m of the gain was attributable to US property interests and therefore taxable in the United States. The IRS and GMM, however, disagreed on whether the remaining $4 million of gain (the "disputed gain") was taxable in the United States.

AGGREGATE VS. ENTITY TREATMENT

The critical issue in Grecian Magnesite Mining was whether the "aggregate theory" or the "entity theory" of partnerships applies to the disposition of a partnership interest. The aggregate theory treats a partnership as an aggregation of its owners rather than as a discrete legal entity. Thus, under the aggregate theory, a partnership interest is merely an interest in the partnership's assets rather than an interest in a distinct entity. In contrast, the entity theory treats a partnership as a discrete entity that is separate from its owners. Under the entity theory, a partnership interest is an interest in the partnership entity itself.

Subchapter K of the Code, which governs partnership taxation, is an amalgam of entity and aggregate treatment for partnerships. Under the Code, a liquidating payment by a partnership to a partner is considered a distribution by the partnership. Any gain or loss on such distribution is considered as gain or loss from the sale of the partnership interest by the distributee partner. The Code provides that gain from the sale of a partnership interest is, subject to certain limited exceptions, treated as gain from the sale of a capital asset.

In Grecian Magnesite Mining, the IRS argued, consistent with its conclusion in Revenue Ruling 91-32, that the aggregate theory should apply to GMM's redemption of its interest in Premier. Consequently, GMM's gain from the redemption should be taxed as if it had resulted from the taxable disposition of Premier's underlying assets. Because Premier's underlying assets were used in a US trade or business, any gain from the disposition of those assets would be effectively connected income.

The IRS pointed to Revenue Ruling 91-32 to support its position that the redemption of GMM's interest in Premier should be analyzed under an aggregate theory. The Tax Court, however, noted that the Revenue Ruling was "not simply an interpretation of the IRS's own regulations, and we find that it lacks the power to persuade." In particular, the Tax Court criticized Revenue Ruling 91-32's "cursory in the extreme" discussion of the partnership provisions governing the disposition of partnership interests. Consequently, the Tax Court declined to follow Revenue Ruling 91-32.

According to the Tax Court, the Code embraces the entity theory as the general principle governing the disposition of a partnership interest. Section 731 of the Code provides that gain from a distribution made in redemption of a partner's interest in a partnership is treated as gain from the sale or exchange of such partnership interest. Section 741 of the Code provides that the sale or exchange of a partnership interest is generally treated as the sale or exchange of a capital asset. The Tax Court noted that the reference in Section 741 of the Code to a singular capital asset demonstrates that what is being sold or exchanged is the partnership interest itself, and not an interest in all of the partnership's underlying assets. The exceptions to this general rule (for example, in Sections 351 and 897(g) of the Code) offer further support for the Tax Court's position that the entity theory generally controls. Accordingly, the Tax Court held that GMM's redemption gain should be treated as gain from the sale of GMM's interest in Premier rather than as gain from the sale of Premier's assets.

II. EFFECTIVELY CONNECTED INCOME

After determining that the redemption of GMM's partnership interest by Premier was properly viewed as a sale of GMM's partnership interest in Premier, the Tax Court turned its focus to Subchapter N of the Code, which addresses the taxation of international transactions. Subchapter N provides for US taxation of a foreign corporation's income if either (i) the income is received from sources within the United States (i.e., "U.S.-source income") and is one of several types of income, including "fixed or determinable annual or periodic" income (i.e., "FDAP income") or (ii) the foreign corporation is engaged in a trade or business within the United States (a "U.S. trade or business") and the income is "effectively connected" with the foreign corporation's conduct of its US trade or business.

GMM and the IRS agreed that the disputed gain was not the type of income taxable under (i) above. The question, therefore, was whether the disputed gain was US-source income effectively connected with Premier's US business.

Section 865(a) of the Code provides a general rule that income realized by a taxpayer from the sale of personal property is sourced within or without the United States based on the residency of the taxpayer. GMM was a Greek corporation and had no other connections to the United States that would support its being treated as a United States resident. Its partnership interest in Premier was personal property. Hence, the disputed gain was not US-source income under the general rule of Section 865.

However, Subchapter N provides certain exceptions to this general rule. The IRS seized onto one exception in particular: income, gain, or loss attributable to a US office or fixed place of business of a nonresident is considered US-source income. Income, gain, or loss is attributable to a US office only if (a) the US office is "a material factor in the production of such income" and (b) the US office regularly carries on activities of the type from which such income, gain, or loss is derived. The IRS presented two arguments in support of its contention that the activities of Premier's office were "material" in the production of the disputed gain.

First, the IRS argued that Premier's office was material to the deemed sale of GMM's partnership interest because Premier's redemption of GMM's partnership was economically equivalent to Premier's selling its underlying assets and distributing to each partner its pro rata share of the proceeds. The Tax Court found this argument to be a mere restatement of the IRS's earlier argument that the aggregate theory governs the sale of partnership interests. Moreover, the Tax Court noted that Premier's activities in actually effecting the redemption (i.e., paying out cash to GMM) were merely "clerical functions incident to the sale or exchange," and therefore not a material factor in GMM's realization of the disputed gain.   Second, the IRS argued that the activities of Premier's office in running Premier's business were responsible for the increased value of GMM's partnership interest in Premier. Hence, the gain realized by GMM was economically attributable to the activities of Premier's US office. The Tax Court dismissed this argument as well, noting that GMM's gain from the redemption was not realized from Premier's US mining activities but rather was realized as a result of Premier redeeming GMM's partnership interest. Although it was true that Premier's activities added value to GMM's partnership interests, the Tax Court noted that analogous Treasury Regulations provide that adding value alone is not a material factor in the realization of gain. Thus, the Tax Court found that the activities of Premier's US office were not "material" in the production of the disputed gain. Moreover, the Tax Court held that, even if the activities of Premier's US office had been material in the production of the disputed gain, the redemption of GMM's interest in Premier was not undertaken in the ordinary course of Premier's US trade or business (Premier had only engaged in two such redemptions in seven years). Accordingly, GMM's disputed gain was not attributable to Premier's US office. Therefore, the disputed gain was foreign-source income not subject to US federal income tax.

Federal Tax Implications

We note that the Tax Court's holding remains subject to appeal. However, if the ruling stands, Grecian Magnesite Mining could have a significant impact on tax planning by foreign investors in US partnerships. Although the foreign partners would remain subject to US tax on current income allocated to them by the partnership, upon exit they would be able to avoid US tax by selling their interest in the partnership rather than having the partnership sell assets and distribute the proceeds to them. Thus, Grecian Magnesite Mining may make investing in certain US investment vehicles (e.g., funds that do not hold US real property) more attractive to foreign investors, as doing so will allow them to avoid some of the tax leakage attendant in investing through corporations.

State Tax Implications

Many states limit taxable income to a corporation's effectively connected income (either by express statute or by virtue of using the corporation's federal form 1120, line 28 as the starting point for state income tax computations). Thus, Grecian Magnesite Mining would arguably prevent those states from taxing gain from the sale of a partnership where the gain is not subject to US federal income tax. However, not all states apply that limitation. Some states deem a corporate partner to be directly taxable wherever the partnership does business (different rules apply for general partnerships and limited partners, but both involve this risk) and then determine the portion of income that could be taxed by the state either by an entity or aggregate approach. Because these states' rules are not necessarily tied to federal treatment and instead are based on the state's own statutory regimes, the holding in Grecian Magnesite Mining may have little or no impact. Companies are, therefore, reminded to separately consider the state tax consequences of structures and transactions even where the structure or transaction does not result in federal tax.

Footnotes

1 Treas. Reg. § 1.871-7(a)(1). This rule does not apply to sales of stock if the stock is held in connection with the conduct of a US trade or business.

2 1991-1 C.B. 107

3 149 T.C. 3.

Originally published on July 28, 2017

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2017. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions