United States: And Now A Word From The Panel: Who Wants To Be An MDL?

Welcome to the latest installment of "And Now A Word From The Panel," a column which "rides the circuit" with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation as it meets on a bimonthly basis at venues around the country.

At its May hearing session in San Antonio, Texas, the panel went two for six, denying four out of the six MDL petitions it considered. With these latest decisions, the panel saw its 2017 "batting average" slip below .400 — from .412 to .391 — now having created a total of nine new MDLs and denying 14 MDL petitions for the year.

In addition, the overall number of pending MDL proceedings currently stands at 233, down from 234 just two months ago. The panel continues to make progress in closing older MDL dockets, terminating a total of 20 existing MDLs this year through mid-July.1

As the panel heads west for an atypical summer destination of Los Angeles, California, for its July 27 hearing session, the panel will consider a relatively small number of potential MDL dockets. At this time, the panel will hear only five motions, with a sixth motion originally appearing on the panel's docket becoming moot. What is, however, intriguing about the lineup for this month's hearing session is the diversity of subject matter presented by motions filed with the panel.

As readers of this column are aware, the MDL world is not the exclusive province of a single industry or type of case. MDL petitions have covered a wide range of subjects and events, including an outbreak of the hantavirus at Yosemite National Park2 and numerous electronic data breaches,3 well beyond the purview of product liability and sales practices-related MDLs, which currently comprise 104 MDLs (or approximately 45 percent) of the currently pending MDL proceedings.4

Looking Forward: Who Wants to Be an MDL?

In recognition of the broad reach of the MDL process, this month's column presents the somewhat unlikely list of those seeking MDL centralization.

As shown below, requests to create an MDL do not fit a single mold; they can involve headline news, social and political issues of the day or exotic vacations. They can even trigger forensic research from the National Archives as to the status of cases filed (and dismissed) decades ago.

Travel Ban (FOIA) MDL?

Evidencing that no issue is immune from the MDL world, the panel is scheduled to consider a request to centralize federal lawsuits arising from Freedom of Information Act requests related to Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States). In re American Civil Liberties Union Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Regarding Executive Order 13769 (MDL No. 2786).

Following the original January 2017 executive order, the national American Civil Liberties Union organization and various ACLU local affiliates submitted separate FOIA requests seeking records relating to the implementation and enforcement of the executive order. The national ACLU (and its D.C. affiliates) sent the request to the national FOIA officer of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a component of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Various ACLU affiliates sent FOIA requests addressed to the CBP's national FOIA officer as well as to local CBP field offices.

The affiliates requested information regarding implementation at "Local International Airports" (as that term is defined in the FOIA requests) and specifically disclaimed any request for documents held in D.C.

This unusual MDL battle is intriguing. When the statutory deadline for a response to the FOIA requests had passed with no response, various ACLU affiliates began to file suits in their local jurisdictions. Facing 13 separate lawsuits in as many federal judicial districts, the CBP and DHS filed an MDL motion seeking centralization of the lawsuits. The ACLU affiliates oppose MDL centralization.5

In essence, the dispute as to whether an MDL is warranted focuses on whether the FOIA requests should be viewed as separate, independent local matters or whether the panel should find that at least one common question of fact among the various lawsuits warrants MDL centralization under the MDL statute, 28 U.S.C.§ 1407.

Moreover, there is panel precedent from more than two decades ago establishing MDL proceedings for multiple FOIA requests6, but the parties dispute whether the serving of FOIA requests on different local offices with an explicit disclaimer that the ACLU affiliates seek documents located at the CBP's national office in D.C. makes this set of cases different.

The resolution by the panel may ultimately turn on whether the panel thinks alternatives to creation of an MDL are feasible and practicable — focusing on overlapping counsel and the availability of informal coordination without the need to add to the ranks of MDL proceedings.

A Weekend Getaway MDL?

Turning to a different type of MDL petition, another group of litigants seeks MDL centralization for actions arising from the allegedly fraudulent and misleading promotion of a weekend festival on the island of Great Exuma in the Bahamas. In re Fyre Festival (MDL No. 2787).

Plaintiffs allege that the organizers advertised ticket packages for "an all-inclusive weekend with 'top notch food, luxurious lodging, and hot entertainment in a stunning locale,'" with ticket prices for the event ranging from $1,200 to $12,000 per person. It is further alleged that the festival was to be replete with "24-hour security detail, a team of professional medical providers, and the availability of amenities such as lounges and cabanas, communal bathrooms with showers, changing stations, a culinary program with special food concepts and premium bottle service."

Plaintiffs allege that the festival "fell substantially below the advertised expectations," with musical acts cancelled before the festival, few restrooms and no security or medical staff.7

The MDL petition embodies six actions pending in a total of four different judicial districts. Although arguably much more exotic than the Executive Order FOIA request MDL petition, this festival MDL motion, which is supported by most of the parties, fits into what some would consider a more traditional mold.

The panel will consider whether the actions present one or more common questions of fact (which they almost certainly do) and whether the relatively few actions in a limited number of jurisdictions can effectively be coordinated, or transferred through alternative means such as via Section 1404, without the need for an MDL proceeding. And of course, there is also the exciting question of MDL venue.

A Civil Rights MDL?

An MDL petition originally docketed for the July hearing session related to another executive order, albeit one issued many decades ago relating to non-discrimination by government contractors. In re Construction Trades Alternative Employment Practices Litigation (MDL No. 2790).

As the petition involved only two actions and one of the actions was subsequently dismissed, the petition became moot as the litigation lost its multidistrict character. Although this petition will no longer be considered at the panel's hearing, it nevertheless illustrates how litigants may try to use the MDL process to centralize cases regarding virtually any subject matter.

In this instance, plaintiffs had filed a class action in the Eastern District of New York challenging the conduct of various agencies for failure to comply with paid on-the-job apprentice training and employment in projects in the greater New York City area, as violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Executive Order 11246 (Equal Employment Opportunity).

Plaintiffs identified an action filed in 1973 — more than four decades ago — in the Southern District of New York alleging similar violations; thus, they sought to use Section 1407 as a means to centralize the two actions. They also appear to have used the MDL process to seek to reopen the earlier filed action, requiring retrieval of the docket for that case from the National Archives.8

After reviewing a 1977 transcript, the court in the Southern District of New York concluded that the action had been dismissed without prejudice at that time as to "such elements which had not been disposed of otherwise to date."9 Thus, the MDL petition became moot because only a single action remained.

What interesting or unusual MDL petitions will the panel face next? Will the panel add to the breadth and scope of MDL proceedings? Stay tuned for our next edition of "And Now A Word From The Panel," as the panel heads back east for its next hearing session on Sept. 28 in "Beantown" — Boston, Massachusetts.

Footnotes

1. http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Recently_Terminated_MDLs-1-1-2017_to_7-17-2017.pdf.

2. And Now A Word From The Panel: "What's Good for America?" Law360 (May 27, 2014).

3. And Now A Word From The Panel: "A 21st Century MDL," Law360 (May 24, 2016).

4. http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_Type-July-17-2017.pdf

5. For further details regarding the parties' positions and the FOIA requests, see In re American Civil Liberties Union Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Regarding Executive Order 13769, MDL No. 2786, Doc. Nos. 1 (MDL Petition) and 47 (Response in Opposition).

6. In re Church of Scientology Flag Serv. Org./IRS FOIA Litig. (MDL No. 892); In re Freedom Magazine/IRS FOIA Litig. (MDL No. 910).

7. In re Fyre Festival, MDL No. 2787, Doc. No. 1-1 (MDL Petition), at 3.

8. See Percy v. Brennan, Case No. 1:73-04279-CM (S.D.N.Y.), Doc. No. 1 (noting the "original docket report received from the National Archives").

9 See id., Doc. No. 11 (memo endorsement).

Originally published by Law360.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions