United States: Does The California Supreme Court Average More Questions To The Losing Side?

Last Updated: July 26 2017
Article by Kirk Jenkins

Yesterday (July 20, 2017), for post no. 1,000 we reviewed the academic literature on question-counting in oral arguments, and began comparing the past year, May 2016-May 2017, at the California and Illinois Supreme Courts.  Every researcher to date – including us in our study of the Illinois Supreme Court 2008-2016 – found that getting more questions than your opponent was generally a sign you were in trouble.  So what did we find in California?

In Table 254, we compare the data for both Courts in affirmances.  We see the two courts are comparable: five of the seven California Supreme Court Justices averaged more questions to the appellant (the losing party) in civil affirmances.  Six of the seven Illinois Supreme Court Justices averaged more questions to the losing party.

Justice Corrigan led the Court in questions to appellants in civil affirmances with 6.06.  Justices Cuellar and Liu were next, averaging 5.6 and 5.11 questions to appellants.  The Chief Justice averaged 5.05 questions to appellants.  Justice Kruger averaged 4.06, Justice Chin 3.94 and Justice Werdegar averaged 3.58 questions to appellants.

Nearly all Illinois Supreme Court Justices averaged substantially fewer questions to appellants in civil affirmances than California Justices.  Justice Theis averaged 6.62.  Justice Garman averaged 2.92.  Justice Thomas and Chief Justice Karmeier averaged 1.75 and 1.08, respectively.  Justice Burke averaged 1 question to appellants, Justice Freeman 0.54 and Justice Kilbride 0.25.

Justice Liu led the California Justices in questions to respondents (the California term) in civil affirmances.  Justice Werdegar was next at 5.21 questions per argument.  Justice Cuellar averaged 4.25, and the remaining four Justices all averaged between two and three questions to respondents: Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye (2.85), Justice Kruger (2.65), Justice Chin (2.5) and Justice Corrigan (2.39).

The Illinois Supreme Court Justices asked virtually nothing of appellees in civil affirmances.  Justice Thomas averaged 1.5 questions.  Justice Theis asked 1.31, Justice Garman averaged 1.08, Justice Kilbride 0.42, Justice Burke 0.36 and Chief Justice Karmeier averaged 0.25.

So to summarize: California Justices Corrigan, Kruger, Chin, Cuellar and Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye averaged more questions to the losing party in the past year in civil affirmances.  Illinois Justices Burke, Garman, Freeman, Thomas, Theis and Chief Justice Karmeier averaged more questions to the losing party in affirmances.

We report the data for civil reversals in Table 255.

Justice Liu led the Court in questions to appellants in civil reversals with 6.41.  Justice Werdegar averaged 5.67. Justice Cuellar was right behind, averaging 5.5.  Justice Kruger averaged 3.93, Justice Chin 3.48, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye 3.39 and Justice Corrigan averaged 2.1.

Once again, the Illinois Supreme Court Justices were less active nearly across the board.  Justice Thomas averaged 3.7 questions to appellants in civil reversals.  Justice Burke and Chief Justice Karmeier averaged 1.56 and 1.2 questions to appellants.  Justice Garman averaged 0.8 questions to appellants, Justice Theis averaged 0.4, and Chief Justice Karmeier asked appellants in civil reversals no questions at all.

Justice Liu led the California Justices, averaging 7.45 questions to respondents in civil reversals.  Justice Corrigan averaged 6.48.  Justice Cuellar averaged 5.86 questions.  Justice Werdegar and Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye were nearly tied – 3.87 questions for Justice Werdegar and 3.86 questions for the Chief Justice.  Justice Kruger averaged 2.71 questions to respondents, and Justice Chin averaged 2.23.

Justice Thomas led the Illinois Justices, averaging 4.8 questions to appellees in civil reversals.  Justice Theis averaged 3.1 questions.  Chief Justice Karmeier and Justice Garman averaged two questions apiece, while Justice Burke averaged 1.67, Justice Kilbride averaged 0.7 and Justice Freeman averaged 0.25.

We summarize again: four of the seven Justices of the California Supreme Court averaged more questions to the losing side in civil reversals: Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Justices Corrigan, Cuellar and Liu.  Six of the seven Justices of the Illinois Supreme Court averaged more questions to the losing party: Chief Justice Karmeier and Justices Burke, Garman, Kilbride, Thomas and Theis.

So what's the bottom line – with only four of the seven Justices of the California Supreme Court averaging more questions to the losing party in reversals, can we say that the California Supreme Court is the first studied at length which didn't match the same pattern as the others, with the losing party averaging more questions?

The answer is "maybe."  In both California and Illinois, the majority of the Court fits the pattern: the losing party gets more questions.  The pattern holds with aggregate numbers.  In affirmances, the California Supreme Court averaged 33.4 questions to appellants and 26.8 to respondents.  The Illinois Supreme Court averaged 14.16 questions to appellants and 5.15 to appellees.  Among reversals, the California Supreme Court averaged 32.46 questions to respondents and 30.48 to appellants.  The Illinois Supreme Court averaged 14.52 questions to appellees and 8.04 to appellants.

The California result with reversals is interesting, but also reminiscent of the concept of regression to the mean.  The best description of that statistical concept I've ever heard came from the TV series Numb3rs.  Imagine you throw a wadded-up piece of paper at a waste basket.  You make the basket.  Then you do it three more times.  Have you beaten the odds?  Well, no – because as you keep trying, your completion rate will converge on 50%.

So it will be interesting to see where the California data goes in the years to come.  A slight majority of California Justices more heavily question the losing party in reversals, but as the years go by, will the data move towards the trend of every other court researchers have studied, with more and more Justices averaging more question to the losing party?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.