United States: Hsu v. DON Holding Corp. And The Rights Of (UN)preferred Stockholders

In a recent opinion, Hsu v. ODN Holding Corp. (Del. Ch. April 25, 2017), the Delaware Court of Chancery refused to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that the company's directors and others breached their fiduciary duties by selling assets to fund the redemption of preferred stock. Along the way, the court suggests that the fiduciary duties of directors may in certain cases require that the rights of preferred holders be intentionally violated. The ODN case is the latest in a line of Delaware cases where the courts have not reflexively enforced the redemption rights of preferred stockholders, and may cast a shadow on the rights of preferred holders generally.

The Case

In 2008 venture capital firm Oak Hill Capital Partners sponsored an investment of $150 million in Oversee.net, a technology-based marketing solutions company for online advertisers. To facilitate the investment, the parties formed ODN as a holding company for Oversee.net, and in exchange for their investment, Oak Hill received 53,380,783 shares of preferred stock. Oak Hill's preferred stock carried mandatory redemption rights which required ODN to redeem Oak Hill's shares using legally available funds.

In 2009 Oak Hill purchased additional shares in ODN and became the company's controlling shareholder. The company's business strategy changed dramatically two years later when ODN began selling off large portions of the company, for fractions of what the company paid to acquire these businesses only a few years prior. The divestitures caused ODN's annual revenues to plummet, going from $141 million in 2011 to $11 million in 2015, and the cash that was generated was used to redeem two rounds of Oak Hill's preferred stock.

In response to the redemptions, Frederick Hsu — one of Oversee.net's founders — filed a lawsuit against Oak Hill (as ODN's controlling shareholder), ODN's directors and several of ODN's officers for breach of fiduciary duty. The suit claimed that, in liquidating ODN's assets to fund Oak Hill's redemptions, the defendants sought to benefit Oak Hill to the detriment of ODN's common shareholders. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss Hsu's lawsuit on the grounds that ODN was contractually obligated to satisfy Oak Hill's redemption rights. The defendants were not in breach of their fiduciary duties, they argued, because the company had no choice but to take the actions necessary to fund the redemptions.

The court refused to dismiss the action. It held that the facts "support[ed] a reasonable inference that the individual defendants acted in bad faith to benefit Oak Hill by maximizing the value of its contractual redemption right." Oak Hill itself, the court found, could be found liable either for breach of its own fiduciary duty as a controlling shareholder or for aiding and abetting the breaches of the individual defendants. In assessing whether the defendants could be seen to have acted in bad faith, and therefore breached their duty of loyalty to the company, the court at least preliminarily adopted the entire fairness of review. This standard typically applies when a controlling shareholder — here Oak Hill — is viewed as being on both sides of a transaction, and places the burden on the defendants to establish the propriety of their conduct.

The Court's Analysis

General Principles

Relying on prior case law, the decision provides a useful synthesis of the rights and ranking in the corporate hierarchy of preferred stock under Delaware law (internal and external quotation marks omitted):

  • As a general matter, the rights and preferences of preferred stock are contractual in nature.
  • Preferred stockholders are owed fiduciary duties only when they do not invoke their special contractual rights and rely on a right shared equally with the common stock.
  • A board does not owe fiduciary duties to preferred stockholders when considering whether or not to take corporate action that might trigger or circumvent the preferred stockholders' contractual rights.
  • Because the fiduciary principle does not protect special preferences or rights, the fiduciary-based standard of conduct requires that decision makers focus on promoting the value of the undifferentiated equity in the aggregate.
  • Consequently, it generally will be the duty of the board, where discretionary judgment is to be exercised, to prefer the interests of common stock — as the good faith judgment of the board sees them to be — to the interests created by the special rights, preferences, etc., of preferred stock.
  • In circumstances where the interests of the common stockholders diverge from those of the preferred stockholders, it is possible that a director could breach her duty by improperly favoring the interests of the preferred stockholders over those of the common stockholders.
  • This principle is not unique to preferred stock; it applies equally to other holders of contract rights against the corporation.
  • It is true that the fiduciary status of directors does not give them "Houdini-like powers" to escape from valid contracts. Only if the directors breached their fiduciary duties when entering into a contract does it become possible to invalidate it on fiduciary grounds.
  • But the fact that a corporation is bound by its valid contractual obligations does not mean that a board does not owe fiduciary duties when considering how to handle those contractual obligations; it rather means that the directors must evaluate the corporation's alternatives in a world where the contract is binding.
  • Even with an iron-clad contractual obligation, there remains room for fiduciary discretion because of the doctrine of efficient breach. Under that doctrine, a party to a contract may decide that its most advantageous course is to breach and pay damages.

Application to the Case

As presented by the court, the complaint alleged that the board breached its duty of loyalty by managing ODN, before the redemption provisions of the preferred stock came into effect, to maximize the value of the redemption right, rather than to maximize its value for the benefit of equity holders generally. For purposes of a motion to dismiss, the court found this plausible. In this regard, the court noted:

  • The preferred stock did not pay a cumulative dividend. Once the redemption right ripened, the amount of the redemption obligation would not increase.
  • To the contrary, because ODN would be redeeming the preferred stock over time with future dollars, the present value of the obligation would diminish.
  • The preferred stock was effectively trapped capital, which the company could have used for the benefit of the residual claimants.
  • Over a long-term time horizon, ODN conceivably could have grown its business, gradually redeemed all of the preferred stock, and then generated returns for its common stockholders.
  • Instead, the directors engaged in hasty divestitures at seemingly fire-sale prices, virtually destroying ODN's ability to generate income.

Putting this all together, the court held that the allegations of the complaint supported a reasonable inference that dismembering the company to maximize the value of the redemption right of the preferred stock was not fair to the equity generally and therefore constituted a breach of the duty of loyalty.


This is not the first time a Delaware court has declined to defer to the redemption rights of preferred holders. In TCV, L.P. v Tradingscreen Inc. (Del. Ch. March 27, 2015), the court held that a company was not obligated to mandatorily redeem preferred stock where the redemption would call into question the ability of the company to continue as a going concern. The court was following the holding of an earlier Delaware case, SV Investment Partners, LLC v. Thoughtworks, Inc. (Del. Ch. November 10, 2010), which reached a similar conclusion.

The ODN case goes in a different direction, but with the similar theme that rights of preferred stockholders are not absolute or inviolable. In this case, the court observed that the directors were under no obligation to manage a corporation so as to assure that the preferred holders will realize their contract rights. To the contrary, the court suggested that directors may be required to actively disregard the interests of preferred stockholders in order to manage the corporation for the long-term benefit of the holders of common stock.

Various suggestions are being offered for safeguarding the interests of preferred investors in the wake of the ODN ruling. For example, the court in ODN paid special attention to the absence of dividend cumulation, so that there was little downside for the company to defer payment of the redemption price. A board might not be able to ignore a looming preferred redemption obligation, where embedded in the terms of the preferred stock are escalating penalties for a failure to redeem. It is difficult to foresee, however, all situations in which the principles articulated in the ODN case may come into play. The important watchword for preferred investors may therefore be to approach their investment from a purely contractual perspective, and not to expect that a board, or the courts for that matter, will stretch to assure that their rights are protected.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions